Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 12;37:13518. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.13518

TABLE 3.

Management and follow-up.

All patients (n = 154) MIT (n = 64) Fumagillin (n = 54) Nitazoxanide (n = 36) p
Immunosuppressive treatment at day 0
Tacrolimus 134 (87.0) 58 (90.6) 50 (92.6) 26 (72.2) 0.02
 Trough levels (ng/L) (n = 121) 10.0 [6.6; 14.7] 9.9 [7.1; 13.9] 9.8 [5.5; 14.7] 11.2 [6.5; 14.8] 0.85
 Trough levels >10 ng/L 60/121 (49.6) 25/52 (48.1) 24/48 (50.0) 11/21 (52.4) 0.94
Mycophenolate mofetil 128 (83.1) 51 (79.7) 49 (90.7) 28 (77.8) 0.17
 Dose (g/day) (n = 124) 1.0 [1.0; 1.5] 1.0 [1.0; 1.0] 1.0 [1.0; 1.5] 1.0 [0.8; 1.5] 0.63
Steroids 105 (68.2) 45 (70.3) 38 (70.4) 22 (61.1) 0.58
 Dose (mg/day) (n = 103) 5.0 [5.0; 10.0] 5.0 [5.0; 5.0] 7.5 [5.0; 10.0] 5.0 [5.0; 10.0] 0.003
Everolimus 15 (9.7) 9 (14.1) 2 (3.7) 4 (11.1) 0.14
 Dose (mg/day) (n = 15) 2.0 [1.5; 3.0] 2.0 [2.0; 4.0] 2.5 [2.0; 3.0] 1.5 [1.3; 1.8] 0.15
Cyclosporine 14 (9.1) 3 (4.7) 2 (3.7) 9 (25.0) 0.002
 Dose (mg/day) (n = 13) 120 [100; 200] 160 [60; 400] 85 [50; 120] 120 [110; 200] 0.41
Azathioprine 5 (3.3) 2 (3.1) 2 (3.7) 1 (2.8) 1.00
 Dose (mg/day) (n = 4) 88 [63; 100] 63 [50; 75] 100 100 0.26
Belatacept 4 (2.6) 1 (1.6) 3 (5.6) 0 0.36
 Dose (mg/day) (n = 4) 340 [265; 395] 380 300 [230; 410] 0.65
Follow-up and outcome
Clinical remission 134 (87.0) 57 (89.1) 49 (90.7) 28 (77.8) 0.23
Time from first symptoms to clinical remission (days) (n = 76) 10 [5; 21] 8 [5; 15] 14 [7; 24] 9 [5; 25] 0.28
Serum creatinine at month 3 (µmol/L) (n = 126) 144 [115; 203] 137 [110; 195] 159 [116; 203] 139 [117; 209] 0.69
Microsporidia stool monitoring 72 (46.8) 22 (34.4) 36 (66.7) 14 (38.9) 0.08
 Stool negativization rate 50/72 (69.4) 13/22 (59.1) 33/36 (91.7) 4/14 (28.6) 0.002
Relapse 10/145 (6.9) 4/57 (7.0) 1/53 (1.9) 5/35 (14.3) 0.13
Organ failure at month 12 1/101 (1.0) 0/50 (0.0) 0/23 (0.0) 1/28 (3.6) 0.51
Death at month 12 1/124 (0.8) 0/50 (0.0) 1/47 (2.1) 0/27 (0.0) 0.60

Data are presented as number of patients (percentages), or median [25th; 75th percentiles]. Comparisons between groups for immunosuppressive treatment at day 0 were made with Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical data, and with Kruskal-Wallis test for quantitative data. Comparisons between groups for outcomes were made with linear or generalized linear mixed models, with the center as random effect. In the first column, “n” is the number of available data when there is missing data. MIT: modification of immunosuppressive treatment.