Table 5.
Species | Classified as | Total | Correct identification | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |||
(1) S. asakoae | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 100.00% |
(2) S. chamlongi | 0 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 80.00% |
(3) S. doipuiense complex | 0 | 1 | 35 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 39 | 89.74% |
(4) S. nodosum | 0 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 96.77% |
(5) S. nigrogilvum | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 76.92% |
(6) S. tenebrosum complex | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 31 | 87.10% |
(7) S. umphangense | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 28 | 33 | 84.85% |
Correctly assigned/total individual | 224/253 | 88.54% |
The rows represent given species, while columns represent predicted species