TABLE 2.
Group | Ace | p | Chao 1 | p | Simpson | p | Shannon | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LC (OTU) | 574.05 ± 89.11 | 0.15 | 582.03 ± 87.04 | 0.13 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.38 | 6.6 ± 0.46 | 0.96 |
FG(OTU) | 702.69 ± 150.90 | 723.22 ± 157.47 | 0.96 ± 0.04 | 6.62 ± 0.79 | ||||
LC (phylum) | 11.8 ± 1.30 | 0.67 | 11.8 ± 1.30 | 0.42 | 0.6 ± 0.11 | 0.69 | 1.84 ± 0.34 | 0.29 |
FG (phylum) | 11.47 ± 0.98 | 11.2 ± 0.84 | 0.57 ± 0.16 | 1.58 ± 0.39 | ||||
LC (order) | 41.06 ± 4.88 | 0.082 | 40.9 ± 6.41 | 0.12 | 0.86 ± 0.05 | 0.008 | 3.34 ± 0.31 | 0.01 |
FG (order) | 35.48 ± 3.87 | 34.97 ± 3.62 | 0.75 ± 0.05 | 2.68 ± 0.31 | ||||
LC (family) | 69.91 ± 4.36 | 0.048 | 69.97 ± 7.32 | 0.085 | 0.9 ± 0.02 | 0.073 | 3.98 ± 0.17 | 0.089 |
FG (family) | 62.04 ± 5.99 | 62.16 ± 4.66 | 0.86 ± 0.04 | 3.6 ± 0.39 | ||||
LC (genus) | 117.32 ± 9.26 | 0.68 | 118.48 ± 10 | 0.68 | 0.92 ± 0.02 | 0.11 | 4.54 ± 0.17 | 0.2 |
FG (genus) | 119.84 ± 9.69 | 120.92 ± 7.7 | 0.88 ± 0.05 | 4.15 ± 0.56 |
Note: The comparison of alpha diversity between LC and FG group, bold numbers showed values with significant differences (p < 0.05).