Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 23;24:1235. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05942-4

Table 2.

Effects of different treatments on leaf δ13C and grain yield of maize

Treatment δ13C Grain yield
(g plant–1)
Ten-leaf stage Milk stage Physiological maturity stage
SL –11.08b –10.81b –11.90b 99.49c
SH –11.57c –11.56c –12.97c 194.45a
FL –10.49a –9.91a –10.93a 37.79d
FH –11.02b –10.73b –11.61ab 140.60b
ANOVA (F values)
SWS 13.97** 18.93*** 19.90*** 288.40***
W 11.09** 15.88** 11.08** 844.88***
SWS*W 0.01 0.04 0.54 1.33

Note: Duncan’s multiple-range test was used to test differences among treatments at the P < 0.05 level. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences among treatments at the same stage. SL: stable soil water with 55% FC, SH: stable soil water with 75% FC, FL: fluctuating soil water with 55% FC, FH: fluctuating soil water with 75% FC, SWS: soil water stability, W: soil water content, SWS*W: the interaction between soil water stability and soil water content. *, **, and *** indicate significance levels at P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively