Table 2.
Conf. | Best | Next Best | Next Best | Relative |
---|---|---|---|---|
AIC | AIC | Model | Likelihood | |
NES | 558.71 | 561.99 | 0.19 | |
MND | 364.43 | 384.29 | Linear | 4.9e-05 |
ABI | 367.72 | 378.07 | Threshold | 0.0057 |
SLU | 371.12 | 369.98 | Memory | 0.57 |
MZT | 354.32 | 372.52 | Threshold | 1.2e-4 |
MCL | 375.88 | 385.62 | 0.0077 | |
TDA | 337.02 | 340.79 | 0.15 | |
AES | 526.62 | 541.64 | 0.00055 | |
CMC | 407.96 | 430.53 | 1.3e-05 |
Note: the nonlinear memory model is the best performing model for all Scialogs except SLU, for which it was the next best model. In the case of SLU, performed the best.