Abstract
The prevalence of many chronic noncommunicable diseases has been steadily rising over the past six decades. During this time, over 350,000 new chemical substances have been introduced to the lives of humans. In recent years, the epithelial barrier theory came to light explaining the growing prevalence and exacerbations of these diseases worldwide. It attributes their onset to a functionally impaired epithelial barrier triggered by the toxicity of the exposed substances, associated with microbial dysbiosis, immune system activation, and inflammation. Diseases encompassed by the epithelial barrier theory share common features such as an increased prevalence after the 1960s or 2000s that cannot (solely) be accounted for by the emergence of improved diagnostic methods. Other common traits include epithelial barrier defects, microbial dysbiosis with loss of commensals and colonization of opportunistic pathogens, and circulating inflammatory cells and cytokines. In addition, practically unrelated diseases that fulfill these criteria have started to emerge as multimorbidities during the last decades. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of diseases encompassed by the epithelial barrier theory and discuss evidence and similarities for their epidemiology, genetic susceptibility, epithelial barrier dysfunction, microbial dysbiosis, and tissue inflammation.
Keywords: epidemiology, epithelial barrier, epithelial barrier dysfunction, inflammation, microbial dysbiosis
1. INTRODUCTION
During the last 60 years, the prevalence of many chronic noncommunicable diseases has been rising and they are now a major health concern, currently impacting more than 25% of the global population. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 During this time, over 350,000 new substances have been introduced into the lives of humans and domestic animals. 6 A second epidemic rise in allergic diseases began after the 2000s, with a significant increase in the prevalence of food allergy, eosinophilic esophagitis, and drug‐induced anaphylaxis. 1 This period coincides with a continuous exposure to environmental factors present in our modern lifestyle, such as detergents, food additives, microplastics, and nanoplastics. 4 , 5 The exploration of epithelial barriers started in 2000s, focusing on elucidating the mechanisms underlying type 2 diseases such as eczema, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis. This research revealed that the death of epithelial cells leads to chronic defects in the epithelial barrier, accompanied by periepithelial inflammation triggered by innate and adaptive immune responses. 7 , 8 , 9
Initially, the understanding of epithelial barrier functions in relation to type 2 diseases centered around the concept of preventing allergens, toxins, pollutants, and microbes from breaching the barrier. This involved processes such as “washing away” inflammatory cells and cytokines through the opening of epithelial barriers, as well as “suppression” mediated by regulatory cytokines released by T cells and other cells on barrier surfaces during type 2 inflammation and exposure to high allergen doses in healthy individuals. 10 , 11
Recent studies identified epithelial barrier defects in conditions like asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis, attributing them to genetic factors, exposure to toxic substances affecting the epithelial barrier, and the influence of immune cells and cytokines associated with type 2 responses, particularly IL‐4 and IL‐13. 12 , 13 Certain lifestyle‐related or environmentally encountered substances, such as detergents, food emulsifiers, and air pollution, were found to damage the epithelial barrier, trigger alarmin release, and induce tissue inflammation. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24
This research culminated in the development of the comprehensive “Epithelial Barrier Theory” 1 , 3 was proposed by Akdis to explain the growing prevalence of many chronic noncommunicable diseases observed over the last 60 years. It attributes the onset of these diseases to a damaged epithelial barrier triggered by hazardous substances originating from industrialization, urbanization, and westernized lifestyles, such as air pollution, cigarette smoke, particulate matter, ozone, microplastics, nanoplastics, several surfactant formulations in detergents, household cleaners, dishwashers, hand sanitizers, disinfectants, toothpastes, and processed food emulsifiers and additives. 25 , 26 An impaired epithelial barrier can initiate a chronic vicious cycle of pathological events, including opportunistic pathogen colonization, bacterial translocation to subepithelial areas, immune response to pathogens, microbial dysbiosis, periepithelial chronic inflammation, and defective epithelial barrier healing (Figure 1). 3
FIGURE 1.

Exposure to allergens, chemical pollutants, toxic substances, and nanoparticles causes epithelial damage, microbial dysbiosis, and inflammation. The resulting epithelial damage and microbial translocation across epithelial barriers increase the production of alarmins and multiple chemokines, altering the activation thresholds of resident immune cells and leading to cell migration. This cascade results in an inflammatory state, contributing to chronic inflammatory diseases.
Epithelial barrier‐related diseases are triggered by the barrier disruption, chronic inflammation, and microbial dysbiosis that occurs in organs or tissues such as skin, respiratory tract, digestive tract, and ocular surface. These diseases include atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, asthma, allergic rhinitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, food allergy, irritable bowel syndrome, ocular allergy, and dry eye. 1 Another group of epithelial barrier‐related diseases mainly constitutes autoimmune, autoinflammatory, metabolic, and neuropsychiatric diseases associated with intestinal barrier dysfunction and microbial dysbiosis. 1 These are triggered through the gut–thyroid axis, gut–joint axis, gut–liver axis, or gut–brain axis such as in Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Graves' disease, osteoarthritis, obesity, diabetes, and cirrhosis. These diseases share common characteristics with an increased prevalence after the 1960s or 2000s, and similar pathophysiology involving defects in the epithelial barrier, microbial dysbiosis, and circulating microinflammation. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of diseases encompassed by the epithelial barrier theory and discuss their epidemiology, genetic predisposition, epithelial barrier disruption, microbial dysbiosis and tissue, and circulating inflammation.
2. CROSSTALK BETWEEN THE EPITHELIAL BARRIER, MICROBIOTA, AND THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
The external surfaces of the body, such as the skin, the respiratory and digestive tracts, and the ocular surface, serve as a vital line of defense against the invasion of a variety of exogenous factors, such as allergens, microbes, and environmental substances, while at the same time, “trespassing” and exchange of particles is required to be facilitated. 1 , 25 Epithelial cells are key players in the innate defense of the mucosal surface. Epithelial cells not only form a physical barrier based on tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs), but also constitute complex chemical and biological barriers. 27 , 28 , 29 Under normal physiological conditions, epithelial cells separate immune cells and commensal microbiota to control and prevent excessive immune responses, thus maintaining homeostasis. In addition, the commensal microbiota and its metabolites can enhance the defense mechanisms of the epithelium and ameliorate the intestinal permeability, as part of the mucosal barrier. 30 Commensal segmented filamentous bacteria (SFBs) adhering to the luminal surface of Peyer's patches in the gut have been shown to induce T helper 17 (Th17) cell differentiation and prevent pathogen colonization. 31 , 32 Short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs) produced as end metabolites by the gut microbiota also play an essential role in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal barrier and mitigating local inflammation. 33 , 34 However, many different exogenous factors can impact epithelial cells and cause the loss of junctional proteins and mucosa, resulting in a leaky epithelial barrier that allows the translocation of microbiota to subepithelial areas. 25 Many viruses cause a transient damage in the epithelial barrier, 35 which is further impaired in chronic inflammatory diseases, such as asthma. 36 Epithelial cells, infected with respiratory viruses and exposed to inhaled allergens, are partly damaged and release many pro‐inflammatory cytokines, including IL‐1 family molecules and alarmins, which further delay antiviral response and enhance problems with epithelial repair. 37 During chronic subepithelial inflammation, the distribution of many epithelial receptors is changing, including angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 for SARS‐CoV‐2, which might facilitate epithelial barrier damage upon infection. 38 Recent studies have suggested that cigarette smoke or ozone can alter lung microbial composition and function, reduce epithelial integrity, and increase susceptibility to respiratory pathogens, including COVID‐19. 20 , 39 , 40 , 41
Defects in the epithelial barrier function trigger immune responses, which vary depending on the location (e.g., skin, airway, esophagus, gut, and ocular surface) (Figure 2). Epithelial cells release inflammatory cytokines, including thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin (IL)‐25, and IL‐33, alarmins, and several chemokines that activate epithelial cells, mast cells, macrophages and attract and activate dendritic cells (DCs), eosinophils, neutrophils, T and B cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). 42 , 43 A damaged epithelial barrier function along with the activation of DCs, Th2 cells, and ILCs form a single immunopathological unit has been demonstrated to initiate type 2 immune and inflammatory responses, 27 which are persistently abnormal in allergic patients. 44
FIGURE 2.

Defects in epithelial barrier function with different allergens and environmental toxic substances are required to initiate epithelial immune responses. The secretion of alarmins IL‐25, IL‐33, and TSLP leads to the development of type 2 inflammation, which is characterized by the presence of ILC2s, Th2 cells, B cells, eosinophils (EOS), neutrophils, and mast cells (MC). ILC2s and Th2 cells secrete IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐9, and IL‐13 that induce an inflammatory immune response.
A compromised skin epithelial barrier triggered by environmental factors such as mechanical trauma, repeated scratching, exposure to exogenous proteases, detergents, and air pollution can activate the innate immune system (Figure 3), inducing keratinocytes to release pro‐inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and enhancing the antigen presentation by intradermal Langerhans cells (LCs) and dermal DCs. 45 , 46 Simultaneously, antigen binding promotes the secretion of Th2‐promoting cytokines (IL‐25, IL‐33, and TSLP), which drives immunoglobulin (Ig)E‐bearing LCs and DCs to migrate to regional lymph nodes to initiate Th2 differentiation. In turn, memory T cells cycle back to infiltrate the skin or distribute in the periphery to other end organs, triggering various skin diseases. 47
FIGURE 3.

Exposome and/or risk factors in contact with neuropsychiatric diseases, airway diseases, skin diseases, and digestive tract diseases.
Inhalation of air pollutants, infectious agents, or aeroallergens leads to airway epithelial dysfunction and causes the release of mediators, including the pro‐inflammatory cytokines, alarmins, and chemokines C‐C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and CCL20. 48 These cytokines trigger the massive secretion of IL‐5 and IL‐13 from ILC2s adjacent to the airway epithelium, leading to eosinophilic infiltration and goblet cell formation in the airways. 49 , 50 In addition, DCs activated by these cytokines migrate to regional lymph nodes where they trigger the differentiation of naive T cells into Th2 cells. 51 Th2 cells secrete IL‐4 and IL‐13, which induce airway inflammation and the onset of respiratory inflammatory diseases.
A disrupted esophageal epithelial barrier allows dietary antigens, bacteria, and bacterial metabolites to penetrate the esophageal mucosa (Figure 3). Recent studies have shown that biofilm formation following microbial dysbiosis, particularly by Campylobacter species on the esophageal mucosa, can exacerbate inflammation and further contribute to barrier damage. 52 CD1+ LCs and DCs in the esophageal epithelium take up antigens directly from the lumen 53 as the esophagus, unlike the small and large intestines, lacks secondary lymphoid tissues with follicle‐associated epithelium. 54 DCs migrate to draining lymph nodes to present antigens to T cells, which primes naïve T cells or activates effector T cells to produce Th2 cytokines and induce the expression of chemokines in the lamina propria, aggravating inflammatory esophageal diseases. 54
The intestine is the largest compartment of the immune system, and it is constantly exposed to dietary antigens and commensal microbiota. Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), consisting of several specialized cell types (enterocytes, Paneth cells, microfold cells (M cells), goblet cells, tuft cells, and enteroendocrine cells), construct an important defensive barrier system against exogenous factors (Figure 3). 55 Once the intestinal epithelial barrier is impaired, antigens and pathogenic bacteria can be taken up by M cells in the follicle‐associated epithelium of Peyer's patches and isolated lymphoid follicles and transported to DCs in the subepithelial areas. 56 In addition, goblet cells can transport soluble luminal antigens to subepithelial CD103+ DCs. 57 In response to antigens and pathogenic bacteria, IECs express and release more TSLP that acts directly on DCs to instruct naïve T cells to differentiate into Th2 cells to produce cytokines such as IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐10, and IL‐13. 58 , 59 Similar to TSLP, the epithelial cytokines IL‐25 and IL‐33, released by damaged IECs during parasitic infection and allergen stimulation, can also promote type 2 immune responses by activating ILC2 to produce IL‐5 and IL‐13. 60 , 61 , 62 These immune responses further contribute to the development of intestinal inflammation and the onset of intestinal disorders. Similar to sweeteners it is suggested that in both CD and UC it may be prudent to reduce the intake of processed foods that contain carrageenan, carboxymethylcellulose, and polysorbate‐80, all of which are food additives from the group of emulsifiers and thickeners. The health effects of carrageenan were studied in many animal models including rats, mice, guinea pigs, rhesus monkeys, and rabbits. 63 In the animal studies, intestinal lesions, neoplasia, ulcerations, accumulation in intestinal lymph nodes, stricture formation, and UC‐like inflammatory changes were reported. 63 Emulsifiers also have been reported to aggravate intestinal inflammation in mouse models. 64 Interestingly, at least some of the adverse effects of these emulsifiers on promoting colitis or obesity might be driven by the induction of intestinal microbial alterations in conjunction with immune activation and can be transmitted via the transfer of fecal material. 64
Environmental allergens in contact with the ocular surface epithelium can interact with epithelial cells or cross the epithelial layer and enter the subepithelial layer where they encounter DCs. DCs sample and process the allergens, then migrate to the regional lymph node and present them to naïve CD4+ T cells, which triggers the activation, proliferation, and differentiation of CD4+ T cells into allergen‐specific Th2 cells, resulting in allergic inflammation. 65 Moreover, damaged conjunctival epithelial cells induced by allergens can release pro‐type 2 cytokines, particularly TSLP and IL‐33, 66 the epithelial‐derived IL‐33 is involved in conjunctival epithelium barrier disruption and exacerbation of allergic inflammation via the IL‐33/ST2/IL‐9/IL‐9R signaling pathway. 67 TSLP activates resident DCs in the conjunctiva by interacting with TSLP receptors on conjunctival DCs. Activated DCs expressing OX40 ligands migrate to regional lymph nodes and promote Th2 differentiation through the OX40 ligand and OX40 interactions. 68 , 69
3. EVIDENCE FOR EPITHELIAL BARRIER THEORY‐ASSOCIATED DISEASES
The selection criteria for epithelial barrier theory‐associated diseases (see Box 1) are diseases that fit at least two of the five criteria are included.
BOX 1. Selection criteria for diseases encompassed by the epithelial barrier theory.
Increased prevalence after 1960s or 2000s that cannot (solely) be accounted for by novel diagnostic methods.
Epithelial barrier defects and epithelitis (IL‐1, IL‐25, IL‐33, and TSLP).
Microbial dysbiosis with loss of biodiversity, loss of commensals, and colonization of opportunistic pathogens.
Circulating inflammation as evidenced by elevated inflammatory cells, cytokines, or chemokines in the blood.
Different and practically non‐related diseases that fulfill these criteria appear as multimorbidities.
3.1. Skin diseases
Studies have shown that the skin microbiome contributes to host immunity by maintaining the epithelial barrier function of the skin. 70 , 71 As such, disruption of the skin epithelial barrier has been linked to an altered microbiome. Several studies have demonstrated epithelial barrier disruption, microbial dysbiosis, and microinflammation present in lesional skin from a broad range of dermatological diseases (Table 1), such as atopic dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, chronic spontaneous urticaria, psoriasis, bullous pemphigoid, alopecia areata, and hidradenitis suppurativa.
TABLE 1.
Skin diseases in the context of the epithelial barrier theory.
| Skin disease | Epidemiological evidence | Evidence for epithelial barrier disruption, microbial dysbiosis, and microinflammation |
|---|---|---|
| Atopic dermatitis |
Epidemiological studies suggest that the prevalence of atopic dermatitis among children aged 0–7 years tripled in Denmark, from 3% in 1960–1964 to 10% in 1970–1974. 77 The prevalence of atopic dermatitis in young Finnish men increased from 0.15% to 2.90% during the period 1966–2017. 78 |
Patients with atopic dermatitis exhibited increased transepidermal water loss, altered bioelectric properties in the epidermis, and reduced expression of tight junction proteins. 83 , 84 The expression of 4 tight junction genes (CLDN4, CLDN5, TJP1, and TJP2) was closely associated with microbial dysbiosis in the lesional skin of atopic dermatitis patients. 17 Serum from atopic dermatitis patients showed upregulation of inflammatory and cardiovascular risk proteins. 87 |
| Alopecia areata | The prevalence of alopecia areata in Japan has gradually increased from 0.16% in 2012 to 0.27% in 2019. 509 | The keratins KRT35, KRT83, and KRT81 were significantly downregulated in lesional tissue of individuals with alopecia areata relative to healthy controls. 510 Th1/Th2‐related indicators were strongly linked with the clinical severity of alopecia areata. 510 , 511 Alopecia areata subjects showed over‐colonization of Propionibacterium acnes along with a decreased relative abundance of Staphylococcus epidermidis compared with healthy controls. 512 |
| Allergic contact dermatitis | The reported clinical prevalence trends from Europe and North America show a notable rise in allergic contact dermatitis from the late 1960s to the mid‐1970s. 98 , 99 | Skin biopsy specimens from patients with p‐phenylenediamine (PPD)‐related allergic contact dermatitis demonstrated downregulation of tight junction mRNAs and proteins after PPD exposure. 103 Despite a lack of direct data on changes in the skin microbiome, dysbiosis in allergic contact dermatitis is possible as also evidenced in studies of the skin microbiome in mouse models. 513 |
| Irritant contact dermatitis | One study from UK on healthcare workers showed that campaign to increase hand hygiene with increased hand washing increased irritant contact dermatitis. However, little other longitudinal epidemiological data is available. 70 | Atopic skin and filaggrin defects are major risk factors. 68 Pathogenesis starts with keratinocyte damage, followed by inflammatory cascade of neutrophils and T cells. 69 |
| Chronic spontaneous urticaria | Epidemiological data from the Italian Health Search IMS Health Longitudinal Patient Database showed that the annual prevalence of chronic spontaneous urticaria increased from 0.02% in 2002 to 0.38% in 2013. 110 | Urticaria patients exhibit elevated plasma levels of IL‐17, IL‐31, and IL‐33 compared with healthy individuals. 114 Moreover, alterations in the gut microbiome and high levels of IL‐31 and IL‐33 were found in the serum of chronic urticaria patients. 116 |
| Psoriasis |
The overall age‐ and sex‐adjusted annual incidence of psoriasis in the United States has nearly doubled from 50.8 in the period 1970–1974 to 100.5 per 100,000 in the 1995–1999 time period. 121 The age‐ and sex‐standardized cumulative prevalence of psoriasis in Ontario, Canada increased from 1.74% in 2000 to 2.32% in 2015. 122 |
Psoriatic skin in humans presented a defective barrier function, an inflammatory state, and dysbiosis in the microbial composition. 132 , 133 |
| Rosacea | The epidemiological data on rosacea is very heterogeneous. The prevalence statistics published in Europe and the United States vary widely, ranging from less than 1% to more than 20% of the adult population. 514 Currently, there is little longitudinal data on the prevalence of rosacea | The lesional skin of rosacea patients showed significant alterations in barrier components. 515 , 516 Moreover, patients with rosacea showed significant differences in the skin microbiota from healthy controls. 517 |
| Pemphigus vulgaris | Annual incidence of pemphigus vulgaris in the northeast region of the state of Sao Paulo in Brazil increased from 1 case/year in 1988 to 7 cases/year in 2008. 518 | Patients with pemphigus vulgaris showed intercellular edema in epithelial cells, dissolution of intercellular bridges, higher levels of inflammatory Th1/Th17 cytokines (IFN‐γ, IL‐17, and IL‐23), and an imbalance in microbial composition. 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 |
| Bullous pemphigoid |
Incidence of bullous pemphigoid in Minnesota (United States) showed an increase from 0.9/100,000 person‐years in 1960–1969 to 4.2/100,000 in 1990–1999. 142 Incidence of bullous pemphigoid in France was 21.7 cases per million persons per year during the 2000–2005 period, which is approximately threefold higher than the incidence that was estimated 15 years ago. 143 |
Blister fluids and skin lesions of bullous pemphigoid demonstrated a significant increase in thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) levels when compared to healthy controls. 145 Cutaneous microbial dysbiosis was found in patients with bullous pemphigoid compared with healthy controls. 146 |
| Hidradenitis suppurativa | Incidence of hidradenitis suppurativa in the United States showed an increase from 4.3 per 100,000 person‐years in 1970–1979 to 9.6 per 100,000 person‐years in 2000–2008. 153 | Lesioned skin of hidradenitis suppurativa showed upregulated inflammation (PI3, TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and IFN‐γ), altered epithelial organization, and dysregulated metabolic signaling. 148 Multiple studies in humans support a dysbiotic skin microbiome in HS patients. 149 |
3.1.1. Atopic dermatitis
Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as atopic eczema, is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease worldwide. It presents with clinical features such as pruritus and eczematous changes. 72 AD often usually begins in early childhood and may persist into adulthood, 73 and AD is associated with an increased risk of developing allergic rhinitis, asthma, and chronic diseases at later stages. 74 , 75 , 76 Numerous epidemiological studies revealed an increasing prevalence of AD in industrialized countries since the 1960s. AD now affects up to 20% of the general population. The prevalence of AD among children aged 0–7 years tripled in Denmark, from 3% in 1960–1964 to 10% in 1970–1974. 77 The prevalence of AD in young Finnish men increased from 0.15% to 2.90% during the period 1966–2017. 78 Moreover, AD is more prevalent in urban areas compared with rural areas, suggesting that exposure to antigenic contaminants and limited exposure to infectious agents or other antigenic triggers may contribute to the development of AD. 72
Genetic and/or acquired epidermal barrier dysfunction plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AD, as it facilitates penetration of allergens into the skin and promotes allergic sensitization. 79 Loss‐of‐function mutations in the filaggrin (FLG) gene represent the most significant genetic risk factor for atopic dermatitis (AD). 80 Individuals with FLG mutations have a more than threefold increased risk of developing AD compared with the general population. 81 Filaggrin (FLG) ensures the alignment of keratin filaments in the corneocytes and hydrates the stratum corneum, and is thereby crucial for maintaining skin barrier functions. FLG is synthesized as the polymer proflaggrin and resides in the outer nucleated layers of the epidermis. Two independent loss‐of‐function genetic variants (R510X and 2282del4) in FLG genes have been identified as extremely potent predisposing factors for AD and approximately 9% of Europeans carry these variants. 82 These variants have also been shown to have a highly significant association with asthma occurring on the basis of AD. 82 In addition, epidermal barrier defects triggered by environmental factors have been shown in patients with AD, as evidenced by increased transepidermal water loss (TEWL), defective bioelectric impedance of the epidermis, and ameliorated expression of TJ proteins. 83 , 84 The expression of four TJ genes (CLDN4, CLDN5, TJP1, and TJP2) was closely associated with microbial dysbiosis in the lesional skin of AD patients, in which Staphylococcus aureus showed a negative correlation and S epidermidis, S hominis, and S haemolyticus displayed a positive correlation. 17 , 85
Mounting evidence indicates that AD patients are at increased risk of developing “allergic”/atopic comorbidities (e.g., asthma, rhinitis, and food allergies) and chronic diseases (e.g., cardiovascular disease and ischemic stroke), 75 , 76 , 86 which were attributed to microinflammation. Serum of AD patients exhibits significant upregulation of Th1, Th2, and Th1/Th17/Th22‐associated proteins, as well as a broad array of proteins involved in atherosclerosis, tissue remodelling, and angiogenesis. 87 Recently, an increased rate of alopecia areata has also been associated with having one or more atopic comorbidities. 88
3.1.2. Alopecia areata
Alopecia areata (AA) has been increasingly associated with allergic or atopic conditions. 89 Studies showed that with each atopic comorbidity the risk of developing AA increases, and IL‐13 has been a strong link to AA in GWAS studies. 90 Further, anti‐Th2 treatment with dupilumab has been shown to regrow hair in AA patients with atopy and/or high IgE, and antihistamines were shown to have an adjuvant effect in AA treatment. 91 Similar to other atopic diseases such as AD, AA was also suggested to have a barrier defect with significant inhibition of hair keratins, with the decreased hair keratin expression likely due to increases in Th1, Th2, and other cytokines. 92
3.1.3. Allergic contact dermatitis
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin disease. It is caused by type IVa T1 delayed‐type hypersensitivity responses to low molecular weight haptens that come into contact with the skin. 93 , 94 ACD presents with a wide range of symptoms, such as intensely pruritic erythema, edema, oozing, and even spongiotic vesicles. 93 Contact allergens or haptens are mainly reactive organic compounds or metal ions that bind to proteins and other biomolecules to trigger skin immune responses. 95 Around 4000 chemicals have been reported as potential triggers for ACD in humans, 96 presenting a wide range of symptoms, such as intensely pruritic erythema, edema, oozing, and even spongiotic vesicles. 93 The most common contact allergies are triggered by exposure to nickel, chromium, fragrances, and preservatives. Recently, it has been reported that diphencyprone induces the strongest immune response and barrier defects characteristic of ACD. 97 ACD has increased in prevalence after the 1960s and currently affects up to 15%–20% of the general population. 96 The reported clinical prevalence trends of chromium‐allergic contact dermatitis from Europe and North America show a notable increase in ACD from the late 1960s to the mid‐1970s. 98 Similarly, the incidence of positive patch test reactions to nickel has significantly increased in most countries, for example, in Malmo, Sweden, female patients increased from 7% to 29% in 1962 and 1997, respectively. 99
As the first line of defense, impaired skin barrier function facilitates the penetration of contact allergens into the epidermal layer to interact with cutaneous DCs, which can promote allergic sensitization. 100 Disruption of the epithelial barrier by dysregulated filaggrin is now known to be one of the underlying causes of ACD. 101 The association between loss‐of‐function mutations in FLG and ACD to nickel has been reported. 100 An increased risk of contact sensitization to substances other than nickel was further observed in FLG mutation carriers with self‐reported dermatitis. 102 Moreover, dysregulation of TJ proteins is also involved in the development of ACD. Skin biopsy specimens from patients with p‐phenylenediamine (PPD)‐related ACD demonstrated downregulation of TJ proteins after PPD exposure. 103
Despite limited data on microbial alterations in ACD skin, dysbiosis in ACD is possible as demonstrated in studies of the skin microbiome in animal models. An ACD mouse model showed that inflammatory responses and skin inflammation created a favorable environment for the colonization of the opportunistic bacteria Faecalibaculum and Muribacter muris, and can promote the depletion of native skin bacteria such as Streptococcus. 104
3.1.4. Irritant contact dermatitis
While the pathogenesis and epidemiology of AD and ACD are well‐reported, studies on irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) are sparse. ICD is one of the most common diseases overall, with most of the population having mild irritant hand dermatitis. The most common irritant arises from wet work with direct contact to water for more than 2 h per day, use of protective gloves over 2 h per day, and/or washing hands more than 20 times per day. Other major irritants include soaps, detergents, disinfectants, solvents, and oils. ICD is more common in women than in men and the incidence seems to decrease with age. Atopic skin and FLG deficiency are major risk factors. Diagnosis is based on clinical features and includes the exclusion of ACD by patch tests. 105 In contrast to ACD, ICD is characterized by a non‐specific inflammation. Danger signals damage and are sensed by keratinocytes, which start an inflammatory cascade involving T cells and neutrophils. 106
A study based on the EPIDERM registry in the UK reported the change in the occurrence of ICD over time from 1996 to 2012. The findings showed that overall ICD was decreasing or remaining the same in most of the population except for healthcare workers. During the study period, there was a campaign to mitigate transmission of infections by raising awareness of the importance of hand washing and antiseptic use. Healthcare workers developed significantly higher ICDs by the end of 2012. 107 Unfortunately, there is no longitudinal population data available yet on the impact of similar hygiene practices on COVID‐19.
3.1.5. Chronic spontaneous urticaria
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), classically known as chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), is a systemic immune‐mediated disease. It presents with recurrent itchy wheals, sometimes with, which persist for more than 6 weeks without inducible causes. 108 These symptoms result from pathogenic activation of skin mast cells and basophils with the release of pre‐formed vasoactive mediators (i.e., histamine, tryptase, and leukotrienes) and their delayed generation of cytokines. 109 Longitudinal epidemiological data revealed an increased prevalence of CSU after the 2000s. The annual prevalence of CSU in Italy based on data from the Health Search IMS Health Longitudinal Patient Database increased from 0.02% to 0.38% in 2002–2013 and the incidence rates ranged from 0.10 to 1.50 per 1000 person‐years, with a trend toward a continuous increase. 110 The risk of CSU was significantly higher in subjects who suffered from obesity, anxiety, dissociative and somatoform disorders, or malignancies. 110
Even though CSU is not a priori epidermal disorder, an overexpression of genes involved in terminal epidermal differentiation and barrier function was observed in CSU skin when compared to healthy control skin. 111 For example, filaggrin overexpression was observed in nonlesional CSU skin vs skin from healthy controls. Another study conducted in patients with CSU/CIU showed overexpressed filaggrin, and elevated filaggrin expression was positively correlated with urticaria severity in CSU/CIU. 112 An increased expression of filaggrin was suggested to promote histamine production, decreasing skin barrier formation by activation of the histamine receptor 1. 113
Several independent studies have demonstrated elevated levels of pro‐inflammatory cytokines in patients with CSU. A study conducted in 51 CSU patients and 20 healthy controls showed that plasma levels of IL‐17, IL‐31, and IL‐33 were significantly elevated in CSU patients compared with healthy controls and that the severe group of patients had significantly higher IL‐17 and IL‐33 levels than the mild group. 114 Another study conducted in skin biopsies also demonstrated elevated levels of IL‐33 in the lesional skin of CSU patients, 115 suggesting their use as potential biomarkers of disease severity or treatment response in CSU. An altered gut microbiota composition has been linked to inflammation. Patients with CSU demonstrated depletion of Akkermansia muciniphila, Clostridium leptum, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and a significant increase in relative amounts of the Enterobacteriaceae family compared with healthy controls. 116 Actually, Akkermansia muciniphila has been reported to exert anti‐inflammatory properties, and Enterobacteriaceae family members are among the pro‐inflammatory members of the gut microbiota. 117
3.1.6. Psoriasis
Psoriasis is a chronic, immune‐mediated skin disease characterized by hyperproliferation and dysfunctional differentiation of keratinocytes. 118 The clinical manifestations are sharply demarcated, erythematous, pruritic plaques accompanied by silvery scales. 119 The prevalence of psoriasis is estimated to be between 2% and 4% of the population in Western countries 120 and appears to have an upward trend. The overall age‐ and sex‐adjusted annual incidence of psoriasis in the United States has nearly doubled from 50.8 in the period 1970–1974 to 100.5 per 100,000 in the 1995–1999 time period. 121 Moreover, the age‐ and sex‐standardized cumulative prevalence of psoriasis in Ontario, Canada, increased from 1.74% in 2000 to 2.32% in 2015. 122
Clinical studies have shown that the IL‐23–IL‐17 axis plays a key role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. 123 , 124 , 125 Activation of the IL‐23–IL‐17 axis is considered to be initiated by the activation of skin‐resident DCs and their production of IL‐23, driving T‐cell production of type 17 cytokines such as IL‐17 and IL‐22. IL‐17 activates epidermal keratinocytes to produce pro‐inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, such as IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐31, CXCL1, and CCL20. 126 , 127 Moreover, in vitro studies show that IL‐17 downregulates filaggrin expression and impairs skin TJs. 128 , 129 A defective barrier function and increased TEWL were also reported in psoriasis. 130 , 131 Takahashi et al. showed a 1.7‐fold increase in TEWL of psoriatic skin compared with that of healthy skin. 132 A positive correlation has been shown between TEWL levels and the severity of psoriasis. 130 Moreover, psoriatic skin also revealed ameliorated stratum corneum hydration, a characteristic indicative of skin barrier disruption. 132 TEWL levels and stratum corneum hydration were restored to normal levels following clinical resolution of the psoriatic lesion, 132 suggesting that skin barrier function might be used to monitor disease activity and tailor appropriate psoriasis treatments to each patient.
New evidence suggests that the microbiome may play a pathogenic role in psoriasis. 133 A series of studies have compared compositional differences between the microbiomes of psoriatic and healthy skin. 134 , 135 , 136 Psoriatic lesional skin was demonstrated to have decreased relative abundance of Propionibacterium, 135 , 136 which is a major component of healthy skin microflora 137 that is known to modulate the immune system. 138 , 139 Loss of Propionibacterium has been shown to mitigate immune tolerance and increase the risk for psoriatic inflammation. 140
3.1.7. Bullous pemphigoid
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a common autoimmune bullous disease of the skin characterized by extremely polymorphic cutaneous manifestations, including urticaria‐like and eczema‐like lesions. 141 It mainly affects the elderly and the incidence has sharply increased over the past decades. The age‐ and sex‐adjusted incidence of BP in the US white population showed an increase from 0.9/100,000 individuals in 1960–1969 to 4.2/100,000 individuals in 1990–1999. 142 A sharp increase in the incidence of BP was also reported in France with an overall estimated incidence of 21.7 cases per 1 million individuals during the 2000–2005 period, indicating a nearly threefold increase in the incidence over the prior 15 years. 143 The increase in BP incidence was attributed to the concomitant increase in the elderly population and neurodegenerative disorders. 142
BP is mainly induced and maintained by a Th2‐polarized autoimmune response. 144 Type 2 cytokines, such as IL‐4 and IL‐6, and chemokines, thymus activation regulated chemokines (TARC), have been demonstrated to be significantly elevated in patients with BP compared with healthy controls. 145 TSLP, a cytokine that is secreted by barrier‐defective skin into the systemic circulation, was upregulated in lesional skin and blister fluids of BP, 145 suggesting skin epithelial barrier dysfunction in BP patients. A disrupted epidermal barrier makes the skin particularly susceptible to colonization by many bacteria. 146 Emerging evidence revealed that BP might contribute to a loss of skin‐protective microbiota and an increased abundance of Staphylococcus aureus. 147
3.1.8. Hidradenitis suppurativa
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disorder with clinical manifestations of painful inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining sinus tracts in areas bearing apocrine glands, such as axillae, breasts, buttocks, and groins. 148 , 149 HS has been reported to be associated with smoking, obesity, and inflammatory bowel disease. 150 , 151 , 152 The incidence of HS has risen over the past four decades in the United States, showing an increase from 4.3 per 100,000 person‐years in 1970–1979 to 9.6 per 100,000 person‐years in 2000–2008. 153 Additionally, 70.2% of HS patients were smokers, 54.9% obese, 42.9% were diagnosed with depression, and 36.2% with acne. Of these, smoking was significantly associated with HS severity. 153
A meta‐analysis revealed that upregulated inflammation, altered epithelial cell differentiation, and dysregulated metabolism signaling may potentially contribute to HS pathogenesis. 148 Highly upregulated pro‐inflammatory molecules, including IFN‐γ and IL‐1β, have been identified in HS lesioned skin, 154 , 155 suggesting the involvement of an initial inflammatory reaction in HS patients. Moreover, overexpression of specific genes, such as SERPINs, SPRR3, KRT6, and KRT16, confirms the impairment of barrier function in the early phases of HS pathogenesis. 148 , 156 Multiple studies have demonstrated an altered skin structure in HS with abnormal expression and location of AJs, cytokeratins, desmosomes, and integrins. 157 , 158 , 159 , 160 Several downregulated genes associated with metabolic‐related syndromes, including metabolic syndrome and obesity, have been identified in HS lesions, suggesting concomitant HS and metabolic‐related disorders in the patients. 148 , 161 , 162
Multiple studies in humans support a dysbiotic skin microbiome in HS patients and a consensus has been established that there is an increased abundance of anaerobic and opportunistic pathogens including Corynebacterium, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas at the expense of normal skin symbiosis (i.e., Cutibacterium) in HS skin. 149 The pathogenic bacteria Corynebacterium, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas have been reported to activate Toll‐like receptor 2 (TLR2) and/or TLR4 across various cell types. 163 , 164 , 165 Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical analysis of HS skin revealed an elevated expression of TLR2 in dermal macrophages and DCs of HS skin. 166 This supports the potential for dysbiosis to promote inflammation in HS skin via TLRs.
3.2. Airway diseases
The airway epithelial barrier represents the first line of defense against inhaled airborne particulate matter and pathogens. Inhalation of airborne pollutants may impair the airway epithelial barrier function and subsequently lead to excessive inflammatory responses and susceptibility to microbial infection, 167 which are key hallmarks of several airway diseases (Table 2), such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
TABLE 2.
Airway diseases in the context of the epithelial barrier theory.
| Airway disease | Epidemiological evidence | Evidence for epithelial barrier disruption, microbial dysbiosis, and microinflammation |
|---|---|---|
| Asthma |
The prevalence of asthma among Finnish candidates for military recruitment increased 20‐fold from 0.08% in 1961 to 1.79% in 1989. 170 The annual emergency hospital admissions for asthma in the UK increased across all age groups from the early 1960s to the early 1970s. 171 |
Asthma is a type 2 inflammatory disease with the majority of patients eliciting an overexpression of type 2 inflammatory pathways. 172 Airway biopsies from asthmatic patients showed a patchy disruption of TJs, reduced expression of epithelial zonula occludens 1 (ZO‐1), E‐cadherin, and α‐catenin, and an increased influx of eosinophils in the epithelium. 12 The airways of asthmatic subjects displayed altered microbial communities with more pathogenic Proteobacteria, particularly Haemophilus spp. and reduced levels of Bacteroidetes, particularly Prevotella spp., compared with controls. 178 |
| Allergic rhinitis | The prevalence of allergic rhinitis in young Finnish men increased 100‐fold, from 0.06% in 1966 to 6.46% in 1993, with a peak in 2000 (8.88%). 78 | Patients with house dust mite–induced allergic rhinitis showed a decreased transepithelial resistance in vitro and ex vivo, an increased permeability of FITC–dextran 4 kDa and a reduced occludin and ZO‐1 expression. 187 Moreover, the microbiota in the nasal mucus of AR patients was altered at the level of microbial genera and species; Staphylococcus aureus showed the greatest abundance (37.69%) in the nasal mucus and was associated with a positive response to house dust mites. 191 |
| Chronic rhinosinusitis | Chronic rhinosinusitis affects nearly 15% of the US population, and an increasing prevalence has been reported since 1991. 195 , 196 | Air‐liquid interface cultures of epithelia from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis showed a disrupted epithelial barrier with an altered expression pattern in TJs; the sinus epithelial integrity was downregulated by Th1 (IFN‐γ) and Th2 (IL‐4) cytokines in vitro. 13 Chronic rhinosinusitis subjects showed aberrant bacterial communities characterized by reductions in numerous common core bacterial taxa, decreased bacterial diversity, increased inter‐ and intra‐subject variability, and increased bacterial burden. 202 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | The incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) began increasing in the early 1960s in the population of Yokkaichi‐city (Mie Prefecture, Japan). 209 From 1980 to 2000, annual mortality rates for COPD increased from 40.7 to 66.9 per 100,000 population in the United States. 210 | Airway sections from patients with COPD demonstrated a disrupted expression of tight junction proteins. 213 Cultured bronchial epithelial cells from ex‐smoking patients with COPD displayed abnormalities with reduced capacity to form epithelial junctions during air‐liquid interface differentiation in vitro. 213 Moreover, studies on sputum samples from subjects with COPD demonstrated that microbial dysbiosis and eosinophilic inflammation were associated with increased exacerbation severity. 217 |
| Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis | Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) emerged during the second half of the 20th century, coinciding with an increase in cigarette smoking. 219 The number of recorded deaths from IPF clinical syndrome (IPF‐CS) in England and Wales rose sixfold from 1968 to 2008, and the incidence of IPF‐CS in primary care increased by 35% from 2000 to 2008. 220 | Lung specimens from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis showed an altered expression of tight junction proteins even those distant from fibroblastic foci, as in the case of claudin‐2 and claudin‐4, suggesting a generalized barrier dysfunction in the lungs of IPF patients. 222 Moreover, clinical evidence and animal models showed that lung microbiota changes may aggravate pulmonary inflammation and disease progression in IPF. 224 |
| Nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome | Nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome (NARES) was first described in 1981. 523 Although the epidemiology of NARES is not clear, it is estimated that 200 million people worldwide suffer from NARES, 50 millions of them living in Europe and 17 million living in the United States. 524 , 525 | Nonallergic eosinophilic inflammation in mice was demonstrated upon chronic airborne PM exposure, along with sinonasal epithelial barrier damage. 526 |
| Sarcoidosis | The number of reported cases of sarcoidosis in Japan has shown a sharp increase since 1960. 527 | Open lung biopsy specimens from patients with sarcoidosis exhibited ultrastructural lesions of the air‐blood barrier; elevated levels of serum Clara cell protein (CC16) in sarcoidosis patients resulted from an increased intravascular leakage of the protein across the air‐blood barrier. 528 , 529 The concentration of many cytokines and chemokines was elevated in serum and BAL of sarcoidosis patients. 530 |
| Pulmonary hypertension | In the late 1960s, an epidemic of primary pulmonary hypertension occurred in Switzerland, Austria, and Germany shortly after the introduction of aminorex fumarate, a potent anorexigen. 531 The age‐adjusted proportion of pulmonary hypertension hospitalizations in the United States increased by 44%, from 91 per 100,000 in 2001/2002 to 131 per 100,000 in 2009/2010. 532 | A rat model of pulmonary hypertension indicated that early progression of pulmonary hypertension was associated with increased lung permeability. 533 An altered lung and gut metabolome was also observed in a pulmonary hypertension rat model. 534 |
| Cystic fibrosis | The number of cystic fibrosis patients reported by the US CF Registry Year Source increased from ~15,000 in 1986 to over ~26,000 in 2010. 535 | Intestinal paracellular permeability is 4–10 times higher in patients with cystic fibrosis than in healthy controls. 536 Moreover, patients with cystic fibrosis showed disrupted intestinal microbiota and intestinal inflammation. 537 , 538 |
3.2.1. Asthma
Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by intermittent wheeze and airway inflammation, 168 affecting all ages with an estimated 300 million cases worldwide. 169 Asthma prevalence has been increasing over the past few decades. For example, a 20‐fold increase in asthma, from 0.08% in 1961 to 1.79% in 1989, was reported in Finnish candidates for military recruitment. 170 The annual emergency hospital admissions for asthma in the UK rose across all age groups, from the early 1960s to the early 1970s. 171
Allergic asthma is a type 2 immune disease and the majority of asthma patients are characterized by an overexpression of type 2 inflammatory pathways. 172 Exposure to environmental stimuli leads to airway epithelial damage and induces the production of alarmins (IL‐25, IL‐33, and TSLP), followed by type 2 inflammation. 172 Specifically, a subset of the patients demonstrates non‐type 2 mechanisms in which they display a neutrophil‐dominant presentation and are characterized by low (or even absent) Th2 cytokines. 173 Studies on airway biopsies from asthmatic patients showed patchy disruption of TJs with reduced expression of epithelial zonula occludens 1 (ZO‐1), E‐cadherin and α‐catenin, and an increased influx of eosinophils into the epithelium. 12 , 174 Moreover, airway epithelial brushings from subjects with asthma exhibited remarkably decreased claudin‐18 mRNA levels compared with healthy controls, which showed an inverse association with type 2 inflammation. 175
The link between microbial dysbiosis and the pathogenesis of asthma has been reported in the last decade. 176 In an analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey based on the US population, nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus was linked to an elevated risk of asthma prevalence, symptoms, and aggravation in children and young adults. 177 In addition, 16S rRNA bacterial sequences from the airways of asthmatic children and adults exhibited disordered microbial communities with higher levels of pathogenic Proteobacteria, particularly Haemophilus, and ameliorated levels of Bacteroidetes, particularly Prevotella, compared with controls. 178 Microbial production of histamine in the gut was highest in asthma patients with severe disease. 179 In addition, obese asthmatics displayed significantly greater changes in microbiota composition and inflammatory responses, compared with lean asthmatics or obese controls. 180 The development of asthma in childhood is strongly associated with alterations in the microbiota that results in a loss of the protective effects of the “normal” microbiota, including the production of immunoregulatory short‐chain fatty acids; among adults with established asthma, variations in the microbiota were associated with the severity of asthma. 176 , 181
3.2.2. Allergic rhinitis
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa and its classic symptoms are nasal itch, sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion. 182 Similar to allergic asthma, it involves an IgE‐mediated response to inhaled allergens and mucosal inflammation driven by Th2 cells. 183 In general, the prevalence of AR has risen globally since the 1960s, coinciding with an increase in the prevalence of atopic disorders. 184 A 100‐fold increase in AR prevalence was found in young Finnish men from 0.06% in 1966 to 6.46% in 1993, with a peak in 2000 (8.88%). 78 Currently, the worldwide prevalence of AR in adults was reported to be 18.1% based on 310 reported prevalences. 185
Multiple investigations support the notion that the structure and function of the airway epithelial barrier are disrupted in AR, and it is regarded as one of the underlying causes for the onset of AR. 186 Patients with house dust mite–induced AR showed decreased transepithelial resistance in vitro and ex vivo, enhanced permeability of FITC–dextran 4 kDa and mitigated expression of TJ molecules occludin and ZO‐1. 187 Moreover, an increased permeability of the nasal mucosa and decreased ZO‐1 expression were also observed in an AR mouse model. 188 Th2 cells and their cytokines, as well as ILCs, appear to be key contributors to barrier leakiness in AR patients. 189
A plethora of studies suggest that an altered microbial composition in the nasal mucosa is implicated in the development of AR. 190 Kim et al. demonstrated microbial alterations in AR patients at the genera and species levels, and Staphylococcus aureus showed the greatest abundance (37.69%) in the nasal mucosa and was associated with a positive response to house dust mites. 191 Another study found an increased abundance of Streptococcus salivarius in the nasal microbiome of patients with AR, promoting inflammatory cytokine release and morphological changes in the nasal epithelium. 192
3.2.3. Chronic rhinosinusitis
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses and diagnosed clinically with at least two of four symptoms (e.g., sinus pressure, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, and hyposmia/anosmia) persisting for at least 12 weeks. 193 , 194 CRS affects nearly 15% of the US population and has been reported to be increasing in prevalence since 1991, 195 , 196 placing an immense burden on both patients and the healthcare system.
Although the pathogenesis of CRS is still elusive, there is strong evidence suggesting that epithelial barrier defects and inflammation play a role. Air‐liquid interface cultures of epithelia from patients with CRS showed a disrupted epithelial barrier with an altered expression pattern in TJs, 13 and claudin‐3 has been identified as a potential biomarker for predicting nasal epithelial barrier defects and disease severity in CRS with nasal polyps (NPs). 197 Evidence showed that the sinonasal epithelial integrity was downregulated by Th1 (IFN‐γ) and Th2 (IL‐4) cytokines in vitro. 13 Van Bruaene et al. also reported that CRS with NPs patients in Western populations display a Th2 type inflammatory profile, 198 whereas CRS patients without NPs show a Th1 type. 199 In addition, patients with the same phenotype of CRS (e.g., CRS with NPs) may have different endotypes due to different functional or pathophysiologic findings. NPs from patients with eosinophilic CRS (eCRS) showed elevated levels of expression of IL4, IL5, IL13, TSLP, and IL1RL1 (ST2 [an IL‐33 receptor]), whereas NPs from patients with non‐eCRS showed elevated levels of expression of IL17A. 200
There is mounting evidence linking sinus microbiota dysbiosis to the pathogenesis of CRS. 201 Clinical studies have revealed that the CRS microbiome is characterized by a loss of numerous common core bacterial taxa, decreased bacterial diversity, and colonization by pathogenic bacteria as compared to healthy controls. 202 , 203 Anaerobic taxa, such as Bacteroides, Corynebacterium, Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, and Veillonella, gradually replace the persistent aerobic microorganisms in the healthy sinuses with the development of CRS. 204
3.2.4. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a slowly progressing chronic respiratory disorder characterized by partially reversible airflow obstruction, chronic airway inflammation, and an accelerated decline of lung function. 205 , 206 Common symptoms include breathlessness, wheezing, coughing, and sputum production. 207 COPD has been listed as the third leading cause of death worldwide, 208 and increases in its incidence and mortality were reported in the last decades. The incidence of COPD began increasing in the early 1960s in the population of Yokkaichi City (Mie Prefecture, Japan). 209 Between 1980 and 2000, annual rates for deaths with COPD increased from 40.7 to 66.9 per 100,000 population in the United States. 210 Although the most common cause of COPD is cigarette smoking, several other factors can cause or worsen COPD, including environmental exposures (e.g., air pollution, chemical vapors, and heavy exposure to dust) and genetic predisposition. 207
Numerous studies have shown that airway epithelial barrier dysfunction is involved in the pathogenesis of COPD. Genome‐wide gene expression analysis revealed an association of COPD with genes enriched for epithelial barrier function. 211 Clinical evidence demonstrated that patients with COPD showed loss of epithelial cell–cell contact, increased permeability, and disrupted expression of AJ and TJ proteins, including E‐cadherin, β‐catenin, occludin, and ZO‐1. 39 , 212 , 213 In addition, airway barrier dysfunction may lead to altered immune responses and increased susceptibility to infection, which also plays an important role in the pathogenesis of COPD. Clinical trials have shown that eosinophilic airway inflammation and upregulated interleukin IL‐1β, IL‐17A, and IL‐22 levels are present in a subset of COPD patients. 214 , 215 , 216 Moreover, a shift in pulmonary microbiota toward Proteobacteria and Firmicutes was observed in COPD patients. 39 Of note, studies on sputum samples from subjects with COPD demonstrated that microbial dysbiosis and eosinophilic inflammation were associated with increased exacerbation severity. 217
3.2.5. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive interstitial lung disease characterized by recurrent epithelial cell injury, senescent alveolar epithelium, and aberrant accumulation of fibrotic tissue in the lungs parenchyma. 218 IPF emerged during the second half of the 20th century, coinciding with the increase in cigarette smoking. 219 The number of recorded deaths of IPF clinical syndrome (IPF‐CS) in England and Wales rose sixfold from 1968 to 2008, and the incidence of IPF‐CS in primary care increased by 35% from 2000 to 2008. 220 Besides smoking, genetic factors and environmental exposures have also been linked to the onset of IPF. 221
Mounting evidence points IPF as an epithelial‐driven disease. IPF lung specimens showed elevated claudin‐2 expression in bronchiolar and alveolar epithelium and ameliorated claudin‐4 expression in type II pneumocytes, suggesting epithelial barrier damage in the lungs of IPF patients. 222 , 223 Moreover, lung microbial dysbiosis was closely associated with IPF disease progression. 224 Molyneaux and colleagues demonstrated a twofold higher bacterial burden in the BAL of IPF patients compared with healthy controls. 225 Lung bacterial burden predicts fibrosis progression, and notably, decreased lung bacterial diversity is associated with the production of alveolar profibrotic cytokines, such as IL‐1Ra and IL‐1β. 224 Thus, the lung microbiota contributes to alveolar inflammation and IPF progression. Recently studies have been focused on pirfenidone, a synthetic chemical that inhibits the prevention or removal of excessive scar tissue deposition in several organs through the production of multiple factors, such as transforming growth factor‐beta 1 (TGF‐β1), tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α), platelet‐derived growth factor (PDGF), interleukin 1 beta (IL‐1β), and collagen 1 (COL1A1). 226
3.3. Digestive tract diseases
A wide range of environmental antigens, including food‐derived antigens, emulgators/emulsifiers, detergents, and commensal bacteria, interact with the epithelial layer of the digestive tract. Disruption of this epithelial barrier has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of digestive tract diseases (Table 3). This may be due to an impaired epithelial barrier function that facilitates the translocation of microbiota and their metabolites, penetration by allergens, and/or migration of activated immune cells.
TABLE 3.
Digestive tract diseases in the context of the epithelial barrier theory.
| Digestive tract disease | Epidemiological evidence | Evidence for epithelial barrier disruption, microbial dysbiosis, and microinflammation |
|---|---|---|
| Eosinophilic esophagitis | The incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) among children in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA, was 5.31 per 100,000 population person‐years in 1995, 15.2 in 2005, and 19.2 in 2015 after adjusting for age and sex. 230 The current prevalence of EoE in adults and children is 32.5 and 30.9/100,000 inhabitants, respectively, according to a large meta‐analysis. 231 | Esophageal mucosal impedance values, which represent an indirect surrogate of barrier dysfunction, were significantly lower in patients with active EoE (1909 Ω) than inactive EoE (4349 Ω) or controls (5530 Ω). 235 Analysis of EoE tissue samples showed increased expression levels of TSLP, cathelicidin, and proteases, and decreased expression of filaggrin, E‐cadherin, claudin, occludin, and demoglein‐1. 236 Multiomic analysis revealed dysbiosis of esophageal microbiota as a main feature of eosinophilic esophagitis. 238 |
| Periodontitis | The global prevalence of periodontitis increased 99.0% from 546,434,147 to 1,087,367,744 from 1990 to 2019. 539 | Periodontitis gingival tissues exhibited reduced expression of genes involved in epithelial barrier defense. Upregulation of IL‐17 was also found, which is associated with a hyperinflammatory response and a distinct microbial community in periodontitis. 540 |
| Gastroesophageal reflux disease | The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease began to rise in the 1970s. A study by the US Department of Veterans Affairs found that the proportion of hospitalizations with gastroesophageal reflux disease increased from 61.2 per 10,000 hospitalizations in 1970–1974 to 315.6 per 10,000 hospitalizations in 1990–1995. 241 | Endoscopic biopsies of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients and a rat model of gastroesophageal reflux disease indicated a loss of esophageal barrier function and elevated expression of inflammatory markers, including IL‐8. 245 , 246 An altered microbiota composition was also found in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease when compared with controls. 247 |
| Barrett's esophagus | The first Barrett's esophagus (>3 cm) was found in 1969. A study of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents found that the incidence of clinically diagnosed Barrett's esophagus (>3 cm) increased 28‐fold from 0.37/100,000 person‐years in 1965–1969 to 10.5/100,000 in 1995–1997. 250 | Patients with Barrett's esophagus manifested a near threefold increase transepithelial leakage, a strong difference in the expression of claudin TJ protein, and an alteration of the microbiome, when compared with healthy controls. 254 , 255 This condition was associated with an increased risk for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. 541 |
| Food allergy | In the UK, the rates of hospital admissions for food anaphylaxis rose from 1.2 to 2.4/105 population between 1998 and 2012, with children aged 0–4 years being the most susceptible. 260 In Australia, the rates of hospital admissions for food anaphylaxis increased fourfold, from 2 to 8.2/105 population between 1998/1999 and 2011/2012. 261 In New Zealand, the rates of hospital admissions for food anaphylaxis increased from 3.3 to 5.8/105 population between 2002 and 2011 in individuals aged 15 years or greater. 542 In the United States, the rates of hospital admissions for food anaphylaxis more than doubled in those aged 0–18 years between 2000 and 2009. 543 | 96% of patients with food allergy exhibited functional and structural barrier defects as visualized in the terminal ileum and at two colorectal sites by confocal laser endomicroscopy. 265 Moreover, increasing evidence from human studies and mouse models of food allergy showed an association of food allergy with microbial dysbiosis, type 2 inflammation, and epithelial cell–derived cytokine (TSLP, IL‐33, and IL‐25) production. 266 , 267 , 269 |
| Food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome | The incidence of food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) diagnosis increases across the time span 2010–2014, and then again from 2015 to 2018. 544 | Serum samples of patients with FPIES exhibited significantly increased expression of regenerating family member 1 alpha, which is regarded as the mucosal damage marker, as well as elevated levels of cytokines and chemokines including IL17A, IL‐22, IL‐17C, and CCL20. 545 FPIES infants showed an alteration of the gut microbiome when compared with allergy‐free infants. 546 |
| Inflammatory bowel disease | There is a clear increase in incidence and prevalence of IBD on a global scale, with an even steeper rise in emerging countries. Between 1995 and 2016, the incidence per 100,000 person‐years in Denmark increased from 9.1 to 17.8 for Crohn's disease, and from 21.0 to 28.4 for ulcerative colitis. 273 | Biopsy specimens from patients with inflammatory bowel disease showed an impaired intestinal barrier function, as evidenced by significantly reduced epithelial resistance, reduced and discontinuous tight junctions, and changes in the expression of claudins. 277 , 278 Patients with inflammatory bowel disease showed alterations in the gut microbiota, mainly manifested by loss of bacterial diversity and changes in the composition of the microbiota, which were reported to be associated with local inflammation. 280 , 281 , 282 |
| Celiac disease | The prevalence of diagnosed celiac disease has doubled every decade in Denmark from 14 per 100,000 persons in 1986 and 180 per 100,000 persons in 2016. 284 Current estimations of the prevalence are at least 0.7% in the general population in the western countries and the majority of patients are considered undiagnosed, that is, tip of the iceberg phenomenon. 286 | Duodenal biopsies from celiac disease patients showed an altered expression of TJ proteins claudin‐2, ‐3, ‐5, and ‐7 and ZO‐1, reduced and discontinuous TJ strands, and an increase in paracellular biotin‐NHS uptake. 287 , 289 Patients with celiac disease showed alterations in the intestinal microbiota, particularly with an increase in Gram‐negative bacteria and a decrease in Gram‐positive bacteria. 291 |
| Irritable bowel syndrome | Irritable bowel syndrome is increasing in incidence and prevalence in Asia resulting from an uptake of a Westernized diet and lifestyle. The prevalence was reported to be <5% in a cross‐sectional study from Thailand that was published in 1988, while studies published since 2000 found a prevalence of 6%–9%. 292 | Diarrhea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome patients show altered epithelial permeability and mucosal microinflammation in both proximal and distal regions of the intestine. 295 , 296 These findings can potentially be used for diagnostic purposes in the near future to identify food items triggering barrier dysfunction and symptoms. 297 Moreover, microarray analysis in colonic biopsies of irritable bowel syndrome patients describes significant changes in the expression and secretion of selected pro‐inflammatory cytokines and the impairment of mucosal immune response to microbial pathogens. 299 , 300 |
| Colonic diverticulosis |
Annual age‐standardized hospital admission rates for diverticular disease of the colon in England increased by 16% for males (from 20.1 to 23.2 per 100,000) and 12% for females (from 28.6 to 31.9 per 100,000) between 1989/1990 and 1999/2000. 302 The prevalence of colonic diverticulosis has increased from 13% in 1990–2000 to 24% in 2001–2010 in Asia. 303 |
Patients with colonic diverticulosis displayed lower transepithelial electrical resistance, increased paracellular permeability, increased colonic macrophages, and depletion of microbiota members with anti‐inflammatory activity associated with mucosal macrophage infiltration when compared to the control group. 310 , 311 |
| Microscopic colitis | The incidence of microscopic colitis in Denmark increased from 2.3 cases per 100,000 person‐years in 2001 to 24.3 cases per 100,000 person‐years in 2016. 547 | Biopsies from the sigmoid colon of patients with microscopic colitis showed decreased epithelial resistance and increased levels of IL‐1β, IFN‐γ, and TNF‐α. 548 A significant higher microbial dysbiosis index was observed in active microscopic colitis when compared to healthy controls. 549 |
3.3.1. Eosinophilic esophagitis
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2–associated inflammatory disease primarily induced by food antigens and characterized by esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil‐predominant inflammation. 227 EoE, first reported in the 1970s as a case‐reportable disorder 228 and characterized as a clinicopathologic entity in the 1990s, 229 has been steadily increasing in its incidence and prevalence. A population‐based study found that the EoE incidence among children in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA, was 5.31 per 100,000 population person‐years in 1995, 15.2 in 2005, and 19.2 in 2015 after adjusting for age and sex. 230 The current prevalence of EoE in adults and children is 32.5 and 30.9/100,000 inhabitants, respectively, according to a large meta‐analysis. 231 Several risk factors were associated with EoE, including genetic predisposition, allergic/atopic conditions, antibiotic use, and environmental factors. 232 Importantly, EoE may be successfully treated by food elimination in a fraction of patients, frequently even with an exclusive single‐food milk elimination, strongly undermining the notion, that EoE may be one distinctive and extreme form of food allergy. 233 , 234
Studies have reported that epithelial barrier dysfunction plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of EoE. Esophageal mucosal impedance values, which represent an indirect surrogate of barrier dysfunction, were significantly lower in patients with active EoE (1909 Ω) than inactive EoE (4349 Ω) or controls (5530 Ω). 235 Analysis of biopsies from patients with EoE identified elevated expression levels of TSLP, cathelicidin, and proteases, as well as a decreased expression of filaggrin, E‐cadherin, claudin, occludin, and demoglein‐1. 236 A damaged epithelial barrier may provide a favorable environment for antigen presentation, leading to persistent chronic inflammation associated with microbial dysbiosis. 237 Multiomics analysis revealed dysbiosis of esophageal microbiota as a main feature of EoE. 238 An elevated bacterial load was demonstrated in EoE subjects, regardless of treatment status, showing the enrichment of Proteobacteria, Haemophilus, and Streptococcus. 239
3.3.2. Gastroesophageal reflux disease
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a gastrointestinal motility disorder that results from the involuntary backflow of stomach contents into the esophagus, causing heartburn, regurgitation, mucosal damage, and epigastric pain. 240 The prevalence of GERD has been on the rise since the 1970s. A study by the US Department of Veterans Affairs found that the rate of GERD hospitalizations increased from 61.2 per 10,000 hospitalizations in 1970–1974 to 315.6 per 10,000 hospitalizations in 1990–1995. 241 A meta‐analysis demonstrated that obesity was associated with a significant increased risk of GERD. 242
Of notice, the most common manifestation of GERD is heartburn, a reflection of acid damage to the esophageal epithelium. Studies have indicated that an acid‐induced enhanced paracellular permeability of the esophageal epithelium is involved as an early event in the pathogenesis of GERD. 243 , 244 In addition to gastric acid, components of duodenal reflux, such as bile salts and pancreatic enzymes, may also disrupt esophageal barrier function by modulating the expression of AJ and TJ proteins. 245 Other studies found that exposure of esophageal squamous epithelial cells to acidified bile salts sharply promoted IL‐8 and IL‐1β secretion, supporting an alternative concept that gastroesophageal reflux evokes a cytokine‐mediated immune response, resulting in the esophageal epithelial damage. 246 Moreover, accumulating data support the role of esophageal microbiota in the development of GERD. Microbial dysbiosis was also found in GERD patients when compared to controls. There was a loss of the dominant genera in the GERD group with concomitant increase in Gram‐negative bacteria, particularly Campylobacter which is closely associated with IL‐18 production in epithelial cells. 247
3.3.3. Barrett's esophagus
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a precancerous condition in which a specialized columnar epithelium replaces squamous cells in the distal esophagus. 248 It has become a global health concern due to the consumption of processed foods, greenhouse emissions, and smoking, affecting 1.6% to 6.8% of the global population. 249 A study of Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA, residents found that the incidence of clinically diagnosed BE (>3 cm) increased 28‐fold from 0.37 per 100,000 person‐years in 1965–1969 to 10.5 per 100,000 person‐years in 1995–1997. 250 Patients usually do not experience symptoms, except in those that have been previously diagnosed with GERD and might be a pre‐developmental case, 251 of which around 10%–15% of GERD patients may be at risk of converting the lining of the esophagus and develop BE. 252
Studies indicate that Barrett's epithelium is a typical precancerous epithelium that forms a highly paracellular leaky area across the otherwise highly efficient epithelial barrier of the normal esophagus. BE patients showed nearly three times higher upper gastrointestinal sucrose leakage than healthy controls, which might be attributed to different TJ barriers in Barrett's metaplasia compared with a healthy esophagus. 253 , 254 Endoscopic examination confirmed a higher expression of claudin‐2 and claudin‐3 but markedly lower claudins‐1 and ‐5 in Barrett's metaplasia compared with the normal esophageal mucosa. 253
Disruption of the mucosal barrier in the distal esophagus exposes the squamous epithelium to a diverse esophageal microbiome and induces chronic inflammation. Biopsy samples of the distal esophagus collected from BE patients showed an altered microbiome with a significant colonization in Gram‐negative bacteria and a loss of Gram‐positive bacteria compared with healthy controls. 255 Gram‐negative bacteria can produce lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which may activate the NF‐kB pathway of the epithelial cells and induce the production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as IL‐1β and TNF‐α. 256 Esophageal biopsies from BE patients demonstrated elevated epithelial expression of pro‐inflammatory enzymes, such as COX‐2, 257 revealing that inflammation in BE may be associated with microbial dysbiosis.
3.3.4. Food allergy
Food allergy is characterized as a recurrent adverse reaction after exposure to a specific food allergen that elicits an IgE‐mediated immunological response. 258 The prevalence of food allergies across the globe was estimated to be between 1% and 10% of the global population and has been on the rise over the last two decades. 259 In the UK, food anaphylaxis hospital admissions increased from 1.2 to 2.4 per 100,000 population between 1998 and 2012, with the highest rates observed in children aged 0–4 years. 260 Similarly, a fourfold increase in the rate of food anaphylaxis hospital admissions was observed in Australia from 1998–1999 to 2011–2012. 261
Oral tolerance to food allergens usually occurs via the gastrointestinal tract or the skin, and intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction or skin barrier impairment can lead to sensitization to food allergens. 262 , 263 , 264 Rath et al. demonstrated that 96% of patients with food allergies showed structural and functional barrier defects visualized in the terminal ileum and at two colorectal sites using confocal laser endomicroscopy. 265 Moreover, elevated levels of epithelial cell–derived cytokines (TSLP, IL‐33, and IL‐25) were observed in food allergy patients. 266 , 267 Suppression of all three epithelial cytokines with antagonists inhibited established food allergy in a mouse model. 268 Gut microbiota play a key role in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier, and microbial dysbiosis has been significantly associated with the pathogenesis of food allergy. Patients with food allergy showed distinct gut microbiota compared with healthy controls, 269 and food allergy‐associated dysbiosis was found to transmit food allergy susceptibility in microbial transfer experiments. 270 High levels of bifidobacterial in the gut were associated with reduced risk of food allergy. 271
3.3.5. Inflammatory bowel disease
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic recurrent inflammatory disease that includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis with characteristic symptoms such as fever, abdominal tenderness, rectal bleeding, fatigue, and weight loss. 272 The incidence and prevalence of IBD are increasing worldwide, with an even steeper rise in emerging countries. Between 1995 and 2016, the incidence per 100,000 person‐years in Denmark increased from 9.1 to 17.8 for Crohn's disease, and from 21.0 to 28.4 for ulcerative colitis. 273 Currently, IBD is estimated to affect approximately 1 million people in the United States and 2.5 million people in Europe posing a significant socio‐economic burden. 274
Studies into the pathophysiology of IBD have long focused on genetic polymorphisms and immune cell‐mediated mechanisms. However, these two factors would not serve as a valid explanation for the substantial epidemiological rise starting in the western world after the industrial revolution and around a century thereafter in the emerging industrializing countries. 275 Instead, there is a growing body of evidence implicating environmental factors and intestinal barrier dysfunction in the development and long‐term persistence of IBD. 276 Biopsy specimens from patients with IBD showed significantly ameliorated epithelial resistance, loss and discontinuous tight junctions, and an altered claudin expression. 277 , 278 Barrier dysfunction has been considered as a potential cause of intestinal inflammation in IBD. 276 IL10‐deficient mice that develop idiopathic colitis during aging display elevated ileal and colonic permeability before the onset of intestinal inflammation. 279 In addition, IBD patients show changes in the gut microbiota, which primarily manifested in a loss of bacterial diversity and an altered composition of the microbiota, which have been reported to be associated with local inflammation. 280 , 281 , 282
3.3.6. Celiac disease
Celiac disease is an immune‐mediated gastrointestinal disorder with gluten intolerance that is triggered by ingestion of gluten in genetically susceptible individuals. 283 A steady increase in the incidence of celiac disease has been observed in Western countries in recent decades. The prevalence of diagnosed celiac disease in Denmark has doubled every decade from 14 per 100,000 persons in 1986 and 180 per 100,000 persons in 2016. 284 A fivefold increase in the prevalence of celiac disease was observed in the United States between 1975 and 2000. 285 The prevalence is currently estimated to be at least 0.7/ in the general population (with the majority of patients being considered undiagnosed, i.e., tip of the iceberg phenomenon) in Western countries. 286
Gluten is a major environmental factor that contributes to the onset of celiac disease. It contains peptide sequences that may elicit HLA‐DQ2‐ or HLA‐DQ8‐restricted T‐cell responses in the small intestine. 287 Gluten‐activated T cells release pro‐inflammatory cytokines (mainly IL‐17, IL‐21, and IFN‐γ) that induce mucosal inflammation and cause direct disruption of the intestinal barrier. 288 Duodenal biopsies from patients with celiac disease showed an altered expression of TJ proteins claudin‐2, ‐3, ‐5 and ‐7, and ZO‐1, reduced and discontinuous TJ strands, and an increase in paracellular biotin‐NHS uptake. 287 , 289 In addition, epidemiological and clinical studies revealed that other environmental factors besides gluten play an important role in the development of celiac disease, such as early feeding practices, infections, and changes in gut microbiota composition. 290 Patients with celiac disease showed an increase in pathogenic Gram‐negative bacteria and a decrease in beneficial Gram‐positive bacteria. 291 This microbial disturbance has been observed not only in untreated celiac disease patients, but also in patients with underlying celiac disease and those following a gluten‐free diet, as well as in infants at high genetic risk of celiac disease. 288
3.3.7. Irritable bowel syndrome
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common disorders of the gut–brain axis. It is cardinal feature is the recurrent abdominal pain associated with defecation or change in frequency and form of stool. 292 IBS was described in the 1960s as a disorder of civilization that was extremely common in Western countries. 293 The prevalence of IBS in developing countries is rising in recent decades due to the consumption of processed foods and increased psychosocial stress. 294 A cross‐sectional study from Thailand reported a <5% prevalence in 1988, while studies published since 2000 have found a prevalence of 6%–9%. 292
Although the pathophysiologic mechanisms of IBS are not yet well understood, accumulating evidence supports the role of the intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction. Clinical data indicated that increased intestinal permeability and mucosal microinflammation occurred in both the proximal and distal bowel of IBS patients, which was closely linked to an ameliorated expression of ZO‐1 and redistribution of proteins from the TJ to the cytoplasm. 295 , 296 Interestingly, epithelial barrier defects were shown to be provocable using endomicrosopcy upon ingestion with several food allergies in some patients with IBD. 297 , 298 Moreover, microarray investigation of IBS patients' colonic biopsies revealed a decreased expression of chemokines (IL‐8, CXCL9, and MCP‐1) and an impaired mucosal immune response to microbial pathogens. 299 , 300 Thus, epithelial barrier dysfunction and associated microinflammation and microbial dysbiosis may be involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms driving IBS.
3.3.8. Colonic diverticulosis
Colonic diverticulosis (ColD) is defined as the presence of sac‐like protrusions, termed diverticula, in the colonic wall. 301 Its prevalence has increased over the last few decades in developed countries due to a Western lifestyle. In the UK, the age‐standardized hospitalization rate for ColD increased by 12% from 25.1 to 28.2 per 100,000 population between 1989/1990 and 1999/2000. 302 In fact, the prevalence of ColD has risen in some Asian countries due to an altered lifestyle and modern food habits. This is particularly event in Japan where ColD rose from 13.0% in 1990–2000 to 23.9% in 2001–2010. 303 A multivariate logistic analysis revealed a significant positive correlation of ColD prevalence with smoking, alcohol consumption, and severe weight gain in adulthood. 303
Some reports have linked ColD to a chronic inflammatory state, referred to as segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis (SCAD). Notably, many of the dietary and lifestyle risk factors that contribute to ColD, such as a low fiber and high red meat diet, 304 , 305 smoking, 306 obesity, 307 and physical inactivity, 308 are linked to chronic inflammation. A nested case–control study demonstrated that participants with ColD had elevated plasma levels of inflammatory markers including IL‐6, C‐reactive protein, and TNF receptor superfamily member 1B (TNFRSF1B). 309 It is well‐established that damage to the TJ barrier under inflammatory conditions is closely related to the pathogenesis of intestinal diseases. A study on the colonic mucosa using the Ussing chamber technique revealed that ColD patients' permeability was significantly higher than that of controls, as evidenced by markedly reduced transepithelial electrical resistance and significantly enhanced paracellular permeability to fluorescein isothiocyanate‐dextran. 310 Another study showed that ColD patients exhibited a depletion of microbiota members with an anti‐inflammatory effect, including Lactobacillaceae, Fusobacterium, Clostridium cluster IV, and Clostridium cluster IX. 311 Additionally, it was demonstrated that the diverticular area of biopsy samples from ColD patients had ameliorated levels of the mucus‐degrading Akkermansia muciniphila, which can protect the integrity of the epithelial barrier by mitigating inflammation, as compared to the distal colonic regions. 311 In view of these studies, gut dysbiosis may contribute to the pathogenesis of mucosal inflammation and the development of colonic diverticulosis.
3.4. Neuropsychiatric diseases
In addition to diseases occurring directly in affected tissues, leakiness of the gut epithelium is linked to systemic diseases, such as obesity, impaired glucose metabolism, or neuropsychiatric diseases, as demonstrated in many recent animal and human studies. Regarding the latter, these diseases include autism spectrum disorders, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, stress‐related psychiatric disorders, chronic depression, multiple sclerosis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Table 4), which have significantly increased in incidence at the same time as allergic diseases. 312 , 313 , 314
TABLE 4.
Neuropsychiatric diseases in the context of the epithelial barrier theory.
| Neuropsychiatric disease | Epidemiological evidence | Evidence for epithelial barrier disruption, microbial dysbiosis, and microinflammation |
|---|---|---|
| Alzheimer's disease | The incidence of Alzheimer's disease at the age of ≥60 increased from 44.92/100,000 inhabitants in 1980–1994 to 72.83/100,000 inhabitants in 1995–2006. 315 | Animal models of Alzheimer's disease showed abnormal epithelial cell turnover and a dysfunctional intestinal barrier. 316 Microbial dysbiosis and intestinal inflammation were frequently observed in patients with Alzheimer's disease and animal models. 320 |
| Parkinson's disease | The global prevalent number of PD in 204 countries/territories increased 155.50% from 1990 and reached 8511.02 × 103 in 2019. 323 | An aberrant subcellular distribution and reduced expression of occludin and ZO‐1 were observed in colon biopsies from patients with Parkinson's disease. 326 Clinical evidence and animal models showed changes in gut microbiota composition and mitigated fecal SCFA levels. 320 |
| Autism spectrum disorders | The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders among children aged 0–17 years in Sweden increased by almost 250% from 4.20/1000 in 2001 to 14.40/1000 in 2011. 329 | Duodenal biopsies from patients with autism spectrum disorders showed reduced mRNA expression of barrier‐forming TJ components (CLDN‐1, OCLN, TRIC). 338 Accumulating evidence showed altered gut microbiota in children with autism spectrum disorders. 339 |
| Stress‐related psychiatric disorders | The prevalence of neurotic, stress‐related, and somatoform disorders in Japan rose from 0.33% to 0.56% for men and from 0.48% to 1.06% for women during 1999–2017. 550 | Several animal studies have demonstrated that psychological stress can induce chronic disturbances of intestinal barrier function with concomitant gut microbiota dysbiosis. 344 , 551 |
| Chronic depression | The annual prevalence of chronic depression in the United States increased from 6.6% in 2005 to 7.3% in 2015. 340 Depression prevalence in South Korea increased from 2.8% in 2002 to 5.3% in 2013. 341 | Patients and animal models with chronic depression showed a disturbed gut microbiota composition and immune responses to gut commensal bacteria. 342 , 345 |
| Ischemic stroke | In the early 2000s, ischemic stroke incidence was on the rise in young adults in high‐income countries, including Europe, as well as in developing countries. 348 The incidence of ischemic stroke among young adults (<50 years) in the Netherlands increased by 42% from 7.6 in 2000 to 10.8 per 100,000 person‐years in 2010. 349 | Studies in mice demonstrated an increased intestinal permeability, a disruption of intestinal barrier integrity, and a translocation of gut microbiota in cerebral ischemic stroke. 353 Studies in humans demonstrated that stroke and transient ischemic attacks altered the gut microbiota, including an increased abundance of opportunistic pathogens and decreased beneficial commensals. 352 |
| Migraine | The prevalence of migraine among adults in the United States increased from 25.8 per 1000 persons in 1980 to 41.0 per 1000 persons in 1989. 355 The prevalence of migraine among children in southwestern Finland increased from 1.9% in 1974 to 5.7% in 1992. 356 | Migraine patients showed enhanced intestinal permeability and levels of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF‐α and IL‐1β. 357 , 360 Fecal samples obtained from elderly women with recurrent migraines demonstrated significant differences in the gut microbiota composition compared with healthy controls. 362 |
| Multiple sclerosis |
The standardized prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Denmark increased from 58.8 in 1950 to 154.5 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2005. 552 Multiple sclerosis incidence in the Province of Padua, Northeast Italy, increased from 0.9 in the decade 1960–1965 to 6.5 in the decade 2011–2015. 553 |
Various biomarkers of intestinal barrier function, such as ZO‐1 and occluding, were altered in patients with multiple sclerosis and correlated with disease severity. 554 Mounting evidence showed an altered gut microbiome in patients with multiple sclerosis. 555 |
| Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis | The age‐standardized incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Sweden climbed from 2.32 per 100,000 person‐years in 1991–1993 to 2.98 per 100,000 person‐years in 2003–2005. 556 The prevalence in Norway rose from 3.67 per 1,00,000 population in 1988 to 4.10 per 1,00,000 population in 2015; meanwhile, the incidence rose from 1.60 per 1,00,000 person‐years in 1978–1988 to 2.10 person‐years in 2000–2015. 557 | The gut epithelial barrier of a mouse model with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis showed a damaged tight junction structure, increased permeability with a significant reduction in the expression levels of tight junction protein ZO‐1 and the adherens junction protein E‐cadherin, and an altered intestinal microbiome profile. 558 |
3.4.1. Alzheimer's disease
Alzheimer's disease is the most common neurodegenerative disorder among the elderly. It causes a steady deterioration in cognitive function, eventually leading to a loss of memory, thinking, and reasoning. The incidence of Alzheimer's disease has increased over the past few decades and has reached pandemic levels, affecting over 50 million people worldwide. The incidence of Alzheimer's disease at the age of ≥60 increased from 44.92/100,000 inhabitants in 1980–1994 to 72.83/100,000 inhabitants in 1995–2006. 315
Imbalances in the homeostasis of the gastrointestinal system are considered to be underlying factors in the pathogenesis and progression of Alzheimer's disease. Several clinical and in vivo studies have shown pathophysiological alterations of the GI system in Alzheimer's disease. Animal models of Alzheimer's disease showed abnormal epithelial cell turnover, dysfunctional intestinal barrier, and elevated inflammation. 316 , 317 , 318 Moreover, Alzheimer's disease patients displayed a loss of microbial diversity and altered composition of the gut microbiome compared with age‐ and sex‐matched controls. 319 , 320 Specifically, loss of Firmicutes and Bifidobacterium and colonization by Bacteroidetes, were observed in the microbiome of Alzheimer's disease individuals, shifting the gut microbiome toward a pro‐inflammatory state. 319
3.4.2. Parkinson's disease
Parkinson's disease (PD) represents the second most common neurodegenerative disorder in the elderly after Alzheimer's disease. It is characterized by progressive motor symptoms (bradykinesia, rest tremor, and rigidity) and non‐motor manifestations (cognitive decline, depression, dysphagia, and constipation). 321 , 322 It is currently the fastest growing neurological disorder and disability among the elderly. A study of the prevalence of PD in 204 countries reported a 156% increase since 1990, reaching an estimated 8511.02 × 103 patients in 2019. 323 These concerning numbers may be associated with smoking trends or other harmful lifestyle and environmental factors originating from the second half of the 20th century. 313
In recent decades, there has been growing evidence that PD is also a gastrointestinal disorder. 324 A compromised intestinal epithelial barrier, intestinal inflammation, and gut dysbiosis could represent early events in the pathogenesis of PD. 320 Forsyth et al. demonstrated an increased intestinal permeability in PD subjects with a strong positive correlation to intestinal mucosal staining for Escherichia coli bacteria, nitrotyrosine, and alpha‐synuclein, as well as elevated levels of serum LPS‐binding protein (a marker of endotoxin exposure). 325 Furthermore, an aberrant subcellular distribution and reduced expression of occludin and ZO‐1, were observed in colon biopsies from PD patients. 326 , 327 An impaired intestinal barrier facilitates the spread of bacteria across the TJs into circulation. Numerous clinical findings and animal models showed that the composition of the gut microbiota is altered in PD and that the content of SCFAs in the stool is reduced. 320
3.4.3. Autism spectrum disorders
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by deficits in social interaction, repetitive behaviors, and sensory sensitivity. 328 In most cases, ASD begins in infancy, no later than the first 3 years of life, and often continues into adolescence and adulthood. 328 A dramatic increase in the prevalence of ASD has been observed worldwide over the past few decades. 312 The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders among children aged 0–17 years in Sweden showed an increase from 4.20/1000 in 2001 to 14.40/1000 in 2011. 329 Several environmental factors, including air pollution, pesticide exposure, infections, inflammation, and use of antibiotics during pregnancy, have been shown to be associated with an increased risk for children with ASD. 330 , 331 , 332
Although the pathogenesis of ASD is still poorly understood, several studies support the involvement of an inflammatory response. 333 , 334 , 335 A compromised gut barrier allows the entry of pathogenic antigens into the bloodstream that pass the blood–brain barrier and may contribute to the development of ASD. Clinical studies have shown increased intestinal permeability and decreased mRNA expression of barrier‐forming TJ components (CLDN‐1, OCLN, and TRIC) in ASD patients compared with healthy controls. 336 , 337 , 338 Disruption of barrier function may facilitate the transfer of microbiota and their metabolites from the gut to circulation, leading to microbial dysbiosis. Accumulating evidence suggests an aberrant gut microbiome in children with ASD correlating with disease severity. 339
3.4.4. Chronic depression and stress‐related psychiatric disorders
Chronic depression and stress‐related psychiatric disorders are regarded as civilization diseases because of their wide range and frequency, especially in highly developed countries. The annual prevalence of chronic depression in the United States increased from 6.6% in 2005 to 7.3% in 2015. 340 Depression prevalence in South Korea increased from 2.8% in 2002 to 5.3% in 2013. 341
The immune system plays an important role in the development of depression, and especially in periods of excessively activated stress reactions, negatively affects the tightness of the intestinal barrier and the intestinal microbiota. 342 A recent study also showed that chronic stress disrupts intestinal barrier homeostasis by decreasing expression of jejunum tight junctions, increasing serum lipopolysaccharide‐binding protein, and altering microbial populations in conjunction with the manifestations of depressive‐like behaviors in a sex‐dependent manner in mice. 343 Bacterial translocation following microbial dysbiosis is commonly observed in patients suffering from chronic depression and stress‐related psychiatric disorders. 344 , 345
3.4.5. Ischemic stroke
Ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke, accounting for ~80% of stroke cases. 346 It occurs when blood flow is blocked in cerebral vessels or major arteries leading to the brain. 347 Although the risk of stroke rises with age, it can occur at any age. Notably, there has been a sharp rise in ischemic stroke among young adults in recent decades. In the early 2000s, ischemic stroke incidence was on the rise in young adults in affluent countries, including Europe, as well as in developing countries. 348 The incidence of ischemic stroke among young adults (<50 years) in the Netherlands increased by 42% from 7.6 in 2000 to 10.8 per 100,000 person‐years in 2010. 349 The increase in ischemic stroke among young people is believed to be driven by the same lifestyle factors that cause stroke in the elderly, such as high blood pressure, obesity, diabetes, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and smoking. 350
Mounting evidence in recent years suggests that the pathophysiological process of ischemic stroke is strongly associated with the gut–brain axis, comprising intestinal barriers, intestinal microbiota, flora metabolites, and the central nervous system. 351 Clinical data revealed that individuals with ischemic stroke had a relative loss in beneficial commensal bacteria such Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, and Prevotella and a relative increase in opportunistic pathogenic bacteria, including Desulfovibrio, Enterobacter, Megasphaera, and Oscillibacter when compared to healthy controls. 352 Pathogenic bacteria can disrupt the intestinal barrier after a disturbance of the intestinal flora induced by ischemic stroke. Animal studies also demonstrated an enhanced intestinal permeability, damage to the intestinal barrier integrity, and a translocation of gut microbiota following an ischemic stroke in both young and aged mice. 353 The intestinal barrier may play an intermediate role in the relationship between intestinal flora disturbance, intestinal inflammation, intestinal neurological dysfunction, and ischemic stroke.
3.4.6. Migraine
A migraine is a frequent, complex, recurring neurogenic inflammatory disorder characterized by throbbing headaches, with certain associated characteristics such as photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea. 354 The prevalence of migraine has been increasing globally over the years, with studies reporting an increase among adults in the United States from 25.8 per 1000 persons in 1980 to 41.0 per 1000 persons in 1989, 355 and among children in southwestern Finland from 1.9% in 1974 to 5.7% in 1992. 356
A growing number of gastrointestinal disorders were demonstrated to be closely related to migraines. 357 A cohort study reported that more than half of the patients with migraine also suffer from IBS, 358 and patients with IBD are 2.7 times more likely to experience migraines than healthy controls. 359 Possible mechanisms underlying migraine and gastrointestinal disorders may be enhanced intestinal permeability and inflammation. Similar to individuals with gastrointestinal disorders, migraine patients showed an impaired intestinal barrier function and elevated levels of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF‐α and IL‐1β. 360 , 361 The notion that both increased intestinal permeability and inflammation produced by irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease are associated with gut microbes suggests an important role for intestinal bacteria in migraines. Indeed, the migraine group revealed a significant loss of alpha diversity in the gut microbiome compared with the healthy controls, possibly due to the depletion of certain highly abundant beneficial bacteria active in energy metabolism and SCFAs synthesis. 362 Therefore, further research is warranted to unravel the pathogenesis of migraines in the context of the gut–brain axis.
3.5. Autoimmune, autoinflammatory, and metabolic diseases
Intestinal epithelial barrier defects and microbial dysbiosis have been demonstrated in autoimmune, autoinflammatory, and metabolic diseases such as autoimmune thyroid disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, ankylosing spondylitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, autoimmune hepatitis, Behçet's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, diabetes, obesity, and metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (Table 5).
TABLE 5.
Autoimmune, autoinflammatory, and metabolic diseases in the context of the epithelial barrier theory.
| Autoimmune, autoinflammatory, and metabolic diseases | Epidemiological evidence | Evidence for epithelial barrier disruption, microbial dysbiosis, and microinflammation |
|---|---|---|
| Graves' disease | The incidence in Sweden increased from 17.7 cases/100,000/year in 1970–1974 to 22.3 cases/100,000/year in 1988–1990 368 ; in Denmark, 14.8 cases/100,000/year in 1987–1988 to 31.2 cases/100,000/year in 1997–2000 368 ; in Austria, 12.2 cases/100,000/year in 1987 to a peak of 27.0 cases/100,000/year in 1993. 368 | Patients with Graves' disease showed bacterial translocation and a disrupted intestinal barrier characterized by elevated levels of zonulin. 371 |
| Hashimoto's thyroiditis | The incidence of Hashimoto's thyroiditis in Slovenia increased from 73.2 cases/100,000/year in 1999 to 166.4 cases/100,000/year in 2009. 369 | Patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis demonstrated morphological changes in gut epithelial cells, increased colonic intraepithelial lymphocytes, and an altered gut microbial profile. 372 , 559 , 560 |
| Systemic lupus erythematosus | Age‐ and sex‐adjusted incidence rates of systemic lupus erythematosus in Northwestern Spain increased from 1.9 per 100,000 in 1987–1991 to 5.7 per 100,000 in 1997–2001. 561 | Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus display distinct patterns of gut dysbiosis, impaired gut barrier integrity, and immune responses. 562 , 563 |
| Ankylosing spondylitis | Annual prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis in Northern Norway rose from 0.043% in 1970 to 0.26% in 1990. 564 | Ileal biopsies from patients with ankylosing spondylitis displayed increased zonulin expression and intestinal inflammation. Adherent and pathogenic bacteria were present in the ileum of patients, which were associated with an impaired epithelial barrier. 565 |
| Granulomatosis with polyangiitis | The annual incidence rate of granulomatosis with polyangiitis in Italy increased from 1.7/million/year during 1995–1999 to 3.4 during 2005–2009, and the point prevalence increased from 17.8 per million in 1999 to 34.3 per million in 2009. 566 | Nasal samples from individuals with granulomatosis with polyangiitis showed upregulation of genes associated with epithelial structural proteins including keratin and small proline‐rich proteins, 567 as well as a markedly different microbial composition and lower relative abundance of Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis when compared with controls. 568 |
| Autoimmune hepatitis | Age‐ and sex‐standardized incidence rates of autoimmune hepatitis in Denmark indicated a 1.7‐fold increase, from 1.37 in 1994 to 2.33 in 2012. 569 The prevalence of autoimmune hepatitis in Japan tripled over a 12‐year period, from 8.7% in 2004 to 23.9% in 2016. 570 | Increased intestinal permeability, decreased expression of ZO‐1 and occludin, derangement of the gut flora and bacterial translocation were observed in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and these changes were correlated with the severity of the disease. 571 |
| Behçet's syndrome | The prevalence of Behçet's syndrome in Japan increased from 6.3–8.5 per 100,000 population in 1972 to 13.5 per 100,000 population in 1991. 572 In Berlin‐West, Germany, the prevalence increased from 0.65 in 1984 to 2.26 patients per 100,000 inhabitants in 1994. 572 | Patients with Behçet's syndrome demonstrated significantly higher intestinal permeation and compositional changes of gut microbes compared with the healthy controls. 573 , 574 , 575 |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | The prevalence of age‐ and sex‐standardized rheumatoid arthritis in Ontario, Canada, increased steadily from 0.49% in 1996 to 0.9% in 2010, while its incidence ranged from 62 to 54 per 100,000 population during 1996–2010. 576 | Increased intestinal permeability, elevated zonulin levels, intestinal inflammation, and intestinal microbial changes were observed in rheumatoid arthritis patients or mice, which were correlated with the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. 577 |
| Osteoarthritis | Knee osteoarthritis prevalence in the postindustrial sample from the United States was 16%, which was 2.6 times higher than in the early industrial sample (6%) and 2 times higher than in the prehistoric sample (8%). 378 The prevalence of hip osteoarthritis rose from 4.0% in the 1970s to 8.6% in the 2000s. 379 | Studies in humans correlated an increased intestinal permeability to the development of osteoarthritis. 578 Patients with osteoarthritis showed significant alterations in the gut microbial composition and function compared with healthy controls. 579 |
| IgA Nephropathy | Increasing prevalence has been shown especially in industrialized regions | The pathophysiology was strongly associated to a disturbance in the gut, particularly the small intestine, where IgA‐misfolding to galactose‐deficient IgA1 (Gd‐IgA1) is taking place (Hit 1). 388 Autoimmunity with recognition of misfolded IgA (Gd‐IgA1) by circulating IgG or IgA leads to the phenotype in the glomerulum with the formation of immune complexes as well as the activation of the complement system (Hit 2). 389 , 390 |
| Diabetes | Self‐reported prevalence of diabetes in Portugal increased between 1987 and 2009 in middle‐aged and older adults, more than doubling in women and tripling in men. 580 | Patients with type 1 diabetes showed increased intestinal permeability, changes in the expression levels of tight junctions, and intestinal inflammation. 581 , 582 , 583 Children with type 1 diabetes showed gut microbial dysbiosis with lower abundance of SCFA‐producing bacteria, which was associated with increased intestinal permeability. 584 Gut microbial dysbiosis, breaching of intestinal barriers and immune‐related low‐grade inflammation were demonstrated to be directly or indirectly related to insulin resistance in T2D. 585 |
| Obesity | The prevalence of obesity in the United States has risen dramatically since the 1960s, 586 increasing from 15% to 34% in adults and from 5% to 17% in children and adolescents from 1976–1980 to 2007–2008. 586 , 587 , 588 | Intestinal mucosal biopsies from patients and animal models with obesity exhibited increased intestinal permeability, altered expression of tight junction proteins (ZO‐1), and inflammation. 589 , 590 Evidence from obese patients showed perturbation of the intestinal microbiota with phylum‐level changes and mitigated bacterial diversity, 591 , 592 which was associated with a leaky intestinal barrier and inflammation in obesity. 593 |
| Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease | The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) among US adolescents increased from 3.9% in 1988–1994 to 10.7% in 2007–2010. 594 MASLD incidence in a US community increased fivefold, from 62 to 329 in 100,000 person‐years. 595 | Patients with MASLD revealed increased intestinal permeability and decreased ZO‐1 expression, indicating the disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier. 596 Accumulating evidence showed changes in the intestinal microbiota of patients with MASLD. 597 |
| Cirrhosis | Cirrhosis prevalence nearly doubled from 2001–2013 in US veterans (664 to 1058 per 100,000 enrollees). 396 The age‐standardized incidence in Canada rose from 70.6 per 100,000 person‐years in 1997 to 89.6 per 100,000 person‐years in 2016 and the prevalence increased from 0.42% in 1997 to 0.84% in 2016. 397 | Decreased transepithelial resistance, increased duodenal permeability and increased claudin‐2 were detected in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. 398 Distinct fecal microbial communities were found in patients with cirrhosis compared with healthy individuals. 598 |
3.5.1. Autoimmune thyroid disease
Autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) is an organ‐specific autoimmune condition that consists of two primary clinical entities: Graves' disease (GD) and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT). Both are pathologically characterized by lymphocytic infiltration of the thyroid and clinically by a dysfunction of the thyroid (hyperthyroidism in GD and hypothyroidism in HT). 363 AIDT is not only caused by genetic susceptibility, but also associated with environmental risk factors (e.g., cigarette smoking, excess iodine intake, infections, and stress). 363 , 364 GD was associated with smoking, 365 and showed an increased incidence in Sweden from 17.7 cases/100,000/year in 1970–1974 to 22.3 cases/100,000/year in 1988–1990. 366 , 367 A similar trend was reported in Denmark, where the incidence of GD increased from 14.8 cases/100,000/year in 1987–1988 to 31.2 cases/100,000/year in 1997–2000. 368 In Slovenia, after the introduction of iodized salt in 1999, the incidence of HT sharply increased from 73.2 cases/100,000/year in 1999 to 166.4 cases/100,000/year in 2009. 369
According to the gut–thyroid axis hypothesis, epithelial leakage due to microbial dysbiosis may facilitate the passage of antigens and trigger a pro‐inflammatory immune response, further aggravating thyroid dysfunction and the risk of developing autoimmune thyroid disease. In turn, thyroid hormone imbalance may aggravate intestinal barrier disruption, inducing bacterial translocation. 370 Multiple studies have observed increased intestinal permeability and alterations of the gut microbiota in patients with GD or HT. 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 Although GD and HT patients share some gut microbiome profile features at family and genus levels, they also differ in terms of abundance and their respective core microbiomes which are closely related to the onset of the disease. 375
3.5.2. Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, a leading cause of chronic pain and disability in affluent countries, is recognized as a degenerative joint disease involving multiple risk factors, such as genetic predisposition, age, prior joint injury, obesity, and a sedentary lifestyle. 376 Although osteoarthritis can affect every joint in the body, knee osteoarthritis is the most common, followed by hip osteoarthritis, 377 both of which have been increasing in prevalence over the past decades. Long‐term historical statistics show that knee osteoarthritis has more than doubled in prevalence since the mid‐20th century. 378 In the United States, the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis was reported to be 16% in the postindustrial era (late 1900s to early 2000s), albeit only 6% in the early industrial era (1800s to early 1900s). 378 Similarly, the prevalence of hip osteoarthritis doubled from 4.0% in the 1970s to 8.6% in the 2000s. 379 These epidemiological findings were mainly attributed to the increasing life expectancy and risk factors that contribute to osteoarthritis, especially obesity and a sedentary lifestyle. 376
Recent findings from studies in humans and animals indicate that gut microbial dysbiosis via the gut–joint axis is an emerging pathogenic factor for osteoarthritis. 380 Its mechanism of action in osteoarthritis is quite complex, with both direct and indirect effects. On the one hand, gut microbes produce pro‐inflammatory metabolites such as LPS which enhance intestinal permeability, and further circulate throughout the body to induce chronic low‐grade intestinal inflammation. 381 A positive association was found between osteoarthritis and gut microbiota‐producing LPS. 382 On the other hand, numerous risk factors for osteoarthritis, such as obesity and metabolic syndromes, disturb the intestinal microbiota, leading to dysfunction of the intestinal barrier and immune system, promoting the onset of osteoarthritis. 383 , 384 Transplantation with fecal microbiota from patients with metabolic syndrome to germ‐free mice increased gut permeability (reflected by decreased mRNA levels of ZO‐1 and occludin, elevated plasma LPS level, and gut barrier visualized by fluorescence in situ hybridization), endotoxemia, systemic low‐grade inflammation, and exacerbated the severity of injury‐induced osteoarthritis. 385
3.5.3. IgA Nephropathy
IgA nephropathy is the most common cause of glomerulonephritis across the globe, with a heterogenous distribution, more prevalent in Asia and less in Africa. 386 Even though the overall incidence may vary due to different diagnostic definitions across the world, an underdiagnosing and generally increasing prevalence was reported, especially in affluent countries. 387 Its pathophysiology seems to be strongly associated with a disturbance in the gut, particularly the small intestine, where IgA‐misfolding to galactose‐deficient IgA1 (Gd‐IgA1) is taking place, namely the hit 1. 388 Autoimmunity with recognition of misfolded IgA (Gd‐IgA1) by circulating IgG or IgA (hit 2) leads to the formation of immune complexes (hit 3), activation of the complement system and deposition in the glomerulus with the disease phenotype (hit 4). 389 , 390 Associations between forms of IgA nephropathy and gastrointestinal diseases with epithelial barrier defects are well‐reported, such as liver cirrhosis, coeliac disease, and inflammatory bowel disease. 391 , 392 Furthermore, the role of circulating cytokines is a hot topic in current studies on the disease. The innate immune activation via Toll‐like receptor 9 (TLR9) is associated with Gd‐IgA1 production. A B‐cell proliferation‐inducing ligand (APRIL) and IL‐6 also enhance Gd‐IgA1 synthesis in IgA nephropathy. 393 Recently, a potential role for the gut microbiota was shown where gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to IgA1 deglycosylation and the generation of auto‐antigens in patients with IgA nephropathy.
3.5.4. Liver Cirrhosis
Cirrhosis develops after prolonged inflammation that leads to the healthy liver parenchyma being replaced by fibrotic tissue and regenerative nodules, which results in portal hypertension and end‐stage liver disease. 394 Globally, cirrhosis currently causes 1.16 million deaths annually, making it the 11th leading cause of mortality. 395 Cirrhosis poses a heavy health burden on many countries and shows increased prevalence and incidence over the past two decades due to obesity, high alcohol consumption, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and hepatitis B or C infection. 394 The prevalence of cirrhosis among US veterans increased from 664 per 100,000 individuals in 2001 to 1058 per 100,000 individuals in 2013, as did the incidence (from 159 to 193 per 100,000 patient‐years). 396 Similar trends in the prevalence and incidence of cirrhosis have been observed in Canada, where the age‐standardized prevalence doubled from 0.42% in 1997 to 0.84% in 2016 and the incidence increased from 70.6 to 89.6 per 100,000 person‐years. 397
Several studies have observed decreased transepithelial resistance, increased duodenal permeability, and altered TJs in patients with cirrhosis, implying an impairment of intestinal epithelial barrier function. 398 , 399 , 400 Barrier dysfunction in cirrhosis may involve various factors and mechanisms. Multiple contributing factors such as obesity and alcohol consumption may influence the barrier dysfunction directly and indirectly, which can lead to chronic liver disease and eventually cirrhosis. 401 , 402 On the contrary, cirrhosis‐related features such as portal hypertension, altered intestinal microbiota, inflammation, and oxidative stress can compromise the barrier function in both the small and large intestines. 403 , 404
3.6. Ocular diseases
The ocular surface is directly exposed to the external environment and is protected by two barrier layers: One is a transcellular barrier at the foremost apical cell membrane, also known as the epithelial glycocalyx, and the other layer is a paracellular barrier that includes the layered structures of the corneal and conjunctival epithelia. 66 In addition to acting as a physical barrier against the external environment, the ocular surface epithelium plays a crucial role as the innate immune system's first line of defense. 405 Dysfunction of this barrier may lead to ocular surface inflammation and the onset of ocular diseases (Table 6), such as ocular allergy, age‐related macular degeneration, dry eye disease, glaucoma, and uveitis.
TABLE 6.
Ocular diseases and the epithelial barrier theory.
| Ocular disease | Epidemiological evidence | Evidence for epithelial barrier disruption, microbial dysbiosis, and microinflammation |
|---|---|---|
| Ocular allergy/allergic conjunctivitis | The prevalence of oculonasal symptoms in the United States increased 3.3‐fold from 9.0% in 1976–1980 to 29.9% in 1988–1994. 410 A similar trend was observed in Japan, where the lifetime prevalence of OA increased from 24.5% in 1996 to 30.0% in 2006. 409 | Eye specimens from patients with keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) showed ocular surface inflammation and alterations of the ocular surface epithelial MUC 1, 2, 4, and 16. 599 Specimens from seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) patients showed increased expression of conjunctival epithelial PAR‐2, which was positively correlated with epithelial permeability. 600 Chronic vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) patients showed significant alterations in the distribution of goblet cells, increased expression of genes encoding pro‐inflammatory cytokines, and altered conjunctival microbiota composition. 601 , 602 |
| Age‐related macular degeneration | A meta‐analysis of incidence studies showed that since the 1960s, there were 3.5 per 1000 aged 50 years and older, equivalent to 293,000 new cases in white Americans per year, and the incidence rates approximately quadrupled per decade in age. 603 | The pathogenesis was strongly associated with chronic oxidative stress and inflammation that ultimately leads to protein damage, aggregation, and degeneration of retinal pigment epithelium. 604 Studies also showed that an intestinal dysbiosis occurs in advanced age‐related macular degeneration. 605 |
| Dry eye | From the epidemiological report, the annual prevalence of dry eye tripled over the 7 years from 2005 to 2012 in the United States. 416 | Mice with dry eye‐like ocular surface damages showed squamous metaplasia in the ocular surface and epithelial barrier dysfunction. 421 , 606 In addition, experimental dry eye stimulated production of inflammatory cytokines and MMP‐9. 421 Samples from the inferior fornix of the conjunctiva of dry eye patients displayed decreased microbial diversity. 425 , 426 |
| Glaucoma | The prevalence of glaucoma in Denmark increased from 0.79% in 1996 to 1.72% in 2011; the incidence of glaucoma increased from 0.137% in 1996 to 0.155% in 2011. 607 | Patients with glaucoma exhibited epithelial barrier defects as observed by fluorescein staining. 608 The eyelid and buccal microbiomes in patients with uveitic glaucoma showed lower alpha diversity and higher beta diversity than those in controls, as well as depletion of Lactococcus. 609 |
| Uveitis | An annual incidence of uveitis in the United States was estimated to be around 17.4 per 100,000 population in the 1960s, and it has increased to be 52.4 per 100,000 in 1998–1999. 610 , 611 | A murine model of uveitis showed disrupted tight junctions and infiltrating T cells detected in retinal pigment epithelial flat mounts. 612 Moreover, uveitis patients showed a significant decrease in the gut fungal richness and diversity compared with healthy controls. 613 |
3.6.1. Ocular allergy
Ocular allergy (OA), also named as allergic conjunctivitis, refers to a series of hypersensitivity disorders of the ocular surface (eyelid, conjunctiva, and cornea), and includes acute diseases such as seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis and chronic diseases such as vernal, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, and contact blepharoconjunctivitis. 406 It is pathologically characterized by the mucosal infiltration of eosinophils, neutrophils, basophils, and T lymphocytes, and manifested by the redness, swelling, and itching triad. 407 , 408 The prevalence of OA has been rising globally over the past few decades and was demonstrated to be associated with exposure to air pollutants. 409 The prevalence of oculonasal symptoms in the United States increased 3.3‐fold from 9.0% in 1976–1980 to 29.9% in 1988–1994. 410 A similar trend was observed in Japan, where the lifetime prevalence of OA increased from 24.5% in 1996 to 30.0% in 2006. 409 Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between the level of airborne particulate matter (PM2.5) and the prevalence of OA. 411
Several studies demonstrated a pivotal role of ocular surface epithelial barrier dysfunction in the pathology of OA. Epithelial barrier integrity is primarily maintained by AJ proteins (i.e., E‐cadherin, CD44, and keratins) and TJ proteins (i.e., occludin, claudin, and ZO‐1), and changes in their expression and function lead to barrier dysfunction. 66 Conjunctival biopsy samples from “out of season” seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis patients showed downregulated expression of E‐cadherin, CD44 and keratin‐14 as compared to healthy controls. 412 Similarly, ameliorated expression of ZO‐1 and E‐cadherin was observed in a murine model of OA. 413 Using a mouse model of OA, a recent study proposed that the IL‐33/ST2/IL‐9/IL‐9R signaling cascade disrupts ocular surface barrier integrity, potentially exacerbating allergic inflammation. 67
3.6.2. Dry eye disease
Dry eye disease (DED) is defined as a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by a loss of tear film homeostasis and accompanied by ocular symptoms, with tear film instability and hyperosmolarity, ocular surface inflammation and damage, and neurosensory abnormalities play etiological roles. 414 With an increasing trend, its global prevalence varies from 4.6% to 47.6%. 415 An epidemiological report showed that the annual prevalence of DED in the United States tripled in the course of 7 years from 2005 to 2012. 416 Epidemiological studies have identified some risk factors for the development of DED, such as aging, hormonal changes, autoimmune diseases, low humidity, use of contact lenses, alcohol consumption, pollution, computer use, and certain preservatives in topical drugs, 417 may have contributed to the increased prevalence observed for DED.
Evidence indicates that DED is a mucosal autoimmune disease 418 manifested by a compromised epithelial barrier 66 , 419 and increased levels of inflammatory cytokines on the ocular surface, 420 , 421 which has been shown to be associated with TLRs expressed by epithelial and immune cells in the eye and activated by LPS. 422 Epithelial barrier disruption during DED induces greater exposure of LPS to TLR4+ cells, which contributes to production of IL‐1β and TNF‐α. 422 Notably, IL‐1β has been shown to disrupt the corneal epithelial barrier through upregulation of MMP‐9. 423 , 424 This, in turn, may lead to higher exposure to TLR4 initiating a vicious cycle of inflammation that disrupts ocular surface homeostasis. A range of studies have found altered ocular surface microbiota diversity and composition in DED patients compared with healthy controls, 425 , 426 , 427 implying a critical role of the ocular surface microbiota in DED pathogenesis.
3.7. Other diseases
3.7.1. End‐stage renal disease (ESRD)
End‐stage renal disease (ESRD) is characterized by a progressive, irreversible loss of kidney function, which is severe enough to cause death without dialysis or kidney transplant. 428 The steadily increasing number of ESRD patients is recognized as a global public health issue. A report showed that an increase in the incidence of ESRD in children under the age of 18 years in Australia and New Zealand began in the 1960s and that the incidence increased continued until the early 1980s. 429 In a study of a California cohort from 1973 to 2000, ninety percent of documented cases of treated ESRD occurred after 1983, and 80% after 1987 (Table 7). 430 The increased incidence observed for ESRD may be attributed to its independent risk factors, including overweight and obesity, 431 cigarette smoking, 432 higher serum uric acid level, 433 and a family history of kidney disease. 433
TABLE 7.
Other diseases in the context of the epithelial barrier theory.
| Other diseases | Epidemiologic evidence | Evidence for epithelial barrier disruption, microbial dysbiosis, and microinflammation |
|---|---|---|
| End‐stage renal disease |
An increase in the incidence of end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) in children under the age of 18 years in Australia and New Zealand began in the 1960s, and the incidence increased continuously until the early 1980s. 429 In a California cohort study from 1973 to 2000, ninety percent of the documented cases of treated ESRD occurred after 1983, and 80% of the cases occurred after 1987. 430 |
Addition of uremic pre‐dialysis plasma from ESRD patients to cultured human enterocytes damaged the barrier function and tight junction protein constituents of the intestinal epithelium. 434 Further studies revealed significant changes in the composition and function of gut microbiota in patients and animals with ESRD. 436 |
| Heart failure | Cross‐sectional studies have shown increases in the point prevalence of heart failure in the United States and Europe since the 1970s. 614 , 615 | Heart failure patients showed the structural disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier, a significantly decreased diversity of the intestinal microbiome and depletion of core intestinal microbiota. 616 , 617 , 618 , 619 |
| Myocarditis | Data from Italy showed that the prevalence of myocarditis rose from 0.4% in 1975–1984 to 1.2% in 1985–1994. 620 The death certificate‐based incidence of fatal myocarditis collected from the database of Statistics Finland showed an increase from 0.32/100,000 person‐years in 1985–1989 to 0.62/100,000 in 1990–1994. 621 | Mice with experimental autoimmune myocarditis showed elevated serum levels of the epithelial gut damage markers and pro‐inflammatory mediators as well as a lower bacterial diversity in gut microbiota composition. 622 |
| Osteoporosis | The estimated annual prevalence of osteoporosis in Malmö, Sweden, increased from 1061 per 10,000 women aged 50 years or above in 1970 to 1698 per 10,000 women aged 50 years or above in 1999. 438 | Female SD rats of old age with transplanted fecal microbiota from senile osteoporotic rats exhibited gut microbiota dysbiosis, impaired intestinal barrier, and osteoporosis. 446 |
| Anemia | The prevalence of anemia (4.0% to 7.1%) and moderate–severe anemia (1.0% to 1.9%) in the general US population nearly doubled from 2003–2004 to 2011–2012. 623 | Anemic mouse pups displayed increased intestinal permeability, reduced tight junction protein ZO‐1 expression, and increased macrophage pro‐inflammatory cytokine levels. 624 , 625 Studies on patients with iron deficiency anemia, gestational anemia, or aplastic anemia showed a close correlation between dysbiosis of gut microbiota and anemia. 626 , 627 , 628 |
| Hemolytic uremic syndrome |
The annual incidence of hemolytic uremic syndrome in Minnesota, United States, showed an increase from 0.5 cases per 100,000 child years among children less than 18 in 1979 to 2.0 cases per 100,000 in 1988. 629 The annual incidence in Washington, United States, rose from 0.69 cases per 100,000 children under age 15 years between 1971 and 1975 to 1.77 cases between 1976 and 1980 and 1.74 cases between 1981 and 1986. 630 |
The classic post‐diarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome begins when bacteria dying from host immunity and other causes release Stx into the intestinal lumen and initiate intestinal damage. Patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome have elevated circulating inflammatory cytokines (IL‐8, IL‐1β, TNF‐α). 631 |
| Sepsis syndrome | The incidence of sepsis in the United States increased annually between 1979 and 2000, from approximately 82.7 cases per 100,000 people to nearly 240.4 cases per 100,000 people. 632 | Individuals with sepsis frequently manifest damaged epithelia in numerous organs, such as alterations in vectorial ion transport, impaired barrier function, and increased cell‐to‐cell, paracrine, and endocrine communication. 633 The composition and function of the intestinal microbiota were significantly disturbed in patients with sepsis as shown by 16S rDNA sequencing, metabolomics, and metaproteomic analysis, and such enteric dysbiosis induced more organ inflammation and injury during sepsis. 634 |
| Severe COVID‐19 | The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) outbreak originated in Wuhan, China, 447 , 449 and its rapid spread worldwide caused COVID‐19 disease to reach a pandemic status on March 11, 2020. 450 As of July 5, 2023, there have been over 767 million confirmed cases of COVID‐19 worldwide as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO). 451 | Patients with severe COVID‐19 infection displayed intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction, altered upper respiratory and gut microbiota composition, and immune dysfunction. 454 , 455 , 635 , 636 , 637 Biomarkers of epithelial barrier defects at the time of hospital admission were proposed as predictors of a severe disease course. 454 |
| Cardiovascular diseases | The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is rising globally, making it the primary cause of death in both developing and affluent countries. CVD is responsible for the death of 17.9 million people worldwide in 2016, accounting for 31% of all global deaths. Moreover, the prevalence of CVD increased from 257 million in 1990 to 550 million in 2019. 638 |
Animal and human studies show differences in gut microbial composition between hypertensive individuals and controls, with a loss of diversity and higher levels of Gram‐negative bacteria, which were correlated with elevated blood pressure. 467 In hypertensive mice, an increased gut permeability allows lipopolysaccharides (LPS) found in the outer membrane of Gram‐negative bacteria to trigger systemic inflammation via Toll‐like receptor 4. The pro‐inflammatory effects of systemic LPS were demonstrated in endothelial subpopulations. 470 Chronic heart failure (HF) patients exhibit a loss of gut microbiota diversity that correlates with HF severity and ameliorated levels of beneficial bacteria. 473 , 474 |
| Polycystic ovary syndrome | The worldwide prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) varies between 8 and 13%. There is mounting evidence that the condition has become more common over the past few decades. 481 , 482 , 485 | PCOS patients have exhibited gut dysbiosis compared with healthy controls, characterized by a reduction in short‐chain fatty acid‐producing and bile acid‐metabolizing bacteria, suggesting a shift toward a pro‐inflammatory environment. 498 A low fiber, high fat, and high sugar diet, along with obesity, can cause gut dysbiosis, leading to impaired intestinal permeability and a leaky gut. This, in turn, contributes to metabolic endotoxemia, chronic inflammation, and hyperinsulinemia in individuals susceptible to PCOS. 490 , 502 |
The disruption associated with uremia is crucial for the progression of ESRD. Exposure of human colonic epithelial cells to uremic plasma from ESRD patients induced a significant decrease in transepithelial electrical resistance along with a marked reduction in TJ protein expression, such as claudin‐1 (85%), ZO1 (70%), and occludin (15%), 434 suggesting an impaired intestinal epithelial barrier structure and function in ESRD patients. The influx of endotoxins and other harmful luminal products into the internal environment through damaged TJs can lead to systemic inflammation. Clinical evidence demonstrated that in the ESRD population, the severity of systemic inflammation as measured by C‐reactive protein levels correlated with plasma endotoxin levels. 435 In addition, impairment of the intestinal epithelial barrier integrity can induce intestinal bacterial translocation, leading to intestinal microbial dysbiosis. Studies suggest significant changes in the composition and function of gut microbiota in patients with ESRD and animal models. 436 Overall, uremia‐induced intestinal barrier dysfunction in ESRD triggered intestinal microbial dysbiosis, resulting in chronic inflammation.
3.7.2. Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis is a form of bone metabolic disease with manifestations of low bone mass and deterioration of skeletal microarchitecture leading to bone fragility and fracture risk. 437 Osteoporosis is a global health concern as its prevalence has been increasing over the past decades, especially in postmenopausal women. The estimated annual prevalence of osteoporosis in Malmö (Sweden) increased from 1061 per 10,000 women aged 50 years or above in 1970 to 1698 per 10,000 women aged 50 years or above in 1999 (Table 7). 438 Aging, ameliorated estrogen levels, persistent calcium loss, and smoking are all significant independent risk factors for postmenopausal osteoporosis. 439 , 440
Bone homeostasis depends on the balance between osteoblast‐mediated bone formation and osteoclast‐mediated bone resorption. 441 Osteoporosis is caused by an imbalance in bone homeostasis associated with gut microbiota via multiple potential mechanisms. 442 Osteoclast activity can be inhibited by short‐chain fatty acids or bacterial components such as exopolysaccharides in a TLR‐2‐dependent mechanism. 443 , 444 In addition, the association between gut microbiota and bone homeostasis is partially regulated by immune cells. An imbalance in gut microbiota, on the one hand, induces the differentiation of Th17 cells, which belong to the CD4+ T‐cell osteoclast population; on the other hand, it inhibits the differentiation of Th1 and Th2 cells as well as Tregs, which induces the differentiation and proliferation of osteoclasts, exacerbating bone loss. 445 Young female SD rats with transplanted fecal microbiota from senile osteoporotic rats exhibited gut microbiota dysbiosis, impaired intestinal structure, reduced expression of occludin, claudin, and ZO‐1, and osteoporosis. 446 Thus, gut microbial dysbiosis induces the impairment of the intestinal barrier and contributes to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis.
3.7.3. Severe COVID‐19
Coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) is a highly infectious respiratory disease caused by the coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) with symptoms including fever, dry cough, respiratory failure, and pneumonia. It can cause other complications such as fatigue, diarrhea, dysgeusia, and anosmia. 447 , 448 The SARS‐CoV‐2 outbreak was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. 447 , 449 Its rapid global transmission led the COVID‐19 disease to reach pandemic status on March 11, 2020. 450 As of 2024, there have been over 800 million confirmed cases of COVID‐19 worldwide according to the World Health Organization. 451
Infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 can directly and/or indirectly induce epithelial barrier disruption. Directly, SARS‐CoV‐2 can infect the airway and gut cells 452 ; indirectly, lung infection can promote systemic inflammation, which may compromise the intestinal barrier, enhancing permeability to intestinal microorganisms and their metabolites and aggravating inflammation. 453 Levels of the zonulin family peptides and bacterial DNA, which are markers of intestinal permeability and microbial translocation, were significantly elevated in COVID‐19 patients compared with healthy controls. 454 Other studies using a multiomics approach showed that severe COVID‐19 was associated with high levels of markers of TJ permeability and microbial translocation. 455 , 456 Moreover, 23 markers of systemic inflammation showed elevated levels in severe COVID‐19 patients compared with mild COVID‐19 patients or healthy controls. 455 Distinct mechanistic modules have been shown to link host and microbiome metabolic processes with fatal outcomes to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and a recent meta‐analysis demonstrated consistent microbiota correlations with COVID‐19 disease severity. 457 , 458 These findings demonstrate that the pathophysiology of severe COVID‐19 fits the epithelial barrier theory.
3.7.4. Long COVID
SARS‐CoV‐2 infection can result in a prolonged multisystem disorder termed long COVID, which may affect up to 10% of people following COVID‐19 disease. 459 It is currently unclear why certain individuals do not fully recover following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Post‐infectious disorders have been previously described, 460 but the current number of cases is unprecedented. Multisystem involvement in individual patients is common, with one study reporting the median number of symptoms reported at any given time to be eight. 461 The most common symptoms reported in this cohort were fatigue, post‐exertional malaise, palpitations, chest pain, stomach upset/nausea, memory problems, muscle pain, and joint pain. The mechanisms underpinning long COVID are thought to include an inappropriate immune response to acute SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, immune cell metabolic reprogramming, a persistent SARS‐CoV‐2 reservoir, an effect of reactivation of other viruses such as Epstein–Barr virus, inflammatory responses impacting the central nervous system, autoimmunity (including effects on the autonomic nervous system), coagulopathy, complement activation, and microbiome dysbiosis. 462 , 463 , 464 , 465 Given the breadth of symptoms described by long COVID patients, it is possible that distinct or a combination of multiple immune and epithelial barrier mechanisms are relevant for specific patient subgroups.
3.7.5. Cardiovascular diseases: hypertension and structural heart disease
Hypertension
Hypertension is a leading chronic cardiovascular disease that results from the interplay between genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and lifestyle choices. In recent years, research has focused on investigating the crucial role of the gut barrier and microbiota in the pathogenesis of hypertension. 466
Animal and human studies show distinct gut microbiota profiles in hypertensive individuals and controls, with aberrant microbial diversity and elevated levels of Gram‐negative bacteria, linked to high blood pressure. Hypertensive individuals also show loss of beneficial bacteria that producing anti‐inflammatory SCFAs. Dietary salt intake was demonstrated to alter gut microbiota composition. In mice models, supplementation with Lactobacillus spp. was found to mitigate salt‐sensitive hypertension, possibly through TH‐17 cell modulation. In humans, probiotics containing Lactobacillus spp., lowered blood pressure in healthy controls. In animal models, the SCFA butyrate was shown to mitigate hypertension through histone deacetylase inhibition, impacting cytokine production. 467 , 468 , 469 In hypertensive mice, an increased gut permeability allows LPS found in the outer membrane of Gram‐negative bacteria to trigger systemic inflammation via TLR‐4. The pro‐inflammatory effects of systemic LPS have been demonstrated in a small group of individuals. 470
Trimethylamine‐N‐oxide (TMAO), a metabolic by‐product of gut microbiota processing animal‐derived L‐carnitine and choline, plays a significant role in cardiovascular diseases. TMAO disrupts lipid metabolism, promotes atherosclerosis by increasing cholesterol accumulation, activates inflammatory pathways, and exacerbates vascular inflammation, contributing to oxidative stress and cytokine release also via activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. Therapeutic options to mitigate TMAO levels for the treatment of hypertension are currently under investigation, such as 3,3‐dimethyl‐1‐butanol (DMB), resveratrol, and enalapril. 471
Structural heart disease
Heart failure (HF) caused by cardiac injuries leading to structural and functional impairment remains a major health concern and is linked to rising morbidity and mortality rates. Emerging evidence suggests that dysfunctional gut barriers and dysbiosis may play important roles in the disease progression of several cardiomyopathies leading to HF. 472
Chronic HF patients exhibited attenuated gut microbial diversity, correlating with HF severity and loss of beneficial bacteria, such as certain Bacteroides and Lactobacillus spp., and an overgrowth of pathogens, such as Shigella, Campylobacter, and Salmonella. In mouse models, TAMO supplementation induced the onset of fibrosis and hypertrophy. In humans, TMAO levels were associated with HF severity and disease outcomes. 473 , 474
The development of autoimmune myocarditis is induced by the gut microbe Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron as it triggers an immune response via an enzyme similar to the myosin heavy chain 6 (MYH6), leading to the proliferation and differentiation of pro‐inflammatory T cells that infiltrate the heart. In certain patients, its abundance is linked to disease severity, suggesting a gut microbiome‐host genotype interplay. 473 Myocarditis mouse models revealed that disease progression to lethal outcomes may involve heart‐specific T cells, imprinted in the gut by a commensal Bacteroides species peptide mimic. Elevated Bacteroides‐specific T‐cell and B‐cell responses in human myocarditis patients suggest that production of myosin‐peptide mimics from commensal bacteria may promote inflammatory cardiomyopathy. 475 The presence of LPS in the bloodstream has also been associated with the development of HF. Studies indicate that LPS may impair myocardial function, exacerbating HF or triggering atrial fibrillation (AF). 476 HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by a preserved left ventricular systolic function and objective evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. In the last decades, the prevalence of HFpEF has been simultaneously increasing with its risk factors, including hypertension, obesity, and diabetes. Recent studies demonstrated the association between circulating levels of the gut microbial metabolite phenylacetylglutamine (PAGIn) with adverse HFpEF outcomes. PAGIn mitigated cardiomyocyte contraction in vitro and elevated the expression of B‐type natriuretic peptide. 477
Furthermore, HFpEF‐mouse models demonstrated attenuated indole‐3‐propionic acid (IPA) levels the benefits of IPA supplementation as it ameliorates diastolic dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Human studies also confirmed diminished IPA levels in HFpEF patients. 478
Atrial fibrillation (AF) plays a significant role in the development and progression of cardiomyopathies. Recent preclinical and observational studies have shown that gut barrier dysfunction with elevated circulating LPS leads to an upregulated atrial inflammation and exacerbates AF susceptibility. 479 In animal models, inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome has been associated with ameliorated AF and atrial fibrosis. 480
Tailored approaches for the management of cardiomyopathies and heart failure have emerged that can potentially reshape the gut microenvironment and control inflammation. These include individual nutrition plans, probiotics, antibiotic therapy, and fecal transplantation. Further research on the skin and gut epithelial barriers is warranted in refining these interventions.
3.7.6. Polycystic ovary syndrome
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine disorder in women of childbearing age which is characterized by polycystic ovaries, androgen excess, and ovulatory dysfunction accompanied by insulin resistance. This syndrome is the leading cause of infertility mostly due to anovulation. 481 , 482 , 483 Although genetic predisposition has been emphasized in PCOS etiology, not more than 10% of cases are linked. 481 , 484 There are still unclear points in the etiology and pathophysiology of PCOS, which appears like PCOS is a multifactorial disease with genetic, epigenetic, and environmental backgrounds. 481 Despite the worldwide prevalence varies between 8% and 13%, there is a growing body of evidence of an increase in the prevalence of PCOS over the past decades. 481 , 482 , 485
While in definition PCOS seems to be related to the ovaries and the reproductive system, remarkably it is associated with many other clinical outcomes including impaired glucose tolerance, type‐2 diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia. Gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, miscarriage, premature labor, intrauterine growth retardation, endometrial hyperplasia, and endometrial cancer, in addition to cardiovascular complications, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, depression, anxiety, negative body image, decreased self‐confidence, and mood disorders are among the comorbidities seen in PCOS patients. 486 , 487 , 488 Reduced physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, altered light exposures, sleep disturbances, increased stress in addition change in diet, and exposure to environmental endocrine disrupter chemical agents are among the proposed causative factors. 489 , 490 , 491 , 492 , 493
There are two main facts related to the adverse metabolic effects in PCOS. Primarily insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia that can be accounted in nearly 70% of cases, and as a consequence majority of them are overweight or obese. 494 Besides, there is a well‐recognized lean body type in PCOS patients due to the selective insulin resistance in the ovaries rather than whole body type insulin resistance. 495 , 496 Secondarily, there is a chronic low‐grade inflammation lead by metabolic endotoxemia.
Several studies have highlighted the role of gut microbiota in regulating insulin synthesis and secretion, and affecting androgen metabolism and follicle development in PCOS. 497 In a recent meta‐analysis, gut dysbiosis has been marked in PCOS patients compared with healthy controls, which is characterized by the reduction in short‐chain fatty acid‐producing and bile acid‐metabolizing bacteria that is suggesting a shift favoring a pro‐inflammatory environment. 498 For example, the alpha diversity of gut microbiota and the relative abundance of Bacteroidaceae in women with PCOS were found high. 499 Mice transplanted with stool from individuals with PCOS displayed several features of the disease including insulin resistance. 500 Nowadays, Western‐type diet can cause a reduction in beneficial bacteria like Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, 489 , 492 , 501 while an increase in pathogenic bacteria such as Gram‐negative ones. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) as a component of these bacteria can disrupt gut permeability, damage the enterocytes, and may cause a strong activation of the innate immune system. 490 , 502 In other words, low fiber/ high fat‐high sugar diet, and obesity cause gut dysbiosis, which leads to impaired intestinal permeability causing a leaky gut making metabolic endotoxemia, chronic inflammation, and hyperinsulinemia in PCOS susceptible individuals. The chronic inflammatory state of PCOS is not limited to the ovaries, but also the changes in the level of relevant inflammatory markers such as C‐reactive protein, interleukin‐6, TNF‐α ensue. 503 , 504 Furthermore, hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenism, which are results of insulin resistance in PCOS patients, make these individuals more prone to obesity that further increase insulin resistance as a vicious circle. Androgen excess itself increases insulin resistance by malfunctioning of islets of Langerhans, thereby compromising the pancreatic functions making this vicious circle more complicated in which hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance stimulating hyperandrogenemia, hyperandrogenemia stimulating insulin resistance as a never‐ending cycle. 505
Recently, research needs to be focused on altered gut microbiota, their products, metabolites, and increased intestinal permeability as a reason for insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism, and chronic low‐grade inflammation in PCOS patients. 506 , 507 , 508
4. CONCLUSION
The epithelial barrier is attracting attention as mounting evidence implicates it in the pathogenesis of many chronic noncommunicable conditions. Diseases associated with an impaired epithelial barrier have been continuously rising in prevalence over the past six decades or after the 2000s; most of which have been shown to be linked to environmental factors (including air pollutants, cigarette smoke, toxic chemicals used in cleaning, and processed food). Western lifestyles and genetic susceptibility. Epithelial barrier‐damaging agents induce the crosstalk between the epithelial barrier, microbiota, and an immune response, as reported in numerous studies of the pathogenesis of epithelial barrier‐associated diseases. The studies presented within this review emphasize the significant implications of the epithelial barrier theory in unraveling the pathogenesis of chronic noncommunicable diseases and to elucidate novel strategies for the development of preventive or therapeutic approaches.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors contributed to the conception, structure, development, writing, and review of the manuscript.
FUNDING INFORMATION
There is no specific funding source for this review article.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
M.S. has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF no.: 310030_189334/1), GSK, Novartis, Stiftung vorm. Bündner Heilstätte Arosa and OM Pharma as well as speaker's fee from AstraZeneca. W.V. has received research grants from PROMEDICA Stiftung, Switzerland, and EoE Stiftung, Switzerland, and consulting fees form Mabylon AG, Switzerland. M.C.B. reports grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Christine Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education, Leo Foundation, LEO Pharmacy, and Freenovation, advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Almirall, LEO Pharma, lecture honorarium from Almirall and AstraZeneca, and patient education grant from AstraZeneca and GSK. A.S. has currently consultant contracts with Astra‐Seneca, BMS‐Receptos, Calypso, EsoCap, Falk‐Pharma, GSK, and Sanofi‐Regeneron. E.G.Y. is an employee of Mount Sinai and has received research grants from and/or is a consultant for: Research Grants (paid to the institution): Boehringer Ingelheim, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Cara Therapeutics, UCB, Kyowa Kirin, RAPT, Amgen, GSK, Incyte, Sanofi, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Aslan, Regeneron, Anaptysbio, Concert, Janssen. Consultant: Abbvie, Aclaris, Almirall, Amgen, AnaptysBio, Apogee Therapeutics, Apollo Therapeutics Limited, Artax Biopharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Boerhinger‐Ingelhiem, Cara Therapeutics, Centrexion Therapeutics Corporation, Connect Biopharm, DBV TECHNOLOGIES, Eli Lilly, Enveda Biosciences, Escient Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Fairmount Funds Management LLC, Forest Laboratories Galderma, Gate Bio, Google Ventures (GV), GSK Immunology, Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc., Incyte, Inmagene, Janssen Biotech, JT Central Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Jasper Therapeutics, Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Merck, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, NUMAB Therapeutics AG, OrbiMed Advisors LLC, OTSUKA, Pfizer, Pharmaxis Ltd, Pioneering Medicine VII, Inc., Proteologix US Inc, RAPT, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, RibonTherapeutics, Inc., Sanofi, SATO, Schrödinger Inc., Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company (SPARC), Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, UCB. A.F.S. reports grants from the Medical Research Council (MR/M008517/1; MC/PC/18052; MR/T032081/1), Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE), the Immune Tolerance Network/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID, NIH), Asthma UK (AUK‐BC‐2015‐01), BBSRC, Rosetrees Trust and the NIHR through the Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) award to Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Thermo Scientific, Nestle, Novartis, Allergy Therapeutics, IgGenix, Buhlmann, as well as research support from IgGenix, Buhlmann, and Thermo Fisher Scientific through a collaboration agreement with King's College London. S.D.G. reports speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Novartis, Sanofi, Stallergenes and Takeda; advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, CSL‐Behring, GSK, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda; unrestricted research grants from AstraZeneca, CSL‐Behring, GSK, Novartis, and Sanofi. O.P. reports grants and/or personal fees and/or travel support from ALK‐Abelló, Allergopharma, Stallergenes Greer, HAL Allergy Holding B.V./HAL Allergie GmbH, Bencard Allergie GmbH/Allergy Therapeutics, Laboratorios LETI/LETI Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, ROXALL Medizin, Novartis, Sanofi‐Aventis and Sanofi‐Genzyme, Med Update Europe GmbH, streamedup! GmbH, Pohl‐Boskamp, Inmunotek S.L., John Wiley and Sons/AS, Paul‐Martini‐Stiftung (PMS), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., RG Aerztefortbildung, Institut für Disease Management, Springer GmbH, AstraZeneca, IQVIA Commercial, Ingress Health, Wort&Bild Verlag, Verlag ME, Procter&Gamble, ALTAMIRA, Meinhardt Congress GmbH, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Thieme, Deutsche AllergieLiga e.V., AeDA, Alfried‐Krupp Krankenhaus, Red Maple Trials Inc., Königlich Dänisches Generalkonsulat, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, ECM Expro&Conference Management, Technical University Dresden, Lilly, Japanese Society of Allergy, Forum für Medizinische Fortbildung, Dustri‐Verlag, Pneumolive, ASIT Biotech, LOFARMA, Almirall, Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut, outside the submitted work, and he is member of EAACI Excom, member of ext. board of directors DGAKI; coordinator, main‐ or co‐author of different position papers and guidelines in rhinology, allergology and allergen‐immunotherapy; he is associate editor (AE) of Allergy and Clinical Translational Allergy. T.E. reports personal fees from Danone/Nutricia/Milupa, grants from DBV, non‐financial support from Novartis, personal fees from Thermo Fisher, personal fees from Aimmune, grants and personal fees from ALK, non‐financial support from MADX, personal fees from EFSA, outside the submitted work, and I am the Co‐I or scientific lead in three investigator‐initiated oral immunotherapy trials supported by the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program Sickkids and serve as associate editor for Allergy. Site PI of company sponsored trials by DBV, Novartis, and Stallergen. C.O. is Assistant Editor of Allergy, EAACI Allied Health & Primary Care Section chair. K.N. currently reports grants from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS); Stock options from IgGenix, Seed Health, ClostraBio, Cour, Alladapt; Consultant for Excellergy, Red tree ventures, Regeneron, and IgGenix; Co‐founder of Alladapt, Latitude, and IgGenix; National Scientific Committee member at Immune Tolerance Network (ITN), and National Institutes of Health (NIH) clinical research centers; patents include, “Mixed allergen com‐position and methods for using the same,” “Granulocyte‐based methods for detecting and monitoring immune system disorders,” and “Methods and Assays for Detecting and Quantifying Pure Subpopulations of White Blood Cells in Immune System Disorders.” M.A. has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Bern; research grant from the Stanford University; Leading House for the Latin American Region, Seed Money Grant. She is in the Scientific Advisory Board member of Stanford University Sean Parker Asthma Allergy Center, CA; Advisory Board member of LEO Foundation Skin Immunology Research Center, Copenhagen; and Scientific Co‐Chair of World Allergy Congress (WAC) Istanbul, 2022, Scientific Programme Committee Chair, EAACI. M.J. reports personal fees outside of submitted work from Allergopharma, ALK‐Abello, Stallergenes, Anergis, Allergy Therapeutics, Leti, HAL, GSK, Novartis, Teva, Takeda, Chiesi, Pfizer, Regeneron, Astra‐Zeneka, Lallemand, Shire, Celltrion Inc., Genentech, Roche, Verona, Lek Pharmaceuticals, Arcutis Biotherapeutics and FAES FARMA. I.A. reports Deputy Editor of Allergy journal. C.A.A. has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, European Union (EU CURE, EU Syn‐Air‐G), Novartis Research Institutes (Basel, Switzerland), Stanford University (Redwood City, Calif), Seed Health (Boston, USA) and SciBase (Stockholm, Sweden); is the Co‐Chair for EAACI Guidelines on Environmental Science in Allergic diseases and Asthma; Chair of the EAACI Epithelial Cell Biology Working Group is on the Advisory Boards of Sanofi/Regeneron (Bern, Switzerland, New York, USA), Stanford University Sean Parker Asthma Allergy Center (CA, USA), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Glaxo Smith Kline (Zurich, Switzerland), Bristol‐Myers Squibb (New York, USA), Seed Health (Boston, USA), and SciBase (Stockholm, Sweden); and is the Editor‐in‐Chief of Allergy. N.S., I.O., Y.M., D.Y., Y.P., X.B., M.L., X.Z., H.B., S.A., O.A., P.D., A.K., L.W., D.A., B.G.O. L.B., A.K., C.T.H., D.J.J., D.Y.W., A.L., H.B., L.Z., L.O.M., R.O.H., W.J.F., B.C., K.W., M.B., and M.J.T declare no relevant conflict of interest. N.S. reports grants from CSC scholarship program of China (No. 202008210164). D.A. reports grants and personal fees, outside the submitted work, from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation and Boehringer Ingelheim. L.B. reports advisory from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Falk, Janssen, Pfizer, Lilly, Takeda, Sanofi, Esocap, and speaker fees from Takeda, Sanofi, Abbvie, Lilly, Falk, BMS and Pfizer. D.J.J. has received speaker fees and consultancy fees from AZ, GSK and Sanofi. L.O.M. is a consultant to PrecisionBiotics and has received research funding from GSK, Chiesi, Reckitt and Fonterra. He has participated in speaker's bureau for Nestle, Nutricia, Reckitt and Abbott.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We want to thank Dr. Anna Globinska for her assistance in the preparation of the figures. Open access funding provided by Universitat Zurich.
Sun N, Ogulur I, Mitamura Y, et al. The epithelial barrier theory and its associated diseases. Allergy. 2024;79:3192‐3237. doi: 10.1111/all.16318
Na Sun and Ismail Ogulur first co‐authors.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Akdis CA. Does the epithelial barrier hypothesis explain the increase in allergy, autoimmunity and other chronic conditions? Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(11):739‐751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. D'Amato G, Akdis CA. Desert dust and respiratory diseases: further insights into the epithelial barrier hypothesis. Allergy. 2022;77:3490‐3492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Akdis CA. The epithelial barrier hypothesis proposes a comprehensive understanding of the origins of allergic and other chronic noncommunicable diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149(1):41‐44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pat Y, Ogulur I, Yazici D, et al. Effect of altered human exposome on the skin and mucosal epithelial barrier integrity. Tissue Barriers. 2022;11:2133877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sözener ZC, Cevhertas L, Nadeau K, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Environmental factors in epithelial barrier dysfunction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(6):1517‐1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wang Z, Walker GW, Muir DC, Nagatani‐Yoshida K. Toward a global understanding of chemical pollution: a first comprehensive analysis of national and regional chemical inventories. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(5):2575‐2584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Trautmann A, Akdis M, Kleemann D, et al. T cell‐mediated Fas‐induced keratinocyte apoptosis plays a key pathogenetic role in eczematous dermatitis. J Clin Invest. 2000;106(1):25‐35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Trautmann A, Schmid‐Grendelmeier P, Kruger K, et al. T cells and eosinophils cooperate in the induction of bronchial epithelial cell apoptosis in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109(2):329‐337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Basinski TM, Holzmann D, Eiwegger T, et al. Dual nature of T cell‐epithelium interaction in chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(1):74‐80.e71–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Akdis CA. Allergy and hypersensitivity: mechanisms of allergic disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18(6):718‐726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Akdis M. Healthy immune response to allergens: T regulatory cells and more. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18(6):738‐744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Xiao C, Puddicombe SM, Field S, et al. Defective epithelial barrier function in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(3):549‐556.e512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Soyka MB, Wawrzyniak P, Eiwegger T, et al. Defective epithelial barrier in chronic rhinosinusitis: the regulation of tight junctions by IFN‐γ and IL‐4. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(5):1087‐1096.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wawrzyniak P, Wawrzyniak M, Wanke K, et al. Regulation of bronchial epithelial barrier integrity by type 2 cytokines and histone deacetylases in asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(1):93‐103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sugita K, Altunbulakli C, Morita H, et al. Human type 2 innate lymphoid cells disrupt skin keratinocyte tight junction barrier by IL‐13. Allergy. 2019;74(12):2534‐2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Xian M, Wawrzyniak P, Ruckert B, et al. Anionic surfactants and commercial detergents decrease tight junction barrier integrity in human keratinocytes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(3):890‐893 e899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Altunbulakli C, Reiger M, Neumann AU, et al. Relations between epidermal barrier dysregulation and Staphylococcus species–dominated microbiome dysbiosis in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(5):1643‐1647.e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wang M, Tan G, Eljaszewicz A, et al. Laundry detergents and detergent residue after rinsing directly disrupt tight junction barrier integrity in human bronchial epithelial cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(5):1892‐1903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Xian M, Ma S, Wang K, et al. Particulate matter 2.5 causes deficiency in barrier integrity in human nasal epithelial cells. Allergy, Asthma Immunol Res. 2020;12(1):56‐71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Michaudel C, Mackowiak C, Maillet I, et al. Ozone exposure induces respiratory barrier biphasic injury and inflammation controlled by IL‐33. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(3):942‐958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Jin Y, Lu L, Tu W, Luo T, Fu Z. Impacts of polystyrene microplastic on the gut barrier, microbiota and metabolism of mice. Sci Total Environ. 2019;649:308‐317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ogulur I, Pat Y, Aydin T, et al. Gut epithelial barrier damage caused by dishwasher detergents and rinse aids. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;151(2):469‐484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ogulur I, Yazici D, Pat Y, et al. Mechanisms of gut epithelial barrier impairment caused by food emulsifiers polysorbate 20 and polysorbate 80. Allergy. 2023;78(9):2441‐2455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rinaldi AO, Li M, Barletta E, et al. Household laundry detergents disrupt barrier integrity and induce inflammation in mouse and human skin. Allergy. 2024;79(1):128‐141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mitamura Y, Ogulur I, Pat Y, et al. Dysregulation of the epithelial barrier by environmental and other exogenous factors. Contact Derm. 2021;85(6):615‐626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kiykim A, Ogulur I, Yazici D, Cokugras H, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Epithelial barrier hypothesis and its comparison with the hygiene hypothesis. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2023;58(2):122‐128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Moens E, Veldhoen M. Epithelial barrier biology: good fences make good neighbours. Immunology. 2012;135(1):1‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Eyerich S, Eyerich K, Traidl‐Hoffmann C, Biedermann T. Cutaneous barriers and skin immunity: differentiating a connected network. Trends Immunol. 2018;39(4):315‐327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hellings PW, Steelant B. Epithelial barriers in allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(6):1499‐1509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhou A, Yuan Y, Yang M, et al. Crosstalk between the gut microbiota and epithelial cells under physiological and infectious conditions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Gaboriau‐Routhiau V, Rakotobe S, Lecuyer E, et al. The key role of segmented filamentous bacteria in the coordinated maturation of gut helper T cell responses. Immunity. 2009;31(4):677‐689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ivanov II, Atarashi K, Manel N, et al. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell. 2009;139(3):485‐498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Martin‐Gallausiaux C, Marinelli L, Blottière HM, Larraufie P, Lapaque N. SCFA: mechanisms and functional importance in the gut. Proc Nutr Soc. 2021;80(1):37‐49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Vinolo MA, Rodrigues HG, Nachbar RT, Curi R. Regulation of inflammation by short chain fatty acids. Nutrients. 2011;3(10):858‐876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kast JI, McFarlane AJ, Globinska A, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection influences tight junction integrity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017;190(3):351‐359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Tan HT, Hagner S, Ruchti F, et al. Tight junction, mucin, and inflammasome‐related molecules are differentially expressed in eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic experimental asthma in mice. Allergy. 2019;74(2):294‐307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Radzikowska U, Eljaszewicz A, Tan G, et al. Rhinovirus‐induced epithelial RIG‐I inflammasome suppresses antiviral immunity and promotes inflammation in asthma and COVID‐19. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Stocker N, Radzikowska U, Wawrzyniak P, et al. Regulation of angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 isoforms by type 2 inflammation and viral infection in human airway epithelium. Mucosal Immunol. 2023;16(1):5‐16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Aghapour M, Raee P, Moghaddam SJ, Hiemstra PS, Heijink IH. Airway epithelial barrier dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: role of cigarette smoke exposure. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2018;58(2):157‐169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Feldman C, Anderson R. Cigarette smoking and mechanisms of susceptibility to infections of the respiratory tract and other organ systems. J Infect. 2013;67(3):169‐184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Radzikowska U, Ding M, Tan G, et al. Distribution of ACE2, CD147, CD26, and other SARS‐CoV‐2 associated molecules in tissues and immune cells in health and in asthma, COPD, obesity, hypertension, and COVID‐19 risk factors. Allergy. 2020;75(11):2829‐2845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Gon Y, Hashimoto S. Role of airway epithelial barrier dysfunction in pathogenesis of asthma. Allergol Int. 2018;67(1):12‐17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Akdis M, Burgler S, Crameri R, et al. Interleukins, from 1 to 37, and interferon‐gamma: receptors, functions, and roles in diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3):701‐721.e1‐70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Eljaszewicz A, Ruchti F, Radzikowska U, et al. Trained immunity and tolerance in innate lymphoid cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells during allergen‐specific immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(5):1865‐1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kezic S, O'Regan GM, Lutter R, et al. Filaggrin loss‐of‐function mutations are associated with enhanced expression of IL‐1 cytokines in the stratum corneum of patients with atopic dermatitis and in a murine model of filaggrin deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(4):1031‐1039.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Yoshida K, Kubo A, Fujita H, et al. Distinct behavior of human Langerhans cells and inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells at tight junctions in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(4):856‐864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Czarnowicki T, Krueger JG, Guttman‐Yassky E. Novel concepts of prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis through barrier and immune manipulations with implications for the atopic march. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(6):1723‐1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Lambrecht BN, Hammad H. The airway epithelium in asthma. Nat Med. 2012;18(5):684‐692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Loxham M, Davies D, Blume C. Epithelial function and dysfunction in asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(11):1299‐1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Gold MJ, Antignano F, Halim TY, et al. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells facilitate sensitization to local, but not systemic, TH2‐inducing allergen exposures. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):1142‐1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Dong X, Ding M, Zhang J, et al. Involvement and therapeutic implications of airway epithelial barrier dysfunction in type 2 inflammation of asthma. Chin Med J. 2022;135(05):519‐531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Gillespie MR, Rai V, Agrawal S, Nandipati KC. The role of microbiota in the pathogenesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(8):697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Novak N, Haberstok J, Bieber T, Allam J‐P. The immune privilege of the oral mucosa. Trends Mol Med. 2008;14(5):191‐198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Kaymak T, Hruz P, Niess JH. Immune system and microbiome in the esophagus: implications for understanding inflammatory diseases. FEBS J. 2022;289(16):4758‐4772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Goto Y, Kiyono H. Epithelial barrier: an interface for the cross‐communication between gut flora and immune system. Immunol Rev. 2012;245(1):147‐163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Mowat AM, Agace WW. Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(10):667‐685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. McDole JR, Wheeler LW, McDonald KG, et al. Goblet cells deliver luminal antigen to CD103+ dendritic cells in the small intestine. Nature. 2012;483(7389):345‐349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Zeuthen LH, Fink LN, Frokiaer H. Epithelial cells prime the immune response to an array of gut‐derived commensals towards a tolerogenic phenotype through distinct actions of thymic stromal lymphopoietin and transforming growth factor‐β. Immunology. 2008;123(2):197‐208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Salucci V, et al. Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(5):507‐514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Von Moltke J, Ji M, Liang H‐E, Locksley RM. Tuft‐cell‐derived IL‐25 regulates an intestinal ILC2–epithelial response circuit. Nature. 2016;529(7585):221‐225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Moro K, Yamada T, Tanabe M, et al. Innate production of TH2 cytokines by adipose tissue‐associated c‐Kit+ Sca‐1+ lymphoid cells. Nature. 2010;463(7280):540‐544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Humphreys NE, Xu D, Hepworth MR, Liew FY, Grencis RK. IL‐33, a potent inducer of adaptive immunity to intestinal nematodes. J Immunol. 2008;180(4):2443‐2449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Tobacman JK. Review of harmful gastrointestinal effects of carrageenan in animal experiments. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(10):983‐994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Chassaing B, Koren O, Goodrich JK, et al. Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2015;519(7541):92‐96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Chigbu D, Minhas BK. Immunopathology of allergic conjunctivitis. Eur Med J. 2018;3:76‐83. [Google Scholar]
- 66. Singh N, Diebold Y, Sahu SK, Leonardi A. Epithelial barrier dysfunction in ocular allergy. Allergy. 2022;77(5):1360‐1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Hu J, Gao N, Zhang Y, et al. IL‐33/ST2/IL‐9/IL‐9R signaling disrupts ocular surface barrier in allergic inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13(6):919‐930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Zheng X, Ma P, de Paiva CS, et al. TSLP and downstream molecules in experimental mouse allergic conjunctivitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(6):3076‐3082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Takai T. TSLP expression: cellular sources, triggers, and regulatory mechanisms. Allergol Int. 2012;61(1):3‐17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Uberoi A, Bartow‐McKenney C, Zheng Q, et al. Commensal microbiota regulates skin barrier function and repair via signaling through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(8):1235‐1248.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Belkaid Y, Segre JA. Dialogue between skin microbiota and immunity. Science. 2014;346(6212):954‐959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Spergel JM, Paller AS. Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(6):S118‐S127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Silverberg JI. Persistence of childhood eczema into adulthood. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(6):591‐592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Spergel JM. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis and atopic march in children. Immunol Allergy Clin. 2010;30(3):269‐280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Silverberg J. Association between adult atopic dermatitis, cardiovascular disease, and increased heart attacks in three population‐based studies. Allergy. 2015;70(10):1300‐1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Andersen YM, Egeberg A, Gislason GH, Hansen PR, Skov L, Thyssen JP. Risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(1):310‐312.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Olesen AB, Bang K, Juul S, Thestrup‐Pedersen K. Stable incidence of atopic dermatitis among children in Denmark during the 1990s. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;1(1):1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Reijula J, Latvala J, Mäkelä M, Siitonen S, Saario M, Haahtela T. Long‐term trends of asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic eczema in young Finnish men: a retrospective analysis, 1926–2017. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(6):1902144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Agrawal R, Woodfolk JA. Skin barrier defects in atopic dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014;14:1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Irvine AD, McLean WI, Leung DY. Filaggrin mutations associated with skin and allergic diseases. New Engl J Med. 2011;365(14):1315‐1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Leung DY, Berdyshev E, Goleva E. Cutaneous barrier dysfunction in allergic diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(6):1485‐1497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Palmer CN, Irvine AD, Terron‐Kwiatkowski A, et al. Common loss‐of‐function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat Genet. 2006;38(4):441‐446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. De Benedetto A, Rafaels NM, McGirt LY, et al. Tight junction defects in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3):773‐786.e1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Rinaldi AO, Korsfeldt A, Ward S, et al. Electrical impedance spectroscopy for the characterization of skin barrier in atopic dermatitis. Allergy. 2021;76(10):3066‐3079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Çetinarslan T, Kümper L, Fölster‐Holst R. The immunological and structural epidermal barrier dysfunction and skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis‐an update. Front Mol Biosci. 2023;10:1159404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Spergel JM. From atopic dermatitis to asthma: the atopic march. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;105(2):99‐106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Brunner PM, Suárez‐Fariñas M, He H, et al. The atopic dermatitis blood signature is characterized by increases in inflammatory and cardiovascular risk proteins. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Vano‐Galvan S, Egeberg A, Piraccini BM, et al. Characteristics and management of patients with alopecia Areata and selected comorbid conditions: results from a survey in five European countries. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024;14(4):1027‐1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Kridin K, Renert‐Yuval Y, Guttman‐Yassky E, Cohen AD. Alopecia areata is associated with atopic diathesis: results from a population‐based study of 51,561 patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(4):1323‐1328 e1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Thyssen JP, Halling AS, Schmid‐Grendelmeier P, Guttman‐Yassky E, Silverberg JI. Comorbidities of atopic dermatitis‐what does the evidence say? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;151(5):1155‐1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Guttman‐Yassky E, Renert‐Yuval Y, Bares J, et al. Phase 2a randomized clinical trial of dupilumab (anti‐IL‐4Ralpha) for alopecia areata patients. Allergy. 2022;77(3):897‐906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Song T, Guttman‐Yassky E. Alopecia areata: a complex cytokine driven disease. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2020;20(1):S55‐S57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kaplan DH, Igyártó BZ, Gaspari AA. Early immune events in the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(2):114‐124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Jutel M, Agache I, Zemelka‐Wiacek M, et al. Nomenclature of allergic diseases and hypersensitivity reactions: adapted to modern needs: an EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2023;78(11):2851‐2874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. McFadden J, Puangpet P, Basketter D, Dearman R, Kimber I. Why does allergic contact dermatitis exist? Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(4):692‐699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Martin SF. New concepts in cutaneous allergy. Contact Derm. 2015;72(1):2‐10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Pavel AB, Del Duca E, Cheng J, et al. Delayed type hypersensitivity reactions to various allergens may differently model inflammatory skin diseases. Allergy. 2023;78(1):178‐191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Bregnbak D, Johansen JD, Jellesen MS, Zachariae C, Menné T, Thyssen JP. Chromium allergy and dermatitis: prevalence and main findings. Contact Derm. 2015;73(5):261‐280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Menné T. Contact allergy epidemics and their controls. Contact Derm. 2007;56(4):185‐195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Novak N, Baurecht H, Schäfer T, et al. Loss‐of‐function mutations in the filaggrin gene and allergic contact sensitization to nickel. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128(6):1430‐1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Proksch E, Brasch J. Abnormal epidermal barrier in the pathogenesis of contact dermatitis. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30(3):335‐344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Ross‐Hansen K, et al. Filaggrin mutations are strongly associated with contact sensitization in individuals with dermatitis. Contact Derm. 2013;68(5):273‐276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Meisser SS, Altunbulakli C, Bandier J, et al. Skin barrier damage after exposure to paraphenylenediamine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(2):619‐631. e612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Mäenpää K, Wang S, Ilves M, et al. Skin microbiota of oxazolone‐induced contact hypersensitivity mouse model. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):e0276071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Patel K, Nixon R. Irritant contact dermatitis ‐ a review. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022;11(2):41‐51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Shibuya R, Ishida Y, Hanakawa S, et al. CCL2–CCR2 signaling in the skin drives surfactant‐induced irritant contact dermatitis through IL‐1beta–mediated neutrophil accumulation. J Invest Dermatol. 2022;142(3 Pt A):571‐582.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Stocks SJ, McNamee R, Turner S, Carder M, Agius RM. The impact of national‐level interventions to improve hygiene on the incidence of irritant contact dermatitis in healthcare workers: changes in incidence from 1996 to 2012 and interrupted times series analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(1):165‐171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Zuberbier T, Aberer W, Asero R, et al. The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria. Allergy. 2018;73(7):1393‐1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Bracken SJ, Abraham S, MacLeod AS. Autoimmune theories of chronic spontaneous urticaria. Front Immunol. 2019;10:627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Lapi F, Cassano N, Pegoraro V, et al. Epidemiology of chronic spontaneous urticaria: results from a nationwide, population‐based study in Italy. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174(5):996‐1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Giménez‐Arnau A, Curto‐Barredo L, Nonell L, et al. Transcriptome analysis of severely active chronic spontaneous urticaria shows an overall immunological skin involvement. Allergy. 2017;72(11):1778‐1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Ye Y‐M, Kim BE, Shin YS, Park H‐S, Leung DY. Increased epidermal filaggrin in chronic idiopathic urticaria is associated with severity of urticaria. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;112(6):533‐538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Gschwandtner M, Mildner M, Mlitz V, et al. Histamine suppresses epidermal keratinocyte differentiation and impairs skin barrier function in a human skin model. Allergy. 2013;68(1):37‐47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Lin W, Zhou Q, Liu C, Ying M, Xu S. Increased plasma IL‐17, IL‐31, and IL‐33 levels in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Kay A, Clark P, Maurer M, Ying S. Elevations in T‐helper‐2‐initiating cytokines (interleukin‐33, interleukin‐25 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin) in lesional skin from chronic spontaneous (‘idiopathic’) urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1294‐1302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Nabizadeh E, Jazani NH, Bagheri M, Shahabi S. Association of altered gut microbiota composition with chronic urticaria. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;119(1):48‐53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Candela M, Rampelli S, Turroni S, et al. Unbalance of intestinal microbiota in atopic children. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12(1):1‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Lowes MA, Bowcock AM, Krueger JG. Pathogenesis and therapy of psoriasis. Nature. 2007;445(7130):866‐873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Rendon A, Schäkel K. Psoriasis pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Parisi R, Symmons DP, Griffiths CE, Ashcroft DM. Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(2):377‐385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Icen M, Crowson CS, McEvoy MT, Dann FJ, Gabriel SE, Kremers HM. Trends in incidence of adult‐onset psoriasis over three decades: a population‐based study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(3):394‐401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Eder L, Widdifield J, Rosen CF, et al. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in Ontario, Canada: a population‐based study. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71(8):1084‐1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Kim J, Krueger JG. Highly effective new treatments for psoriasis target the IL‐23/type 17 T cell autoimmune axis. Annu Rev Med. 2017;68:255‐269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Wohn C, Ober‐Blöbaum JL, Haak S, et al. Langerinneg conventional dendritic cells produce IL‐23 to drive psoriatic plaque formation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(26):10723‐10728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Van Der Fits L, Mourits S, Voerman JS, et al. Imiquimod‐induced psoriasis‐like skin inflammation in mice is mediated via the IL‐23/IL‐17 axis. J Immunol. 2009;182(9):5836‐5845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Lowes MA, Suarez‐Farinas M, Krueger JG. Immunology of psoriasis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Wongjirattikarn R, Chaisuriya N, Chaowattanapanit S, et al. Increased tissue expression of IL‐31 in patients with psoriasis. Cytokine. 2024;176:156531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Yuki T, Tobiishi M, Kusaka‐Kikushima A, Ota Y, Tokura Y. Impaired tight junctions in atopic dermatitis skin and in a skin‐equivalent model treated with interleukin‐17. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0161759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Gutowska‐Owsiak D, Schaupp AL, Salimi M, et al. IL‐17 downregulates filaggrin and affects keratinocyte expression of genes associated with cellular adhesion. Exp Dermatol. 2012;21(2):104‐110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Grice K, Sattar H, Baker H. The cutaneous barrier to salts and water in psoriasis and in normal skin. Br J Dermatol. 1973;88(5):459‐463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Motta S, Monti M, Sesana S, Mellesi L, Ghidoni R, Caputo R. Abnormality of water barrier function in psoriasis: role of ceramide fractions. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(4):452‐456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Takahashi H, Tsuji H, Minami‐Hori M, Miyauchi Y, Iizuka H. Defective barrier function accompanied by structural changes of psoriatic stratum corneum. J Dermatol. 2014;41(2):144‐148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Yan D, Issa N, Afifi L, Jeon C, Chang H‐W, Liao W. The role of the skin and gut microbiome in psoriatic disease. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2017;6(2):94‐103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Alekseyenko AV, Perez‐Perez GI, De Souza A, et al. Community differentiation of the cutaneous microbiota in psoriasis. Microbiome. 2013;1(1):1‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Fahlén A, Engstrand L, Baker BS, Powles A, Fry L. Comparison of bacterial microbiota in skin biopsies from normal and psoriatic skin. Arch Dermatol Res. 2012;304(1):15‐22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Drago L, De Grandi R, Altomare G, Pigatto P, Rossi O, Toscano M. Skin microbiota of first cousins affected by psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Clin Mol Allergy. 2016;14(1):1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Dekio I, Hayashi H, Sakamoto M, et al. Detection of potentially novel bacterial components of the human skin microbiota using culture‐independent molecular profiling. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54(12):1231‐1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, et al. The microbial metabolites, short‐chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science. 2013;341(6145):569‐573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(5):313‐323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Gao Z, Tseng C‐h, Strober BE, Pei Z, Blaser MJ. Substantial alterations of the cutaneous bacterial biota in psoriatic lesions. PLoS One. 2008;3(7):e2719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Borradori L, Van Beek N, Feliciani C, et al. Updated S2 K guidelines for the management of bullous pemphigoid initiated by the European academy of dermatology and venereology (EADV). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(10):1689‐1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Brick KE, Weaver CH, Lohse CM, et al. Incidence of bullous pemphigoid and mortality of patients with bullous pemphigoid in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1960 through 2009. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(1):92‐99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Joly P, Baricault S, Sparsa A, et al. Incidence and mortality of bullous pemphigoid in France. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(8):1998‐2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Hammers CM, Stanley JR. Mechanisms of disease: pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid. Annu Rev Pathol. 2016;11:175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Hu Y‐q, Zhang J‐z. A comparison for type 2 cytokines and lesional inflammatory infiltrations in bullous pemphigoid and atopic dermatitis. Clin, Cosmetic Invest Dermatol. 2022;15:2313‐2321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Miodovnik M, Künstner A, Langan EA, et al. A distinct cutaneous microbiota profile in autoimmune bullous disease patients. Exp Dermatol. 2017;26(12):1221‐1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Belheouane M, Hermes BM, Van Beek N, et al. Characterization of the skin microbiota in bullous pemphigoid patients and controls reveals novel microbial indicators of disease. J Adv Res. 2022;44:71‐79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. de Oliveira ASLE, Bloise G, Moltrasio C, et al. Transcriptome meta‐analysis confirms the hidradenitis suppurativa pathogenic triad: upregulated inflammation, altered epithelial organization, and dysregulated metabolic signaling. Biomol Ther. 2022;12(10):1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Schell SL, Schneider AM, Nelson AM. Yin and Yang: a disrupted skin microbiome and an aberrant host immune response in hidradenitis suppurativa. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30(10):1453‐1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Revuz JE, Canoui‐Poitrine F, Wolkenstein P, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with hidradenitis suppurativa: results from two case‐control studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(4):596‐601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Sartorius K, Emtestam L, Jemec G, Lapins J. Objective scoring of hidradenitis suppurativa reflecting the role of tobacco smoking and obesity. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(4):831‐839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Van der Zee H, Van Der Woude C, Florencia E, Prens E. Hidradenitis suppurativa and inflammatory bowel disease: are they associated? Results of a pilot study. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162(1):195‐197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Vazquez BG, Alikhan A, Weaver AL, Wetter DA, Davis MD. Incidence of hidradenitis suppurativa and associated factors: a population‐based study of Olmsted County, Minnesota. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(1):97‐103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Lowe MM, Naik HB, Clancy S, et al. Immunopathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa and response to anti–TNF‐α therapy. JCI Insight. 2020;5(19):e139932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Witte‐Händel E, Wolk K, Tsaousi A, et al. The IL‐1 pathway is hyperactive in hidradenitis suppurativa and contributes to skin infiltration and destruction. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(6):1294‐1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Zouboulis CC, Nogueira da Costa A, Makrantonaki E, et al. Alterations in innate immunity and epithelial cell differentiation are the molecular pillars of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(4):846‐861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Kurokawa I, Nishijima S, Kusumoto K, Senzaki H, Shikata N, Tsubura A. Immunohistochemical study of cytokeratins in hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa). J Int Med Res. 2002;30(2):131‐136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Blok JL, Janse IC, Horváth B, Jonkman MF. Increased expression of integrin α6β4 in the basement membrane zone lining the sebaceous glands in hidradenitis suppurativa. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95(8):994‐996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Kurzen H, Jung E, Hartschuh W, Moll I, Franke W, Moll R. Forms of epithelial differentiation of draining sinus in acne inversa (hidradenitis suppurativa). Br J Dermatol. 1999;141(2):231‐239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Nelson AM, Cong Z, Gettle SL, et al. E‐cadherin and p120ctn protein expression are lost in hidradenitis suppurativa lesions. Exp Dermatol. 2019;28(7):867‐871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Mintoff D, Benhadou F, Pace NP, Frew JW. Metabolic syndrome and hidradenitis suppurativa: epidemiological, molecular, and therapeutic aspects. Int J Dermatol. 2022;61(10):1175‐1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Shalom G, Freud T, Harman‐Boehm I, Polishchuk I, Cohen A. Hidradenitis suppurativa and metabolic syndrome: a comparative cross‐sectional study of 3207 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(2):464‐470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Kikkert R, Laine M, Aarden L, Van Winkelhoff A. Activation of toll‐like receptors 2 and 4 by gram‐negative periodontal bacteria. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2007;22(3):145‐151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Schick J, Etschel P, Bailo R, et al. Toll‐like receptor 2 and Mincle cooperatively sense corynebacterial cell wall glycolipids. Infect Immun. 2017;85(7):e00075‐00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Jang H‐M, Park J‐Y, Lee Y‐J, et al. TLR2 and the NLRP3 inflammasome mediate IL‐1β production in Prevotella nigrescens‐infected dendritic cells. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18(2):432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Hunger R, Surovy AM, Hassan A, Braathen L, Yawalkar N. Toll‐like receptor 2 is highly expressed in lesions of acne inversa and colocalizes with C‐type lectin receptor. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(4):691‐697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Aghapour M, Ubags ND, Bruder D, et al. Role of air pollutants in airway epithelial barrier dysfunction in asthma and COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2022;31(163):210112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Asher MI, García‐Marcos L, Pearce NE, Strachan DP. Trends in worldwide asthma prevalence. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(6):2002094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Collaborators GCRD. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability‐adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(9):691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Haahtela T, Lindholm H, Björkstén F, Koskenvuo K, Laitinen L. Prevalence of asthma in Finnish young men. Br Med J. 1990;301(6746):266‐268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Anderson HR, Gupta R, Strachan DP, Limb ES. 50 years of asthma: UK trends from 1955 to 2004. Thorax. 2007;62(1):85‐90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Akdis CA, Arkwright PD, Brüggen M‐C, et al. Type 2 immunity in the skin and lungs. Allergy. 2020;75(7):1582‐1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Gao H, Ying S, Dai Y. Pathological roles of neutrophil‐mediated inflammation in asthma and its potential for therapy as a target. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017(1):3743048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. de Boer WI, Sharma HS, Baelemans SM, Hoogsteden HC, Lambrecht BN, Braunstahl GJ. Altered expression of epithelial junctional proteins in atopic asthma: possible role in inflammation. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;86(3):105‐112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Sweerus K, Lachowicz‐Scroggins M, Gordon E, et al. Claudin‐18 deficiency is associated with airway epithelial barrier dysfunction and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(1):72‐81.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Chung KF. Airway microbial dysbiosis in asthmatic patients: a target for prevention and treatment? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(4):1071‐1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Davis MF, Peng RD, McCormack MC, Matsui EC. Staphylococcus aureus colonization is associated with wheeze and asthma among US children and young adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(3):811‐813.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Hilty M, Burke C, Pedro H, et al. Disordered microbial communities in asthmatic airways. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):e8578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Barcik W, Pugin B, Westermann P, et al. Histamine‐secreting microbes are increased in the gut of adult asthma patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(5):1491‐1494.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Michalovich D, Rodriguez‐Perez N, Smolinska S, et al. Obesity and disease severity magnify disturbed microbiome‐immune interactions in asthma patients. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Roduit C, Frei R, Ferstl R, et al. High levels of butyrate and propionate in early life are associated with protection against atopy. Allergy. 2019;74(4):799‐809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Bousquet J, Anto JM, Bachert C, et al. Allergic rhinitis. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2020;6(1):95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA2LEN and AllerGen). Allergy. 2008;63(86):8‐160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Latvala J, von Hertzen L, Lindholm H, Haahtela T. Trends in prevalence of asthma and allergy in Finnish young men: nationwide study, 1966‐2003. BMJ. 2005;330(7501):1186‐1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Savouré M, Bousquet J, Jaakkola JJ, Jaakkola MS, Jacquemin B, Nadif R. Worldwide prevalence of rhinitis in adults: a review of definitions and temporal evolution. Clin Transl Allergy. 2022;12(3):e12130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Nur Husna SM, Tan H‐TT, Md Shukri N, Mohd Ashari NS, Wong KK. Nasal epithelial barrier integrity and tight junctions disruption in allergic rhinitis: overview and pathogenic insights. Front Immunol. 2021;12:663626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Steelant B, Farré R, Wawrzyniak P, et al. Impaired barrier function in patients with house dust mite–induced allergic rhinitis is accompanied by decreased occludin and zonula occludens‐1 expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(4):1043‐1053.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Lanza M, Casili G, Filippone A, et al. Evaluating the protective properties of a xyloglucan‐based nasal spray in a mouse model of allergic rhinitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Sugita K, Soyka MB, Wawrzyniak P, et al. Outside‐in hypothesis revisited: the role of microbial, epithelial, and immune interactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;125(5):517‐527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Azevedo AC, Hilário S, Gonçalves MF. Microbiome in nasal mucosa of children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis: a systematic review. Children. 2023;10(2):226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Kim HJ, Kim J‐H, Han S‐A, Kim W. Compositional alterations of the nasal microbiome and Staphylococcus aureus–characterized Dysbiosis in the nasal mucosa of patients with allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;15(4):335‐345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Miao P, Jiang Y, Jian Y, et al. Exacerbation of allergic rhinitis by the commensal bacterium Streptococcus salivarius . Nat Microbiol. 2023;8:1‐13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Sedaghat AR. Chronic rhinosinusitis. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(8):500‐506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Wise SK, Damask C, Roland LT, et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: allergic rhinitis – 2023. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023;13(4):293‐859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Damm M, Quante G, Jungehuelsing M, Stennert E. Impact of functional endoscopic sinus surgery on symptoms and quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(2):310‐315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Kaliner MA, Osguthorpe JD, Fireman P, et al. Sinusitis: bench to bedside: current findings, future directions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99(6):S829‐S847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Huang Z‐Q, Ye J, Liu J, et al. Predictive significance of Claudin‐3 for epithelial barrier dysfunction in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Allergy, Asthma Immunol Res. 2023;15(4):512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Van Bruaene N, Pérez‐Novo CA, Basinski TM, et al. T‐cell regulation in chronic paranasal sinus disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121(6):1435‐1441.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Van Zele T, Claeys S, Gevaert P, et al. Differentiation of chronic sinus diseases by measurement of inflammatory mediators. Allergy. 2006;61(11):1280‐1289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Oka A, Kanai K, Higaki T, et al. Macroarray expression analysis of cytokines and prostaglandin metabolism–related genes in chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;2(3):100123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Cho D‐Y, Hunter RC, Ramakrishnan VR. The microbiome and chronic rhinosinusitis. Immunol Allergy Clin. 2020;40(2):251‐263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Hoggard M, Biswas K, Zoing M, Wagner Mackenzie B, Taylor MW, Douglas RG. Evidence of microbiota dysbiosis in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(3):230‐239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Wagner Mackenzie B, Waite DW, Hoggard M, Douglas RG, Taylor MW, Biswas K. Bacterial community collapse: a meta‐analysis of the sinonasal microbiota in chronic rhinosinusitis. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19(1):381‐392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Ivanchenko O, Karpishchenko S, Kozlov R, et al. The microbiome of the maxillary sinus and middle nasal meatus in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2016;54(1):68‐74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Senior RM, Anthonisen NR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(4):S139‐S147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Singh D, Agusti A, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(5):1900164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Lareau SC, Fahy B, Meek P, Wang A. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(1):P1‐P2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095‐2128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Guo P, Yokoyama K, Suenaga M, Kida H. Mortality and life expectancy of Yokkaichi asthma patients, Japan: late effects of air pollution in 1960–70s. Environ Health. 2008;7(1):1‐10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Mannino DM, Homa DM, Akinbami LJ, Ford ES, Redd SC. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease surveillance‐United States, 1971–2000. Respir Care. 2002;47:1184‐1199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. van den Berge M, Steiling K, Timens W, et al. Airway gene expression in COPD is dynamic with inhaled corticosteroid treatment and reflects biological pathways associated with disease activity. Thorax. 2014;69(1):14‐23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Nishida K, Brune KA, Putcha N, et al. Cigarette smoke disrupts monolayer integrity by altering epithelial cell‐cell adhesion and cortical tension. Am J Phys Lung Cell Mol Phys. 2017;313(3):L581‐L591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Heijink IH, Noordhoek JA, Timens W, van Oosterhout AJ, Postma DS. Abnormalities in airway epithelial junction formation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(11):1439‐1442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Kolsum U, Damera G, Pham T‐H, et al. Pulmonary inflammation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with higher blood eosinophil counts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(4):1181‐1184.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Faner R, Sobradillo P, Noguera A, et al. The inflammasome pathway in stable COPD and acute exacerbations. ERJ Open Res. 2016;2(3):00002‐2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Zhang L, Cheng Z, Liu W, Wu K. Expression of interleukin (IL)‐10, IL‐17A and IL‐22 in serum and sputum of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. COPD: J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;10(4):459‐465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Wang Z, Singh R, Miller BE, et al. Sputum microbiome temporal variability and dysbiosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: an analysis of the COPDMAP study. Thorax. 2018;73(4):331‐338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Lederer DJ, Martinez FJ. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. New Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1811‐1823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Cordier J‐F, Cottin V. Neglected evidence in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: from history to earlier diagnosis. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(4):916‐923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Navaratnam V, Fleming K, West J, et al. The rising incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the UK. Thorax. 2011;66(6):462‐467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Richeldi L, Collard HR, Jones MG. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet. 2017;389(10082):1941‐1952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Zou J, Li Y, Yu J, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is associated with tight junction protein alterations. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)‐Biomembranes. 2020;1862(5):183205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Kodera Y, Kohno T, Konno T, et al. HMGB1 enhances epithelial permeability via p63/TGF‐β signaling in lung and terminal bronchial epithelial cells. Tissue Barriers. 2020;8(4):1805997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. O'Dwyer DN, Ashley SL, Gurczynski SJ, et al. Lung microbiota contribute to pulmonary inflammation and disease progression in pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(9):1127‐1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225. Molyneaux PL, Cox MJ, Willis‐Owen SA, et al. The role of bacteria in the pathogenesis and progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(8):906‐913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226. Antar SA, Saleh MA, Al‐Karmalawy AA. Investigating the possible mechanisms of pirfenidone to be targeted as a promising anti‐inflammatory, anti‐fibrotic, anti‐oxidant, anti‐apoptotic, anti‐tumor, and/or anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2. Life Sci. 2022;309:121048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. O'Shea KM, Aceves SS, Dellon ES, et al. Pathophysiology of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):333‐345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. Dobbins JW, Sheahan DG, Behar J. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis with esophageal involvement. Gastroenterology. 1977;72(6):1312‐1316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Attwood SE, Smyrk TC, Demeester TR, Jones JB. Esophageal eosinophilia with dysphagia: a distinct clinicopathologic syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:109‐116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Hommeida S, Grothe R, Hafed Y, et al. Assessing the incidence trend and characteristics of eosinophilic esophagitis in children in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Dis Esophagus. 2018;31(12):doy062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Arias A, Pérez‐Martínez I, Tenías J, Lucendo A. Systematic review with meta‐analysis: the incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults in population‐based studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43(1):3‐15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Hirano I, Dellon ES. Eosinophilic Esophagitis. 6th ed. Wiley; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 233. Kliewer KL, Gonsalves N, Dellon ES, et al. One‐food versus six‐food elimination diet therapy for the treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis: a multicentre, randomised, open‐label trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8(5):408‐421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. Wechsler JB, Schwartz S, Arva NC, et al. A single‐food milk elimination diet is effective for treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis in children. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(8):1748‐1756 e1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235. Katzka DA, Ravi K, Geno DM, et al. Endoscopic mucosal impedance measurements correlate with eosinophilia and dilation of intercellular spaces in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(7):1242‐1248.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236. Simon D, Page B, Vogel M, et al. Evidence of an abnormal epithelial barrier in active, untreated and corticosteroid‐treated eosinophilic esophagitis. Allergy. 2018;73(1):239‐247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237. Furuta GT, Katzka DA. Eosinophilic esophagitis. New Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1640‐1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238. Massimino L, Barchi A, Mandarino FV, et al. A multi‐omic analysis reveals the esophageal dysbiosis as the predominant trait of eosinophilic esophagitis. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239. Mennini M, Tambucci R, Riccardi C, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis and microbiota: state of the art. Front Immunol. 2021;12:595762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240. Kellerman R, Kintanar T. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Primary Care: Clin Office Pract. 2017;44(4):561‐573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241. El‐Serag H, Sonnenberg A. Opposing time trends of peptic ulcer and reflux disease. Gut. 1998;43(3):327‐333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242. Hampel H, Abraham NS, El‐Serag HB. Meta‐analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(3):199‐211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243. Björkman E, Casselbrant A, Lundberg S, Fändriks L. In vitro assessment of epithelial electrical resistance in human esophageal and jejunal mucosae and in Caco‐2 cell layers. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(11):1321‐1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244. Orlando R, Powell D, Carney CN. Pathophysiology of acute acid injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium. J Clin Invest. 1981;68(1):286‐293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245. Björkman EVC, Edebo A, Oltean M, Casselbrant A. Esophageal barrier function and tight junction expression in healthy subjects and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: functionality of esophageal mucosa exposed to bile salt and trypsin in vitro. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(10):1118‐1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246. Souza RF, Huo X, Mittal V, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux might cause esophagitis through a cytokine‐mediated mechanism rather than caustic acid injury. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(5):1776‐1784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247. Blackett K, Siddhi S, Cleary S, et al. Oesophageal bacterial biofilm changes in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's and oesophageal carcinoma: association or causality? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(11):1084‐1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248. Profumo RJ. Barrett's esophagus. J Insur Med. 2002;34(1):70‐73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249. Kiesslich R, Gossner L, Goetz M, et al. In vivo histology of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(8):979‐987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250. Conio M, Cameron A, Romero Y, et al. Secular trends in the epidemiology and outcome of Barrett's oesophagus in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gut. 2001;48(3):304‐309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251. Gill RS, Singh R. Endoscopic imaging in Barrett's esophagus: current practice and future applications. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;25(2):89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252. Ghatwary N, Ahmed A, Ye X, Jalab H. Automatic grade classification of Barretts esophagus through feature enhancement. Paper presented at: Medical Imaging 2017: Computer‐Aided Diagnosis. 2017.
- 253. Mullin J, Valenzano M, Trembeth S, et al. Transepithelial leak in Barrett's esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51(12):2326‐2336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254. Farrell C, Morgan M, Tully O, et al. Transepithelial leak in Barrett's esophagus patients: the role of proton pump inhibitors. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2012;18(22):2793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255. Yang L, Lu X, Nossa CW, Francois F, Peek RM, Pei Z. Inflammation and intestinal metaplasia of the distal esophagus are associated with alterations in the microbiome. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(2):588‐597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256. Yang L, Francois F, Pei Z. Molecular pathways: pathogenesis and clinical implications of microbiome alteration in esophagitis and Barrett esophagus. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(8):2138‐2144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257. Morris CD, Armstrong GR, Bigley G, Green H, Attwood SE. Cyclooxygenase‐2 expression in the Barrett's metaplasia–dysplasia–adenocarcinoma sequence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(4):990‐996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258. Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy: a review and update on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(1):41‐58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259. Sampath V, Abrams EM, Adlou B, et al. Food allergy across the globe. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148(6):1347‐1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260. Turner PJ, Gowland MH, Sharma V, et al. Increase in anaphylaxis‐related hospitalizations but no increase in fatalities: an analysis of United Kingdom national anaphylaxis data, 1992–2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(4):956‐963.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261. Mullins RJ, Dear KB, Tang ML. Time trends in Australian hospital anaphylaxis admissions in 1998–1999 to 2011–2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(2):367‐375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262. Lockhart A, Reed A, Rezende de Castro T, Herman C, Campos Canesso MC, Mucida D. Dietary protein shapes the profile and repertoire of intestinal CD4+ T cells. J Exp Med. 2023;220(8):e20221816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263. Hong SW, Krueger PD, Osum KC, et al. Immune tolerance of food is mediated by layers of CD4(+) T cell dysfunction. Nature. 2022;607(7920):762‐768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264. Fukaya T, Uto T, Mitoma S, et al. Gut dysbiosis promotes the breakdown of oral tolerance mediated through dysfunction of mucosal dendritic cells. Cell Rep. 2023;42(5):112431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265. Rath T, Dieterich W, Kätscher‐Murad C, Neurath MF, Zopf Y. Cross‐sectional imaging of intestinal barrier dysfunction by confocal laser endomicroscopy can identify patients with food allergy in vivo with high sensitivity. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266. Ungar B, da Rosa JC, Shemer A, et al. Patch testing of food allergens promotes Th17 and Th2 responses with increased IL‐33: a pilot study. Exp Dermatol. 2017;26(3):272‐275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267. Ukleja‐Sokołowska N, Żbikowska‐Gotz M, Lis K, Adamczak R, Bartuzi Z. Assessment of TSLP, IL 25 and IL 33 in patients with shrimp allergy. Allergy, Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021;17(1):1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268. Khodoun MV, Tomar S, Tocker JE, Wang YH, Finkelman FD. Prevention of food allergy development and suppression of established food allergy by neutralization of thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL‐25, and IL‐33. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(1):171‐179.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269. Kourosh A, Luna RA, Balderas M, et al. Fecal microbiome signatures are different in food‐allergic children compared to siblings and healthy children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018;29(5):545‐554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270. Rivas MN, Burton OT, Wise P, et al. A microbiota signature associated with experimental food allergy promotes allergic sensitization and anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(1):201‐212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271. Korpela K, Hurley S, Ford SA, et al. Association between gut microbiota development and allergy in infants born during pandemic‐related social distancing restrictions. Allergy. 2024;79:1938‐1951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272. Sairenji T, Collins KL, Evans DV. An update on inflammatory bowel disease. Prim Care. 2017;44(4):673‐692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273. Agrawal M, Christensen HS, Bøgsted M, Colombel J‐F, Jess T, Allin KH. The rising burden of inflammatory bowel disease in Denmark over two decades: a nationwide cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2022;163(6):1547‐1554.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274. Kaplan GG. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(12):720‐727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275. Kaplan GG, Ng SC. Understanding and preventing the global increase of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(2):313‐321.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276. Martini E, Krug SM, Siegmund B, Neurath MF, Becker C. Mend your fences: the epithelial barrier and its relationship with mucosal immunity in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;4(1):33‐46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277. Zeissig S, Bürgel N, Günzel D, et al. Changes in expression and distribution of claudin 2, 5 and 8 lead to discontinuous tight junctions and barrier dysfunction in active Crohn's disease. Gut. 2007;56(1):61‐72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278. Oshima T, Miwa H, Joh T. Changes in the expression of claudins in active ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:S146‐S150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279. Madsen KL, Malfair D, Gray D, Doyle JS, Jewell LD, Fedorak RN. Interleukin‐10 gene‐deficient mice develop a primary intestinal permeability defect in response to enteric microflora. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1999;5(4):262‐270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280. Neut C, Bulois P, Desreumaux P, et al. Changes in the bacterial flora of the neoterminal ileum after ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(4):939‐946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281. Ott S, Musfeldt M, Wenderoth D, et al. Reduction in diversity of the colonic mucosa associated bacterial microflora in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2004;53(5):685‐693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282. Halfvarson J, Brislawn CJ, Lamendella R, et al. Dynamics of the human gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2(5):1‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283. Fasano A, Catassi C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(25):2419‐2426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284. Grode L, Bech BH, Jensen TM, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and autoimmune comorbidities of celiac disease: a nation‐wide, population‐based study in Denmark from 1977 to 2016. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30(1):83‐91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285. Catassi C, Kryszak D, Bhatti B, et al. Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann Med. 2010;42(7):530‐538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286. Rubio‐Tapia A, Ludvigsson JF, Brantner TL, Murray JA, Everhart JE. The prevalence of celiac disease in the United States. Official J Am College Gastroenterol. 2012;107(10):1538‐1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287. Schumann M, Siegmund B, Schulzke JD, Fromm M. Celiac disease: role of the epithelial barrier. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;3(2):150‐162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288. Cukrowska B, Sowińska A, Bierła JB, Czarnowska E, Rybak A, Grzybowska‐Chlebowczyk U. Intestinal epithelium, intraepithelial lymphocytes and the gut microbiota‐Key players in the pathogenesis of celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(42):7505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289. Schumann M, Günzel D, Buergel N, et al. Cell polarity‐determining proteins par‐3 and PP‐1 are involved in epithelial tight junction defects in coeliac disease. Gut. 2012;61(2):220‐228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290. Pozo‐Rubio T, Olivares M, Nova E, et al. Immune development and intestinal microbiota in celiac disease. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:654143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291. Girbovan A, Sur G, Samasca G, Lupan I. Dysbiosis a risk factor for celiac disease. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2017;206:83‐91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292. Black CJ, Ford AC. Global burden of irritable bowel syndrome: trends, predictions and risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(8):473‐486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293. Gwee KA, Lu CL, Ghoshal UC. Epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome in Asia: something old, something new, something borrowed. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(10):1601‐1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294. Gwee KA. Irritable bowel syndrome in developing countries–a disorder of civilization or colonization? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;17(3):317‐324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295. Zhou Q, Zhang B, Verne GN. Intestinal membrane permeability and hypersensitivity in the irritable bowel syndrome. Pain. 2009;146(1–2):41‐46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296. Martínez C, Vicario M, Ramos L, et al. The jejunum of diarrhea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome shows molecular alterations in the tight junction signaling pathway that are associated with mucosal pathobiology and clinical manifestations. Official J Am College Gastroenterol. 2012;107(5):736‐746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297. Fritscher‐Ravens A, Schuppan D, Ellrichmann M, et al. Confocal endomicroscopy shows food‐associated changes in the intestinal mucosa of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(5):1012‐1020.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298. Fritscher‐Ravens A, Pflaum T, Mosinger M, et al. Many patients with irritable bowel syndrome have atypical food allergies not associated with immunoglobulin E. Gastroenterology. 2019;157(1):109‐118 e105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299. Macsharry J, O'Mahony L, Fanning A, et al. Mucosal cytokine imbalance in irritable bowel syndrome. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(12):1467‐1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300. Aerssens J, Camilleri M, Talloen W, et al. Alterations in mucosal immunity identified in the colon of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(2):194‐205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301. Tursi A, Scarpignato C, Strate LL, et al. Colonic diverticular disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):1‐23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302. Kang J, Hoare J, Tinto A, et al. Diverticular disease of the colon—on the rise: a study of hospital admissions in England between 1989/1990 and 1999/2000. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(9):1189‐1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303. Yamamichi N, Shimamoto T, Takahashi Y, et al. Trend and risk factors of diverticulosis in Japan: age, gender, and lifestyle/metabolic‐related factors may cooperatively affect on the colorectal diverticula formation. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304. Crowe FL, Appleby PN, Allen NE, Key TJ. Diet and risk of diverticular disease in Oxford cohort of European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC): prospective study of British vegetarians and non‐vegetarians. BMJ. 2011;343:d4131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305. Cao Y, Strate LL, Keeley BR, et al. Meat intake and risk of diverticulitis among men. Gut. 2018;67(3):466‐472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306. Hjern F, Wolk A, Håkansson N. Smoking and the risk of diverticular disease in women. J Br Surg. 2011;98(7):997‐1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307. Ma W, Jovani M, Liu P‐H, et al. Association between obesity and weight change and risk of diverticulitis in women. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(1):58‐66.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308. Strate LL, Liu YL, Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL. Physical activity decreases diverticular complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(5):1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309. Ma W, Jovani M, Nguyen LH, et al. Association between inflammatory diets, circulating markers of inflammation, and risk of diverticulitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(10):2279‐2286.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310. Altomare A, Gori M, Cocca S, et al. Impaired colonic contractility and intestinal permeability in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motility. 2021;27(2):292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311. Barbara G, Scaioli E, Barbaro MR, et al. Gut microbiota, metabolome and immune signatures in patients with uncomplicated diverticular disease. Gut. 2017;66(7):1252‐1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312. Chiarotti F, Venerosi A. Epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders: a review of worldwide prevalence estimates since 2014. Brain Sci. 2020;10(5):274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313. Savica R, Grossardt BR, Bower JH, Ahlskog JE, Rocca WA. Time trends in the incidence of Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(8):981‐989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314. Hidaka BH. Depression as a disease of modernity: explanations for increasing prevalence. J Affect Disord. 2012;140(3):205‐214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315. Cornutiu G. The epidemiological scale of Alzheimer's disease. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(9):657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316. Homolak J, Perhoc AB, Knezovic A, et al. Disbalance of the intestinal epithelial cell turnover and apoptosis in a rat model of sporadic Alzheimer's disease. bioRxiv . 2004. doi: 10.1101/2021.04.22.440947 [DOI]
- 317. Liao W, Wei J, Liu C, et al. Magnesium‐L‐threonate treats Alzheimer's disease by modulating the microbiota‐gut‐brain axis. Neural Regen Res. 2024;19(10):2281‐2289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318. Asghari K, Niknam Z, Mohammadpour‐Asl S, Chodari L. Cellular junction dynamics and Alzheimer's disease: a comprehensive review. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;51(1):273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319. Vogt NM, Kerby RL, Dill‐McFarland KA, et al. Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320. Pellegrini C, Antonioli L, Colucci R, Blandizzi C, Fornai M. Interplay among gut microbiota, intestinal mucosal barrier and enteric neuro‐immune system: a common path to neurodegenerative diseases? Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136:345‐361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321. Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2021;397(10291):2284‐2303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322. Jankovic J. Parkinson's disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(4):368‐376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323. Ou Z, Pan J, Tang S, et al. Global trends in the incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability of Parkinson's disease in 204 countries/territories from 1990 to 2019. Front Public Health. 2021;9:776847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324. Derkinderen P, Rouaud T, Lebouvier T, Des Varannes SB, Neunlist M, De Giorgio R. Parkinson disease: the enteric nervous system spills its guts. Neurology. 2011;77(19):1761‐1767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325. Forsyth CB, Shannon KM, Kordower JH, et al. Increased intestinal permeability correlates with sigmoid mucosa alpha‐synuclein staining and endotoxin exposure markers in early Parkinson's disease. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326. van IJzendoorn SC, Derkinderen P. The intestinal barrier in Parkinson's disease: current state of knowledge. J Parkinsons Dis. 2019;9(s2):S323‐S329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327. Clairembault T, Leclair‐Visonneau L, Coron E, et al. Structural alterations of the intestinal epithelial barrier in Parkinson's disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3:1‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328. World Health Organization . Autism Spectrum Disorders. World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 329. Idring S, Lundberg M, Sturm H, et al. Changes in prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in 2001–2011: findings from the Stockholm youth cohort. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45:1766‐1773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330. Raz R, Roberts AL, Lyall K, et al. Autism spectrum disorder and particulate matter air pollution before, during, and after pregnancy: a nested case–control analysis within the Nurses' health study II cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(3):264‐270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331. Shelton JF, Geraghty EM, Tancredi DJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: the CHARGE study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(10):1103‐1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332. Atladóttir HÓ, Henriksen TB, Schendel DE, Parner ET. Autism after infection, febrile episodes, and antibiotic use during pregnancy: an exploratory study. Pediatrics. 2012;130(6):e1447‐e1454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333. Zimmerman AW, Jyonouchi H, Comi AM, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and serum markers of inflammation in autism. Pediatr Neurol. 2005;33(3):195‐201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334. Pardo CA, Vargas DL, Zimmerman AW. Immunity, neuroglia and neuroinflammation in autism. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005;17(6):485‐495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335. Estes ML, McAllister AK. Immune mediators in the brain and peripheral tissues in autism spectrum disorder. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(8):469‐486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336. D'Eufemia P, Celli M, Finocchiaro R, et al. Abnormal intestinal permeability in children with autism. Acta Paediatr. 1996;85(9):1076‐1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337. De Magistris L, Familiari V, Pascotto A, et al. Alterations of the intestinal barrier in patients with autism spectrum disorders and in their first‐degree relatives. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(4):418‐424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338. Fiorentino M, Sapone A, Senger S, et al. Blood–brain barrier and intestinal epithelial barrier alterations in autism spectrum disorders. Mol Autism. 2016;7(1):1‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339. Hughes HK, Rose D, Ashwood P. The gut microbiota and dysbiosis in autism spectrum disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018;18:1‐15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340. Weinberger AH, Gbedemah M, Martinez AM, Nash D, Galea S, Goodwin RD. Trends in depression prevalence in the USA from 2005 to 2015: widening disparities in vulnerable groups. Psychol Med. 2018;48(8):1308‐1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341. Kim GE, Jo M‐W, Shin Y‐W. Increased prevalence of depression in South Korea from 2002 to 2013. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 342. Trzeciak P, Herbet M. Role of the intestinal microbiome, intestinal barrier and psychobiotics in depression. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343. Doney E, Dion‐Albert L, Coulombe‐Rozon F, et al. Chronic stress exposure alters the gut barrier: sex‐specific effects on microbiota and jejunum tight junctions. Biol Psychiatry Global Open Sci. 2024;4(1):213‐228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 344. Kelly JR, Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G, Hyland NP. Breaking down the barriers: the gut microbiome, intestinal permeability and stress‐related psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 345. Maes M, Kubera M, Leunis JC, Berk M. Increased IgA and IgM responses against gut commensals in chronic depression: further evidence for increased bacterial translocation or leaky gut. J Affect Disord. 2012;141(1):55‐62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 346. Boursin P, Paternotte S, Dercy B, Sabben C, Maïer B. Semantics, epidemiology and semiology of stroke. Soins. 2018;63(828):24‐27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347. Higashida RT. What is stroke? From: the cerebrovascular imaging and interventions committee of the american heart association cardiovascular radiology council. 2003. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 348. Béjot Y, Bailly H, Durier J, Giroud M. Epidemiology of stroke in Europe and trends for the 21st century. Presse Med. 2016;45(12):e391‐e398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 349. Ekker MS, Verhoeven JI, Vaartjes I, van Nieuwenhuizen KM, Klijn CJ, de Leeuw F‐E. Stroke incidence in young adults according to age, subtype, sex, and time trends. Neurology. 2019;92(21):e2444‐e2454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 350. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153‐e639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351. Benakis C, Liesz A. The gut‐brain axis in ischemic stroke: its relevance in pathology and as a therapeutic target. Neurol Res Pract. 2022;4(1):57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352. Yin J, Liao SX, He Y, et al. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota with reduced trimethylamine‐N‐oxide level in patients with large‐artery atherosclerotic stroke or transient ischemic attack. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(11):e002699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353. Crapser J, Ritzel R, Verma R, et al. Ischemic stroke induces gut permeability and enhances bacterial translocation leading to sepsis in aged mice. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8(5):1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354. Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA. Pathophysiology of migraine. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:365‐391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) . Prevalence of chronic migraine headaches–United States, 1980–1989. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1991;40(20):331‐338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356. Sillanpää M, Anttila P. Increasing prevalence of headache in 7‐year‐old schoolchildren. Headache. 1996;36(8):466‐470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 357. van Hemert S, Breedveld AC, Rovers JM, et al. Migraine associated with gastrointestinal disorders: review of the literature and clinical implications. Front Neurol. 2014;5:241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358. Lau CI, Lin CC, Chen WH, Wang HC, Kao CH. Association between migraine and irritable bowel syndrome: a population‐based retrospective cohort study. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(9):1198‐1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 359. Dimitrova AK, Ungaro RC, Lebwohl B, et al. Prevalence of migraine in patients with celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. Headache. 2013;53(2):344‐355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 360. Scarpellini E, Ferraro D, Lauritano C, et al. Intestinal permeability in migraineurs. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:S143. [Google Scholar]
- 361. Kemper R, Meijler W, Korf J, Ter Horst G. Migraine and function of the immune system: a meta‐analysis of clinical literature published between 1966 and 1999. Cephalalgia. 2001;21(5):549‐557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 362. Chen J, Wang Q, Wang A, Lin Z. Structural and functional characterization of the gut microbiota in elderly women with migraine. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;9:470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363. Tomer Y, Huber A. The etiology of autoimmune thyroid disease: a story of genes and environment. J Autoimmun. 2009;32(3–4):231‐239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 364. Weetman AP. Autoimmune thyroid disease: propagation and progression. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;148(1):1‐9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365. Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM. Smoking and risk of Graves' disease. JAMA. 1993;269(4):479‐482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366. Berglund J, Christensen SB, Hallengren B. Total and age‐specific incidence of Graves' thyrotoxicosis, toxic nodular goitre and solitary toxic adenoma in Malmö 1970–74. J Intern Med. 1990;227(2):137‐141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 367. Berglund J, Ericsson UB, Hallengren B. Increased incidence of thyrotoxicosis in Malmö during the years 1988–1990 as compared to the years 1970–1974. J Intern Med. 1996;239(1):57‐62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 368. McLeod DS, Cooper DS. The incidence and prevalence of thyroid autoimmunity. Endocrine. 2012;42:252‐265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 369. Zaletel K, Gaberšček S, Pirnat E, Krhin B, Hojker S. Ten‐year follow‐up of thyroid epidemiology in Slovenia after increase in salt iodization. Croat Med J. 2011;52(5):615‐621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 370. Bargiel P, Szczuko M, Stachowska L, et al. Microbiome metabolites and thyroid dysfunction. J Clin Med. 2021;10(16):3609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 371. Zheng D, Liao H, Chen S, et al. Elevated levels of circulating biomarkers related to leaky gut syndrome and bacterial translocation are associated with graves' disease. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:796212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372. Sasso F, Carbonara O, Torella R, et al. Ultrastructural changes in enterocytes in subjects with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Gut. 2004;53(12):1878‐1880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373. Yan H‐x, An W‐c, Chen F, et al. Intestinal microbiota changes in Graves' disease: a prospective clinical study. Biosci Rep. 2020;40(9):BSR20191242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374. Zhao F, Feng J, Li J, et al. Alterations of the gut microbiota in Hashimoto's thyroiditis patients. Thyroid. 2018;28(2):175‐186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375. Cornejo‐Pareja I, Ruiz‐Limón P, Gómez‐Pérez AM, Molina‐Vega M, Moreno‐Indias I, Tinahones FJ. Differential microbial pattern description in subjects with autoimmune‐based thyroid diseases: a pilot study. J Personal Med. 2020;10(4):192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376. Palazzo C, Nguyen C, Lefevre‐Colau M‐M, Rannou F, Poiraudeau S. Risk factors and burden of osteoarthritis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;59(3):134‐138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377. Zhang W, Doherty M. EULAR recommendations for knee and hip osteoarthritis: a critique of the methodology. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(8):664‐669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 378. Wallace IJ, Worthington S, Felson DT, et al. Knee osteoarthritis has doubled in prevalence since the mid‐20th century. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(35):9332‐9336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379. Dagenais S, Garbedian S, Wai EK. Systematic review of the prevalence of radiographic primary hip osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):623‐637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380. Favazzo LJ, Hendesi H, Villani DA, et al. The gut microbiome‐joint connection: implications in osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2020;32(1):92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 381. Ramires LC, Santos GS, Ramires RP, et al. The association between gut microbiota and osteoarthritis: does the disease begin in the gut? Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3):1494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 382. Huang Z, Stabler T, Pei F, Kraus VB. Both systemic and local lipopolysaccharide (LPS) burden are associated with knee OA severity and inflammation. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(10):1769‐1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 383. Guss JD, Ziemian SN, Luna M, et al. The effects of metabolic syndrome, obesity, and the gut microbiome on load‐induced osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2019;27(1):129‐139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 384. Herzog W, Collins KH, Paul HA, Reimer RA, Seerattan RA, Hart DA. Relationship between inflammation, the gut microbiota, and metabolic osteoarthritis development: studies in a rat model. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;23(11):1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 385. Huang Z, Chen J, Li B, et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation from metabolically compromised human donors accelerates osteoarthritis in mice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(5):646‐656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 386. Schena FP, Nistor I. Epidemiology of IgA nephropathy: a global perspective. Semin Nephrol. 2018;38(5):435‐442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 387. McGrogan A, Franssen CF, de Vries CS. The incidence of primary glomerulonephritis worldwide: a systematic review of the literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(2):414‐430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 388. Kano T, Suzuki H, Makita Y, et al. Mucosal immune system dysregulation in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Biomedicine. 2022;10(12):3027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 389. Suzuki H, Kiryluk K, Novak J, et al. The pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(10):1795‐1803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 390. Lai KN, Leung JC, Tang SC. Recent advances in the understanding and management of IgA nephropathy. F1000Res. 2016;5:F1000 Faculty Rev‐161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 391. Sinniah R. Heterogeneous IgA glomerulonephropathy in liver cirrhosis. Histopathology. 1984;8:947‐962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 392. Coppo R. The gut‐renal connection in IgA nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. 2018;38(5):504‐512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 393. Makita Y, Suzuki H, Kano T, et al. TLR9 activation induces aberrant IgA glycosylation via APRIL‐ and IL‐6‐mediated pathways in IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2020;97(2):340‐349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 394. Ginès P, Krag A, Abraldes JG, Solà E, Fabrellas N, Kamath PS. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2021;398(10308):1359‐1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 395. Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol. 2019;70(1):151‐171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 396. Beste LA, Leipertz SL, Green PK, Dominitz JA, Ross D, Ioannou GN. Trends in burden of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma by underlying liver disease in US veterans, 2001–2013. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(6):1471‐1482.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 397. Flemming JA, Dewit Y, Mah JM, Saperia J, Groome PA, Booth CM. Incidence of cirrhosis in young birth cohorts in Canada from 1997 to 2016: a retrospective population‐based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4(3):217‐226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 398. Du Plessis J, Vanheel H, Janssen CE, et al. Activated intestinal macrophages in patients with cirrhosis release NO and IL‐6 that may disrupt intestinal barrier function. J Hepatol. 2013;58(6):1125‐1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 399. Assimakopoulos SF, Tsamandas AC, Tsiaoussis GI, et al. Altered intestinal tight junctions' expression in patients with liver cirrhosis: a pathogenetic mechanism of intestinal hyperpermeability. Eur J Clin Investig. 2012;42(4):439‐446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 400. Voulgaris T, Tiniakos D, Karagiannakis D, et al. Alteration of small intestinal occludin and ZO‐1 expession in liver cirrhosis. Pathol Int. 2024;74(3):154‐156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 401. Moreno‐Navarrete JM, Sabater M, Ortega F, Ricart W, Fernandez‐Real JM. Circulating zonulin, a marker of intestinal permeability, is increased in association with obesity‐associated insulin resistance. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 402. Tang Y, Forsyth CB, Farhadi A, et al. Nitric oxide‐mediated intestinal injury is required for alcohol‐induced gut leakiness and liver damage. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33(7):1220‐1230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 403. Pijls KE, Jonkers DM, Elamin EE, Masclee AA, Koek GH. Intestinal epithelial barrier function in liver cirrhosis: an extensive review of the literature. Liver Int. 2013;33(10):1457‐1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 404. Fukui H, Wiest R. Changes of intestinal functions in liver cirrhosis. Inflammatory Intestinal Dis. 2016;1(1):24‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 405. Ueta M, Kinoshita S. Innate immunity of the ocular surface. Brain Res Bull. 2010;81(2–3):219‐228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 406. Leonardi A, Bogacka E, Fauquert J‐L, et al. Ocular allergy: recognizing and diagnosing hypersensitivity disorders of the ocular surface. Allergy. 2012;67(11):1327‐1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 407. Leonardi A, Motterle L, Bortolotti M. Allergy and the eye. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;153(Supplement_1):17‐21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 408. Friedlaender MH. Ocular allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;11(5):477‐482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 409. Miyazaki D, Fukagawa K, Okamoto S, et al. Epidemiological aspects of allergic conjunctivitis. Allergol Int. 2020;69(4):487‐495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 410. Meng Q, Nagarajan S, Son Y, Koutsoupias P, Bielory L. Asthma, oculonasal symptoms, and skin test sensitivity across National Health and nutrition examination surveys. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;116(2):118‐125.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 411. Mimura T, Ichinose T, Yamagami S, et al. Airborne particulate matter (PM2. 5) and the prevalence of allergic conjunctivitis in Japan. Sci Total Environ. 2014;487:493‐499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 412. Hughes J, Lackie P, Wilson S, Church M, McGill J. Reduced structural proteins in the conjunctival epithelium in allergic eye disease. Allergy. 2006;61(11):1268‐1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 413. Ono SJ, Lane K. Comparison of effects of alcaftadine and olopatadine on conjunctival epithelium and eosinophil recruitment in a murine model of allergic conjunctivitis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2011;5:77‐84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 414. Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):276‐283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 415. Papas EB. The global prevalence of dry eye disease: a Bayesian view. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41(6):1254‐1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 416. Dana R, Bradley JL, Guerin A, et al. Estimated prevalence and incidence of dry eye disease based on coding analysis of a large, all‐age United States health care system. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;202:47‐54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 417. Gayton JL. Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:405‐412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 418. Stern ME, Schaumburg CS, Pflugfelder SC. Dry eye as a mucosal autoimmune disease. Int Rev Immunol. 2013;32(1):19‐41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 419. Leonardi A, Silva D, Perez Formigo D, et al. Management of ocular allergy. Allergy. 2019;74(9):1611‐1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 420. Mantelli F, Massaro‐Giordano M, Macchi I, Lambiase A, Bonini S. The cellular mechanisms of dry eye: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Cell Physiol. 2013;228(12):2253‐2256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 421. Luo L, Li D‐Q, Doshi A, Farley W, Corrales RM, Pflugfelder SC. Experimental dry eye stimulates production of inflammatory cytokines and MMP‐9 and activates MAPK signaling pathways on the ocular surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(12):4293‐4301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 422. Simmons KT, Xiao Y, Pflugfelder SC, de Paiva CS. Inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide on the ocular surface in a murine dry eye model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(6):2443‐2451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 423. Li D‐Q, Lokeshwar BL, Solomon A, Monroy D, Ji Z, Pflugfelder SC. Regulation of MMP‐9 production by human corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73(4):449‐459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 424. Pflugfelder SC, Farley W, Luo L, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase‐9 knockout confers resistance to corneal epithelial barrier disruption in experimental dry eye. Am J Pathol. 2005;166(1):61‐71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 425. Willis KA, Postnikoff CK, Freeman A, et al. The closed eye harbours a unique microbiome in dry eye disease. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1‐10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 426. Andersson J, Vogt JK, Dalgaard MD, Pedersen O, Holmgaard K, Heegaard S. Ocular surface microbiota in patients with aqueous tear‐deficient dry eye. Ocul Surf. 2021;19:210‐217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 427. Zhang Z, Zou X, Xue W, Zhang P, Wang S, Zou H. Ocular surface microbiota in diabetic patients with dry eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(12):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 428. Abbasi MA, Chertow GM, Hall YN. End‐stage renal disease. BMJ Clinical Evidence. 2010;2010:2002. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 429. Orr NI, McDonald SP, McTaggart S, Henning P, Craig JC. Frequency, etiology and treatment of childhood end‐stage kidney disease in Australia and New Zealand. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24:1719‐1726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 430. Hsu C‐y, Go AS, McCulloch CE, Darbinian J, Iribarren C. Exploring secular trends in the likelihood of receiving treatment for end‐stage renal disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(1):81‐88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 431. Hsu C‐y, McCulloch CE, Iribarren C, Darbinian J, Go AS. Body mass index and risk for end‐stage renal disease. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(1):21‐28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 432. Orth SR, Stöckmann A, Conradt C, et al. Smoking as a risk factor for end‐stage renal failure in men with primary renal disease. Kidney Int. 1998;54(3):926‐931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 433. Hsu C‐y, Iribarren C, McCulloch CE, Darbinian J, Go AS. Risk factors for end‐stage renal disease: 25‐year follow‐up. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(4):342‐350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 434. Vaziri ND, Goshtasbi N, Yuan J, et al. Uremic plasma impairs barrier function and depletes the tight junction protein constituents of intestinal epithelium. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36(5):438‐443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 435. Feroze U, Kalantar‐Zadeh K, Sterling KA, et al. Examining associations of circulating endotoxin with nutritional status, inflammation, and mortality in hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2012;22(3):317‐326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 436. Vaziri ND, Wong J, Pahl M, et al. Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora. Kidney Int. 2013;83(2):308‐315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 437. Rachner TD, Khosla S, Hofbauer LC. Osteoporosis: now and the future. Lancet. 2011;377(9773):1276‐1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 438. Ahlborg HG, Rosengren BE, Järvinen TL, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis and incidence of hip fracture in women‐secular trends over 30 years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:1‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 439. Black D, Rosen C. Clinical practice. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:254‐262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 440. Bijelic R, Milicevic S, Balaban J. Risk factors for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Medical Arch. 2017;71(1):25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 441. Kim J‐M, Lin C, Stavre Z, Greenblatt MB, Shim J‐H. Osteoblast‐osteoclast communication and bone homeostasis. Cells. 2020;9(9):2073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 442. Wang J, Wang Y, Gao W, et al. Diversity analysis of gut microbiota in osteoporosis and osteopenia patients. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 443. Wallimann A, Magrath W, Pugliese B, et al. Butyrate inhibits osteoclast activity in vitro and regulates systemic inflammation and bone healing in a murine osteotomy model compared to antibiotic‐treated mice. Mediat Inflamm. 2021;2021:8817421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 444. Wallimann A, Hildebrand M, Groeger D, et al. An exopolysaccharide produced by Bifidobacterium longum 35624(R) inhibits osteoclast formation via a TLR2‐dependent mechanism. Calcif Tissue Int. 2021;108(5):654‐666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 445. Hao M‐l, Wang G‐y, Zuo X‐q, Qu C‐j, Yao B‐c, Wang D‐l. Gut microbiota: an overlooked factor that plays a significant role in osteoporosis. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(9):4095‐4103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 446. Wang N, Ma S, Fu L. Gut microbiota dysbiosis as one cause of osteoporosis by impairing intestinal barrier function. Calcif Tissue Int. 2022;110:225‐235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 447. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497‐506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 448. Zayet S, Lepiller Q, Zahra H, et al. Clinical features of COVID‐19 and influenza: a comparative study on Nord Franche‐Comte cluster. Microbes Infect. 2020;22(9):481‐488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 449. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727‐733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 450. WHO . WHO Director‐General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID‐19. 2020. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who‐director‐general‐s‐opening‐remarks‐at‐the‐media‐briefing‐on‐covid‐19‐‐‐11‐march‐2020
- 451. WHO . WHO coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) dashboard. 2023. Accessed 2023‐07‐11. https://covid19.who.int
- 452. Lamers MM, Beumer J, van der Vaart J, et al. SARS‐CoV‐2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science. 2020;369(6499):50‐54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 453. Dumas A, Bernard L, Poquet Y, Lugo‐Villarino G, Neyrolles O. The role of the lung microbiota and the gut–lung axis in respiratory infectious diseases. Cell Microbiol. 2018;20(12):e12966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 454. Yazici D, Cagan E, Tan G, et al. Disrupted epithelial permeability as a predictor of severe COVID‐19 development. Allergy. 2023;78:2644‐2658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 455. Giron LB, Dweep H, Yin X, et al. Plasma markers of disrupted gut permeability in severe COVID‐19 patients. Front Immunol. 2021;12:686240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 456. Lunjani N, Albrich WC, Suh N, et al. Higher levels of bacterial DNA in serum associate with severe and fatal COVID‐19. Allergy. 2022;77(4):1312‐1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 457. Albrich WC, Ghosh TS, Ahearn‐Ford S, et al. A high‐risk gut microbiota configuration associates with fatal hyperinflammatory immune and metabolic responses to SARS‐CoV‐2. Gut Microbes. 2022;14(1):2073131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 458. Li J, Ghosh TS, McCann R, et al. Robust cross‐cohort gut microbiome associations with COVID‐19 severity. Gut Microbes. 2023;15(1):2242615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 459. Ballering AV, van Zon SKR, Olde Hartman TC, Rosmalen JGM, Lifelines Corona Research I . Persistence of somatic symptoms after COVID‐19 in The Netherlands: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2022;400(10350):452‐461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 460. Choutka J, Jansari V, Hornig M, Iwasaki A. Unexplained post‐acute infection syndromes. Nat Med. 2022;28(5):911‐923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 461. O'Mahony L, Buwalda T, Blair M, et al. Impact of Long COVID on health and quality of life. HRB Open Res. 2022;5:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 462. Unstersmayr E, Venter C, Smith P, et al. Immune mechanisms underpinning long COVID: collegium internationale allergologicum update 2024. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2024;22:1‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 463. Altmann DM, Whettlock EM, Liu S, Arachchillage DJ, Boyton RJ. The immunology of long COVID. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23(10):618‐634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 464. Davis HE, McCorkell L, Vogel JM, Topol EJ. Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21(3):133‐146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 465. Cervia‐Hasler C, Bruningk SC, Hoch T, et al. Persistent complement dysregulation with signs of thromboinflammation in active Long Covid. Science. 2024;383(6680):eadg7942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 466. Tang WH, Kitai T, Hazen SL. Gut microbiota in cardiovascular health and disease. Circ Res. 2017;120(7):1183‐1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 467. Verhaar BJH, Prodan A, Nieuwdorp M, Muller M. Gut microbiota in hypertension and atherosclerosis: a review. Nutrients. 2020;12(10):2982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 468. Khalesi S, Sun J, Buys N, Jayasinghe R. Effect of probiotics on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Hypertension. 2014;64(4):897‐903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 469. Aguilar EC, Leonel AJ, Teixeira LG, et al. Butyrate impairs atherogenesis by reducing plaque inflammation and vulnerability and decreasing NFkappaB activation. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;24(6):606‐613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 470. Dayang EZ, Plantinga J, Ter Ellen B, van Meurs M, Molema G, Moser J. Identification of LPS‐activated endothelial subpopulations with distinct inflammatory phenotypes and regulatory signaling mechanisms. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 471. Zhang WQ, Wang YJ, Zhang A, et al. TMA/TMAO in hypertension: novel horizons and potential therapies. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2021;14(6):1117‐1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 472. Gallo A, Macerola N, Favuzzi AM, Nicolazzi MA, Gasbarrini A, Montalto M. The gut in heart failure: current knowledge and novel Frontiers. Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(3):203‐214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 473. Mamic P, Snyder M, Tang WHW. Gut microbiome‐based management of patients with heart failure: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(17):1729‐1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 474. Anderson KM, Ferranti EP, Alagha EC, Mykityshyn E, French CE, Reilly CM. The heart and gut relationship: a systematic review of the evaluation of the microbiome and trimethylamine‐N‐oxide (TMAO) in heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2022;27(6):2223‐2249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 475. Gil‐Cruz C, Perez‐Shibayama C, De Martin A, et al. Microbiota‐derived peptide mimics drive lethal inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Science. 2019;366(6467):881‐886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 476. Violi F, Castellani V, Menichelli D, Pignatelli P, Pastori D. Gut barrier dysfunction and endotoxemia in heart failure: a dangerous connubium? Am Heart J. 2023;264:40‐48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 477. Romano KA, Nemet I, Prasad Saha P, et al. Gut microbiota‐generated Phenylacetylglutamine and heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2023;16(1):e009972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 478. Wang YC, Koay YC, Pan C, et al. Indole‐3‐propionic acid protects against heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Res. 2024;134(4):371‐389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 479. Gawałko M, Agbaedeng TA, Saljic A, et al. Gut microbiota, dysbiosis and atrial fibrillation. Arrhythmogenic mechanisms and potential clinical implications. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(11):2415‐2427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 480. Zhang Y, Zhang S, Li B, et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes age‐related atrial fibrillation by lipopolysaccharide and glucose‐induced activation of NLRP3‐inflammasome. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(3):785‐797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 481. Parker J, O'Brien C, Hawrelak J, Gersh FL. Polycystic ovary syndrome: an evolutionary adaptation to lifestyle and the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 482. Azziz R, Carmina E, Chen Z, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 483. Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G, Azziz R. Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7(4):219‐231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 484. Diamanti‐Kandarakis E, Piperi C. Genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome: searching for the way out of the labyrinth. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(6):631‐643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 485. Yang R, Li Q, Zhou Z, et al. Changes in the prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in China over the past decade. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022;25:100494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 486. Vatier C, Christin‐Maitre S. Epigenetic/circadian clocks and PCOS. Hum Reprod. 2024;39(6):1167‐1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 487. Teede HJ, Tay CT, Laven J, et al. Recommendations from the 2023 international evidence‐based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(4):767‐793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 488. Hirschberg AL. Polycystic ovary syndrome, obesity and reproductive implications. Womens Health (Lond). 2009;5(5):529‐540; quiz 541–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 489. Turnbaugh PJ, Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Knight R, Gordon JI. The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Sci Transl Med. 2009;1(6):6ra14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 490. Portincasa P, Bonfrate L, Khalil M, et al. Intestinal barrier and permeability in health, obesity and NAFLD. Biomedicine. 2021;10(1):83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 491. Piazza MJ, Urbanetz AA. Environmental toxins and the impact of other endocrine disrupting chemicals in women's reproductive health. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019;23(2):154‐164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 492. Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Fava F, et al. Selective increases of bifidobacteria in gut microflora improve high‐fat‐diet‐induced diabetes in mice through a mechanism associated with endotoxaemia. Diabetologia. 2007;50(11):2374‐2383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 493. Basu BR, Chowdhury O, Saha SK. Possible link between stress‐related factors and altered body composition in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018;11(1):10‐18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 494. March WA, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Phillips DI, Norman RJ, Davies MJ. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(2):544‐551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 495. Wu XK, Zhou SY, Liu JX, et al. Selective ovary resistance to insulin signaling in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):954‐965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 496. Book CB, Dunaif A. Selective insulin resistance in the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(9):3110‐3116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 497. Guo Y, Qi Y, Yang X, et al. Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and gut microbiota. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 498. Li P, Shuai P, Shen S, et al. Perturbations in gut microbiota composition in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMC Med. 2023;21(1):302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 499. Zou Y, Liao R, Cheng R, Chung H, Zhu H, Huang Y. Alterations of gut microbiota biodiversity and relative abundance in women with PCOS: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Microb Pathog. 2023;184:106370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 500. Qi X, Yun C, Sun L, et al. Gut microbiota‐bile acid‐interleukin‐22 axis orchestrates polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Med. 2019;25(8):1225‐1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 501. Gibson GR, Beatty ER, Wang X, Cummings JH. Selective stimulation of bifidobacteria in the human colon by oligofructose and inulin. Gastroenterology. 1995;108(4):975‐982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 502. Cani PD, Bibiloni R, Knauf C, et al. Changes in gut microbiota control metabolic endotoxemia‐induced inflammation in high‐fat diet‐induced obesity and diabetes in mice. Diabetes. 2008;57(6):1470‐1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 503. Kelly CC, Lyall H, Petrie JR, Gould GW, Connell JM, Sattar N. Low grade chronic inflammation in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(6):2453‐2455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 504. Younis A, Hawkins K, Mahini H, Butler W, Garelnabi M. Serum tumor necrosis factor‐alpha, interleukin‐6, monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 and paraoxonase‐1 profiles in women with endometriosis, PCOS, or unexplained infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(11):1445‐1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 505. Xu Y, Qiao J. Association of insulin resistance and elevated androgen levels with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS): a review of literature. J Healthc Eng. 2022;2022:9240569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 506. Tremellen K, Pearce K. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota (DOGMA)–a novel theory for the development of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2012;79(1):104‐112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 507. Sonnenburg JL, Backhed F. Diet‐microbiota interactions as moderators of human metabolism. Nature. 2016;535(7610):56‐64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 508. Carvalho BM, Saad MJ. Influence of gut microbiota on subclinical inflammation and insulin resistance. Mediat Inflamm. 2013;2013:986734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 509. Campos‐Alberto E, Hirose T, Napatalung L, Ohyama M. Prevalence, comorbidities, and treatment patterns of Japanese patients with alopecia areata: a descriptive study using Japan medical data center claims database. J Dermatol. 2023;50(1):37‐45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 510. Glickman JW, Dubin C, Dahabreh D, et al. An integrated scalp and blood biomarker approach suggests the systemic nature of alopecia areata. Allergy. 2021;76(10):3053‐3065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 511. Glickman JW, Dubin C, Renert‐Yuval Y, et al. Cross‐sectional study of blood biomarkers of patients with moderate to severe alopecia areata reveals systemic immune and cardiovascular biomarker dysregulation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(2):370‐380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 512. Pinto D, Sorbellini E, Marzani B, Rucco M, Giuliani G, Rinaldi F. Scalp bacterial shift in Alopecia areata. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 513. Farahmand S. Microbiome of compromised skin. In: Dayan N, ed. Skin microbiome handbook: from basic research to product development. Wiley‐Scrivener; 2020:143‐169. [Google Scholar]
- 514. Parisi R, Yiu Z. The worldwide epidemiology of rosacea. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(2):239‐240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 515. Medgyesi B, Dajnoki Z, Béke G, et al. Rosacea is characterized by a profoundly diminished skin barrier. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140(10):1938‐1950.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 516. Deng Z, Chen M, Xie H, et al. Claudin reduction may relate to an impaired skin barrier in rosacea. J Dermatol. 2019;46(4):314‐321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 517. Rainer BM, Thompson KG, Antonescu C, et al. Characterization and analysis of the skin microbiota in rosacea: a case–control study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21:139‐147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 518. Gonçalves GAP, Brito MMC, Salathiel AM, Ferraz TS, Alves D, Roselino AMF. Incidence of pemphigus vulgaris exceeds that of pemphigus foliaceus in a region where pemphigus foliaceus is endemic: analysis of a 21‐year historical series. An Bras Dermatol. 2011;86:1109‐1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 519. Hasan S, Ahmed S, Khan NI, Tarannum F. Pemphigus vulgaris—a case report and detailed review of literature. Indian J Dentistry. 2011;2(3):113‐119. [Google Scholar]
- 520. Hashimoto K, Lever WF. An electron microscopic study on pemphigus vulgaris of the mouth and the skin with special reference to the intercellular cement. J Invest Dermatol. 1967;48(6):540‐552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 521. Timoteo RP, da Silva MV, Miguel CB, et al. Th1/Th17‐related cytokines and chemokines and their implications in the pathogenesis of pemphigus vulgaris. Mediat Inflamm. 2017;2017:7151285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 522. Scaglione GL, Fania L, De Paolis E, et al. Evaluation of cutaneous, oral and intestinal microbiota in patients affected by pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid: a pilot study. Exp Mol Pathol. 2020;112:104331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 523. Jacobs RL, Freedman PM, Boswell RN. Nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia (NARES syndrome): clinical and immunologic presentation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981;67(4):253‐262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 524. Bousquet J, Fokkens W, Burney P, et al. Important research questions in allergy and related diseases: nonallergic rhinitis: a GA2LEN paper. Allergy. 2008;63(7):842‐853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 525. Settipane RA, Lieberman P. Update on nonallergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001;86(5):494‐508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 526. Ramanathan M Jr, London NR Jr, Tharakan A, et al. Airborne particulate matter induces nonallergic eosinophilic sinonasal inflammation in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017;57(1):59‐65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 527. Hosoda Y, Yamaguchi M, Hiraga Y. Global epidemiology of sarcoidosis: what story do prevalence and incidence tell us? Clin Chest Med. 1997;18(4):681‐694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 528. Divertie MB, Cassan SM, Brown AL Jr. Ultrastructural morphometry of the blood‐air barrier in pulmonary sarcoidosis. Chest. 1976;69(2):154‐157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 529. Hermans C, Petrek M, Kolek V, et al. Serum Clara cell protein (CC16), a marker of the integrity of the air‐blood barrier in sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J. 2001;18(3):507‐514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 530. Bargagli E, Mazzi A, Rottoli P. Markers of inflammation in sarcoidosis: blood, urine, BAL, sputum, and exhaled gas. Clin Chest Med. 2008;29(3):445‐458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 531. Kramer MS, Lane DA. Aminorex, dexfenfluramine, and primary pulmonary hypertension. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(4):361‐364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 532. George MG, Schieb LJ, Ayala C, Talwalkar A, Levant S. Pulmonary hypertension surveillance: United States, 2001 to 2010. Chest. 2014;146(2):476‐495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 533. Rafikova O, James J, Eccles CA, et al. Early progression of pulmonary hypertension in the monocrotaline model in males is associated with increased lung permeability. Biol Sex Differ. 2020;11(1):1‐9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 534. Chen J, Zhou D, Miao J, et al. Microbiome and metabolome dysbiosis of the gut‐lung axis in pulmonary hypertension. Microbiol Res. 2022;265:127205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 535. Quon BS, Aitken ML. Cystic fibrosis: what to expect now in the early adult years. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2012;13(4):206‐214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 536. Gregory P. Gastrointestinal pH, motility/transit and permeability in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996;23(5):513‐523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 537. Werlin SL, Benuri‐Silbiger I, Kerem E, et al. Evidence of intestinal inflammation in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(3):304‐308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 538. Bruzzese E, Callegari ML, Raia V, et al. Disrupted intestinal microbiota and intestinal inflammation in children with cystic fibrosis and its restoration with lactobacillus GG: a randomised clinical trial. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 539. Wu L, Zhang SQ, Zhao L, Ren ZH, Hu CY. Global, regional, and national burden of periodontitis from 1990 to 2019: results from the global burden of disease study 2019. J Periodontol. 2022;93(10):1445‐1454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 540. Zhang S, Yu N, Arce RM. Periodontal inflammation: integrating genes and dysbiosis. Periodontol. 2020;82(1):129‐142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 541. Hvid‐Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM, Sørensen HT, Funch‐Jensen P. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(15):1375‐1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 542. Kool B, Chandra D, Fitzharris P. Adult food‐induced anaphylaxis hospital presentations in New Zealand. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92(1093):640‐644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 543. Rudders SA, Arias SA, Camargo CA. Trends in hospitalizations for food‐induced anaphylaxis in US children, 2000–2009. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(4):960‐962.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 544. Ruffner MA, Wang KY, Dudley JW, et al. Elevated atopic comorbidity in patients with food protein–induced enterocolitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;8(3):1039‐1046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 545. Berin MC, Lozano‐Ojalvo D, Agashe C, Baker MG, Bird JA, Nowak‐Wegrzyn A. Acute FPIES reactions are associated with an IL‐17 inflammatory signature. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148(3):895‐901.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 546. Boyer J, Scuderi V. P504 comparison of the gut microbiome between food protein‐induced enterocolitis sydrome (FPIES) infants and allergy‐free infants. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;119(5):e3. [Google Scholar]
- 547. Weimers P, Ankersen DV, Lophaven S, et al. Incidence and prevalence of microscopic colitis between 2001 and 2016: a Danish nationwide cohort study. J Crohn's Colitis. 2020;14(12):1717‐1723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 548. Barmeyer C, Erko I, Fromm A, et al. Ion transport and barrier function are disturbed in microscopic colitis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1258(1):143‐148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 549. Morgan DM, Cao Y, Miller K, et al. Microscopic colitis is characterized by intestinal dysbiosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(4):984‐986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 550. Okui T. An age‐period‐cohort analysis for prevalence of common psychiatric disorders in Japan, 1999–2017. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021;56:639‐648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 551. Lennon E, Maharshak N, Elloumi H, Borst L, Plevy S, Moeser AJ. Early life stress triggers persistent colonic barrier dysfunction and exacerbates colitis in adult IL‐10−/− mice. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(4):712‐719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 552. Bentzen J, Meulengracht Flachs E, Stenager E, Brønnum‐Hansen H, Koch‐Henriksen N. Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Denmark 1950–2005. Mult Scler J. 2010;16(5):520‐525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 553. Grassivaro F, Puthenparampil M, Pengo M, et al. Multiple sclerosis incidence and prevalence trends in the province of Padua, Northeast Italy, 1965–2018. Neuroepidemiology. 2019;52(1–2):41‐46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 554. Camara‐Lemarroy CR, Silva C, Greenfield J, Liu W‐Q, Metz LM, Yong VW. Biomarkers of intestinal barrier function in multiple sclerosis are associated with disease activity. Mult Scler J. 2020;26(11):1340‐1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 555. Camara‐Lemarroy CR, Metz L, Meddings JB, Sharkey KA, Wee YV. The intestinal barrier in multiple sclerosis: implications for pathophysiology and therapeutics. Brain. 2018;141(7):1900‐1916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 556. Fang F, Valdimarsdóttir U, Bellocco R, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Sweden, 1991–2005. Arch Neurol. 2009;66(4):515‐519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 557. Xu L, Liu T, Liu L, et al. Global variation in prevalence and incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Neurol. 2020;267:944‐953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 558. Wu S, Yi J, Yg Z, Zhou J, Sun J. Leaky intestine and impaired microbiome in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model. Physiol Rep. 2015;3(4):e12356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 559. Cindoruk M, Tuncer C, Dursun A, et al. Increased colonic intraepithelial lymphocytes in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;34(3):237‐239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 560. Ishaq HM, Mohammad IS, Guo H, et al. Molecular estimation of alteration in intestinal microbial composition in Hashimoto's thyroiditis patients. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;95:865‐874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 561. Alonso MD, Llorca J, Martinez‐Vazquez F, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in northwestern Spain: a 20‐year epidemiologic study. Medicine. 2011;90(5):350‐358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 562. Silverman GJ, Azzouz DF, Alekseyenko AV. Systemic lupus erythematosus and dysbiosis in the microbiome: cause or effect or both? Curr Opin Immunol. 2019;61:80‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 563. Dehner C, Fine R, Kriegel MA. The microbiome in systemic autoimmune disease–mechanistic insights from recent studies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019;31(2):201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 564. Bakland G, Nossent HC, Gran JT. Incidence and prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis in northern Norway. Arthritis Care Res. 2005;53(6):850‐855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 565. Ciccia F, Guggino G, Rizzo A, et al. Dysbiosis and zonulin upregulation alter gut epithelial and vascular barriers in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):1123‐1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 566. Catanoso M, Macchioni P, Boiardi L, et al. Epidemiology of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener' s granulomatosis) in Northern Italy: a 15‐year population‐based study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44:202‐207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 567. Grayson PC, Steiling K, Platt M, et al. Brief report: defining the nasal transcriptome in granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (Wegener's). Arthritis Rheum. 2015;67(8):2233‐2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 568. Rhee RL, Sreih AG, Najem CE, et al. Characterisation of the nasal microbiota in granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(10):1448‐1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 569. Grønbæk L, Vilstrup H, Jepsen P. Autoimmune hepatitis in Denmark: incidence, prevalence, prognosis, and causes of death. A nationwide registry‐based cohort study. J Hepatol. 2014;60(3):612‐617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 570. Tanaka A, Mori M, Matsumoto K, Ohira H, Tazuma S, Takikawa H. Increase trend in the prevalence and male‐to‐female ratio of primary biliary cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2019;49(8):881‐889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 571. Lin R, Zhou L, Zhang J, Wang B. Abnormal intestinal permeability and microbiota in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(5):5153. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 572. Zouboulis CC. Epidemiology of Adamantiades‐Behçet's disease. Ann Med Interne. 1999;150(6):488‐498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 573. Fresko I, Hamuryudan V, Demir M, et al. Intestinal permeability in Behcet's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60(1):65‐66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 574. Shimizu J, Kubota T, Takada E, et al. Bifidobacteria abundance‐featured gut microbiota compositional change in patients with Behcet's disease. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 575. Consolandi C, Turroni S, Emmi G, et al. Behçet's syndrome patients exhibit specific microbiome signature. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14(4):269‐276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 576. Widdifield J, Paterson JM, Bernatsky S, et al. The epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis in Ontario, Canada. Arthritis Rheum. 2014;66(4):786‐793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 577. Tajik N, Frech M, Schulz O, et al. Targeting zonulin and intestinal epithelial barrier function to prevent onset of arthritis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 578. Loeser RF, Arbeeva L, Kelley K, et al. Association of increased serum lipopolysaccharide, but not microbial dysbiosis, with obesity‐related osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2022;74(2):227‐236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 579. Chen J, Wang A, Wang Q. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is a risk factor for osteoarthritis in older female adults: a case control study. BMC Bioinform. 2021;22(1):1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 580. Pereira M, Carreira H, Lunet N, Azevedo A. Trends in prevalence of diabetes mellitus and mean fasting glucose in Portugal (1987–2009): a systematic review. Public Health. 2014;128(3):214‐221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 581. Bosi E, Molteni L, Radaelli M, et al. Increased intestinal permeability precedes clinical onset of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006;49:2824‐2827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 582. Sapone A, De Magistris L, Pietzak M, et al. Zonulin upregulation is associated with increased gut permeability in subjects with type 1 diabetes and their relatives. Diabetes. 2006;55(5):1443‐1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 583. Westerholm‐Ormio M, Vaarala O, Pi P, Ilonen J, Savilahti E. Immunologic activity in the small intestinal mucosa of pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2003;52(9):2287‐2295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 584. Harbison JE, Roth‐Schulze AJ, Giles LC, et al. Gut microbiome dysbiosis and increased intestinal permeability in children with islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;20(5):574‐583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 585. Sharma S, Tripathi P. Gut microbiome and type 2 diabetes: where we are and where to go? J Nutr Biochem. 2019;63:101‐108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 586. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL. Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994. Int J Obes. 1998;22(1):39‐47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 587. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235‐241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 588. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):242‐249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 589. Little TJ, Cvijanovic N, DiPatrizio NV, et al. Plasma endocannabinoid levels in lean, overweight, and obese humans: relationships to intestinal permeability markers, inflammation, and incretin secretion. Am J Physiol‐Endocrinol Metabol. 2018;315(4):E489‐E495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 590. Brun P, Castagliuolo I, Leo VD, et al. Increased intestinal permeability in obese mice: new evidence in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Physiol‐Gastrointest liver Phys. 2007;292(2):G518‐G525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 591. Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1022‐1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 592. Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2009;457(7228):480‐484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 593. Cox AJ, West NP, Cripps AW. Obesity, inflammation, and the gut microbiota. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(3):207‐215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 594. Welsh JA, Karpen S, Vos MB. Increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among United States adolescents, 1988–1994 to 2007–2010. J Pediatr. 2013;162(3):496‐500.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 595. Allen AM, Therneau TM, Larson JJ, Coward A, Somers VK, Kamath PS. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease incidence and impact on metabolic burden and death: a 20 year‐community study. Hepatology. 2018;67(5):1726‐1736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 596. Miele L, Valenza V, La Torre G, et al. Increased intestinal permeability and tight junction alterations in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2009;49(6):1877‐1887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 597. Fukui H. Role of gut dysbiosis in liver diseases: what have we learned so far? Diseases. 2019;7(4):58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 598. Chen Y, Yang F, Lu H, et al. Characterization of fecal microbial communities in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2011;54(2):562‐572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 599. Dogru M, Okada N, Asano‐Kato N, et al. Alterations of the ocular surface epithelial mucins 1, 2, 4 and the tear functions in patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36(12):1556‐1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 600. Yeoh S, Church M, Lackie P, McGill J, Mota M, Hossain P. Increased conjunctival expression of protease activated receptor 2 (PAR‐2) in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a role for abnormal conjunctival epithelial permeability in disease pathogenesis? Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(9):1304‐1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 601. Leonardi A, Daull P, Garrigue J‐S, et al. Conjunctival transcriptome analysis reveals the overexpression of multiple pattern recognition receptors in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Ocul Surf. 2021;19:241‐248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 602. Leonardi A, Modugno R, Cavarzeran F, Rosani U. Metagenomic analysis of the conjunctival bacterial and fungal microbiome in vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Allergy. 2021;76(10):3215‐3217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 603. Rudnicka AR, Kapetanakis VV, Jarrar Z, et al. Incidence of late‐stage age‐related macular degeneration in American whites: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(1):85‐93.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 604. Kinnunen K, Petrovski G, Moe MC, Berta A, Kaarniranta K. Molecular mechanisms of retinal pigment epithelium damage and development of age‐related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(4):299‐309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 605. Zinkernagel MS, Zysset‐Burri DC, Keller I, et al. Association of the intestinal microbiome with the development of neovascular age‐related macular degeneration. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):40826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 606. Wu Y, Wu J, Bu J, et al. High‐fat diet induces dry eye‐like ocular surface damages in murine. Ocul Surf. 2020;18(2):267‐276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 607. Kolko M, Horwitz A, Thygesen J, Jeppesen J, Torp‐Pedersen C. The prevalence and incidence of glaucoma in Denmark in a fifteen year period: a nationwide study. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 608. Usui T, Misawa Y, Honda N, Tomidokoro A, Yamagami S, Amano S. Nontraumatic keratomycosis caused by Alternaria in a glaucoma patient. Int Ophthalmol. 2009;29:529‐531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 609. Shin JH, Lee J‐W, Lim S‐H, Yoon BW, Lee Y, Seo JH. The microbiomes of the eyelid and buccal area of patients with uveitic glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 610. Chams H, Rostami M, Mohammadi S‐F, Ohno S. Epidemiology and prevalence of uveitis: review of literature. Iran J Ophthalmol. 2009;21(4):4‐16. [Google Scholar]
- 611. Gritz DC, Wong IG. Incidence and prevalence of uveitis in northern California: the northern California epidemiology of uveitis study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(3):491‐500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 612. Zhang L, Borjini N, Lun Y, et al. CDCP1 regulates retinal pigmented epithelial barrier integrity for the development of experimental autoimmune uveitis. JCI Insight. 2022;7(18):e157038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 613. Jayasudha R, Chakravarthy SK, Prashanthi GS, Sharma S, Tyagi M, Shivaji S. Implicating dysbiosis of the gut fungal microbiome in uveitis, an inflammatory disease of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(5):1384‐1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 614. McCullough PA, Philbin EF, Spertus JA, Kaatz S, Sandberg KR, Weaver WD. Confirmation of a heart failure epidemic: findings from the resource utilization among congestive heart failure (REACH) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(1):60‐69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 615. Hoes A, Mosterd A, Grobbee D. An epidemic of heart failure? Recent evidence from Europe. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:L2‐L9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 616. Kannel WB, Ho K, Thom T. Changing epidemiological features of cardiac failure. Br Heart J. 1994;72(2 Suppl):S3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 617. Sandek A, Bauditz J, Swidsinski A, et al. Altered intestinal function in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(16):1561‐1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 618. Luedde M, Winkler T, Heinsen FA, et al. Heart failure is associated with depletion of core intestinal microbiota. ESC Heart Failure. 2017;4(3):282‐290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 619. Pasini E, Aquilani R, Testa C, et al. Pathogenic gut flora in patients with chronic heart failure. JACC: Heart Failure. 2016;4(3):220‐227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 620. Passarino G, Burlo P, Ciccone G, Comino A. Prevalence of myocarditis at autopsy in Turin, Italy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121(6):619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 621. Kytö V, Saraste A, Voipio‐Pulkki L‐M, Saukko P. Incidence of fatal myocarditis: a population‐based study in Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(5):570‐574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 622. Nieto Callejo M, Gallardo I, Gutierrez B, et al. Oleanolic acid protection against experimental autoimmune myocarditis modulates the microbiota and the intestinal barrier integrity. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(Supplement_2):ehaa946.3716. [Google Scholar]
- 623. Le CHH. The prevalence of anemia and moderate‐severe anemia in the US population (NHANES 2003–2012). PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 624. MohanKumar K, Namachivayam K, Sivakumar N, et al. Severe neonatal anemia increases intestinal permeability by disrupting epithelial adherens junctions. Am J Physiol‐Gastrointestinal Liver Phys. 2020;318(4):G705‐G716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 625. Arthur CM, Nalbant D, Feldman HA, et al. Anemia induces gut inflammation and injury in an animal model of preterm infants. Transfusion. 2019;59(4):1233‐1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 626. Long Y, Liang F, Guo R, et al. Gut microbiota signatures in gestational anemia. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:549678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 627. Muleviciene A, D'Amico F, Turroni S, Candela M, Jankauskiene A. Iron deficiency anemia‐related gut microbiota dysbiosis in infants and young children: a pilot study. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2018;65(4):551‐564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 628. Ren M, Ge Y, Qi J, et al. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota and its relationship with the regulatory T cells in patients with aplastic anemia. 2021.
- 629. Martin DL, MacDonald KL, White KE, Soler JT, Osterholm MT. The epidemiology and clinical aspects of the hemolytic uremic syndrome in Minnesota. N Engl J Med. 1990;323(17):1161‐1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 630. Tarr PI, Neill MA, Allen J, Siccardi CJ, Watkins SL, Hickman RO. The increasing incidence of the hemolytic‐uremic syndrome in King County, Washington: lack of evidence for ascertainment bias. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(3):582‐586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 631. King AJ. Acute inflammation in the pathogenesis of hemolytic‐uremic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2002;61(4):1553‐1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 632. Wan D, Liang X, Yang L, et al. Integration of gut microbiota and metabolomics for the hematopoiesis of Siwu paste on anemia rats. Heliyon. 2023;9:e18024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 633. Chawla LS, Fink M, Goldstein SL, et al. The epithelium as a target in sepsis. Shock. 2016;45(3):249‐258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 634. Liu Z, Li N, Fang H, et al. Enteric dysbiosis is associated with sepsis in patients. FASEB J. 2019;33(11):12299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 635. Tews HC, Kandulski A, Schmid S, et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) a novel tool to detect intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in severe COVID‐19 disease. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2022;81(2):177‐190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 636. Sokolowska M, Lukasik ZM, Agache I, et al. Immunology of COVID‐19: mechanisms, clinical outcome, diagnostics, and perspectives—a report of the European academy of allergy and clinical immunology (EAACI). Allergy. 2020;75(10):2445‐2476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 637. Fiorito S, Soligo M, Gao Y, Ogulur I, Akdis CA, Bonini S. Is the epithelial barrier hypothesis the key to understanding the higher incidence and excess mortality during COVID‐19 pandemic? The case of Northern Italy. Allergy. 2022;77(5):1408‐1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 638. Baeradeh N, Ghoddusi Johari M, Moftakhar L, Rezaeianzadeh R, Hosseini SV, Rezaianzadeh A. The prevalence and predictors of cardiovascular diseases in Kherameh cohort study: a population‐based study on 10,663 people in southern Iran. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22(1):244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
