Table 2.
Distribution of SSUGs by households’ mean decile value and Category on ternary plot
| Mean decile value of households in SSUG | Category labelled for SSUG | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | ||
| 1.0–<2.0 | 174 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 174 |
| 2.0–<3.0 | 233 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 325 |
| 3.0–<4.0 | 4 | 393 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 398 |
| 4.0–<5.0 | 0 | 271 | 28 | 131 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 430 |
| 5.0–<6.0 | 0 | 6 | 34 | 295 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 347 |
| 6.0–<7.0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 135 | 0 | 103 | 0 | 244 |
| 7.0–<8.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 172 | 1 | 177 |
| 8.0–<9.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 145 |
| 9.0–≤10.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
For mean decile, the lower the value, the higher the economic status and vice versa. For Categories A to G, refer to the classification rules with respect to ternary plot’s triangular area shown in Fig. 1. For each of the mean decile groups, the predominant Category/ies is/are bolded