Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 8;16:100505. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcchd.2024.100505

Table 2.

Comparison of conduit parameters between patients with oversized and non-oversized conduits.

Variable Oversized (n = 44) Non-oversized (n = 42) p value
Age at Fontan procedure, year 2.8 (1.6–5.8) 2.7 (1.8–9.7) 0.766
Weight at Fontan procedure, kg 13.0 (10.4–18.2) 14.1 (10.0–25.7) 0.010
Body surface area at Fontan procedure, m2 0.58 (0.49–0.73) 0.60 (0.47–0.97) 0.056
Simple cardiac situs and position 29 (65.9) 30(71.4) 0.581
Apicocaval juxtaposition 13 (29.5) 12 (28.6) 0.921
Bilateral bidirectional cavopulmonary connection 12 (27.3) 9 (21.4) 0.528
Normalized original conduit area, mm2/m2 600.4 (524.0–694.0) 475.1 (261.7–556.9) <0.001
Interval from Fontan procedure, year 13.0 ± 3.6 13.1 ± 3.2 0.0871
Minimum conduit area, mm2 227.1 ± 38.2 175.2 ± 46.5 <0.001
Normalized minimum conduit area, mm2/m2 148.6 (88.6–278.4) 109.9 (32.6–208.6) <0.001
Maximum percent stenosis, % 34.5 (20.3–56.7) 33.1 (6.9–79.1) 0.809
Minimum conduit area/IVC area, % 47.7 (21.9–95.2) 41.0 (10.8–73.3) 0.010
Aspect ratio 1.41 (1.04–2.30) 1.46 (1.11–8.98) 0.766
Tortuosity, % 103.8 (100.3–115.8) 104.9 (100.3–131.5) 0.063
Location of the minimum conduit area 0.019
 Upper third 11 (25.0) 5 (11.9)
 Middle third 15 (34.1) 27 (64.3)
 Lower third 18 (40.9) 10 (23.8)
Mechanism for narrowing of the conduit
 Luminal irregularity 11 (25.0) 9 (21.4) 0.695
 Calcification 32 (72.7) 32 (76.2) 0.713
 Pseudointimal hyperplasia or mural thrombus 37 (84.1) 21 (50.0) 0.001

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median (range), or number (%).

n = number; IVC = inferior vena cava.