Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 23;24:172. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00817-1

Table 2.

Prediction results of MGMT promoter methylation status using different models

AUC (95% confidence interval) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Standard error
Single-sequence models
 T1WIintra model 0.861 (0.820—0.895) 82.47 76.19 0.0228
 T1WIprei model 0.850 (0.809—0.886) 76.49 78.10 0.0229
 CE-T1WIintra model 0.867 (0.828—0.901) 83.67 80.95 0.0192
 CE-T1WIprei model 0.852 (0.811—0.887) 79.28 81.90 0.0205
Two single-sequence combined intratumoral and peritumoral models
 T1WIintra+prei model 0.874 (0.631—0.865) 75.30 81.90 0.0206
 CE-T1WIintra+prei model 0.889 (0.851—0.920) 85.26 80.95 0.0177
Multi-sequence models
 T1WIintra + CE-T1WIintra model 0.914 (0.879—0.941) 83.67 83.81 0.0155
 T1WIprei + CE-T1WIprei model 0.901 (0.865—0.930) 86.06 84.76 0.0215
Multi-sequence combined intratumoral and peritumoral model
 T1WIintra+prei + CE-T1WIintra+prei model 0.923 (0.890—0.948) 86.45 87.62 0.0141

MGMT O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, T1WI T1-weighted imaging, CE-T1WI contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, intra intratumoral region, prei peritumoral region