Table 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted associations of demographics and substance use factors with stealthing victimization among men

	Unadjusted Analyses		Logistic Regression Analysis
	No Stealthing Victimization (N=1265, 95.0%) M (SD) or %	Stealthing Victimization (N=67, 5.0%) M (SD) or %	Odds Ratio for Stealthing Victimization (95% CI)
Demographics
Age (years)	20.8 (2.3)	21.3 (2.3)	1.06 (0.94–1.20)
Non-Hispanic White	54.0%***	31.3%	0.28 (0.16–0.49)***
Other Race/Ethnicity	46.0%	68.7%	reference
Some College or >	83.9%	86.6%	0.83 (0.38–1.81)
High School or <	16.1%	13.4%	reference
Heterosexual	80.2%***	53.7%	0.24 (0.14–0.40)***
Other Sexual Orientation	19.8%	46.3%	Reference
Past 12-month Frequency of Substance Use
Binge Drinking	1.1 (1.1)***	1.7 (1.1)	1.49 (1.16–1.91)**
Cannabis	1.4 (1.6)*	1.8 (1.7)	0.95 (0.79–1.14)
Other Illegal Drugs	0.3 (0.6)**	0.7 (1.1)	1.79 (1.31–2.44)***
Prescription Drug Misuse	0.2 (0.6)*	0.6 (1.1)	--

Note. Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit: χ² (8) = 3.30, p = .91. Unadjusted analyses (t-tests and chi-square analyses) included missing values in 1 to 7 cases across each variable, N = 1322 were included in the logistic regression model.

^*p<.05,

^**p<.01,

^***p<.001