TABLE 1.
Isolated compound | Separation method | Active part | Anti-HIV to HOG.R5 IC50 (μg/mL) | Cytotoxicity to HOG.R5 CC50 (μg/mL) | Selectivity index (CC50/IC50) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH | LF + TW | 5.0 a | 13.2 a | 2.6 | Zhang et al. (2001) | |
PH | LF + TW | 2–3 a | 5.7 a | 2.8–1.9 | Zhang et al. (2003a) | |
PH | LF + TW | 7.1 a | 17.5 a | 2.4 | Zhang et al. (2003a) | |
PH | LF + TW | 14.4 a | >20 a | >1 | Zhang et al. (2003a) | |
PH | LF + TW | 4.0 a | 12.4 a | 3.1 | Zhang et al. (2003a) | |
PH | LF + TW | 11.3 a | 20.0 a | 1.7 | Zhang et al. (2003a) | |
PH | LF + TW | T a | 2.5–5.0 a | — | Zhang et al. (2003a) | |
SC | LF + TW | 34.5 a | NT a | — | Hoang et al. (2002) | |
SC | LF + TW | 16.4 a | 23.0 a | 1.4 | Hoang et al. (2002) | |
SC | LF + TW | I a | NT a | — | Hoang et al. (2002) | |
PH | LF + TW | 6.5 a | 15.9 a | 2.4 | Zhang et al. (2003b) | |
PH | LF + TW | I a | NT a | — | Zhang et al. (2003b) | |
PH | LF + TW | 17.4 a | NT a | — | Zhang et al. (2003b) | |
PH | LF + TW | I a | NT a | — | Zhang et al. (2003b) | |
PH | LF + TW | I a | NT a | — | Zhang et al. (2003b) | |
PH | LF + TW | I a | NT a | — | Zhang et al. (2003b) | |
PH | LF + TW | 28.0 a | NT a | — | Zhang et al. (2003b) | |
PH | LF + TW | I b | NT b | — | Zhang et al. (2005) | |
PH | LF + TW | 9.0 b | 26.5 b | 2.9 | Zhang et al. (2005) | |
PH | LF + TW | I b | NT b | — | Zhang et al. (2005) | |
PH | LF + TW | 14.0 b | NT b | >1 | Zhang et al. (2005) | |
PH | LF + TW + FB | 14.0 b | NT b | — | Guan et al. (2016) | |
PH | LF + TW + FB | I b | - b | — | Guan et al. (2016) |
Note: PH, preparative HPLC; SC, si gel column; LF, leaves; TW, twigs; FB, flower buds; I, inactive; NT, nontoxic at 20 μg/mL; T, toxic.
Untreated cells served as controls.
3TC (Lamivudine) was used as control compound with a IC50 value of 1.2 μM in the same HOG.R5 system.