Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 22;15:100353. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100353

Table 2.

Applications and performance of AI algorithms in tumor microenvironment diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Article Year Aim Neural network type Neural network model Data Biopsies/resection specimens CRC stage Sample size Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy Precision Recall
Kather J. N. et al. Predicting survival from colorectal cancer histology slides using deep learning: A retrospective multicenter study 2019 Segmentation for tissue classes: adipose tissue, background, debris, lymphocytes, mucus, smooth muscle, normal colon mucosa, cancer-associated stroma, and CRC epithelium CNN VGG19, AlexNet, SqueezeNet v. 1.1, GoogLeNet, Resnet50 CRC tissue slides stained with H&E 100 000 image patches from 86 H&E slides, Training (70%), Validation (15%), Testing (15%) >0.94
Kwak M. S. et al. Deep convolutional neural network-based lymph node metastasis prediction for colon cancer using histopathological images 2021 Segmentation for tissue classes: normal colon mucosa, stroma, lymphocytes, mucus, adipose tissue, smooth muscle, and colon cancer epithelium CNN U-Net CRC tissue slides stained with H&E I–III 100 000 image patches, Training (80%), Validation (10%), Testing (10%) 0.677 ≈0.85
Lin A. et al. Deep learning analysis of the adipose tissue and the prediction of prognosis in colorectal cancer 2022 Segmentation for tissue classes: tumor and non-tumor sections CNN VGG19 CRC tissue slides stained with H&E >100 000 image patches 0.973
Gong C. et al. Quantitative characterization of CD8+ T cell clustering and spatial heterogeneity in solid tumors 2019 Detection CD8+ T cells and quantify the spatial heterogeneity CRC tissue slides stained with CD8 29 slides 0.881 0.742
Jakab A., Patai Á. V., Micsik T. Digital image analysis provides robust tissue microenvironment-based prognosticators in patients with stage I-IV colorectal cancer 2022 Evaluation of tumor-stroma ratio Machine learning–based algorithm SlideViewer software 2.4 version and its QuantCenter module CRC tissue slides stained with H&E Resection specimens I–IV 185 slides 0.671 (tumor epithelium)
0.646 (stroma)
0.865 (tumor epithelium)
0.783 (stroma)
0.80 (tumor epithelium)
0.724 (stroma)
Failmezger H. et al. Computational tumor infiltration phenotypes enable the spatial and genomic analysis of immune infiltration in colorectal cancer 2021 Identification of spatial tumor infiltration phenotypes Lasso regression model CRC tissue slides stained with Ki67, CD3/CD4, CD3/CD8 Resection specimens 80 slides
Pai R. K. et al. Development and initial validation of a deep learning algorithm to quantify histological features in colorectal carcinoma including tumour budding/poorly differentiated clusters 2021 Segmentation for tissue classes: carcinoma, stroma, mucin, necrosis, fat, and smooth muscle CNN CRC tissue slides stained with H&E I–IV 0.88 0.73
Yoo S. Y. et al. Whole-Slide Image Analysis Reveals Quantitative Landscape of Tumor–Immune Microenvironment in Colorectal CancersTIME Analysis via Whole-Slide Histopathologic Images 2022 Evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor-stroma ratio Random forest classifier CRC tissue slides stained with CD3, CD8 Resection specimens II, III Training cohort (260 slides), Discovery cohort (590 patients), Validation cohort (293 patients).
Zhao K. et al. Artificial intelligence quantified tumour-stroma ratio is an independent predictor for overall survival in resectable colorectal cancer 2020 Evaluation of tumor-stroma ratio CNN VGG19 CRC tissue slides stained with H&E Resection specimens Training set (283100 slides), Test set 1 (6300 slides), Test set 2 (22500 slides) 0.728 0.9746

Abbreviation: TME – tumor microenvironment, TB – tumor budding, AUC – area under the curve, CNN – convolutional neural network, CRC – colorectal cancer, H&E – hematoxylin and eosin, CK – cytokeratin.