Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 23:19322968241304751. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/19322968241304751

Table 4.

Results of Each Volunteer Subject Showing Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) of the Best Sensor Algorithms at Correctly Predicting Wear-Times.

Subject Proximity foot Proximity leg Acceleration 4 Temperature 2
1—Trial 1 0.93 0.97 0.79 0.86
2—Trial 1 0.75 0.91 0.65 0.69
3—Trial 1 0.88 0.97 0.39
1—Trial 2 0.99 0.98 0.86 0.94
2—Trial 2 1.00 0.90 0.87 0.97
3—Trial2 0.91 0.67 0.72 0.83
4 0.98 0.62 0.93 0.87
5 0.98 0.99 0.90 0.94
6 0.93 0.80 0.85 0.80
7 0.97 0.84 0.65 0.96
8 0.88 0.93 - 0.59
9 0.98 0.98 0.79 0.63
10 0.98 0.98 0.94 0.93
Mean MCC 0.94 0.89 0.81 0.80
Stdev. 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.18
MCC CI 0.90-0.97 0.82-0.96 0.76-0.87 0.70-0.90

Acceleration data were not available for subject 3, trial 1 and for subject 8.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; stdev., standard deviation.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure