Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 27;13:317. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02733-8

Table 2.

Meta-regression analysis for different parameters

Parameter Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI)
Type of research Prospective (4 studies) 69% (48–90%) 99% (97–100%)
Retrospective (9 studies) 80% (69–90%) 98% (94–100%)
Meta-regression P-value 0.13 0.00
Sequencing conditions BGISEQ (7 studies) 72% (57–86%) 98% (93–100%)
Others (6 studies) 82% (70–94%) 99% (97–100%)
Meta-regression P-value 0.07 0.27
Homogenization Yes (7 studies) 67% (53–80%) 99% (95–100%)
No (6 studies) 86% (77–94%) 99% (95–100%)
Meta-regression P-value 0.00 0.07
Sample pre-treatment With bead-beating (6 studies) 82% (77–94%) 99% (97–100%)
Without bead-beating (7 studies) 72% (57–86%) 98% (93–100%)
Meta-regression P-value 0.87 0.02