Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 21;15:53. doi: 10.1186/s13229-024-00635-z

Table 2.

Diagnostic-group comparison of the average face processing activity in each of the ROIs

ROI activity
FACES vs. FIX contrast
Autism
beta-value
No autism
beta-value
Group comparison
t value Punc PFDR
V1  − 0.05  − 0.01  − 0.91 0.37 0.55
Left inferior occipital 0.16* 0.15* 0.37 0.71 0.78
Right inferior occipital 0.25* 0.20* 1.11 0.27 0.55
Left posterior fusiform 0.22* 0.17* 0.98 0.33 0.55
Right posterior fusiform 0.22* 0.26*  − 0.72 0.48 0.60
Left STS 0.01 0.06*  − 1.17 0.25 0.55
Right STS 0.06° 0.09*  − 0.81 0.42 0.57
Left amygdala 0.08 0.10*  − 0.31 0.76 0.78
Right amygdala 0.09* 0.08* 0.28 0.78 0.78
Left anterior temporal 0.00 0.07*  − 1.87 0.07 0.55
Right anterior temporal 0.00 0.05*  − 1.36 0.18 0.55
Left inferior frontal 0.02 0.06  − 1.13 0.26 0.55
Right inferior frontal 0.26* 0.18* 1.58 0.12 0.55

Beta-values with an asterisks (° p < 0.05 uncorrected, * q < 0.05 FDR corrected) indicate whether the FACESvsFIX contrast yields significant brain activity within a particular ROI within a particular group, based on a one-sample t-test with H0: Mean X = 0. P-values in bold (p < 0.05) indicate whether the FACESvsFIX contrast yields significant brain activity within a particular ROI between both groups, based on a two-sample t-test. However, no significant group-differences were observed