Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 20;7:372. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01383-3

Table 2.

Statistics of the annotations in our dataset per behavior categories

Category Dimension Definition Count Freq Count/Case
Feedback Instances Trainer utterance intended to modify trainee thinking or behavior 3740 100.0% 129.0 ± 77.4
Trainee Behavior Verbal Acknowledgment Verbal or audible reaction from the trainee confirming that they have heard the feedback 1691 45.2% 58.3 ± 31.4
Behavioral Adjustment Behavioral adjustment made by a trainee that corresponds directly with the preceding feedback 1666 44.6% 57.5 ± 39.3
Ask for Clarification Trainee asks for feedback to be restated due to lack of understanding 77 2.1% 3.2 ± 2.4
Trainer Reaction Approval Trainer verbally demonstrates that they are satisfied with the trainee behavioral change 552 14.8% 19.7 ± 16.9
Disapproval Trainer verbally demonstrates that they are not yet satisfied with the trainee behavioral change 71 1.9% 3.6 ± 2.6
Taking Control (non-safety) Trainer takes control of the robot for non-safety related reasons 98 2.6% 3.6 ± 2.3
Taking Control (safety) Trainer takes control of the robot out of concern for patient safety 18 0.5% 1.3 ± 0.5

We provide absolute total counts (Count), the relative frequency of behavior per feedback instance counts (Freq) as well as the prevalence per surgical case (Count/Case).