Table 2. .
Group-level hub disruption (using the metrics in NC match 1 as a baseline) across CDR stages in the MC and across age in the NC (FDR-adjusted)
| Strength (S) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | κS | F(1, 244) | p | R 2 | |
| MC | CDR = 0 | −5.6 | 59.1 | <0.001 | 0.20 |
| CDR = 0.5 | −9.6 | 118.1 | <0.001 | 0.33 | |
| CDR ≥ 1 | −16.7 | 192.2 | <0.001 | 0.44 | |
| NC | Match 2 | −0.8 | 0.78 | 0.38 | 0.003 |
| Match 3 | −1.3 | 1.46 | 0.28 | 0.006 | |
| Participation coefficient (Pc) | |||||
| Group | κS | F(1, 244) | p | R 2 | |
| MC | CDR = 0 | 3.3 | 17.8 | <0.001 | 0.07 |
| CDR = 0.5 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 0.19 | 0.01 | |
| CDR ≥ 1 | −1.6 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 0.44 | |
| NC | Match 2 | 2.1 | 4.7 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Match 3 | −1.0 | 0.9 | 0.34 | 0.003 | |
| Within-module strength Z-score (Z) | |||||
| Group | κS | F(1, 244) | p | R 2 | |
| MC | CDR = 0 | −5.0 | 12.6 | <0.001 | 0.05 |
| CDR = 0.5 | −7.2 | 15.5 | <0.001 | 0.06 | |
| CDR ≥ 1 | −12.7 | 22.1 | <0.001 | 0.08 | |
| NC | Match 2 | −2.1 | 1.6 | 0.21 | 0.01 |
| Match 3 | −3.3 | 2.9 | 0.11 | 0.01 | |