Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 9;15:1453295. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1453295

TABLE 1.

Results of the comparisons between BayeScan and HapFLK analyses performed in this study and the 12 significant loci detected in at least 15 pairwise contrasts out of 60 by Senczuk et al. (2020).

BTA SNP ID a rsID BayeScan results b HapFLK results c
2 Hapmap49624-BTA-47893 rs41638273 11 3
4 Hapmap53144-ss46525999 rs41255147 6 3
14 BTB-01532239 rs42649775 12 3
14 BTB-01530788 rs42646660 12 3
14 BTB-00557532 rs41724332 12 3
14 Hapmap46986-BTA-34282 rs41627953 11 3
14 Hapmap46735-BTA-86653 rs41657755 9 3
14 ARS-BFGL-NGS-36089 rs110774011 9 3
14 Hapmap30932-BTC-011225 rs41724536 6 3
14 BTB-01280026 rs42404006 1 1
14 Hapmap27934-BTC-065223 rs42403970 1 1
26 ARS-BFGL-NGS-11271 rs110513274 9 3
a

List of loci detected as significant in at least 15 pairwise contrasts out of 60 by Senczuk et al. (2020).

b

Number of BayeScan pairwise contrasts where each locus was detected as significant (in one or more of the 12 contrasts) in our study.

c

Number of HapFLK contrasts where each locus was detected as significant (in one or more of the three contrasts) in our study.