Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 9;15:1461599. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1461599

Table 3.

Saturation effect analysis of AIP on uric acid levels and the prevalence of hyperuricemia.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
β(95%CI) P β(95%CI) P β(95%CI) P
Uric acid
 Inflection point(K) 0.578 0.571 0.588
 <K effect size OR(95%CI) 1.438 (1.345,1.531) <0.001 1.197(1.108,1.285) <0.001 0.854(0.762,0.946) <0.001
 >K effect size OR(95%CI) -1.088 (-2.24,0.065) 0.064 -0.849(-1.959,0.26) -0.893(-0.2101,0.316) 0.147
P for log likelihood ratio test <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Hyperuricemia
 Inflection point(K) 0.524 0.547 0.573
 <K effect size OR(95%CI) 5.587 (4.652,6.712) <0.001 7.496 (6.176,9.099) <0.001 4.4 (3.528,5.488) <0.001
 >K effect size OR(95%CI) 0.311 (0.082,1.182) 0.086 0.489 (0.109,2.191) 0.349 0.313 (0.044,2.242) 0.247
P for log likelihood ratio test <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

AIP, atherogenic index of plasma; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; OR, odds ratio. Model 1: univariable;Model 2: age,sex, race; Model 3: age, sex, race, family poverty income ratio, BMI, waist circumference, education level, alcohol consumption status, smoking status, marital status, diabetes, HTN, serum creatinine, coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, sedentary time, LDL-C, TC, glycohemoglobin, urine albumin/urine creatinine, urinary creatinine, urinary albumin.