Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 12;15:1432260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432260

Table 1.

Comparison of measurement models (N = 223).

Model χ2 df χ2 /df CFI TLI SRMR RMSEA
Model 1 (hypothesized five-factor model) 739.823 477 1.551 0.924 0.911 0.078 0.050
Model 2 (four-factor model: combines PIS and AC) 774.279 481 1.610 0.915 0.901 0.082 0.052
Model 3 (three-factor model: combines PIS, AC and COCB) 903.341 484 1.866 0.879 0.860 0.085 0.062
Model 4 (three-factor model: combines PE, PIS and AC) 926.678 484 1.915 0.872 0.852 0.084 0.064
Model 5 (two-factor model: combines PE, PIS, AC and COCB) 1042.391 486 2.145 0.840 0.815 0.087 0.072
Model 6 (one-factor model) 1825.865 487 0.749 0.599 0.538 0.099 0.111

PE, psychological empowerment; PIS, perceived insider status; AC, affective commitment; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation.