Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 23;24:1236. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05952-2

Table 1.

Growth parameters (soluble sugar, protein, starch, chlorophyll) of tomato inoculated with different inoculants and T. absoluta treatment

Treatments Soluble sugar (μg/g) Protein (mg/mL) Starch (mg/g) Chlorophyll (mg/g)
Control 2.83 ± 0.25 Ab 6.77 ± 0.53 Ac 8.02 ± 0.60 Ac 33.10 ± 3.36 Ab
 M 4.21 ± 0.11 Bb 7.65 ± 0.43 Ab 8.72 ± 0.33 Ac 30.83 ± 1.21 Ab
 P 5.40 ± 0.48 Ab 8.98 ± 0.39 Aa 14.57 ± 2.93 Ab 36.18 ± 0.33 Ab
 MP 19.35 ± 1.87 Aa 9.17 ± 0.28 Aa 20.47 ± 1.93 Aa 51.078 ± 5.35 Aa
Control-T 3.87 ± 0.54 Ac 6.75 ± 0.56 Ac 6.85 ± 2.17 Ab 15.94 ± 1.45 Bd
 M-T 8.00 ± 0.67 Aa 7.65 ± 0.43 Ab 7.51 ± 1.07 Ab 33.67 ± 3.19 Ab
 P–T 5.53 ± 0.19 Ab 8.98 ± 0.39 Aa 14.30 ± 0.85 Aa 23.21 ± 2.78 Bc
 MP-T 5.67 ± 0.22 Bb 9.17 ± 0.28 Aa 13.33 ± 2.52 Ba 42.29 ± 3.72 Aa

M, inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae. P, inoculated with Pseudomonas putida. MP, inoculated with F. mosseae and P. putida. Control-T, infested with T. absoluta. M-T, inoculated with F. mosseae and infested with T. absoluta. P–T, inoculated with P. putida and infested with T. absoluta. MP-T, dual inoculated with F. mosseae and P. putida and infested with T. absoluta. The data are mean ± SD. Different uppercase letters are indicating significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments with or without T. absoluta infestation. Different lowercase letters are indicating significant difference of P < 0.05 among the four treatments