Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 28;2013(8):CD005487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005487.pub3

Tran 2009.

Methods Randomized controlled trial
Participants N = 120; adult; 71 male, 49 female; ASA 1‐3; surgery of the elbow/forearm/wrist/hand; Canadian study
Interventions
  1. Infraclavicular block. Localization method: ultrasound‐guided. Endpoint for injection: spread of local anaesthetic posterior to axillary artery. Single injection through needle.

  2. Supraclavicular block. Localization method: ultrasound‐guided. Endpoint for injection: spread of local anaesthetic in "corner pocket" between subclavian artery and first rib. Single injection through needle.

  3. Axillary block. Localization method: ultrasound‐guided. Endpoint for injection: local anaesthetic spread, 40% of volume posterior to axillary artery, 20% in each of the upper quadrants, and 20% around the musculocutaneous nerve.


Injectate in both blocks: 35 ml of lidocaine 1.5% with 1;200,000 epinephrine
Sedation during block: IV midazolam 0.03mg/kg and fentanyl 0.6 mcg/kg
Intraoperative sedation: no details given
Outcomes
  1. Adequate surgical anaesthesia within 30 minutes, defined as completion of surgery without need for supplementation or general anaesthesia

  2. Complete sensory block in individual nerve territories: radial, median, ulnar, musculocutaneous nerves

  3. Block performance time, defined as ultrasound imaging time plus needling time

  4. Block onset time, defined as interval between block completion and a sensory score of 7‐8

  5. Total anaesthesia‐related time, defined as sum of block performance time and block onset time

  6. Block‐associated pain, scored on a 0‐10 point visual analogue scale

  7. Complications: vascular puncture, Horner's syndrome, neurological symptoms, systemic toxicity

Notes All blocks performed by "experts", defined as having experience of 60 or more blocks for that particular technique.
The lead author confirmed by email correspondence that all blocks that did not result in adequate surgical anaesthesia received a general anaesthetic.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: “computer‐generated sequence of random numbers, and sealed envelope”
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: “computer‐generated sequence of random numbers, and sealed envelope”
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: “A blinded observer recorded the onset time, block‐related pain scores, success rate (surgical anaesthesia) and the incidence of complications.”
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Reporting of outcome data was complete
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All stated outcomes were reported
Other bias Low risk No potential sources of other bias identified