Table 2.
OS | PFS | ORR | CR | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Original cohort, HR (95% CI) | ||||
Naive cox | 0.41 (0.26–0.65) | 0.37 (0.25–0.56) | 2.26 (1.26–4.05) | 1.55 (0.68–3.51) |
Time-updated cox | 1.10 (0.69–1.75) | 0.88 (0.59–1.30) | 1.27 (0.68–2.36) | 0.77 (0.35–1.70) |
Emulated cohort, HR (95% CI) | ||||
TTE | 0.90 (0.62–1.30) | 1.02 (0.72–1.44) | 1.43 (0.89–2.29) | 1.47 (0.78–2.76) |
All models were for adjusted for age, and sex, study center, therapy line, ECOG (0/ ≥ 1), and localization of metastases (lymph node only disease/visceral metastases/missing) were added as strata. The TTE pooled weighted Cox model was additionally adjusted for study number as a natural cubic spline.
There were no statistically significant differences regarding sex or therapy line for any endpoint (all p-values for interaction > 0.1 for all four endpoints both for the naive and updated Cox models, and the Cox models from the emulated cohort)
OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; ORR, objective response rate; CR, complete response