Table 4.
Prevalence and factors associated with not receiving family planning counseling during ANC among women aged 15–49 who had ANC visits for the most recent live birth 3 years preceding the BDHS 2017–18 (n = 4604)
| Factors | Prevalence1 | AOR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of ANC provider | |||
| Medically trained provider | 87.3 | Reference | |
| Non-medically trained provider | 88.8 | 0.93 | (0.64, 1.37) |
| Women’s education | |||
| Secondary complete or higher | 81.0 | Reference | |
| Secondary incomplete | 88.9 | 1.91** | (1.46, 2.51) |
| No education or primary | 90.3 | 2.23** | (1.61, 3.09) |
| Parity | |||
| Third or higher | 87.2 | Reference | |
| Second | 86.9 | 1.23 | (0.93, 1.62) |
| First | 88.1 | 1.53** | (1.15, 2.03) |
| Type of residence | |||
| Urban | 84.8 | Reference | |
| Rural | 88.5 | 1.20 | (0.94, 1.52) |
| Administrative division | |||
| Dhaka | 86.6 | Reference | |
| Chattogram | 90.3 | 1.45 | (1.00, 2.11) |
| Barishal | 87.3 | 0.90 | (0.58, 1.39) |
| Khulna | 87.2 | 0.87 | (0.59, 1.30) |
| Mymensingh | 89.8 | 1.10 | (0.72, 1.69) |
| Rajshahi | 87.7 | 0.88 | (0.55, 1.41) |
| Rangpur | 81.2 | 0.50** | (0.34, 0.75) |
| Sylhet | 89.0 | 1.02 | (0.63, 1.64) |
| Household wealth quintile | |||
| Fifth | 82.4 | Reference | |
| Fourth | 87.3 | 1.29 | (0.93, 1.78) |
| Third | 88.4 | 1.38 | (0.98, 1.93) |
| Second | 89.7 | 1.49* | (1.01, 2.20) |
| First | 89.8 | 1.56* | (1.03, 2.36) |
1Percentage of women did not receive family planning counseling during ANC among women aged 15–49 who had ANC visits for most recent live birth 3 years preceding the BDHS 2017–18; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; AOR: Adjusted odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval