Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 4;9(50):49597–49608. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c07489

Figure 6.

Figure 6

In vivo histological comparison of hydrogels implanted into the back of rabbits. (A) In vivo implantation and removal of the hydrogel. (B) Peri-implant inflammatory response assessed by H&E staining results at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after in vivo implantation of GelMA and SsBb/GelMA groups. (C) The cartilaginous tissue maturity and quality of hydrogels after in vivo implantation at 2, 4, and 8 weeks.