Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 24;22:1144. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05982-2

Table 3.

Regression results for screening risk variables

Odds ratio (95% CI) P value P adjust E-value
Demographics
 Sex
  Male [Reference]
  Female 0.69 (0.33–1.44) 0.323 0.420 1.69
 Age 0.98 (0.95–1.01) 0.231 0.334 1.11
csDMARDs
 Treated with csDMARDs
  N [Reference]
  Y 0.77 (0.29–2.09) 0.611 0.611 1.53
 Treated with Iguratimod
  N [Reference]
  Y 1.46 (0.52–4.02) 0.469 0.508 1.71
Drug adjustment
 Glucocorticoid taper
  N [Reference]
  Y 2.61 (1.38–4.92) 0.003 0.010 2.61
 csDMARDs taper
  N [Reference]
  Y 2.97 (1.90–4.64)  < 0.001  < 0.001 2.84
Adverse reactions
 Number of symptoms 1.24 (1.08–1.42) 0.002 0.008 1.47
Psychological health surveys
 FACIT-F 0.95 (0.93–0.96)  < 0.001  < 0.001 1.19
 PHQ-9 1.06 (0.99–1.12) 0.074 0.120 1.20
 GAD-7 1.07 (1.02–1.13) 0.004 0.010 1.23
 PSQI 1.06 (1.00–1.13) 0.060 0.112 1.21
Health status score
 Patient self-report outcome (previous infection) 1.06 (0.92–1.22) 0.447 0.528 1.20
 Patient self-report outcome (current) 0.87 (0.76–0.99) 0.041 0.089 1.35

P-adjusted values are determined using the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) correction method. The E-value measures the minimal magnitude of an association necessary, similar in scale to the observed effect size, for a potential confounding variable to explain the observed association