Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 24;24:277. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01811-1

Table 4.

The association between higher adherence of DII and DIL with sleep quality index and circadian rhythm status

Variables Higher of DII (N = 280) Higher of DIL (N = 280)
Crude model Adjust model Crude model Adjust model
OR 0.95% CI P-value OR 0.95% CI P-value OR 0.95% CI P-value OR 0.95% CI P-value
Sleep quality index
< 5 Good Reference group
≥ 5 Poor 1.83 1.05, 3.18 0.03 1.92 1.04, 3.55 0.03 1.11 0.64, 1.91 0.69 1.41 0.58, 3.45 0.44
Circadian rhythm
Normal Reference group
Morning 0.92 0.40, 2.11 0.84 0.69 0.27, 1.73 0.42 2.09 0.85, 5.13 0.10 1.02 0.25, 4.05 0.97
Evening 1.61 0.33, 1.11 0.10 1.51 0.26,1.009 0.05 1.52 0.28, 0.96 0.03 1.31 0.11, 0.85 0.02

DII: dietary insulin index, DIL: dietary insulin load

All data are presented as OR and 95% Cl by binary logistic regression

Adjustment model: based on age, energy intake and IPAQ

Low adherence of DII and DIL, good sleep quality, and normal circadian rhythm group were considered as reference group

P−values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant