Tran 2009.
Methods | Randomized controlled trial | |
Participants | N = 120; adult; 71 male, 49 female; ASA 1‐3; surgery of the elbow/forearm/wrist/hand; Canadian study | |
Interventions |
Injectate in both blocks: 35 ml of lidocaine 1.5% with 1;200,000 epinephrine Sedation during block: IV midazolam 0.03mg/kg and fentanyl 0.6 mcg/kg Intraoperative sedation: no details given |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | All blocks performed by "experts", defined as having
experience of 60 or more blocks for that particular
technique. The lead author confirmed by email correspondence that all blocks that did not result in adequate surgical anaesthesia received a general anaesthetic. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: “computer‐generated sequence of random numbers, and sealed envelope” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: “computer‐generated sequence of random numbers, and sealed envelope” |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: “A blinded observer recorded the onset time, block‐related pain scores, success rate (surgical anaesthesia) and the incidence of complications.” |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Reporting of outcome data was complete |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All stated outcomes were reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No potential sources of other bias identified |