Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 25.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020 Sep 3;39(3):519–524. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/7kyr5e

Table IV.

Comparison of clinical features during follow-up in IIFA-positive vs. IIFA-negative dermatomyositis patients.

IIFA+
(n=47)
IIFA−
(n=24)
p-value Total
(n=71)
Muscle weakness 91% (43) 92% (22) 1.0 92% (65)
Myalgia 15% (7) 21% (5) 0.5 17% (12)
DM-specific skin involvement 98% (46) 96% (23) 1.0 97% (69)
Sclerodactyly 0% (0) 0% (0) 1.0 0% (0)
Raynaud’s phenomenon 43% (20) 50% (12) 0.6 45% (32)
Telangectasias 2% (1) 4% (1) 1.0 3% (2)
Ulcers 0% (0) 0% (0) 1.0 0% (0)
Carpal tunnel 2% (1) 0% (0) 1.0 1% (1)
Livedo reticularis 2% (1) 4% (1) 1.0 3% (2)
Mechanics hands 26% (12) 21% (5) 0.7 24% (17)
Calcinosis 9% (4) 12% (3) 0.7 10% (7)
Subcutaneous oedema 34% (16) 21% (5) 0.2 30% (21)
Puffy hands 0% (0) 8% (2) 0.1 3% (2)
Interstitial lung disease 19% (9) 21% (5) 1.0 20% (14)
Pulmonary hypertension 0% (0) 0% (0) 1.0 0% (0)
Dyspnea 62% (29) 58% (14) 0.8 61% (43)
Cough 21% (10) 21% (5) 1.0 21% (15)
Gastroesophageal reflux disease 45% (21) 54% (13) 0.4 48% (34)
Dysphagia 51% (24) 54% (13) 0.8 52% (37)
Arthritis 21% (10) 29% (7) 0.5 24% (17)
Arthralgia 70% (33) 46% (11) 0.05 62% (44)
Fever 11% (5) 17% (4) 0.5 13% (9)
Sicca syndrome 4% (2) 0% (0) 0.5 3% (2)
Pericarditis 0% (0) 0% (0) 1.0 0% (0)
Glomerulonephritis 0% (0) 0% (0) 1.0 0% (0)
*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001

Dichotomous variables are shown as %(n) and compared using the Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. IIFA: indirect immunofluorescence.