Table 6. Comparison of prediction performance for J48 and AdaboostM1.

The algorithm performance was compared using a pairwise comparison between schemes using the standard t-test with the WEKA Experimenter tool. This analysis adopted a significance level of 0.05.

AUC: area under the curve; AdaBoostM1: adaptive boosting

Algorithm	Accuracy	Significant	Sensitivity	Significant	Specificity	Significant	κ coefficient	Significant	AUC	Significant
J48	0.906	No	0.885	No	0.886	No	0.801	No	0.928	No
Adaboost M1	0.920		0.908		0.891		0.830		0.972