Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1279. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121279

Table 2.

Cochlear implant use and speech perception scores at baseline, 18-, 36-, and 54-month follow-up.

p-Values
Baseline 18 mths 36 mths 54 mths Baseline vs. 18 mths 18 vs. 36 mths 36 vs. 54 mths
CI usage (hrs/day)
 n 54 36 21
 Mean 12.1 12.8 12.4 0.045 0.554
 Median 12.8 13.5 13.1
 S.D. 2.9 2.9 3.5
 Min 3.3 1.5 0
 Max 17 19.8 17
CI usage (% of a 14 h day)
 >90% 51.9 72.2 61.9
 60–90% 37 19.4 33.3
 30–60% 9.3 5.6 0
 <30% 1.9 2.8 4.8
CVC Words (% correct)
 n 95 51 32 23
 Mean 42.83 70.71 73.75 78.13 0.000 0.306 0.264
 Median 40 74 78 80
 S.D. 26.2 21.2 16.2 14.8
 Min 0 22 34 24
 Max 94 98 94 96
CVC Phonemes (% correct)
 n 95 51 32 23
 Mean 65.85 85.41 86.8 91.01 0.000 0.540 0.121
 Median 67 90 92 92
 S.D. 21.8 13 12.3 8.7
 Min 0.1 51 38 55
 Max 97 99 97 98
SRT
 n 87 51 32 22
 Mean 10.94 5.05 4.31 3.66 0.000 0.111 0.328
 Median 9.5 4.6 3.9 3.6
 S.D. 7.2 3.4 2.8 2.3
 Min −0.9 −0.6 −1.1 −1.1
 Max 21 15 11 9.3

Bold denotes significant differences (p < 0.05; significant at the 5% confidence level). CI use was measured using objective data logging information. Greater CVC Word and Phoneme scores show improved performance in quiet listening conditions. The SRT score measures the signal-to-noise ratio at which 50% of key words are correct in noise; therefore, decreases in SRT scores represent improved performance.