Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 2;23:4369–4383. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.11.041

Table 2.

Clustering results of STMVGAE and baseline methods on all datasets. The best results are in bold black.

Methods DLPFC
BCDC
Melanoma
BRCA
ARI NMI HS Purity ARI NMI HS Purity ARI NMI HS Purity ARI NMI HS Purity
stLearn [14] 0.356 0.526 0.533 0.646 0.501 0.456 0.425 0.855 - - - - 0.588 0.653 0.643 0.646
SEDR [19] 0.499 0.643 0.631 0.725 0.187 0.077 0.083 0.799 0.281 0.389 0.418 0.754 0.485 0.660 0.644 0.566
SpaGCN [17] 0.411 0.543 0.520 0.614 0.334 0.378 0.348 0.789 0.415 0.447 0.423 0.694 0.441 0.626 0.619 0.552
DeepST [20] 0.476 0.620 0.606 0.689 0.459 0.389 0.354 0.838 - - - - 0.546 0.680 0.663 0.642
STAGATE [18] 0.501 0.645 0.624 0.727 0.442 0.337 0.319 0.836 0.410 0.438 0.418 0.719 0.460 0.688 0.666 0.561
STAMARKER [23] 0.527 0.662 0.640 0.735 0.450 0.358 0.337 0.838 0.429 0.442 0.427 0.740 0.461 0.689 0.667 0.562
STMVGAE(ours) 0.562 0.638 0.648 0.789 0.730 0.584 0.583 0.931 0.480 0.468 0.480 0.804 0.660 0.699 0.689 0.678