Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 14;10(2):101681. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101681

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of simulation-computed tomography (CT) and HyperSight cone beam (CB) CT on patients with dental filling. (A) The top figures were fan-beam Siemens simulation-CT with metal artifact reduction, and the bottom figures were HyperSight CBCT with iCBCT MAR reconstruction. (B) The top figures were fan-beam GE simulation-CT (without metal artifact reduction), and the bottom figures were HyperSight CBCT with iCBCT MAR reconstruction. For each set of images, the first 3 images were displayed at a window width of 800/-400 HU, and the fourth image at 225/-125 HU.

Abbreviations: HU = Hounsfield unit.