Table 4.
Visual assessment of patient images.
| Comparison | Number of Judgments | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 mm | 2.5 mm | 1.25 mm | 0.625 mm | |||||
| Ob #1 | Ob #2 | Ob #1 | Ob #2 | Ob #1 | Ob #2 | Ob #1 | Ob #2 | |
| DLR-M > HIR-L | 1 | 1 | 8 b | 1 | 11 a | 11 a | 9 b | 7 b |
| DLR-M = HIR-L | 10 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| DLR-M < HIR-L | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DLR-M > HIR-H | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 11 a | 11 a | 6 | 8 b |
| DLR-M = HIR-H | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| DLR-M < HIR-H | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| HIR-L > HIR-H | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 b | 9 b | 0 | 7 b |
| HIR-L = HIR-H | 5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 |
| HIR-L < HIR-H | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Ob #1, observer 1; Ob #2, observer 2; a, p < 0.01; b, p < 0.05.