Table 1.

Unadjusted and adjusted associations of demographics and substance use factors with men’s stealthing perpetration

	Unadjusted Analyses		Logistic Regression Analysis
	No Stealthing Perpetration (N=1256, 93.9%) M (SD) or %	Stealthing Perpetration (N=81, 6.1%) M (SD) or %	Odds Ratio for Stealthing Perpetration (95% CI)
Demographics
Age (years)	20.8 (2.3)	21.2 (2.1)	1.06 (0.95–1.18)
Non-Hispanic White	53.9%***	34.6%	0.39 (0.24–0.64)***
Other Race/Ethnicity	46.1%	65.4%	reference
Some College or >	84.2%	81.5%	0.70 (0.37–1.32)
High School or <	15.8%	18.5%	reference
Heterosexual	78.4%	86.4%	1.80 (0.92–3.50)
Other Sexual Orientation	21.6%	13.6%	reference
Past 12-month Frequency of Substance Use
Binge Drinking	1.1 (1.1)***	1.7 (1.1)	1.39 (1.12–1.73)**
Cannabis	1.3 (1.6)***	2.5 (1.6)	1.37 (1.17–1.60)***
Other Illegal Drugs	0.3 (0.6)***	0.7 (1.1)	1.43 (1.07–1.91) *
Prescription Drug Misuse	0.2 (0.6)***	0.6 (1.1)	--

Note. Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit: χ² (8) = 8.26, p = .41. Unadjusted analyses (t-tests and chi-square analyses) included missing values in 1 to 7 cases across each variable, N = 1327 were included in the logistic regression model.

^*p<.05,

^**p<.01,

^***p<.001