TABLE 3.
Pre‐baseline assessment to baseline assessment | Baseline assessment to medium‐term assessment | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switch | Control | Switch | Control | |||||||||
Bosentan + sildenafil | Bosentan + sildenafil | Bosentan + sildenafil switched to ambrisentan + tadalafil | Bosentan + sildenafil | |||||||||
n | Δ | p | n | Δ | p | n | Δ | p | n | Δ | p | |
WHO FC** | ||||||||||||
III/IV (%) | ‐ | 15 vs. 48* | <0.01 | 29 vs. 29 | 1.0 | ‐ | 48 vs. 21* | 0.04 | ‐ | 29 vs. 50 | 0.30 | |
Exercise assessment | ||||||||||||
6MWD (m) | 24 | 1 [−33, 36] | 0.94 | 8 | −37 [−71, −3]* | 0.04 | 26 | 8 [−14, 20] | 0.47 | 5 | 26 [−16, 68] | 0.16 |
Echocardiographic parameters | ||||||||||||
RAA (cm2) | 10 | 1.8 [0.2, 3.5]* | 0.03 | 6 | 0.4 [−1.7, 2.5] | 0.66 | 13 | 0.5 [−0.8, 1.9] | 0.42 | 8 | 2.3 [−1.8, 6.3] | 0.23 |
RVSP (mmHg) | 27 | 2 [−6, 10] | 0.57 | 13 | 1.9 [−16.2, 19.9] | 0.82 | 27 | −3 [−11, 4] | 0.39 | 13 | 9.4 [−2.6, 21.5] | 0.11 |
Eccentricity index diastole | 22 | −0.05 [−0.17, 0.08] | 0.45 | 10 | −0.12 [−0.33, 0.08] | 0.20 | 23 | 0.08 [−0.03, 0.18] | 0.16 | 11 | 0.12 [−0.16, 0.40] | 0.36 |
Eccentricity index systole | 22 | 0.00 [−0.19, 0.18] | 0.95 | 10 | −0.10 [−0.64, 0.44] | 0.69 | 24 | 0.63 [−0.50, 1.76] | 0.26 | 11 | 0.37 [−0.17, 0.91] | 0.16 |
TAPSE (mm) | 21 | 1.1 [−0.5, 2.7] | 0.17 | 9 | 1.7 [−1.3, 4.7] | 0.23 | 24 | 0.8 [−0.6, 2.2] | 0.22 | 10 | 2.6 [−6.8, 1.6] | 0.19 |
Note: Data summarized as mean ± standard deviation. Comparison of parameters between assessments summarized as difference, Δ, confidence interval, [], number of paired pre/post data, n, and p‐value, p.
Key: Echocardiographic parameters: LVEI, left ventricular eccentricity index; RAA, right atrial area; RVSP, estimate of right ventricular systolic pressure on echocardiography; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. WHO FC, World Health Organization functional class.
=p < 0.05.
% of children in FC III or IV in those assigned.