Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 24;13(32):2401187. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401187

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A) Layout of the chamber with highlighted ROIs and channels considered for the characterization. B) Top view of channel 3 (scalebar 100 µm). C) Results in both x and y directions are consistent with target strain obtained in the previous version of the device. Transversal strain: (ch.2) 1.73 ± 1.23%, (ch.3) 2.04 ± 0.41%, (ch.4) 1.67 ± 1.00%; Longitudinal strain: (ch.2) 0.88 ± 1.11%, (ch.3) 1.24 ± 1.22%, (ch.4) 1.11 ± 0.86% [n=9]. D) Results of Transversal strain in each ROI – (A) 1.57± 1.19%, (B) 1.81 ± 0.85%, (C) 2.07 ± 0.71%, and Longitudinal strain in each ROI – (A) 2.04 ± 0.70%, (B) ‐0.05 ± 0.42%, (C) 1.23 ± 0.57%.