Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 20;13:98. doi: 10.1186/s40249-024-01268-3

Table 2.

Albendazole medication in patients with echinococcosis in the 10 endemic counties in 2019

General characteristics Total (n) Medication H P-value
No medication (n, %) Irregular medication (n, %) Regular medication (n, %)
Sex
 Male 214 10 (4.7) 155 (72.4) 49 (22.9) 4.12 0.12
 Female 368 36 (9.8) 248 (67.4) 84 (22.8)
Age (year)
< 18 13 3 (23.1) 8 (61.5) 2 (15.4) 3.89 0.14
 18–40 52 1 (1.9) 36 (69.2) 15 (28.9)
 40–60 178 15 (8.4) 127 (71.4) 36 (20.3)
≥ 60 339 27 (8.0) 232 (68.4) 80 (23.6)
Ethnicity
 Han 268 1 (0.4) 193 (72.0) 74 (27.6) 34.76*  < 0.05
 Tibetan 293 44 (15.0) 191 (65.2) 58 (19.8)
 Others 21 1 (4.2) 19 (90.5) 1 (4.2)
Education level
 No formal education 353 38 (10.8) 224 (63.5) 91 (25.8) 46.12**  < 0.05
 Primary school 164 6 (3.7) 133 (81.1) 25 (15.2)
 Junior high school 62 2 (3.2) 45 (28.6) 15 (24.2)
 Senior high school and above 3 0 1 (33.3) 2 (66.7)
Occupation
 Herdsmen 245 37 (15.1) 156 (63.7) 52 (21.2) 31.69  < 0.05
 Farmers 286 5 (1.8) 206 (72.0) 75 (26.2)
 Others 51 4 (7.8) 41 (80.4) 6 (11.7)
Disease type
 CE 563 46 (8.2) 403 (71.6) 114 (20.3) 10.76  < 0.05
 AE 19 0 0 19 (100.0)
Disease duration (year)
< 5 91 22 (24.2) 25 (27.5) 44 (48.4) 6.13  < 0.05
 5–10 422 23 (5.5) 329 (78.0) 70 (16.6)
≥ 10 69 1 (1.5) 49 (71.0) 19 (27.5)
Albendazole dosage form
 Tablet 200 0 150 (75.0) 50 (25.0) 8.70  < 0.05
 Emulsion 178 3 (1.7) 146 (82.0) 29 (16.3)
 Tablet + emulsion 111 0 63 (56.8) 48 (43.2)
 Unrecorded 93 43 (46.2) 44 (47.3) 6 (6.5)
Occurrence of adverse reactions (Excluding patients without medication, N = 536)
 Yes 242 207 (85.5) 35 (14.5) 6.24  < 0.05
 No 294 194 (66.0) 100 (34.0)
Total 582 46 (7.9) 403 (69.2) 133 (22.9)

The chi-square test compared only with the recorded percentage

CE cystic echinococcosis; AE alveolar echinococcosis

*Fewer patients from other ethnic groups and only Tibetan and Han patients were included in the analysis

**Fewer patients in senior high school, college, and beyond, and these patients were merged in the analysis

P values were compared with the 0.05 level