Skip to main content
Translational Neurodegeneration logoLink to Translational Neurodegeneration
. 2024 Dec 23;13:65. doi: 10.1186/s40035-024-00459-0

Inflammasomes in neurodegenerative diseases

Qianchen Wang 1,#, Songwei Yang 2,#, Xuan Zhang 3, Shanshan Zhang 4, Liping Chen 1, Wanxue Wang 5, Naihong Chen 5, Jiaqing Yan 3,
PMCID: PMC11665095  PMID: 39710713

Abstract

Inflammasomes represent a crucial component of the innate immune system, which respond to threats by recognizing different molecules. These are known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or host-derived damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). In neurodegenerative diseases and neuroinflammation, the accumulation of misfolded proteins, such as beta-amyloid and alpha-synuclein, can lead to inflammasome activation, resulting in the release of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18. This activation also induces pyroptosis, the release of inflammatory mediators, and exacerbates neuroinflammation. Increasing evidence suggests that inflammasomes play a pivotal role in neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, elucidating and investigating the activation and regulation of inflammasomes in these diseases is of paramount importance. This review is primarily focused on evidence indicating that inflammasomes are activated through the canonical pathway in these diseases. Inflammasomes as potential targets for treating neurodegenerative diseases are also discussed.

Keywords: Inflammasome, Neurodegenerative diseases, Neurodegeneration, Neuroinflammation, Microglia

Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases are a common cause of death and morbidity worldwide, especially among the elderly population [1]. The prevalence of age-dependent diseases is on the rise. Neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cause impairments of memory, cognition, and motor function. Currently, there is no cure for these diseases, and existing treatments can only control symptoms or halt the progression of the disease [2]. Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the progressive accumulation of specific proteins in various regions of the brain, including alpha-synuclein (α-Syn) inclusions, tau neurofibrillary tangles, TAR DNA binding protein-43 (TDP43) inclusions, and amyloid plaques, accompanied by neuronal loss, vascular lesions, and gliosis. The various protein deposits coexist and are not specific. Furthermore, multiple protein deposits also occur simultaneously in subjects with neurodegenerative diseases and healthy individuals. The interaction of different proteins occurs through various mechanisms, which often accelerates the deposition process [35]. Although these diseases each have specific protein aggregates, it is increasingly clear that there is an interaction between beta-amyloid (Aβ), tau, and α-Syn, which may promote the occurrence and development of the disease through various molecular mechanisms. For example, the interaction between Aβ and tau may result in the activation of inflammation-related components, including the Nod-like receptor and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which in turn triggers neuroinflammation [6]. Although the precise pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases remains elusive, a growing body of evidence suggests that complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors may play a role [7]. Nevertheless, to date, no effective treatment methods have been developed to slow, halt, or prevent the progression of any neurodegenerative diseases.

The occurrence and development of neurodegenerative diseases is accompanied by the involvement of the immune system and relevant immune cells in the brain. In the early stages of many neurological diseases, immune cells provide protection; however, their chronic activation can result in the spread of neuroinflammation, which ultimately leads to harmful changes within the brain [8]. Furthermore, persistent inflammation can result in the development of pathological changes in the affected tissue, indicating that the inflammatory stimuli are either not being terminated or that the normal resolution mechanisms are not functioning properly. Persistent stimuli may arise from environmental factors or the formation of endogenous factors (such as protein aggregates). They are perceived by the immune system as "foreign" or "danger" signals via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [9], which can recognize conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or host-derived damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). PRRs can be membrane-bound, enabling cells to monitor the extracellular space. They can also be intracellular, including nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs) and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2)-like receptor (ALRs), which act as receptors for the inflammasome complex [10]. Inflammasomes are a key component of innate immunity [11]. Evidence from animal models, clinically relevant models, cell cultures, and human tissues suggests that activation of various inflammasomes is closely related to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. In this review, we will discuss the roles of inflammasomes in neurodegenerative diseases, providing insights into the treatment of these diseases by targeting inflammasomes.

Biological concept of inflammasomes

Inflammasomes are large, multi-protein complexes (Fig. 1) with a primary function of regulating the activation of the protease caspase-1. Caspase-1, in turn, regulates the proteolytic maturation of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18, as well as pyroptosis, a rapid, detrimental, and inflammatory form of cell death [12]. The assembly of inflammasomes is dependent upon the recognition of PAMPs or DAMPs via PRRs. PAMPs include unique microbial structures, such as microbial nucleic acids, bacterial secretion systems, and components of the microbial cell wall. DAMPs include monosodium urate crystals, ATP, or endogenous danger signals released by damaged or dying cells [13]. Based on the subcellular localization, PRRs can be divided into two major categories, membrane-bound and intracellular. TLRs and C-type lectin receptors are present on the plasma membrane and in endosomes. They are capable of recognizing extracellular PAMPs and DAMPs. The intracellular PRRs include retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptors, ALRs, and NLRs [13, 14]. A key node in PRR signal transduction is the activation of caspase family members, especially caspase-1. The central role of caspase-1 is to cleave the precursors of IL-1β and IL-18 into biologically active IL-1β and IL-18, and also gasdermin D (GSDMD), leading to inflammatory responses and pyroptosis [15]. The classic inflammasome complex is composed of a cytosolic sensor, which can be either NLR or ALR, an adaptor (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing CARD [ASC]), and an effector caspase-1 [16]. The NLR family is defined by the presence of a central nucleotide-binding and oligomerization (NACHT) domain, which is typically flanked by C-terminal leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) and N-terminal caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD) or pyrin domain (PYD). The LRRs are believed to be involved in ligand sensing and autoregulation, while the CARD and PYD mediate homotypic protein–protein interactions for downstream signaling. The NACHT domain is the sole domain shared by all NLR family members and is capable of activating the signaling complex through ATP-dependent oligomerization [16]. Assembly of the inflammasome results in the recruitment and activation of caspase-1. The activation of caspase-1 is initiated by its self-cleavage and conformational change, a process that is typically facilitated by the adaptor protein ASC [17]. ASC is a bipartite molecule comprising an N-terminal PYD and a C-terminal CARD. This allows it to bridge the sensor (NLRs or ALRs) and the effector pro-caspase-1. Pro-caspase-1 is then activated, resulting in the cleavage of pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into mature, biologically active cytokines. Studies have demonstrated that NLRP3 and AIM2 contain a PYD that does not directly interact with caspase-1, but interacts with the PYD of ASC. The CARD domain of ASC binds to the CARD of caspase-1 through CARD-CARD interactions. Consequently, ASC represents a fundamental component of numerous inflammasomes [12, 18].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Structure of human inflammasomes and inflammasome complexes. a Schematic of compositions of NLRP3, NLRP1, NLRC4, AIM2 and Pyrin. b Apoptosis-Associated Speck-Like Protein (ASC) is composed of a PYD and a CARD. Caspase-1 consists of a CARD and a middle portion that includes the p20 and p10 subunits. c Upon inflammasome activation by various stimuli, homotypic PYD-PYD and CARD-CARD interactions facilitate the recruitment of ASC and the activation of caspase-1. Ultimately, oligomerization leads to the formation of the inflammasome complex, producing active caspase-1, which cleaves pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into mature IL-1β and IL-18, and cleaves gasdermin D, forming pores to release cytokines, leading to pyroptosis. AIM2, absent in melanoma 2; CARD, caspase recruitment domain; FIIND, function-to-find domain; HIN-200, hemopoietic IFN-inducible nuclear proteins with 200-amino acid motif; LRR, leucine-rich repeat sequences; NACHT: NAIP (neuronal apoptosis inhibitor protein), CIITA (class II transactivator), HET-E (invariant chain of the MHC class II), and TP1 (telomerase-associated protein); NLRC4: Nod-like receptor and caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 4; NLRP: Nod-like receptor and pyrin domain-containing protein; PYD, pyrin domain

The initiation of inflammasome activation varies among different cell types, sensors, stimuli, and pattern recognition (Fig. 2). It has been demonstrated that transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κb), can regulate the expression of inflammasome components, including NLRP3, thereby influencing the assembly and activity of the inflammasome [19]. Post-translational modifications of inflammasomes can also affect their activity, including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, alkylation, S-nitrosylation, and S-glutathionylation, among others. These modifications can affect the stability, conformation, interactions, and subcellular localization of inflammasome components, thereby regulating the activation and inhibition of the inflammasome in a finely tuned manner [20]. Interactions between proteins can significantly influence the assembly and activation of inflammasomes. For instance, adaptor proteins such as ASC, can facilitate the aggregation of inflammasome components, while inhibitory proteins can impede this process [21]. Some signaling pathways, such as the TLR signaling pathway, often cross-talk with the inflammasome pathway. This cross-regulation can either enhance or inhibit inflammasome activation [22, 23]. It has been demonstrated that metabolic byproducts within cells, such as fatty acids and intermediates of energy metabolism, can also regulate inflammasome activation. Alterations in intracellular metabolic byproducts can impact the modification state of inflammasome components, thereby affecting the inflammatory response [24]. Genetic polymorphisms, mutations, and epigenetic modifications also play a role in regulating the activity of inflammasomes. For example, mutations of the MEFV gene may lead to inflammasome activation, while epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone modifications can influence the expression of genes associated with inflammasomes [25, 26]. The regulation of inflammasomes is a complex process that involves a multitude of molecular mechanisms and biological pathways.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Inflammasome activation in neurodegenerative diseases. In neurodegenerative diseases, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or host-derived damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) activate Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLR activation induces expression of NLRP3, pro-IL-1β, and pro-IL-18 through nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) transcription. The intracellular NLRP3 is activated by pathological proteins or DAMPs, NLRP1 recognizes dsRNA and viral proteases, NLRC4 identifies bacterial flagellin, AIM2 is specifically activated by dsDNA, and Pyrin recognizes RhoA-inhibiting microbial toxins. Following priming, the inflammasome undergoes activation upon perception of endogenous or exogenous signals, which in turn promote the recruitment of ASC and activation of caspase-1, leading to the formation of an inflammasome complex. Subsequently, the active caspase-1 cleaves pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18 into mature IL-1β and IL-18, and cleaves gasdermin D, forming membrane pores to release cytokines, thereby initiating pyroptosis. AIM2, absent in melanoma 2; NLRC4: Nod-like receptor and caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 4; NLRP1: Nod-like receptor and pyrin domain-containing protein 1; NLRP3: Nod-like receptor and pyrin domain-containing protein 3

Neuroinflammation

Neuroinflammation is defined as the inflammatory response that occurs in the central nervous system (CNS). This response can be triggered by a variety of factors, including infection, autoimmune diseases, oxidative stress, neurodegenerative diseases, etc. [27]. Neuroinflammation is characterized by the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, pleiotropic cytokine IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), by innate immune cells of the CNS. Small-molecule messengers, including prostaglandins, nitric oxide (NO), chemokines including macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [2830], are also involved in neuroinflammation. IL-1β and IL-18 released via inflammasome activation lead to chronic inflammation (Fig. 3). Studies have demonstrated that neuroinflammatory diseases, particularly those that have progressed to the neurodegenerative stage, exhibit characteristics of cellular senescence. Cellular senescence is defined as a stable cell cycle arrest, in which cells are unable to proliferate despite optimal growth conditions and stimuli. Cellular senescence is associated with a variety of human diseases. Preliminary data indicate that cellular senescence is present in neuroinflammatory diseases, suggesting that it may be a potential driver of pathogenesis [28].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Neuroinflammation caused by inflammasome activation. Inflammasome activation has been observed in numerous neurodegenerative diseases, the majority of which are attributed to aberrant aggregation of misfolded proteins, resulting in inflammasome activation. In Alzheimer’s disease, the pathological hallmarks are the deposition of beta-amyloid protein and hyperphosphorylation of tau protein. In Parkinson’s disease, the underlying mechanism involves the aberrant aggregation of alpha-synuclein (α-Syn). In Huntington’s disease, the underlying cause is the aberrant aggregation of the huntingtin protein (HTT) and the mutated form of this protein, mHTT. In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the underlying mechanism involves the aberrant aggregation of TDP-43 and SOD1 proteins. In multiple sclerosis, peripheral immune cells, namely T cells and B cells, infiltrate the central nervous system through the damaged blood–brain barrier, thereby activating inflammasomes. Following inflammasome activation, active caspase-1 cleaves pro-IL-1β and pro-IL-18, resulting in the production of mature IL-1β and IL-18. These mature cytokines serve as principal mediators of chronic inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, active caspase-1 also cleaves gasdermin D, resulting in the formation of pores on the cell membrane, leading to release of cellular contents into the extracellular environment and induction of pyroptosis

Microglia are the primary immune cells in the CNS and play a crucial role in neuroinflammation. In pathological conditions, microglia are activated and undergo a phenotypic transition to a pro-inflammatory state, releasing inflammatory factors that lead to local or systemic neuroinflammation. Astrocytes also undergo reactive proliferation in response to neuroinflammation, known as astrogliosis. In this process, astrocytes release inflammatory mediators and participate in the repair of cellular damage [31]. However, astrocytes can transform into the neurotoxic A1 type. The A1 astrocytes may promote the entry of immune cells into the CNS by secreting neurotoxins, complement components, and chemokines, thereby exacerbating neuroinflammation and neuronal damage [32]. Moreover, classically activated neuroinflammatory microglia can induce the generation of A1-type reactive astrocytes [33]. Microglial activation represents a significant contributing factor in the pathogenesis of neuroinflammation. Microglia rapidly respond to imbalances in the internal environment of brain by releasing a variety of pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic components, leading to neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration [28]. It is noteworthy that the association between microglia and astrocytes is relatively weak. However, studies have demonstrated that the phenotypic transition of microglia requires signals from astrocytes, rather than from microglia themselves. This further emphasizes the significance of the astrocyte-microglia crosstalk in neuroinflammation [34]. In addition, directly blocking the microglia-mediated transformation of astrocytes into the A1 neurotoxic phenotype leads to neuroprotective effects. This transformation may occur in a variety of neurodegenerative diseases [35]. Research has demonstrated that disease-associated microglia (DAM) play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases and brain aging. DAM is a recently identified subset of resident macrophages found at sites of neurodegeneration. DAM express multiple genes related to AD and other neurodegenerative diseases, including triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), a receptor essential for DAM activation [36, 37]. Aggregation of misfolded proteins is a defining feature of numerous neurodegenerative diseases and can result in cytotoxicity. In AD, abnormal aggregation of Aβ can act as DAMPs, activating inflammasomes within microglia, resulting in the release of inflammatory factors and further exacerbating neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative processes [37].

Furthermore, autophagy is crucial for maintaining the stability of the intracellular environment and cellular health, as it is involved in the clearance of damaged proteins and organelles. Impaired autophagy can result in the accumulation of misfolded proteins and aggregates within neurons, leading to neuronal dysfunction and death [38]. Moreover, during the development of neurodegenerative diseases, inflammasome activation can promote the initiation of autophagy, which helps clear intracellular pathogens and damaged organelles, thereby reducing inflammatory responses. The activation of autophagy can in turn regulate the activity of inflammasomes, affecting the release of inflammatory factors. The dual regulation balances the host defense inflammatory response and prevents excessive inflammation [39, 40]. Therefore, autophagy exerts a regulatory effect on inflammasome activation.

Inflammasomes in neurodegenerative diseases

Inflammasomes in AD

AD is the most prevalent form of chronic neurodegenerative disease and the most common type of dementia, primarily affecting the elderly population. The pathological characteristics of AD include brain atrophy, Aβ plaques, neurofibrillary tangles (aggregates of tau protein), neuroinflammation, and loss of neurons and synapses [41]. In addition to the aforementioned pathological characteristics, AD patients exhibit a reduced Aβ42 level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and increased levels of markers of oxidative stress. Concurrently, inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α are elevated, and the levels of NLRP1, NLRP3, ASC, cleaved caspase-1, IL-1β, and GSDMD are also increased, co-localized with Aβ plaques [42, 43]. This evidence suggests that, in addition to the amyloid hypothesis, neuroinflammation is also a key component of the pathogenesis of AD.

Inflammasomes have been demonstrated to play a role in AD pathogenesis. Peripheral monocytes of AD patients show increased mRNA expression of NLRP1, NLRP3, PYCARD, caspase-1, IL-1β, and IL-18, and activation of the NLRP1 and NLRP3 inflammasomes [44]. In early stages of AD, levels of inflammasome proteins in neurons and microglia are increased. NLRP1 is mainly expressed in neurons, while NLRP3 is mainly found in microglia. Caspase-1 is present in the parenchyma of the hippocampus, while ASC is expressed in both neurons and microglia [43]. Furthermore, some studies have demonstrated that Nlrp3 or Caspase-1 knockout in mice carrying familial AD-related mutations results in a notable protection from spatial memory loss and other sequelae associated with AD, evidenced by reduced activation of caspase-1 and IL-1β in the brain and enhanced Aβ clearance. In the APP/PS1 AD mouse model, NLRP3 inflammasome activation results in the transformation of microglia from the M2 type (which promotes repair and clearance) to the M1 type (which is pro-inflammatory and neurotoxic), thereby reducing Aβ clearance and promoting its deposition [45]. Aβ and tau aggregates as DAMPs can activate toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), which subsequently initiates signal transduction through MyD88-dependent and TRIF-dependent pathways. The pro-inflammatory cytokines produced (such as IL-1β) can further promote assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome through the IL-1R/MyD88 pathway [46, 47].

NLRP3 inflammasome activation in AD is a complex process involving multiple intracellular signaling pathways and external stimuli. Aβ activates Syk and inactivates downstream adenosine 5’-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which causes excessive mitochondrial fission, leading to NLRP3 inflammasome activation in microglia. This results in cognitive decline, amyloid plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles. In this process, the microglial receptor TREM2 may be involved in the activation of Syk by Aβ and the induction of NLRP3 inflammasome activation, as TREM2 has an ITAM motif that activates Syk and Aβ has been reported to bind directly to TREM2. TREM2 can also maintain the energy and anabolic metabolism of microglia through the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, thereby reducing inflammation [48, 49]. Meanwhile, insoluble fibrils of endogenous Aβ abnormally aggregate in the brains of AD patients, resulting in the loss of synapses and neurons. These fibrils also interact with multiple receptors on microglia to activate inflammasomes. Notably, the fibrillar state of Aβ is a necessary condition for microglial release of IL-1β [50]. Once Aβ fibrils are phagocytosed by microglia, they are transported to lysosomes, where they cause damage to the lysosomal membrane, resulting in the release of lysosomal protease cathepsin B into the cytoplasm, which then activates the inflammasomes [51]. The association between cathepsin B and AD pathogenesis has been confirmed. It is hypothesized that cathepsin B regulates the migration of microglia through PI3K-Akt signaling, acting as an intermediary among phagocytosis of Aβ, lysosomal damage, and release of IL-1β by microglia. Other phagosomal factors, including other cathepsins, may also participate in inflammasome activation [48]. CD36, a PRR, facilitates the intracellular transition of soluble endogenous Aβ to particulate ligands, which results in lysosomal rupture and subsequent NLRP3 inflammasome activation [52]. CD36 may act as a receptor for soluble Aβ, transmitting signals from Aβ to inflammasomes, possibly through the NF-κB pathway, which may result in increased expression of IL-1β and IL-18 [53]. The P2X7 receptor is an ion channel receptor that can be activated by extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP), resulting in the opening of ion channels. This causes the efflux of potassium ions (K+) and the influx of sodium ions (Na+) and calcium ions (Ca2+), thereby activating the NLRP3 inflammasome and exacerbating neuroinflammation. Studies have demonstrated that activation of the P2X7 receptor may facilitate the deposition of Aβ and aberrant phosphorylation of tau protein, thereby accelerating the pathological progression of AD [54, 55].

One of the principal neuropathological characteristics of AD is the formation of NFTs, caused by aberrant aggregation of tau protein. Tau is a microtubule-associated protein that stabilizes the microtubule structure within nerve cells. In AD, tau protein undergoes aberrant phosphorylation, resulting in loss of function and aggregation to form NFTs. This process leads to inflammasome activation and subsequent induction of neuroinflammation [56]. In transgenic mice with tauopathy and in hippocampal samples from AD patients, the level of NLRP3 acetylation is elevated, which is associated with inflammasome activation. In cellular models and transgenic mice, researchers have confirmed that tau protein can directly acetylate NLRP3, particularly at the lysine residues K21, K22, and K24 in its PYD domain, thereby inducing activation of the inflammasomes. Furthermore, overexpression of tau protein in the hippocampal CA1 neurons of mice results in impaired cognitive function, transmission of tau to microglia, and activation of microglia accompanied by NLRP3 acetylation and inflammasome activation [57]. Tau seeds are internalized by microglia and transported to lysosomes. Once inside the lysosomes, tau seeds may cause lysosomal rupture, releasing contents including cathepsin B. The released cathepsin B and other DAMPs activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, resulting in aggregation of ASC and subsequent activation of caspase-1. Furthermore, the activated caspase-1 cleaves pro-IL-1β into active IL-1β. This process ultimately exacerbates tau pathology, including both endogenous and non-endogenous seed-induced tau pathology [58]. In the Tau22 mouse model, researchers have found evidence of NLRP3 inflammasome activation, namely, increased expression levels of cleaved caspase-1, IL-1β, and ASC. This suggests that the aberrant tau protein facilitates assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. In Tau22 mice, injection of Aβ-containing brain homogenate into the hippocampus induced tau pathology, whereas in the inflammasome-knockout Tau22 mice, this was not observed, suggesting that the NLRP3 inflammasome is involved in Aβ-induced tau pathology in AD [59, 60]. It is noteworthy that Aβ plaques and tau protein are not only individually implicated in the pathological process of AD, but may also serve a facilitating role. A previous study demonstrated that Aβ plaques facilitate the rapid expansion of AD-brain-derived pathological tau protein into large tau aggregates and promote the formation of tau aggregates (NP tau) around degenerating neurites surrounding Aβ plaques. This evidence indicates that Aβ facilitates tau protein pathology in AD by promoting tau protein aggregation [61].

A growing body of evidence indicates that the gut-brain axis plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of AD. Research has demonstrated that the gut microbiota of AD patients can produce amyloid peptides, which accumulate in the brain through the gut-brain axis. Furthermore, administration of the gut microbiota from AD patients exacerbates AD pathology and cognitive dysfunction in 3 × Tg mice. Imbalances of metabolites in the gut, such as short-chain fatty acids and inflammatory polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolite, stimulate the maturation of microglia, thereby activating inflammasomes. Various strategies to regulate the composition of the gut microbiota have been demonstrated to alleviate cognitive impairments. This evidence suggests that a dysbiotic gut microbiota can lead to inflammasome activation and contribute to the pathogenesis of AD [6264].

NLRP3 inflammasome activation exacerbates the progression of AD; consistently, several genes related to AD are highly expressed in microglia, including INPP5D (inositol Polyphosphate-5-phosphatase D) and CALHM2 (calcium Homeostasis Modulator 2). INPP5D encodes the Src homology 2-containing inositol phosphatase-1 (SHIP1) protein. SHIP1 regulates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by dephosphorylating phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PIPs), thereby regulating the phagocytic function and immune response of microglia. Studies have demonstrated decreased protein level and increased mRNA expression of INPP5D in the brains of AD patients. Further validation demonstrated that reducing INPP5D activity induces formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, cleavage of caspase-1, and secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 [65, 66]. Calhm2 is a member of the calcium homeostasis regulator family. Research has demonstrated increased expression level of Calhm2 in AD mouse models. Moreover, Calhm2-knockout mice exhibit significantly reduced Aβ deposition, neuroinflammation, and cognitive impairment. This indicates that inhibition of microglial activation may attenuate inflammasome activation and thereby alleviate the pathology of AD [67]. In conclusion, NLRP3 inflammasome activation may contribute to the progression of AD via production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and reduction of Aβ and tau clearance, leading to increased deposition and formation of a self-perpetuating cycle [53].

In addition to the NLRP3 inflammasome, other inflammasomes have also been implicated in AD. Recent studies have demonstrated elevated mRNA levels of NLRP1 in individuals diagnosed with severe AD. NLRP1 is localized to CD14 cells, and the proportion of CD14+/NLRP1+ immune cells is also higher in these patients, indicating that NLRP1 is activated in AD [43, 68]. Another study demonstrated that the NLRP1 inflammasomes are expressed in primary neurons of the CNS. In response to stress, the NLRP1 inflammasomes are activated, leading to activation of caspase-1 and subsequent caspase-6 activation, which is associated with AD. This results in axonal degeneration [69]. Similarly, aged mice, particularly 24-month-old mice, show significant increases of neuronal injury, inflammatory cytokines, and NLRP1 inflammasomes [70]. Activation of the NLRP1 inflammasomes in APP/PS1 mice results in increased Aβ production, neuroinflammation, and dysfunction of the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway related to autophagy at 9 months of age [71]. Genetic knockout of NLRP1, Caspase-1, or Caspase-6 restores the episodic memory and spatial learning of J20 mice, increases the density of dendritic spines in the hippocampal CA1 region, and normalizes the levels of synaptophysin in the hippocampal dentate gyrus and CA3 region [72].

A previous study employed streptozotocin to induce memory deficits and cognitive decline in mice and observed an increase in Nodlike receptor and caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 4 (NLRC4) in hippocampal samples [73]. However, another study observed that in the hippocampus of aged APP/PS1 mice, the expression of ASC protein was increased, yet there were no notable alterations in NLRP1, NLRP3, or NLRC4 [74]. In mice with Aβ1-42-induced AD, the expression level of AIM2 increases, predominantly in microglia. Specific knockout of AIM2 in microglia improves cognitive function and synaptic plasticity in mice [75, 76]. Similarly, activation of the AIM2 inflammasomes may exacerbate neurodegeneration by promoting Aβ deposition and abnormal phosphorylation of tau protein, leading to an inflammatory response that further affects cognitive function [77]. A deeper understanding of the specific contributions of various inflammasomes to AD pathogenesis could facilitate the development of targeted therapies that modulate inflammasome activity to reduce inflammation and potentially slow the progression of AD. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which these inflammasomes are activated and to determine how their activation affects the course of the disease.

Inflammasomes in PD

PD is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder only next to AD, characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and the presence of Lewy bodies mainly composed of abnormally aggregated α-Syn [78, 79]. In the early stages of PD, prior to the formation of Lewy bodies, the loss of neurons in the SNpc has already occurred, along with oxidative stress and autophagy impairment [79]. The abnormal aggregation of α-Syn activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in microglia through interaction with TLRs, leading to release of pro-inflammatory cytokines through translocation of NF-κB, thereby damaging dopaminergic neurons [80]. Concurrently, aberrant aggregation of α-Syn may influence mitochondrial functionality, resulting in diminished ATP production and augmented ROS levels. This, in turn, affects lysosomal function, leading to the accumulation of protein aggregates [81]. The dysfunction of mitochondria and production of ROS may serve as the basis for NLRP3 inflammasome activation in microglia [82].

Studies have demonstrated that in the cerebral cortex of individuals diagnosed with PD and those without a PD diagnosis but with substantia nigra cell loss, there is an increase in the expression of inflammasome-associated proteins, including IL-1β, TNF-α, and NLRP3, in comparison to the control group [83]. Research has indicated that in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with PD, there is increased gene expression of NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1, as well as elevated protein levels of NLRP3, caspase-1, and IL-1β, indicating NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the PBMCs of PD patients[84]. Similarly, another study found elevated levels of α-Syn as well as inflammatory factors NLRP3, caspase-1, and IL-1β in the CSF of PD patients [85].

In vitro experiments exposing human brain-derived microglia and C57BL/6 J mouse brain-derived microglia to α-Syn monomers and fibrils revealed activation of the typical NLRP3 inflammasome and secretion of IL-1β [86]. NLRP3 inflammasome activation in PD may occur through direct recognition of α-syn aggregates by TLR2 and TLR4, with signal transduction leading to the activation of NF-κB. NF-κB then migrates to the nucleus, where it promotes the expression of various inflammatory factors, including NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β. Following NLRP3 inflammasome activation, caspase-1 is subsequently activated, resulting in the release of IL-1β and IL-18 [87]. TLR4-deficient mice have demonstrated an increased number of surviving dopaminergic neurons, a reduced number of activated glial cells, decreased accumulation of α-syn, as well as suppression of NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome activation [88]. Evidence indicates that in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced mouse model of PD, NLRP3 inflammasome activation in microglia directly leads to neuronal death induced by MPTP. Furthermore, MPTP or its metabolite MPP+ may activate the NLRP3 inflammasome by producing mitochondrial ROS [89]. Similarly, following treatment with 6-hydroxydopamine, the levels of NLRP3 and ASC exhibited a significant increase [90]. These findings collectively indicate NLRP3 inflammasome activation in both in vitro models of PD induced by toxic substances and in PD patients. Studies have demonstrated that the use of NLRP3–/– mice in the PFF model resulted in a significant reduction in the levels of ASC, caspase-1, and α-Syn [91]. Similarly, treatment of α-Syn mice with an NLRP3 inhibitor reduced the insoluble aggregation of α-Syn and ameliorated the loss of dopaminergic neurons [92].

The SNCA A53T mutation is associated with early-onset familial PD. This mutation increases the tendency of α-Syn to form toxic oligomers. The aggregation of A53T α-Syn and mitochondrial dysfunction together promote the activation of inflammatory bodies in PD [93]. Inhibiting the p38-TFEB pathway effectively reduces the NLRP3 inflammasome activation, thereby alleviating the motor and autophagy impairments observed in the A53T transgenic mouse model [94]. Research has demonstrated that in the adeno-associated virus overexpressing αSyn (AAV-α-Syn) model, stereotactic injection of AAV-α-Syn into the SNpc of Fyn−/− mice resulted in significant reductions of microglial activation, formation of ASC specks, NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β secretion, compared to wild-type mice [95]. Moreover, serum/glucocorticoid receptor kinase 1 (SGK1) is found to be upregulated in the brains of PD patients. Inhibition of SGK1 in glial cells can correct the inflammatory characteristics of glial cells by inhibiting the NF-κB-, NLRP3 inflammasome-, and cGAS-STING-mediated inflammatory pathways [96]. Similarly, activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and JWA (a tumor suppressor gene), and overexpression of BAG3 (Bcl2-associated athanogene 3) can inhibit the activation of NLRP3 and caspase-1, reduce the nuclear transfer of NF-κB, and thereby suppress inflammation [97100]. These findings collectively suggest that modulation of inflammasome activation in PD can be achieved by activating or inhibiting upstream molecules.

The PRKN gene encodes the Parkin protein, which has been demonstrated to suppress neuroinflammation by ubiquitinating the NLRP3 inflammasome. When mitochondrial function is impaired, Parkin can facilitate their selective autophagy, which involves mitochondrial tagging and ultimately degradation by lysosomes [101]. In the absence or with inactivation of Parkin, NLRP3 accumulates in DA neurons, initiating inflammasome activation. Furthermore, the loss of Parkin activity results in increased ROS production by mitochondria through accumulation of another Parkin ubiquitination substrate, ZNF746/PARIS, thus promoting NLRP3 complex assembly [102].

In addition to NLRP3 inflammasome activation in PD, activation of other inflammasomes in PD remains a matter of debate. In the MPTP mouse model, the levels of NLRP1, AIM2, NLRP2, NLRP3, and NLRC4 are all elevated compared to the saline mouse group, with the NLRP3 increase being the most significant [103]. Additionally, AIM2 activation has been found to exert a protective effect against MPTP-induced behavioral deficits and neuroinflammation independent of the inflammasome in the MPTP mouse model [104]. However, in the PBMCs of PD patients, mRNA expression of NLRP3 is increased, while the mRNA expression of AIM2, NLRP1, and NLRC4 shows no significant changes [84]. Consequently, further research is required to ascertain whether other inflammasomes are activated in PD and the underlying mechanisms.

Some studies have demonstrated that microglial exosomes can facilitate the transfer of α-Syn between neurons, resulting in the aggregation and neurotoxicity of α-Syn [105]. In the CSF from PD patients, exosomes derived from microglia and macrophages contain monomeric α-Syn, which can induce α-Syn aggregation in neurons. A study injecting PD patient plasma-derived exosomes into the mouse brain found that these exosomes can spread throughout the brain [106]. It is of note that peripheral monocytes can phagocytose aggregated α-syn and lead to a more pronounced NLRP3 inflammasome response [107]. These α-Syn are likely to be carried by exosomes and transmitted to the periphery. Therefore, exosomes may spread inflammatory responses and activate NLRP3 inflammatory responses.

Inflammasomes in HD

HD is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder caused by an abnormal expansion of the CAG repeat sequence in the huntingtin (HTT) gene. This expansion results in the production of a huntingtin protein with an excessively long polyglutamine (polyQ) tract [108]. In HD, both wild-type HTT and mutant HTT (mHTT) form aggregates and accumulate abnormally in the nucleus and processes of neurons, leading to the disruption of various cellular functions. Therefore, HTT and mHTT, particularly soluble mHTT in the CSF, can be used as biomarkers, which are positively correlated with the severity of symptoms [109]. Studies have shown that inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 are increased in the brains and CSF of HD patients. In addition, HD patients show signs of microglial and astrocyte activation in the brain [110]. Meanwhile, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, eotaxin-3, MIP-1β, and eotaxin levels are increased in the blood of HD patients [111]. In HD, the increased mRNA expression of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α leads to microglial activation, which is intended to remove mHTT but instead exacerbates neurodegeneration [112, 113]. The presence of mHTT may also lead to disruption of the blood–brain barrier, potentially allowing peripheral immune cells to enter the CNS and exacerbate neuroinflammation [114]. Another study found that inhibition of TNF-α in the R6/2 HD transgenic mouse model could modulate neuroinflammation, caspase activation, mHTT aggregate burden, and motor dysfunction [115]. Using microarray and DeepSAGE technologies, AIM2 in peripheral blood has been revealed to be a biomarker of HD, and AIM2 may be activated in HD [116]. However, current evidence is not sufficient to prove that the peripheral blood marker has the same significance as biomarkers within the brain, and the peripheral effects are not as profound as those within the neurons. Studies have found that the expression levels of NLRP3 and caspase-1 are increased in the striatal region in the R6/2 mouse brain [117]. Another study showed a significant increase in IL-1β and a decrease in IL-18 level in HD [118, 119]. This suggests that there are other mechanisms that regulate IL-18 level. The use of NLRP3 inhibitors in R6/2 mice reduces NLRP3 activation and ROS production, rescues neurons, and reduces microglial activation [120], which support the role of NLRP3 in HD. Activation of Nrf2 can increase the resistance of neurons to cytotoxicity caused by mHTT aggregates [121]. Meanwhile, administration of anti-inflammatory drugs celecoxib and meloxicam can attenuate the behavioral and biochemical changes in a rat model of quinolinic acid-induced HD [120]. However, in another study, acetylsalicylic acid and rofecoxib failed to show neuroprotective effects in the N171-82Q and R6/2 transgenic HD mouse models [122]. These results not only suggest that the activation of anti-inflammatory factors or the use of anti-inflammatory drugs may have therapeutic effects in HD, but also elucidate the roles of inflammasomes in HD. More studies are needed to find out roles of other inflammasomes besides NLRP3 in HD. In addition to abnormal protein aggregation, mitochondrial damage, lysosomal rupture, and autophagy dysfunction may also be inducers of inflammasome activation [123], all of which require further research.

Inflammasomes in multiple sclerosis (MS)

MS is a chronic autoimmune disease of the nervous system. It is characterized by infiltration of peripheral immune cells, particularly T and B cells, into the central nervous system through compromised blood–brain barrier, where they attack and destroy the myelin sheath, accompanied by microglial activation, resulting in demyelinating lesions and neuroinflammation [124, 125]. Myelin regeneration refers to the process of restoring the insulating properties and function of nerve fibers by forming new myelin after demyelination. This process is particularly important for restoring myelin function. However, myelin regeneration is hindered in MS due to chronic neurological responses [126]. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is the most widely used experimental model of MS, in which microglia and astrocytes play have dual roles. They may exert a neuroprotective effect in the early stages by removing damage and promoting repair in response to CNS injury. However, their long-term activation can lead to neurodegenerative changes [127]. Mature oligodendrocytes are responsible for the formation of myelin, to restore impaired nerve conduction caused by myelin destruction [128].

Inflammatory factors such as IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-6, and chemokines MIP-1a and CXCL9 in CSF and plasma, can serve as potential markers for MS, indicating the important role of neuroinflammation in MS [129131]. Inflammasome-related markers such as NLRP3 protein, ASC, and caspase-1, as well as downstream IL-1β and IL-18, may also serve as potential biomarkers for MS [132]. The mRNA expression of NLRP3 in PBMCs of MS patients increases over time [133]. Similarly, serum levels of caspase-1, ASC and IL-18 are elevated in MS patients, while IL-1β level is lower [134]. However, in primary progressive MS patients, IL-1β is highly expressed in monocytes from peripheral blood and CSF [135]. This suggests that the expression of IL-1β may not be completely the same in different subtypes of MS patients and may be regulated by different factors. Once released, IL-1β and IL-18 further promote T-cell responses and endothelial cell damage, exacerbating the severity of EAE [136]. In the EAE mouse model, increased levels of NLRP3 protein have been found not only in glial cells, but also in macrophages, T cells, and B cells [137]. In the hippocampus of EAE mice, both microglia and the NLRP3 inflammasome are activated, and treatment with an NLRP3 inhibitor can suppress the activation of both [138]. Studies have shown that Nlrp3−/− mice are resistant to EAE induced by low-dose Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but susceptible to EAE under high-dose Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This suggests that different doses may induce EAE through different mechanisms and NLRP3 may play different roles in different immune environments [139]. NLRP3-knockout EAE mice show reductions of neutrophil infiltration, ROS production and recruitment of Th1 and Th17 cells compared to WT EAE mice [140]. In addition, inhibition of Th17 cells may reduce NLRP3 inflammasome activation [141]. Another study has shown that inhibiting the level of IL-1β in MS patients can have a symptom-relieving effect, but this is based on MS patients who are dependent on the NLRP3 inflammasome [142], which also suggests that only when the NLRP3 inflammasome is activated in MS patients or EAE models can inhibition of IL-1β have the effect of relieving MS symptoms. Research has shown that treatment of EAE animals with a caspase-1 inhibitor improves neurobehavioral performance, reduces the severity of neuropathology, and decreases inflammatory molecular markers. This suggests that caspase-1 is involved in the pathology of MS [143]. In addition, experiments have shown that targeting ASC can effectively inhibit the cleavage of caspase-1 and secretion of IL-1β, thereby alleviating EAE symptoms [144]. This result suggests that inhibition of ASC can alleviate EAE and provides evidence for the involvement of ASC in MS. Research has shown that in patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS), IL-11 is most highly expressed in myeloid cells, particularly dendritic cells, neutrophils and monocytes, participating in the disruption of the blood–brain barrier and promoting migration of inflammatory cells into the CNS. Meanwhile, caspase-1 and IL-18 gene expression induced by the NLRP3 inflammasome in PBMCs is also increased in RRMS patients [145]. The levels of IL-1β, IL-18, caspase-1, and NLRP3 can be effectively reduced through Nrf2 activation and NF-kB pathway inhibition, thereby reducing ROS generation and damage [146, 147]. Meanwhile, inhibition of the p38 MAPK pathway can also prevent the neuroinflammation and demyelination caused by EAE [148]. This evidence suggests that the NLRP3 inflammasome may play a certain pathological role in MS, but is not activated in all subtypes of MS. More detailed research is needed to unravel the differences among MS subtypes.

In addition to NLRP3 activation in MS, the roles of other inflammasomes in MS are not yet clear. In the PBMCs of MS patients, the gene levels of NLRP1, NLRC4, and AIM2 were not elevated [149]. However, another study found that the levels of NLRC4 were increased in EAE and the brains of MS patients after death [143]. In addition, in MS patients, treatment with interferon β 1a significantly decreased mRNA expression of NLRP3, NLRC4 and AIM2 in leukocytes as well as plasma level of IL-1β [150]. In late EAE, the AIM2 inflammasome is activated in astrocytes, which may be independent of IL-1β-mediated inflammation [151]. Genetic research has shown that specific variations in NLRP3 may lead to excessive production of IL-1β and IL-18, while reduced activation of NLRC4 or decreased production of IL-18 may be beneficial in MS patients [152]. One study found that NLRP12−/− EAE mice had earlier and more severe clinical and pathological EAE outcomes, suggesting that the absence of NLRP12 leads to increased inflammatory responses in microglia [153]. After EAE induction, mRNA expression of GSDMD is increased [154]. A more recent study showed increased expression of GSDMD in both oligodendrocytes and microglia in the brain tissues of patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (P-MS), and GSDMD knockout in a cuprizone (CPZ)-induced demyelination mouse model reduced demyelination and neuronal axon damage [155].

Ion channels also play a critical role in MS. For example, the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channel modulates ATP-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation by mediating Ca2+ influx and phosphorylation of the phosphatase PP2A (protein phosphatase 2A) [156]. TRPM2 (transient receptor potential melastatin 2) deletion can protect mice from CPZ-induced demyelination, synaptic loss, microglial activation, NLRP3 inflammasome activation, and pro-inflammatory cytokine production, ultimately ameliorating cognitive decline [157]. Inhibition of the TRPV4 channel ameliorated demyelination and inhibited glial activation and production of TNF-α and IL-1β in a CPZ-induced demyelination mouse model [158]. Another study suggests that although inhibition of the TRPV4 channel may reduce microglial activity and have anti-inflammatory effects, it does not significantly alter the severity of MS [159]. Some evidence suggests that high-mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) contributes to MS through TLRs, and inhibition of HMGB1 can reduce inflammatory responses and improve cognitive and motor functions in MS patients [160]. These studies suggest that inhibiting downstream pathways of inflammation may also be a strategy for alleviating MS.

Inflammasomes in ALS

ALS is a fatal neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. Most ALS patients have a hereditary component, with mutations in C9orf72, TARDBP (also known as TDP43), SOD1 (superoxide dismutase 1), and FUS2 (Fused in sarcoma 2) accounting for the vast majority of cases [161]. Of these, the TDP43 and SOD1 proteins are the most extensively studied, and transgenic animals based on TDP43 and SOD1 are widely used to study ALS [162]. TDP43 and mutant SOD1 form abnormal aggregates in the cytoplasm of neurons, which impair mitochondrial function, autophagy, and the ubiquitin–proteasome system, leading to impaired protein clearance and subsequently affecting neuronal function [162, 163]. Increased levels of NLRP3, ASC, IL-18, and activated caspase-1 have been detected in the spinal cord tissues of ALS patients compared to controls [164]. Similarly, in the brains of ALS patients, the level of NLRP3 protein is increased compared to the control group [165]. In the serum and CSF of ALS patients, IL-6 and IL-18 are increased while IL-37 is absent, suggesting that IL-6 and IL-18 are involved in the pathological progression of ALS and can be used as inflammatory markers for ALS [166].

Studies have shown that in ALS, SOD1 and TDP43 can directly activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in microglia, leading to caspase-1-dependent inflammasome activation and production of IL-1β [167]. TDP43 interacts with the CD14 receptor on the surface of microglia, triggering the NF-κB pathway and NLRP3 inflammasome activation, leading to production of NOX2 (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 2), TNF-α, and IL-1β [168]. In the SOD1G93A ALS mouse model, significantly increased immunoreactivity for ASC and NLRP3 was observed, suggesting the NLRP3 inflammasome activation in ALS [169]. Similarly, in SOD1G93A mice, the level of NLRP3 expression positively correlates with lifespan, suggesting that NLRP3 may contribute to muscle repair in the early stages of the disease. In the later stages of the disease, significant increases of protein levels of inflammasome components are observed, and mature IL-1β and active caspase-1 are detected in SOD1G93A mice, suggesting NLRP3 inflammasome activation in skeletal muscles of the ALS mouse model, potentially promoting the pathological process [170]. Mutant SOD1 can lead to increased oxidative stress, and the increased ROS may promote aggregation and activation of inflammasome components [171]. Studies have shown that inhibiting activation of the NF-κB pathway in microglia can decrease levels of NO and ROS, inhibit protein nitration and inflammasome activation, and improve motor deficits in SOD1G93A mice [172, 173]. In the spinal cord of SOD1G93A mice, inhibition of IL-6 and caspase-1 can effectively reduce neuroinflammatory responses [174]. Similarly, inhibition of caspase-1 can attenuate glial cell activation and reduce neuroinflammation in SOD1G93A mice [175]. Research has shown that P2X7 receptor antagonists can improve motor function and muscle strength in SOD1G93A mice by inhibiting inflammasome assembly and reducing IL-1β release [176].

In the SOD1G93A transgenic mice and in pathological samples from human ALS patients, the expression level of receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) is increased, which is associated with inflammation and axonal degeneration. This suggests that RIPK1 plays an important role in the inflammatory process of ALS [177]. Abnormal accumulation of TDP43 protein and mitochondrial dysfunction may lead to the release of mtDNA, thereby activating the cGAS-STING pathway and triggering an inflammatory response. The inflammatory factors produced after activation of the cGAS/STING pathway can enhance the inflammasome activation [178]. MCP-1 produced under the stimulation of TDP43 binds to the CC chemokine receptor 2, which further promotes migration and aggregation of monocytes and macrophages to the site of inflammation; these cells can further contribute to inflammasome activation [179]. In addition to microglial involvement, astrocytes release the pro-inflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-1β, causing damage to motor neurons in ALS patients [180]. Glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB), a transmembrane glycoprotein that has been shown to prolong the survival of SOD1G93A mice, has been found to exert its neuroprotective effect through reducing astrocyte-mediated neuroinflammation in a CD44-dependent manner [181].

In a recent study, acute treatment with an NLRP3-specific inhibitor did not reduce spinal cord inflammation in SOD1G93A mice, suggesting that multiple inflammasomes may be activated in ALS and that inhibition of NLRP3 alone may not be sufficient to block inflammation [182]. The expression of NLRP1 is downregulated in SOD1G93A mice, but no such changes have been observed in ALS patients, while the protein levels of NLRC4 and AIM2 are increased in symptomatic animals [183]. However, another study found that the mRNA expression of NLRP1b and NLRC4 was significantly increased in symptomatic SOD1G93A mice, while AIM2 did not change significantly. In ALS patients, the protein level of NLRC4 is significantly increased, while AIM2 is decreased but without statistical significance [184]. In ALS patients with cognitive impairment, only NLRP3 expression is upregulated in neurons and glial cells compared to those without cognitive dysfunction [185]. GSDMD expression has been found in the TDP43 mouse model and in the motor cortex and spinal cord of ALS patients, suggesting that the inflammasome triggers pyroptosis activation in ALS [186]. These studies indicate the need for further investigations of the specific pathological mechanisms of inflammasomes in ALS.

Inflammasomes as pharmacological targets

Inflammasomes play a critical role in neurodegenerative diseases, leading to the discovery or development of many compounds targeting them for pharmacological intervention (Table 1). The NLRP3 inflammasome is a main pharmacological target. Currently, the most widely used and gold-standard compound for NLRP3 inhibition is MCC950 (also known as CRID3). MCC950 is a specific inhibitor that can block both canonical and non-canonical pathways of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. It has been shown to specifically inhibiting NLRP3 without suppressing AIM2, NLRC4 or NLRP1 inflammasome activation. In addition, MCC950 can effectively cross the blood–brain barrier and has been experimentally tested for neurodegenerative diseases [187]. Glyburide is a sulfonylurea drug commonly used to treat type-2 diabetes. It works by inhibiting ATP-sensitive potassium channels in pancreatic β-cells. Glyburide also inhibits NLRP3, caspase-1, and IL-1β in macrophages and may be used as an inflammasome inhibitor to treat NLRP3-related inflammatory diseases [188]. CY-09 is an inhibitor that specifically blocks the NLRP3 inflammasome activation. It works by binding directly to the ATP-binding site of the NACHT domain of NLRP3, inhibiting its ATPase activity, thereby preventing NLRP3 oligomerization and inflammasome assembly [189]. CY-09 and its related analogues have been used to inhibit the activation of NLRP3 in monocytes and subsequently applied in AD. More studies are needed to determine whether they can be applied to other neurodegenerative diseases [190]. OLT1177, TRANILAST, ORIDONIN, JC171 and MNS all inhibit NLRP3 inflammasome activation yet via different mechanisms, and are applicable to only a few neurodegenerative diseases. Other inflammasome inhibitors, such as BAY 11–7082 and PARTHENOLIDE, can target NLRP3 by inhibiting its atpase activity. However, they are not specific for NLRP3, as they can also target AIM2, NLRC4, and NLRP1 [191], suggesting diverse effects of these inhibitors. However, in AD, BAY 11–7082 exerts its effects by inhibiting NLRP3, but not AIM2, NLRC4, or NLRP1 [192]. Other NLRP3 inhibitors such as BOT-4-one and INF39 have not been tested in neurodegenerative disease models.

Table 1.

Overview of pharmacological compounds targeting inflammasome

Compound name Mechanism of action Specificity Applicable diseases Refs
MCC950 Interacts with the Walker B motif within the NACHT domain of NLRP3, preventing ATP hydrolysis NLRP3 AD, PD, MS, HD [91, 120, 213, 214]
Glyburide ATP sensible K+ channels, downstream of the P2X7 receptor NLRP3 AD, PD [188, 215]
CY-09 Binds to the ATP-binding region of NLRP3 protein and inhibits the ATP hydrolytic activity of NLRP3 NLRP3 AD [190]
OLT1177 Binds to NLRP3 and inhibits its ATPase activity NLRP3 AD, PD, MS [216218]
TRANILAST Interacts with the NLRP3 NACHT domain NLRP3 AD [219]
ORIDONIN Inhibits recruitment of NEK7 by covalently modifying Cys279 in the NLRP3 NACHT domain NLRP3 AD [220]
JC171 Inhibits the NLRP3 activation NLRP3 AD, PD, MS [221, 222]
MNS Blocks NLRP3-mediated ASC speck formation and oligomerization NLRP3 AD, PD [223]
BAY 11–7082 Inhibits NACHT ATPase activity NLRP3, NLRC4 AD, PD, MS [192, 224, 225]
PARTHENOLIDE Inhibits NACHT ATPase activity NLRP3, NLRC4, NLRP1, AIM2 AD, PD, MS [189, 226228]
VX765 Inhibits caspase-1 Caspase-1 AD, PD, MS [143, 193, 229]
Indomethacin Inhibits the expression of IL-1β and caspase-1 IL-1β, Caspase-1 AD, PD [230, 231]
Anakinra IL-1 receptor antagonist IL-1 AD, PD, MS, ALS [196, 208, 232, 233]
BHB Inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation and reduces ASC oligomerization and speck formation NLRP3, ASC AD, PD, MS, HD, ALS [234238]
IC100 Inhibits ASC oligomerization ASC AD, MS [194, 239]
Disulfiram Modifies and inhibits GSDMD GSDMD PD, MS [199, 240]
Necrosulfonamide Modifies and inhibits GSDMD GSDMD AD, PD [200, 241]
Dimethyl fumarate Modifies and inhibits GSDMD GSDMD AD, PD, MS, HD, ALS [202, 206, 242244]

In addition to directly inhibiting NLRP3 initiation and assembly, there are inhibitors that target other components of the inflammasome. For example, VX740 and VX765 selectively inhibit caspase-1, which can block the secretion of IL-1β and IL-18, thereby reducing inflammatory responses. Inhibition of caspase-1 has been shown to effectively ameliorate cognitive impairment in AD mice [193], suggesting that caspase-1 inhibitors have potentials to be used for neurodegenerative diseases. ASC is an adaptor protein that not only facilitates the assembly of the inflammasome, but also affects extracellular inflammation, and macrophages can uptake and release ASC plaques, leading to the persistence of inflammatory response. Research has shown that targeting ASC within the inflammasome can also inhibit inflammatory responses [21]. IC100, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits ASC oligomerization, has been found to attenuate inflammatory responses in the EAE model and exert considerable therapeutic potential, suggesting potentials of ASC inhibitors for neurodegenerative diseases [194]. Some inhibitors target downstream effectors of the inflammasome, such as IL-1, to suppress inflammation. Canakinumab (Ilaris), rilonacept (Arcalyst), and anakinra (Kineret) are three IL-1 antagonists that have been approved for clinical use [195]. Of these, anakinra has been used in various neurodegenerative disease models in vitro and in vivo, and has demonstrated safety when used to block IL-1 in ALS patients [196].

Pyroptosis is a form of programmed cell death that triggers a robust inflammatory response. GSDMD is a key mediator of pyroptosis. GSDMD can be cleaved by inflammatory caspases, releasing its active amino-terminal fragment. This fragment translocates to the plasma membrane, undergoes conformational changes, and oligomerizes to form a pore-like structure on the membrane. These pores allow the cell to release a large amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines, causing a strong inflammatory response and inducing pyroptosis of immune cells [197, 198]. Therefore, inhibiting GSDMD to reduce inflammatory responses may also be a strategy. Disulfiram is a blocker of GSDMD pore formation and has been shown to reduce inflammation in a cell model of PD. Changes in GSDMD have also been found in the blood of PD patients, suggesting that inhibition of GSDMD may alleviate neurodegenerative diseases [199]. Necrosulfonamide, an inhibitor with a similar mechanism as disulfiram, has been found to reduce neuroinflammation and rescue dopaminergic neuronal degeneration in the MPTP model [200]. Dimethyl fumarate has been approved for the treatment of MS in the clinic to reduce inflammatory responses in MS [201]. However, another study found that dimethyl fumarate treatment in the EAE model alleviated inflammatory response after one week of treatment, but it did not ameliorate neuroinflammation and microglial activation after two weeks of treatment [202]. These results suggest that GSDMD-dependent inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis may be a potential target for treating neurodegenerative diseases. Ninjurin-1 (NINJ1) is a cell membrane surface protein also associated with pyroptosis. Some studies have shown that inhibiting NINJ1 can reduce cell damage [203]. However, there is little evidence to date for its application in neurodegenerative diseases.

There are some inhibitors that have already undergone clinical trials for ulcerative colitis, acute gout attacks, osteoarthritis, cytokine release syndrom in COVID-19, cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, and advanced cancer (combined therapy) (Table 2). Most of the trials tested NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors with a primary aim of reducing inflammatory factors. There are relatively few clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases. ZYIL1 can inhibit the NLRP3 pathway by blocking ASC oligomerization [204]. In the clinical trial NCT05981040, ZYIL1 was applied to ALS subjects to assess its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics during administration. The pharmacodynamic data can be used to determine whether the NLRP3 inhibitor ZYIL1 can improve ALS symptoms. Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug primarily used for the treatment of gout. In recent years, it has been found to inhibit inflammasome activation [205]. In the clinical trial NCT03693781, Colchicine was used to enhance autophagy to reduce TDP-43 accumulation in neurons, and alleviate ALS symptoms through its anti-inflammatory function. Dimethyl fumarate can inhibit the interaction between NLRP3 and NEK7, and by modifying GSDMD, it plays a role in inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammatory pathway [206]. The clinical trials NCT02675413 and NCT02461069 assessed the efficacy of dimethyl fumarate in alleviating MS symptoms, and its possible mechanism of action is to enhance Nrf2 transcription and exert anti-inflammatory effects [207]. Similarly, antibodies for IL-1β, which have been approved for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, have demonstrated significant individual differences in efficacy, and long-term safety has not been fully verified [208], weakening their potential for clinical use. These drugs mentioned above are used for palliative treatment of patients to alleviate symptoms, and the scope of treatment is narrower. At the same time, for diseases like AD and PD, where there is substantial evidence that inflammasomes play an important role, there are fewer related clinical trials.

Table 2.

Inflammasome inhibitors in clinical development

Compound name Development stage Conditions
ZYIL1 Phase 2 (NCT05981040) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Phase 2 (NCT06398808) Ulcerative colitis
Phase 2 (NCT05186051) Cryopyrin associated periodic syndrome
OLT1177 Early Phase 1 (NCT05880355) Myocardial infarction
Phase 2 (NCT05658575) Acute gout flare
Phase 2 (NCT04540120) COVID-19, cytokine release syndrome
Phase 2 (NCT01768975) Osteoarthritis of the knee
Phase 2 (NCT06047262) Diabetes mellitus, type 2
DFV890 Phase 1 (NCT05552469) Myeloid diseases
Phase 2 (NCT04868968) Familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome
Phase 2 (NCT04886258) Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
Phase 2 (NCT06031844) Coronary heart disease
RRx-001 Phase 2 (NCT03515538) Oral mucositis
Phase 2 (NCT05966194) Oral mucositis
Inzomelid Phase 1 (NCT04015076) Cryopyrin associated periodic syndrome
VTX2735 Phase 2 (NCT05812781) Cryopyrin associated periodic syndrome
NT-0796 Phase 2 (NCT06129409) Cardiovascular diseases
Tranilast Phase 2 (NCT00882024) Active rheumatoid arthritis
Phase 2 (NCT03923140) Cryopyrin associated periodic syndrome
BMS-986299 Phase 2 (NCT03444753) Advanced cancer
Oridonin Phase 4 (NCT05130892) Percutaneous coronary intervention
Colchicine Phase 3 (NCT06054100) Acute coronary syndrome
Phase 2 (NCT03693781) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Phase 3 (NCT05855746) Acute myocarditis
Dimethyl fumarate Phase 4 (NCT02675413) Multiple sclerosis
Phase 4 (NCT02461069) Multiple sclerosis, relapsing–remitting

Data searched from clinicaltrials.gov.

Conclusion

Inflammasomes play a critical role in the innate immune system by recognizing PAMPs or host-derived DAMPs and are essential for host protection. However, excessive or prolonged inflammasome activation can trigger inflammatory responses. Inflammasome activation depends on PAMPs and DAMPs, such as misfolded proteins, increased kinases, gut microbiota dysbiosis, or the release of ATP. It is also possible to directly activate or inhibit inflammasomes by modulating these PAMPs and DAMPs. Additionally, inhibiting key molecular mechanisms upstream and downstream of inflammasome activation can achieve the same purpose. Beyond this, regulating autophagy can also regulate inflammasome activation. Existing research has found that autophagy can inhibit NLRP3 inflammasome activation in three ways, including degradation of ASC, increasing NLRP3 phosphorylation, and clearing ROS [209]. Similarly, oxidative stress, mitochondrial-related factors, and ion channels can also be used as targets to regulate inflammasome acivation[210212].

In neurodegenerative diseases, inflammasome activation, particularly the NLRP3 inflammasome activation, has been extensively studied for its role in AD and PD, but its specific pathogenic mechanisms in HD and ALS are not well understood. In addition to NLRP3, other inflammasomes such as AIM2, NLRC4 and NLRP1 and their downstream effector molecules have been found to play pathological roles in neurodegenerative diseases. However, more preclinical experiments and clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings. Understanding the complex interactions between inflammasomes and the nervous system is essential for identifying potential therapeutic targets and developing effective treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.

Given the role of inflammasomes in neurodegenerative diseases, targeting these complexes has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy. Some small molecules that inhibit inflammasome activation or assembly have been experimentally used to alleviate neuroinflammation in these diseases. However, there are also small molecules that cannot cross the blood–brain barrier and are therefore not applicable to these diseases. This highlights the need to focus on compounds with both inhibitory potential and potential for modification, with the goal of identifying compounds that can modulate inflammasome activation without causing side effects or off-target activities. Targeting downstream effector molecules of inflammasomes, such as IL-1β and IL-18, or targeting GSDMD, which is associated with inflammasome-induced pyroptosis, is a potential strategy. In addition, some drugs with other clinical uses, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, have been found to inhibit inflammasome activation, suggesting their potential of re-direction. Another strategy is to develop inhibitors that target multiple pathways, such as combinational therapies that simultaneously target different aspects of the inflammatory process, potentially providing more effective control of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. In summary, targeting inflammasomes and their associated pathways holds great promise for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. However, this approach requires careful considerations of compound specificity, ability to cross the blood–brain barrier, and the overall impact on disease progression.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AAV

Adeno-associated virus

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

AIM2

Absent in melanoma 2

ALR

AIM2-like receptors

ALS

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

AMPK

Adenosine 5’-monophosphate-activated protein kinase

ASC

Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein

Amyloid-β

Calhm2

Calcium homeostasis modulator 2

CNS

Central nervous system

CPZ

Chlorpromazine

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

CXCL9

Chemokine CXC ligand 9

DAM

Disease-associated microglia

DAMPS

Damage associated molecular patterns

EAE

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

FUS2

Fused in sarcoma 2

Fyn

FYN proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase Gene

GSDMD

Gasdermin D

HD

Huntington’s disease

HMGB1

High-mobility group box 1

IFN-γ

Interferon-γ

IL

Interleukin

INPP5D

Inositol Polyphosphate-5-phosphatase D

MPTP

1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-te-trahydropyridine

MS

Multiple Sclerosis

mTOR

Mammalian target of rapamycin

NFTs

Neurofibrillary tangles

NF-κB

Nuclear factor-kappa B

NINJ1

Nerve injury-induced protein 1

NLRC4

Nodlike receptor and caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 4

NLRP1

Nod-like receptor and pyrin domain-containing protein 1

NLRs

Nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors

Nrf2

Nuclearrespiratoty factor 2

PAMP

Pathogen-associated molecular pattern

PBMC

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell

PD

Parkinson’s disease

PFF

Pre-formed fibrils

PIPs

Phosphatidylinositol phosphates

PRRs

Pattern recognition receptor

RIPK1

Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SGK1

Serum and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase 1

SHIP1

Src homology 2-containing inositol phosphatase-1

SNpc

Substantia nigra pars compacta

SOD1

Superoxide dismutase 1

TDP43

TAR DNA binding protein-43

TLRs

Toll-like receptors

TNF

Tumor necrosis factor

TREM2

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2

TRPV1

Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1

α-Syn

α‐Synuclein

Author contributions

Q.W. designed and wrote the manuscript. S.Y. provided ideas and suggestions for revision. J.Y. and N.C. provided revisions. X.Z. conducted literature search and data analysis. S.Z. and L.C. assisted in searching for clinical trial data. W.W. prepared figured and tables. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (82003973), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82304750), and Hunan University of Chinese Medicine Research Fund Outstanding Youth Project (Z2023XJYQ02).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Footnotes

The original version of this article was revised: “Following publication, the authors reported an error in corresponding author's affiliation. The full list of affiliations has been corrected”.

Qianchen Wang and Songwei Yang have contributed equally to this work.

Change history

1/23/2025

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1186/s40035-025-00468-7

References

  • 1.Erkkinen MG, Kim M-O, Geschwind MD. Clinical neurology and epidemiology of the major neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10: a033118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gupta SP. Advances in studies on neurodegenerative diseases and their treatments. Curr Top Med Chem. 2020;20:2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dugger BN, Dickson DW. Pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9: a028035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Khanam H, Ali A, Asif M, Shamsuzzaman. Neurodegenerative diseases linked to misfolded proteins and their therapeutic approaches: A review. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;124:1121–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sengupta U, Kayed R. Amyloid β, Tau, and α-synuclein aggregates in the pathogenesis, prognosis, and therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases. Prog Neurobiol. 2022;214: 102270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Logroscino G, Urso D, Savica R. Descriptive epidemiology of neurodegenerative diseases: what are the critical questions? Neuroepidemiology. 2022;56:309–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Agnello L, Ciaccio M. Neurodegenerative diseases: from molecular basis to therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:12854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ravichandran KA, Heneka MT. Inflammasomes in neurological disorders—mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024;20:67–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Glass CK, Saijo K, Winner B, Marchetto MC, Gage FH. Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell. 2010;140:918–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Singh J, Habean ML, Panicker N. Inflammasome assembly in neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Neurosci. 2023;46:814–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guo H, Callaway JB, Ting JP-Y. Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat Med. 2015;21:677–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rathinam VAK, Fitzgerald KA. Inflammasome complexes: emerging mechanisms and effector functions. Cell. 2016;165:792–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lamkanfi M, Dixit VM. Mechanisms and functions of inflammasomes. Cell. 2014;157:1013–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schroder K, Tschopp J. The inflammasomes. Cell. 2010;140:821–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Paerewijck O, Lamkanfi M. The human inflammasomes. Mol Aspects Med. 2022;88: 101100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barnett KC, Li S, Liang K, Ting JP-Y. A 360° view of the inflammasome: mechanisms of activation, cell death, and diseases. Cell. 2023;186:2288–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Van Opdenbosch N, Lamkanfi M. Caspases in cell death, inflammation, and disease. Immunity. 2019;50:1352–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Man SM, Kanneganti T. Regulation of inflammasome activation. Immunol Rev. 2015;265:6–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hayden MS, Ghosh S. NF-κB in immunobiology. Cell Res. 2011;21:223–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xia J, Jiang S, Dong S, Liao Y, Zhou Y. The role of post-translational modifications in regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:6126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hoss F, Rodriguez-Alcazar JF, Latz E. Assembly and regulation of ASC specks. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:1211–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Heneka MT, McManus RM, Latz E. Inflammasome signalling in brain function and neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19:610–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wen H, Miao EA, Ting JP-Y. New mechanisms of NOD-like receptor-associated inflammasome activation. Immunity. 2013. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Olona A, Leishman S, Anand PK. The NLRP3 inflammasome: regulation by metabolic signals. Trends Immunol. 2022;43:978–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hoffman HM, Brydges SD. Genetic and molecular basis of inflammasome-mediated disease. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:10889–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pradhan P, Vijayan V, Cirksena K, Buettner FFR, Igarashi K, Motterlini R, et al. Genetic BACH1 deficiency alters mitochondrial function and increases NLRP3 inflammasome activation in mouse macrophages. Redox Biol. 2022;51:102265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Leng F, Edison P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17:157–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nelke C, Schroeter CB, Pawlitzki M, Meuth SG, Ruck T. Cellular senescence in neuroinflammatory disease: new therapies for old cells? Trends Mol Med. 2022;28:850–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rajesh Y, Kanneganti T-D. Innate immune cell death in neuroinflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Cells. 2022;11:1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Teleanu DM, Niculescu A-G, Lungu II, Radu CI, Vladâcenco O, Roza E, et al. An overview of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and neurodegenerative diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:5938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gao C, Jiang J, Tan Y, Chen S. Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kwon HS, Koh S-H. Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: the roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl Neurodegener. 2020;9:42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. 2017;541:481–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Heneka MT. Microglia take centre stage in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:79–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yun SP, Kam T-I, Panicker N, Kim S, Oh Y, Park J-S, et al. Block of A1 astrocyte conversion by microglia is neuroprotective in models of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Med. 2018;24:931–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK, et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 2017;169:1276–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sarlus H, Heneka MT. Microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:3240–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Leidal AM, Levine B, Debnath J. Autophagy and the cell biology of age-related disease. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:1338–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Biasizzo M, Kopitar-Jerala N. Interplay between NLRP3 inflammasome and autophagy. Front Immunol. 2020;11: 591803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature. 2011;469:323–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Scheltens P, Strooper BD, Kivipelto M, Holstege H, Chételat G, Teunissen CE, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Lond Engl. 2021;397:1577–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hansson O. Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Med. 2021;27:954–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vontell RT, de Rivero Vaccari JP, Sun X, Gultekin SH, Bramlett HM, Dietrich WD, et al. Identification of inflammasome signaling proteins in neurons and microglia in early and intermediate stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol. 2022;33:e13142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Saresella M, La Rosa F, Piancone F, Zoppis M, Marventano I, Calabrese E, et al. The NLRP3 and NLRP1 inflammasomes are activated in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2016;11:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Heneka MT, Kummer MP, Stutz A, Delekate A, Schwartz S, Vieira-Saecker A, et al. NLRP3 is activated in Alzheimer’s disease and contributes to pathology in APP/PS1 mice. Nature. 2013;493:674–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yang J, Wise L, Fukuchi K-I. TLR4 cross-talk with NLRP3 inflammasome and complement signaling pathways in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Immunol. 2020;11:724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bai H, Zhang Q. Activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 701282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Halle A, Hornung V, Petzold GC, Stewart CR, Monks BG, Reinheckel T, et al. The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in the innate immune response to amyloid-β. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:857–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jung ES, Suh K, Han J, Kim H, Kang H, Choi W, et al. Amyloid-β activates NLRP3 inflammasomes by affecting microglial immunometabolism through the Syk-AMPK pathway. Aging Cell. 2022;21: e13623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ulland TK, Song WM, Huang SC-C, Ulrich JD, Sergushichev A, Beatty WL, et al. TREM2 maintains microglial metabolic fitness in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 2017;170:649–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yang Y, Wang H, Kouadir M, Song H, Shi F. Recent advances in the mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its inhibitors. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sheedy FJ, Grebe A, Rayner KJ, Kalantari P, Ramkhelawon B, Carpenter SB, et al. CD36 coordinates NLRP3 inflammasome activation by facilitating intracellular nucleation of soluble ligands into particulate ligands in sterile inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:812–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gold M, Khoury JE. β-amyloid, microglia and the inflammasome in Alzheimer’s disease. Semin Immunopathol. 2015;37:607–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Di Virgilio F, Dal Ben D, Sarti AC, Giuliani AL, Falzoni S. The P2X7 receptor in infection and inflammation. Immunity. 2017;47:15–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yin Y, Wei L, Caseley EA, Lopez O, Wei Y, Li D, et al. Leveraging the ATP-P2X7 receptor signalling axis to alleviate traumatic CNS damage and related complications. Med Res Rev. 2023;43(5):1346–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chen Y, Yu Y. Tau and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: interplay mechanisms and clinical translation. J Neuroinflammation. 2023;20:165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang L, Gai Y, Liu Y, Meng D, Zeng Y, Luo Y, et al. Tau induces inflammasome activation and microgliosis through acetylating NLRP3. Clin Transl Med. 2024;14: e1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stancu I-C, Cremers N, Vanrusselt H, Couturier J, Vanoosthuyse A, Kessels S, et al. Aggregated Tau activates NLRP3–ASC inflammasome exacerbating exogenously seeded and non-exogenously seeded Tau pathology in vivo. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2019;137:599–617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ising C, Venegas C, Zhang S, Scheiblich H, Schmidt SV, Vieira-Saecker A, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome activation drives tau pathology. Nature. 2019;575:669–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lemprière S. NLRP3 inflammasome activation implicated in tau pathology. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.He Z, Guo JL, McBride JD, Narasimhan S, Kim H, Changolkar L, et al. Amyloid-β plaques enhance Alzheimer’s brain tau-seeded pathologies by facilitating neuritic plaque tau aggregation. Nat Med. 2018;24:29–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Severini C, Barbato C, Di Certo MG, Gabanella F, Petrella C, Di Stadio A, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: new concepts on the role of autoimmunity and NLRP3 inflammasome in the pathogenesis of the disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19:498–512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bairamian D, Sha S, Rolhion N, Sokol H, Dorothée G, Lemere CA, et al. Microbiota in neuroinflammation and synaptic dysfunction: a focus on Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2022;17:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chen C, Liao J, Xia Y, Liu X, Jones R, Haran J, et al. Gut microbiota regulate Alzheimer’s disease pathologies and cognitive disorders via PUFA-associated neuroinflammation. Gut. 2022;71:2233–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chou V, Pearse RV, Aylward AJ, Ashour N, Taga M, Terzioglu G, et al. INPP5D regulates inflammasome activation in human microglia. Nat Commun. 2023;14:7552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Terzioglu G, Young-Pearse TL. Microglial function, INPP5D/SHIP1 signaling, and NLRP3 inflammasome activation: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2023;18:89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cheng J, Dong Y, Ma J, Pan R, Liao Y, Kong X, et al. Microglial Calhm2 regulates neuroinflammation and contributes to Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabe3600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Johnson NH, de Rivero Vaccari JP, Bramlett HM, Keane RW, Dietrich WD. Inflammasome activation in traumatic brain injury and Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Res J Lab Clin Med. 2023;254:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kaushal V, Dye R, Pakavathkumar P, Foveau B, Flores J, Hyman B, et al. Neuronal NLRP1 inflammasome activation of Caspase-1 coordinately regulates inflammatory interleukin-1-beta production and axonal degeneration-associated Caspase-6 activation. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22:1676–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sun D, Gao G, Zhong B, Zhang H, Ding S, Sun Z, et al. NLRP1 inflammasome involves in learning and memory impairments and neuronal damages during aging process in mice. Behav Brain Funct BBF. 2021;17:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Li X, Zhang H, Yang L, Dong X, Han Y, Su Y, et al. Inhibition of NLRP1 inflammasome improves autophagy dysfunction and Aβ disposition in APP/PS1 mice. Behav Brain Funct BBF. 2023;19:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Flores J, Noël A, Fillion M-L, LeBlanc AC. Therapeutic potential of Nlrp1 inflammasome, Caspase-1, or Caspase-6 against Alzheimer disease cognitive impairment. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:657–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Saadi M, Karkhah A, Pourabdolhossein F, Ataie A, Monif M, Nouri HR. Involvement of NLRC4 inflammasome through caspase-1 and IL-1β augments neuroinflammation and contributes to memory impairment in an experimental model of Alzheimer’s like disease. Brain Res Bull. 2020;154:81–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Reimers D, Vallejo-Muñoz M, Casarejos MJ, Jimenez-Escrig A, Gonzalo-Gobernado R, Bazan E. Immunohistochemical study of ASC expression and distribution in the hippocampus of an aged murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:8697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Choubey D. Type I interferon (IFN)-inducible absent in melanoma 2 proteins in neuroinflammation: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16:236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ye L, Hu M, Mao R, Tan Y, Sun M, Jia J, et al. Conditional knockout of AIM2 in microglia ameliorates synaptic plasticity and spatial memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024;30(6):e14555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cao L-L, Guan P-P, Zhang S-Q, Yang Y, Huang X-S, Wang P. Downregulating expression of OPTN elevates neuroinflammation via AIM2 inflammasome- and RIPK1-activating mechanisms in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2021;397:2284–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Koeglsperger T, Rumpf S-L, Schließer P, Struebing FL, Brendel M, Levin J, et al. Neuropathology of incidental lewy body & prodromal Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2023;18:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Li Y, Xia Y, Yin S, Wan F, Hu J, Kou L, et al. Targeting microglial α-synuclein/TLRs/NF-kappaB/NLRP3 inflammasome axis in Parkinson’s disease. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 719807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nguyen M, Wong YC, Ysselstein D, Severino A, Krainc D. Synaptic, mitochondrial, and lysosomal dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 2019;42:140–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Han Q-Q, Le W. NLRP3 Inflammasome-mediated neuroinflammation and related mitochondrial impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Bull. 2023;39:832–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Anderson FL, von Herrmann KM, Andrew AS, Kuras YI, Young AL, Scherzer CR, et al. Plasma-borne indicators of inflammasome activity in Parkinson’s disease patients. NPJ Park Dis. 2021;7:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Fan Z, Pan Y-T, Zhang Z-Y, Yang H, Yu S-Y, Zheng Y, et al. Systemic activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and plasma α-synuclein levels are correlated with motor severity and progression in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Harms AS, Ferreira SA, Romero-Ramos M. Periphery and brain, innate and adaptive immunity in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2021;141:527–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Pike AF, Varanita T, Herrebout MAC, Plug BC, Kole J, Musters RJP, et al. α-Synuclein evokes NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β secretion from primary human microglia. Glia. 2021;69:1413–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Soraci L, Gambuzza ME, Biscetti L, Laganà P, Lo Russo C, Buda A, et al. Toll-like receptors and NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent pathways in Parkinson’s disease: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. J Neurol. 2023;270:1346–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Shao Q-H, Chen Y, Li F-F, Wang S, Zhang X-L, Yuan Y-H, et al. TLR4 deficiency has a protective effect in the MPTP/probenecid mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2019;40:1503–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lee E, Hwang I, Park S, Hong S, Hwang B, Cho Y, et al. MPTP-driven NLRP3 inflammasome activation in microglia plays a central role in dopaminergic neurodegeneration. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:213–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Que R, Zheng J, Chang Z, Zhang W, Li H, Xie Z, et al. Dl-3-n-Butylphthalide rescues dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson’s disease models by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome and ameliorating mitochondrial impairment. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 794770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gordon R, Albornoz EA, Christie DC, Langley MR, Kumar V, Manotovani S, et al. Inflammasome inhibition prevents α-synuclein pathology and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(465):eaah4066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Grotemeyer A, Fischer JF, Koprich JB, Brotchie JM, Blum R, Volkmann J, et al. Inflammasome inhibition protects dopaminergic neurons from α-synuclein pathology in a model of progressive Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2023;20:79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Choi ML, Chappard A, Singh BP, Maclachlan C, Rodrigues M, Fedotova EI, et al. Pathological structural conversion of α-synuclein at the mitochondria induces neuronal toxicity. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:1134–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Chen J, Mao K, Yu H, Wen Y, She H, Zhang H, et al. p38-TFEB pathways promote microglia activation through inhibiting CMA-mediated NLRP3 degradation in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Panicker N, Sarkar S, Harischandra DS, Neal M, Kam T-I, Jin H, et al. Fyn kinase regulates misfolded α-synuclein uptake and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in microglia. J Exp Med. 2019;216:1411–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kwon O, Song J, Yang Y, Kim S, Kim JY, Seok M, et al. SGK1 inhibition in glia ameliorates pathologies and symptoms in Parkinson disease animal models. EMBO Mol Med. 2021;13: e13076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zhang C, Zhao M, Wang B, Su Z, Guo B, Qin L, et al. The Nrf2-NLRP3-caspase-1 axis mediates the neuroprotective effects of Celastrol in Parkinson’s disease. Redox Biol. 2021;47: 102134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Yang X, Yang R, Zhang F. Role of Nrf2 in Parkinson’s disease: toward new perspectives. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13: 919233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ying Z-M, Lv Q-K, Yao X-Y, Dong A-Q, Yang Y-P, Cao Y-L, et al. BAG3 promotes autophagy and suppresses NLRP3 inflammasome activation in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10:1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zou L, Che Z, Ding K, Zhang C, Liu X, Wang L, et al. JAC4 alleviates rotenone-induced Parkinson’s disease through the inactivation of the NLRP3 signal pathway. Antioxidants. 2023;12:1134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yan Y, Zheng R, Liu Y, Ruan Y, Lin Z, Xue N, et al. Parkin regulates microglial NLRP3 and represses neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Aging Cell. 2023;22: e13834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Panicker N, Kam T-I, Wang H, Neifert S, Chou S-C, Kumar M, et al. Neuronal NLRP3 is a parkin substrate that drives neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Neuron. 2022;110:2422–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Han X, Sun S, Sun Y, Song Q, Zhu J, Song N, et al. Small molecule-driven NLRP3 inflammation inhibition via interplay between ubiquitination and autophagy: implications for Parkinson disease. Autophagy. 2019;15:1860–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Rui W-J, Li S, Yang L, Liu Y, Fan Y, Hu Y-C, et al. Microglial AIM2 alleviates antiviral-related neuro-inflammation in mouse models of Parkinson’s disease. Glia. 2022;70:2409–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Guo M, Wang J, Zhao Y, Feng Y, Han S, Dong Q, et al. Microglial exosomes facilitate α-synuclein transmission in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2020;143:1476–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Xia Y, Zhang G, Han C, Ma K, Guo X, Wan F, et al. Microglia as modulators of exosomal alpha-synuclein transmission. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Codolo G, Plotegher N, Pozzobon T, Brucale M, Tessari I, Bubacco L, et al. Triggering of inflammasome by aggregated α-synuclein, an inflammatory response in synucleinopathies. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e55375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Walker FO. Huntington’s disease. Lancet Lond Engl. 2007;369:218–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Tong H, Yang T, Xu S, Li X, Liu L, Zhou G, et al. Huntington’s disease: complex pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:3845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.De Oliveira FT, Roque IG, Machado Da Silva EW, Vianna PP, Costa Valadão PA, Guatimosim C, et al. Inflammasome activation and assembly in Huntington’s disease. Mol Immunol. 2022;151:134–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zhang S, Cheng Y, Shang H. The updated development of blood-based biomarkers for Huntington’s disease. J Neurol. 2023;270:2483–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hickman S, Izzy S, Sen P, Morsett L, Khoury JE. Microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:1359–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Stephenson J, Nutma E, van der Valk P, Amor S. Inflammation in CNS neurodegenerative diseases. Immunology. 2018;154:204–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Zhang W, Xiao D, Mao Q, Xia H. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Jia Q, Li S, Li X-J, Yin P. Neuroinflammation in Huntington’s disease: from animal models to clinical therapeutics. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1088124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Runne H, Kuhn A, Wild EJ, Pratyaksha W, Kristiansen M, Isaacs JD, et al. Analysis of potential transcriptomic biomarkers for Huntington’s disease in peripheral blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:14424–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Paldino E, D’Angelo V, Laurenti D, Angeloni C, Sancesario G, Fusco FR. Modulation of inflammasome and pyroptosis by olaparib, a PARP-1 inhibitor, in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Cells. 2020;9:2286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Politis M, Lahiri N, Niccolini F, Su P, Wu K, Giannetti P, et al. Increased central microglial activation associated with peripheral cytokine levels in premanifest Huntington’s disease gene carriers. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;83:115–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Chang K-H, Wu Y-R, Chen Y-C, Chen C-M. Plasma inflammatory biomarkers for Huntington’s disease patients and mouse model. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;44:121–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Chen K-P, Hua K-F, Tsai F-T, Lin T-Y, Cheng C-Y, Yang D-I, et al. A selective inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome as a potential therapeutic approach for neuroprotection in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Tucci P, Lattanzi R, Severini C, Saso L. Nrf2 pathway in Huntington’s disease (HD): what is its role? Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:15272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Norflus F, Nanje A, Gutekunst C-A, Shi G, Cohen J, Bejarano M, et al. Anti-inflammatory treatment with acetylsalicylate or rofecoxib is not neuroprotective in Huntington’s disease transgenic mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2004;17:319–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wu A-G, Zhou X-G, Qiao G, Yu L, Tang Y, Yan L, et al. Targeting microglial autophagic degradation in NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neurodegenerative diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;65: 101202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Dendrou CA, Fugger L, Friese MA. Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:545–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Jakimovski D, Bittner S, Zivadinov R, Morrow SA, Benedict RH, Zipp F, et al. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2024;403:183–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Franklin RJM, Simons M. CNS remyelination and inflammation: From basic mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Neuron. 2022;110:3549–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Voet S, Prinz M, Van Loo G. Microglia in central nervous system inflammation and multiple sclerosis pathology. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25:112–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sun Y, Yu H, Guan Y. Glia connect inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Bull. 2023;39:466–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Huang J, Khademi M, Fugger L, Lindhe Ö, Novakova L, Axelsson M, et al. Inflammation-related plasma and CSF biomarkers for multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:12952–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Rodríguez Murúa S, Farez MF, Quintana FJ. The immune response in multiple sclerosis. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. 2022;17:121–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Yang J, Hamade M, Wu Q, Wang Q, Axtell R, Giri S, et al. Current and future biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:5877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Cui Y, Yu H, Bu Z, Wen L, Yan L, Feng J. Focus on the role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutics. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15: 894298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Malhotra S, Hurtado-Navarro L, Pappolla A, Villar LMM, Río J, Montalban X, et al. Increased NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in patients with multiple sclerosis with fingolimod treatment failure. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation. 2023;10: e200100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Keane RW, Dietrich WD, de Rivero Vaccari JP. Inflammasome proteins as biomarkers of multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2018;9:135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Kadowaki A, Quintana FJ. The NLRP3 inflammasome in progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2020;143:1286–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Yang C-A, Chiang B-L. Inflammasomes and human autoimmunity: A comprehensive review. J Autoimmun. 2015;61:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Olcum M, Tastan B, Kiser C, Genc S, Genc K. Microglial NLRP3 inflammasome activation in multiple sclerosis. In: Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology. Elsevier; 2020. p. 247–308. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 138.Hou B, Zhang Y, Liang P, He Y, Peng B, Liu W, et al. Inhibition of the NLRP3-inflammasome prevents cognitive deficits in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice via the alteration of astrocyte phenotype. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Meng J, Li N, Liu X, Qiao S, Zhou Q, Tan J, et al. NLRP3 attenuates intraocular inflammation by inhibiting aim2-mediated pyroptosis through the phosphorylated salt-inducible kinase 1/sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 pathway. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75:842–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Byun DJ, Lee J, Ko K, Hyun Y-M. NLRP3 exacerbates EAE severity through ROS-dependent NET formation in the mouse brain. Cell Commun Signal CCS. 2024;22:96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Zhang Q, Liu W, Wang H, Zhou H, Bulek K, Chen X, et al. TH17 cells promote CNS inflammation by sensing danger signals via Mincle. Nat Commun. 2022;13:2406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Inoue M, Williams KL, Oliver T, Vandenabeele P, Rajan JV, Miao EA, et al. IFNβ therapy against EAE is effective only when development of the disease depends on the NLRP3 inflammasome. Sci Signal. 2012;5:ra38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 143.McKenzie BA, Mamik MK, Saito LB, Boghozian R, Monaco MC, Major EO, et al. Caspase-1 inhibition prevents glial inflammasome activation and pyroptosis in models of multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E6065–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Chen C, Zhou Y, Ning X, Li S, Xue D, Wei C, et al. Directly targeting ASC by lonidamine alleviates inflammasome-driven diseases. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19:315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Seyedsadr M, Wang Y, Elzoheiry M, Shree Gopal S, Jang S, Duran G, et al. IL-11 induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation in monocytes and inflammatory cell migration to the central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120: e2221007120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Yu Y, Wu D-M, Li J, Deng S-H, Liu T, Zhang T, et al. Bixin Attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by suppressing TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome activity and activating NRF2 signaling. Front Immunol. 2020;11: 593368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Tastan B, Arioz BI, Tufekci KU, Tarakcioglu E, Gonul CP, Genc K, et al. Dimethyl fumarate alleviates NLRP3 inflammasome activation in microglia and sickness behavior in LPS-challenged mice. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 737065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Motawi TK, El-Maraghy SA, Kamel AS, Said SE, Kortam MA. Modulation of p38 MAPK and Nrf2/HO-1/NLRP3 inflammasome signaling and pyroptosis outline the anti-neuroinflammatory and remyelinating characters of Clemastine in EAE rat model. Biochem Pharmacol. 2023;209: 115435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Malhotra S, Costa C, Eixarch H, Keller CW, Amman L, Martínez-Banaclocha H, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome as prognostic factor and therapeutic target in primary progressive multiple sclerosis patients. Brain. 2020;143:1414–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Noroozi S, Meimand HAE, Arababadi MK, Nakhaee N, Asadikaram G. The Effects of IFN-β 1a on the expression of inflammasomes and apoptosis-associated speck-like proteins in multiple sclerosis patients. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54:3031–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Barclay WE, Aggarwal N, Deerhake ME, Inoue M, Nonaka T, Nozaki K, et al. The AIM2 inflammasome is activated in astrocytes during the late phase of EAE. JCI Insight. 2022;7: e155563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Soares JL, Oliveira EM, Pontillo A. Variants in NLRP3 and NLRC4 inflammasome associate with susceptibility and severity of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;29:26–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Gharagozloo M, Gris KV, Mahvelati T, Amrani A, Lukens JR, Gris D. NLR-dependent regulation of inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol. 2018;8:2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Wang Y, Pei S, Liu Z, Ding Y, Qian T, Wen H, et al. IRAK-M suppresses the activation of microglial NLRP3 inflammasome and GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis through inhibiting IRAK1 phosphorylation during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Pollock NM, Fernandes JP, Woodfield J, Moussa E, Hlavay B, Branton WG, et al. Gasdermin D activation in oligodendrocytes and microglia drives inflammatory demyelination in progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav Immun. 2024;115:374–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Zhang Y, Hou B, Liang P, Lu X, Wu Y, Zhang X, et al. TRPV1 channel mediates NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent neuroinflammation in microglia. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Shao Y, Chen C, Zhu T, Sun Z, Li S, Gong L, et al. TRPM2 contributes to neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits in a cuprizone-induced multiple sclerosis model via NLRP3 inflammasome. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;160: 105534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Liu M, Liu X, Wang L, Wang Y, Dong F, Wu J, et al. TRPV4 inhibition improved myelination and reduced glia reactivity and inflammation in a cuprizone-induced mouse model of demyelination. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Holloman JP, Dimas SH, Archambault AS, Filipello F, Du L, Feng J, et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4-dependent microglial function in myelin injury and repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:17097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Robinson AP, Caldis MW, Harp CT, Goings GE, Miller SD. High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) neutralization ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Autoimmun. 2013;43:32–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Feldman EL, Goutman SA, Petri S, Mazzini L, Savelieff MG, Shaw PJ, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Lond Engl. 2022;400:1363–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Zhu L, Li S, Li X-J, Yin P. Pathological insights from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis animal models: comparisons, limitations, and challenges. Transl Neurodegener. 2023;12:46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Ilieva H, Vullaganti M, Kwan J. Advances in molecular pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The BMJ. 2023;383: e075037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Johann S, Heitzer M, Kanagaratnam M, Goswami A, Rizo T, Weis J, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome is expressed by astrocytes in the SOD1 mouse model of ALS and in human sporadic ALS patients: NLRP3 Inflammasome Expression in ALS. Glia. 2015;63:2260–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Cunha C, Santos C, Gomes C, Fernandes A, Correia AM, Sebastião AM, et al. Downregulated glia interplay and increased miRNA-155 as promising markers to track ALS at an early stage. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55:4207–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Italiani P, Carlesi C, Giungato P, Puxeddu I, Borroni B, Bossù P, et al. Evaluating the levels of interleukin-1 family cytokines in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Deora V, Lee JD, Albornoz EA, McAlary L, Jagaraj CJ, Robertson AAB, et al. The microglial NLRP3 inflammasome is activated by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis proteins. Glia. 2020;68:407–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Zhao W, Beers DR, Bell S, Wang J, Wen S, Baloh RH, et al. TDP-43 activates microglia through NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome. Exp Neurol. 2015;273:24–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Debye B, Schmülling L, Zhou L, Rune G, Beyer C, Johann S. Neurodegeneration and NLRP3 inflammasome expression in the anterior thalamus of SOD1(G93A) ALS mice. Brain Pathol. 2017;28:14–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Moreno-García L, Miana-Mena FJ, Moreno-Martínez L, de la Torre M, Lunetta C, Tarlarini C, et al. Inflammasome in ALS skeletal muscle: NLRP3 as a potential biomarker. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Urushitani M, Kurisu J, Tsukita K, Takahashi R. Proteasomal inhibition by misfolded mutant superoxide dismutase 1 induces selective motor neuron death in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurochem. 2002;83:1030–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Grottelli S, Mezzasoma L, Scarpelli P, Cacciatore I, Cellini B, Bellezza I. Cyclo(His-Pro) inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome cascade in ALS microglial cells. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2019;94:23–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Zhang C, Wang H, Liang W, Yang Y, Cong C, Wang Y, et al. Diphenyl diselenide protects motor neurons through inhibition of microglia-mediated inflammatory injury in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Pharmacol Res. 2021;165: 105457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Moreno-Martinez L, de la Torre M, Muñoz MJ, Zaragoza P, Aguilera J, Calvo AC, et al. Neuroprotective fragment C of tetanus toxin modulates IL-6 in an ALS mouse model. Toxins. 2020;12:330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Zhang Y, Cook A, Kim J, Baranov SV, Jiang J, Smith K, et al. Melatonin inhibits the caspase-1/cytochrome c/caspase-3 cell death pathway, inhibits MT1 receptor loss and delays disease progression in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis. 2013;55:26–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Apolloni S, Fabbrizio P, Amadio S, Napoli G, Freschi M, Sironi F, et al. Novel P2X7 antagonist ameliorates the early phase of als disease and decreases inflammation and autophagy in SOD1-G93A mouse model. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Ito Y, Ofengeim D, Najafov A, Das S, Saberi S, Li Y, et al. RIPK1 mediates axonal degeneration by promoting inflammation and necroptosis in ALS. Science. 2016;353:603–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Yu C-H, Davidson S, Harapas CR, Hilton JB, Mlodzianoski MJ, Laohamonthonkul P, et al. TDP-43 triggers mitochondrial DNA release via mptp to activate cGAS/STING in ALS. Cell. 2020;183:636–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Jara JH, Gautam M, Kocak N, Xie EF, Mao Q, Bigio EH, et al. MCP1-CCR2 and neuroinflammation in the ALS motor cortex with TDP-43 pathology. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16:196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Brandebura AN, Paumier A, Onur TS, Allen NJ. Astrocyte contribution to dysfunction, risk and progression in neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023;24:23–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Neal ML, Boyle AM, Budge KM, Safadi FF, Richardson JR. The glycoprotein GPNMB attenuates astrocyte inflammatory responses through the CD44 receptor. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Clénet M-L, Keaney J, Gillet G, Valadas JS, Langlois J, Cardenas A, et al. Divergent functional outcomes of NLRP3 blockade downstream of multi-inflammasome activation: therapeutic implications for ALS. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1190219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Lehmann S, Esch E, Hartmann P, Goswami A, Nikolin S, Weis J, et al. Expression profile of pattern recognition receptors in skeletal muscle of SOD1(G93A) amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) mice and sporadic ALS patients. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2018;44:606–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Hummel C, Leylamian O, Pösch A, Weis J, Aronica E, Beyer C, et al. Expression and cell type-specific localization of inflammasome sensors in the spinal cord of SOD1(G93A) mice and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Neuroscience. 2021;463:288–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Banerjee P, Elliott E, Rifai OM, O’Shaughnessy J, McDade K, Abrahams S, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome as a key molecular target underlying cognitive resilience in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Pathol. 2022;256:262–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Van Schoor E, Ospitalieri S, Moonen S, Tomé SO, Ronisz A, Ok O, et al. Increased pyroptosis activation in white matter microglia is associated with neuronal loss in ALS motor cortex. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2022;144:393–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Coll RC, Robertson AAB, Chae JJ, Higgins SC, Muñoz-Planillo R, Inserra MC, et al. A small molecule inhibitior of the NLRP3 inflammasome is a potential therapeutic for inflammatory diseases. Nat Med. 2015;21:248–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Lamkanfi M, Mueller JL, Vitari AC, Misaghi S, Fedorova A, Deshayes K, et al. Glyburide inhibits the Cryopyrin/Nalp3 inflammasome. J Cell Biol. 2009;187:61–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Jiang H, He H, Chen Y, Huang W, Cheng J, Ye J, et al. Identification of a selective and direct NLRP3 inhibitor to treat inflammatory disorders. J Exp Med. 2017;214:3219–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Han S, He Z, Hu X, Li X, Zheng K, Huang Y, et al. Inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation by CY-09 helps to restore cerebral glucose metabolism in 3×Tg-AD mice. Antioxid Basel Switz. 2023;12:722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Swanson KV, Deng M, Ting JP-Y. The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:477–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Ruan Y, Qiu X, Lv Y-D, Dong D, Wu X-J, Zhu J, et al. Kainic acid Induces production and aggregation of amyloid β-protein and memory deficits by activating inflammasomes in NLRP3- and NF-κB-stimulated pathways. Aging. 2019;11:3795–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Flores J, Fillion M-L, LeBlanc AC. Caspase-1 inhibition improves cognition without significantly altering amyloid and inflammation in aged Alzheimer disease mice. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Desu HL, Plastini M, Illiano P, Bramlett HM, Dietrich WD, de Rivero Vaccari JP, et al. IC100: a novel anti-ASC monoclonal antibody improves functional outcomes in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Vande Walle L, Lamkanfi M. Drugging the NLRP3 inflammasome: from signalling mechanisms to therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2024;23:43–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Maier A, Deigendesch N, Müller K, Weishaupt JH, Krannich A, Röhle R, et al. Interleukin-1 antagonist anakinra in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis–a pilot study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0139684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang K, Shi X, Wang Y, Huang H, et al. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. 2015;526:660–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Huang Y, Xu W, Zhou R. NLRP3 inflammasome activation and cell death. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:2114–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Zhang X, Zhang Y, Wang B, Xie C, Wang J, Fang R, et al. Pyroptosis-mediator GSDMD promotes Parkinson’s disease pathology via microglial activation and dopaminergic neuronal death. Brain Behav Immun. 2024;119:129–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Leem Y-H, Kim D-Y, Park J-E, Kim H-S. Necrosulfonamide exerts neuroprotective effect by inhibiting necroptosis, neuroinflammation, and α-synuclein oligomerization in a subacute MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2023;13:8783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Okuda DT, Kantarci O, Lebrun-Frénay C, Sormani MP, Azevedo CJ, Bovis F, et al. Dimethyl fumarate delays multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2023;93:604–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Vainio SK, Dickens AM, Matilainen M, López-Picón FR, Aarnio R, Eskola O, et al. Dimethyl fumarate decreases short-term but not long-term inflammation in a focal EAE model of neuroinflammation. EJNMMI Res. 2022;12:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Kayagaki N, Stowe IB, Alegre K, Deshpande I, Wu S, Lin Z, et al. Inhibiting membrane rupture with NINJ1 antibodies limits tissue injury. Nature. 2023;618:1072–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Coll RC, Schroder K. Inflammasome components as new therapeutic targets in inflammatory disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024. 10.1038/s41577-024-01075-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Dalbeth N, Choi HK, Joosten LAB, Khanna PP, Matsuo H, Perez-Ruiz F, et al. Gout. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2019;5:69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Vucic S, Henderson RD, Mathers S, Needham M, Schultz D, Kiernan MC, et al. Safety and efficacy of dimethyl fumarate in ALS: randomised controlled study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021;8:1991–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Schulze-Topphoff U, Varrin-Doyer M, Pekarek K, Spencer CM, Shetty A, Sagan SA, et al. Dimethyl fumarate treatment induces adaptive and innate immune modulation independent of Nrf2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:4777–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Batista AF, Rody T, Forny-Germano L, Cerdeiro S, Bellio M, Ferreira ST, et al. Interleukin-1β mediates alterations in mitochondrial fusion/fission proteins and memory impairment induced by amyloid-β oligomers. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Bonam SR, Mastrippolito D, Georgel P, Muller S. Pharmacological targets at the lysosomal autophagy–NLRP3 inflammasome crossroads. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2024;45:81–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Minchev D, Kazakova M, Sarafian V. Neuroinflammation and autophagy in Parkinson’s disease—novel perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:14997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Zhou R, Yazdi AS, Menu P, Tschopp J. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. 2011;469:221–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Hafner-Bratkovič I, Pelegrín P. Ion homeostasis and ion channels in NLRP3 inflammasome activation and regulation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2018;52:8–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Xu L, Zhang C, He D, Jiang N, Bai Y, Xin Y. Rapamycin and MCC950 modified gut microbiota in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mouse by brain gut axis. Life Sci. 2020;253: 117747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Naeem A, Prakash R, Kumari N, Ali Khan M, Quaiyoom Khan A, Uddin S, et al. MCC950 reduces autophagy and improves cognitive function by inhibiting NLRP3-dependent neuroinflammation in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Behav Immun. 2024;116:70–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Abdelkader NF, Farid HA, Youness ER, Abdel-Salam OME, Zaki HF. The role of KATP channel blockade and activation in the protection against neurodegeneration in the rotenone model of Parkinson’s disease. Life Sci. 2020;257: 118070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Sánchez-Fernández A, Skouras DB, Dinarello CA, López-Vales R. OLT1177 (Dapansutrile), a selective NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis pathogenesis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Lonnemann N, Hosseini S, Marchetti C, Skouras DB, Stefanoni D, D’Alessandro A, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor OLT1177 rescues cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:32145–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Amo-Aparicio J, Daly J, Højen JF, Dinarello CA. Pharmacologic inhibition of NLRP3 reduces the levels of α-synuclein and protects dopaminergic neurons in a model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2023;20:147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Guo J, Cheng M, Liu P, Cao D, Luo J, Wan Y, et al. A multi-target directed ligands strategy for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: dimethyl fumarate plus tranilast modified dithiocarbate as AChE inhibitor and Nrf2 activator. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;242: 114630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Wang S, Yu L, Yang H, Li C, Hui Z, Xu Y, et al. Oridonin attenuates synaptic loss and cognitive deficits in an Aβ1-42-induced mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0151397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Guo C, Fulp JW, Jiang Y, Li X, Chojnacki JE, Wu J, et al. Development and characterization of a hydroxyl-sulfonamide analogue, 5-chloro-N-[2-(4-hydroxysulfamoyl-phenyl)-ethyl]-2-methoxy-benzamide, as a novel NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor for potential treatment of multiple sclerosis. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017;8:2194–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Yin J, Zhao F, Chojnacki JE, Fulp J, Klein WL, Zhang S, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor ameliorates amyloid pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55:1977–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.He Y, Varadarajan S, Muñoz-Planillo R, Burberry A, Nakamura Y, Núñez G. 3,4-methylenedioxy-β-nitrostyrene inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation by blocking assembly of the inflammasome. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:1142–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Kirkley KS, Popichak KA, Afzali MF, Legare ME, Tjalkens RB. Microglia amplify inflammatory activation of astrocytes in manganese neurotoxicity. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Lang Y, Chu F, Liu L, Zheng C, Li C, Shen D, et al. Potential role of BAY11-7082, a NF-κB blocker inhibiting experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in C57BL/6J mice via declining NLRP3 inflammasomes. Clin Exp Immunol. 2022;207:378–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Juliana C, Fernandes-Alnemri T, Wu J, Datta P, Solorzano L, Yu J-W, et al. Anti-inflammatory compounds parthenolide and Bay 11–7082 are direct inhibitors of the inflammasome. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:9792–802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Zhang Z, Zhang K, Zhang M, Zhang X, Zhang R. Parthenolide suppresses T helper 17 and alleviates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 856694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Sun J, Li L, Xiong L, Chen F, She L, Tang H, et al. Parthenolide alleviates cognitive dysfunction and neurotoxicity via regulation of AMPK/GSK3β(Ser9)/Nrf2 signaling pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;169: 115909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Wang W, Nguyen LTT, Burlak C, Chegini F, Guo F, Chataway T, et al. Caspase-1 causes truncation and aggregation of the Parkinson’s disease-associated protein α-synuclein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:9587–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Hain EG, Sparenberg M, Rasińska J, Klein C, Akyüz L, Steiner B. Indomethacin promotes survival of new neurons in the adult murine hippocampus accompanied by anti-inflammatory effects following MPTP-induced dopamine depletion. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Karkhah A, Saadi M, Pourabdolhossein F, Saleki K, Nouri HR. Indomethacin attenuates neuroinflammation and memory impairment in an STZ-induced model of Alzheimer’s like disease. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2021;43:758–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Koprich JB, Reske-Nielsen C, Mithal P, Isacson O. Neuroinflammation mediated by IL-1beta increases susceptibility of dopamine neurons to degeneration in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2008;5:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Prins M, Eriksson C, Wierinckx A, Bol JGJM, Binnekade R, Tilders FJH, et al. Interleukin-1β and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist appear in grey matter additionally to white matter lesions during experimental multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e83835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Lim S, Chesser AS, Grima JC, Rappold PM, Blum D, Przedborski S, et al. D-β-hydroxybutyrate is protective in mouse models of Huntington’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e24620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Manzo E, O’Conner AG, Barrows JM, Shreiner DD, Birchak GJ, Zarnescu DC. Medium-chain fatty acids, beta-hydroxybutyric acid and genetic modulation of the carnitine shuttle are protective in a Drosophila model of ALS based on TDP-43. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Shippy DC, Wilhelm C, Viharkumar PA, Raife TJ, Ulland TK. β-Hydroxybutyrate inhibits inflammasome activation to attenuate Alzheimer’s disease pathology. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Jiang Z, Yin X, Wang M, Wang Y, Li F, Gao Y, et al. β-Hydroxybutyrate alleviates pyroptosis in MPP+/MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease models via inhibiting STAT3/NLRP3/GSDMD pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022;113(PtB):109451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Sun W, Wen M, Liu M, Wang Q, Liu Q, Li L, et al. Effect of β-hydroxybutyrate on behavioral alterations, molecular and morphological changes in CNS of multiple sclerosis mouse model. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:1075161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Johnson NH, Kerr NA, de Rivero Vaccari JP, Bramlett HM, Keane RW, Dietrich WD. Genetic predisposition to Alzheimer’s disease alters inflammasome activity after traumatic brain injury. Transl Res J Lab Clin Med. 2023;257:66–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Zhao M, Sun D, Guan Y, Wang Z, Sang D, Liu M, et al. Disulfiram and diphenhydramine hydrochloride upregulate miR-30a to suppress IL-17-associated autoimmune inflammation. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2016;36:9253–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Han C, Yang Y, Guan Q, Zhang X, Shen H, Sheng Y, et al. New mechanism of nerve injury in Alzheimer’s disease: β-amyloid-induced neuronal pyroptosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:8078–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Jing X, Shi H, Zhang C, Ren M, Han M, Wei X, et al. Dimethyl fumarate attenuates 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells and in animal model of Parkinson’s disease by enhancing Nrf2 activity. Neuroscience. 2015;286:131–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Hassab LY, Abbas SS, Mohammed RA, Abdallah DM. Dimethyl fumarate abrogates striatal endoplasmic reticulum stress in experimentally induced late-stage Huntington’s disease: focus on the IRE1α/JNK and PERK/CHOP trajectories. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1133863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Wang T, Sobue A, Watanabe S, Komine O, Saido TC, Saito T, et al. Dimethyl fumarate improves cognitive impairment and neuroinflammation in mice with Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2024;21:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Translational Neurodegeneration are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES