Table 3.
Table showing Lysholm and IKDC Scores divided into subgroups
| Subgroups | n | Lysholma | p-value | IKDCa | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSD of PTT < 4 mm | 27 | 85.7 ± 10.1 | 0.0006 | 76.0 ± 16.0 | n.s |
| SSD of PTT ≥ 4 mm | 20 | 79.2 ± 6.6 | 69.9 ± 11.4 | ||
| BMI < 30 kg/m2 | 38 | 81.1 ± 7.3 | n.s | 75.1 ± 13.5 | 0.0484 |
| BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 | 9 | 83.5 ± 9.7 | 75.1 ± 13.5 | ||
| Arciero | 36 | 82.5 ± 9.1 | n.s | 72.7 ± 14.6 | n.s |
| LaPrade | 11 | 84.9 ± 10.2 | 75.8 ± 14.3 |
The Lysholm Score was significantly higher in patients with postoperative SSD of PTT < 4 mm (85.7 ± 10.1 vs. 79.2 ± 6.6, p = 0.0006), while the IKDC Score was higher in patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (75.1 ± 13.5 vs. 75.1 ± 13.5, p = 0.0484)
aMean ± SD; Bold text indicating p < 0.05; SSD of PTT Side-to-side difference of posterior tibial translation