Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 9;2013(10):CD003934. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003934.pub4

Taavoni 2011.

Methods Randomised trial.
Participants 62 women, Tehran, Iran.
  • 31 study participants: nulliparous

  • 31 control participants: nulliparous


Inclusion Criteria:
Parity: nulliparous,
Pluralty: singleton,
Gestation: 38 ‐ 40 weeks,
Onset of labour: spontaneous,
Other: cephalic presentation; cervical dilatation between 4 to 8 cm; anticipation of a normal birth; no history of infertility; aged 18 to 25 years.
Interventions Study group:
  • 29 women were allocated to use a birth ball


There were two post randomisation exclusions from the study group. Reasons included: dissatisfied with sitting on the ball during birth ball movements (n = 1); caesarean birth because of lack of descent of the fetal head (n = 1).
Control group:
  • 31 women were allocated to usual care.


Routine care consists of the parturient lying on the bed without ambulating or any intervention.
Outcomes Maternal Outcomes:
  1. Duration of first stage labour.

  2. Mode of birth

  3. Maternal pain


Neonatal Outcomes:
Nil.
Notes 1. Duration of first stage labour reported as duration of active phase.
2. No mode of birth outcomes for vaginal birth or operative vaginal birth were given.
If there was a need for analgesic medication, or if obstetric complications occurred, the participant was immediately referred to an obstetrician and other professionals as needed, then excluded from the study.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk 60 volunteer women (convenience sample) were randomly allocated using a table of random numbers.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk If the number was even, women were assigned to the birth ball group, if the number was odd, women were assigned to control group.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Women High risk Not feasible.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Clinical staff High risk Not feasible.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Outcome assessor Low risk The individual responsible for data analysis was masked to the study purposes to minimise any bias that might arise from knowledge about the participants.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk There were two post randomisation exclusions reported: dissatisfied with sitting on the ball during birth ball movements (n = 1); caesarean birth because of lack of descent of the fetal head (n = 1).
The total number of participants included for duration of labour and maternal pain data is not clearly stated. It is unclear if the number includes totals before or after exclusions. It is also not clear if the group numbers were even before or after the exclusions.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear.