Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 19;57(1):2442072. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2442072

Table 5.

Subgroup analysis of CEUS imaging features based on nodule size, degree of differentiation and blood supply.

    Wash-in pattern
  Washout onset
 
    APHE Rim APHE Iso/ Hypo P No <45s 45s-1
Min
≥1min P
HCC ≤3cm 20
(95.2%)
0
(0.0%)
1
(4.8%)
0.194 5
(23.8%)
2
(9.5%)
2
(9.5%)
12
(57.1%)
0.656
  >3cm 87
(100%)
0
(0.0%)
0
(0.0%)
  13
(14.9%)
11
(12.6%)
16
(18.4%)
47
(54.0%)
 
  WD and MD 84
(100%)
0
(0.0%)
0
(0.0%)
-- 14
(16.7%)
9
(10.7%)
14
(16.7%)
47
(56.0%)
0.212
  PD and MPD 12
(100%)
0
(0.0%)
0
(0.0%)
  0
(0.0%)
3
(25.0%)
3
(25.0%)
6
(50.0%)
 
MLT ≤3cm 37
(64.9%)
8
(14.0%)
12
(21.1%)
0.387 7
(12.3%)
33
(57.9%)
17
(29.8%)
0
(0.0%)
0.168
  >3cm 58
(71.6%)
13
(16.0%)
10
(12.3%)
  4
(4.9%)
45
(55.6%)
28
(34.6%)
4
(4.9%)
 
  Hypo-
vascular
66
(68.0%)
17
(17.5%)
14
(14.4%)
0.440 10
(10.3%)
55
(56.7%)
31
(32.0%)
1
(0.1%)
0.107
  Hyper-
vascular
29
(70.7%)
4
(9.8%)
8
(19.5%)
  1
(2.4%)
23
(56.1%)
14
(34.1%)
3
(7.3%)
 

Data in parentheses are shown as percentages.

WD: well differentiated, MD: moderately differentiated, PD: Poorly differentiated, MPD: moderately-to-poorly differentiated.

*Statistically significant.