Table 7.
Illustrative example: ranking of treatments
| Frequentist FE model | Frequentist RE model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | p-score | Intervention | p-score |
| Comparator A | 0.984798 | Comparator A | 0.930552 |
| Intervention X | 0.815202 | Intervention X | 0.869446 |
| Comparator C | 0.600000 | Comparator C | 0.597584 |
| Comparator E | 0.349816 | Comparator E | 0.336729 |
| Comparator B | 0.250183 | Comparator B | 0.264845 |
| Comparator D | 1.71E − 06 | Comparator D | 0.000843 |
| Bayesian FE model | Bayesian RE model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | SUCRA | Intervention | SUCRA |
| Comparator A | 0.981027 | Comparator A | 0.92899 |
| Intervention X | 0.818973 | Intervention X | 0.870971 |
| Comparator C | 0.599903 | Comparator C | 0.577122 |
| Comparator E | 0.388257 | Comparator E | 0.382042 |
| Comparator B | 0.211838 | Comparator B | 0.23979 |
| Comparator D | 1.9E − 06 | Comparator D | 0.001084 |
FE fixed effects, RE random effects, SUCRA surface under the cumulative ranking curve