Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 16;40(2):491–503. doi: 10.1007/s00467-024-06487-2

Table 3.

Immunosuppressive regimens in patients with the CMV serostatus “donor and recipient seronegative” and in patients with the CMV serostatus “donor and/or recipient seropositive”

Parameter
Entire cohort (n = 337) CMV serostatus donor negative/recipient negative (n = 115) CMV serostatus donor and/or recipient positive (n = 222) p value
Initial immunosuppressive regimen1
  Desensitization procedure, n (%) 13 (3.86) 2 (1.74) 11 (4.95) 0.232#
  IL-2R antibody induction, n (%) 145 (43.0) 42 (36.5) 103 (46.4) 0.104
  Thymoglobulin, n (%) 25 (7.42) 6 (5.22) 19 (8.56) 0.381#
  Tacrolimus, n (%) 269 (79.8) 88 (76.5) 181 (81.5) 0.346
  Mycophenolate mofetil, n (%) 293 (86.9) 102 (88.7) 191 (86.0) 0.606
  Azathioprine, n (%) 28 (8.31) 6 (5.22) 22 (9.91) 0.152#
  Glucocorticoids, n (%) 328 (97.3) 111 (96.5) 217 (97.7) 0.497
Maintenance immunosuppressive regimen2
  Tacrolimus, n (%) 267 (79.2) 87 (75.7) 180 (81.1) 0.269
  Mycophenolate mofetil, n (%) 256 (76.0) 89 (77.4) 167 (75.2) 0.812
  Azathioprine, n (%) 28 (8.31) 7 (6.09) 21 (9.46) 0.405#
  Glucocorticoids, n (%) 283 (84.0) 96 (83.5) 187 (84.2) 0.909

IL-2R interleukin 2 receptor

1Until day 30 posttransplant

2At 12 months posttransplant

The respective frequencies of the immunosuppressive regimens between the two patient cohorts were compared by Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (marked by #)