Skip to main content
Acta Dermato-Venereologica logoLink to Acta Dermato-Venereologica
letter
. 2024 Dec 13;104:42016. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.42016

An International Examination of Skin Concerns Impacting Self-Confidence Among 5,138 Males

Frederic FLAMENT 1,*, Aurelie MAUDET 1, Caroline DELAUNAY 2, David AMAR 2, Muriel BAYER-VANMOEN 3, Audrey IMBERT LEGRAIN 3, Charles TAIEB 4, Charbel SKAYEM 5,6, Laurence LEBARBANCHON 1
PMCID: PMC11681148  PMID: 39670440

Dear Editor,

The idea that men care less about their skin than women is a stereotype that has persisted for some time. Historically, societal norms and gender roles have often dictated that men should prioritize traits like toughness, stoicism, and practicality over self-care and grooming. Skincare has been traditionally associated with femininity, leading to the perception that it is not as important for men (1, 2).

However, this perception is changing, with evolving societal attitudes towards gender roles and expressions, increased awareness and education, and a growing emphasis on self-care and wellness in contemporary culture (3, 4). Self-reported dermatological concerns encompass a wide range of issues that individuals perceive and report regarding their skin health and appearance. Data on dermatological concerns and impact on self-confidence in men are lacking, and most studies have been conducted in one centre or country. Our objective was to conduct the first international study to assess the relation between skin type/sensitivity and self-reported dermatological concerns in men and their impact on self-confidence.

The survey, conducted between February 2022 and June 2023, involved males ≥ 18 years from the USA (n = 761), France (n = 346), Brazil (n = 515), India (n = 856), China (n = 648), Mexico (n = 672), Japan (n = 118), South Africa (n = 668), and Indonesia (n = 554). In each country, proportional quota sampling was used based on the distribution of the population according to age, sex, environment (large cities, towns, and rural areas), and income, in order to guarantee national representativeness of the sample. Participants were contacted by mail to complete a structured digital questionnaire. Questions included sociodemographic data, skin type, presence/absence of skin sensitivity, presence/absence of 9 dermatological concerns (Table I), and lack or not of self-confidence. The questionnaire for data collection was designed in English by a scientific committee that includes expert dermatologists and public health specialists. Once created, the questionnaire was administered to a small sample to ensure that the questions were properly understood. It was then translated into each language by native speakers living in the country concerned. To ensure linguistic similarity and cultural coherence between different language versions, the translations produced by native speakers were then back-translated in English.

Table I.

Proportion of individuals with the 10 studied dermatological concerns and those with lack of self-confidence with respect to the skin type, presence/absence of skin sensitivity, and age

Factor
Global population
Skin lack of firmness
Skin feeling tight
Skin wrinkles
Skin tired looking
Skin pimple breakouts
Skin redness
Skin loss of elasticity
Skin getting thinner
Skin dark spots
n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n %
Sensitive skin
Yes 2,215 43.1% 230 10.4% 217 9.8% 328 14.8% 497 22.4% 544 24.6% 254 11.5% 134 6.0% 80 3.6% 323 14.6%
No 2,923 56.9% 313 10.7% 215 7.4% 572 19.6% 647 22.1% 498 17.0% 150 5.1% 177 6.1% 79 2.7% 401 13.7%
Type of skin
Very dry/dry 1,055 20.5% 113 10.7% 104 9.9% 217 20.6% 238 22.6% 122 11.6% 77 7.3% 51 4.8% 32 3.0% 143 13.6%
Mixed 1,779 34.6% 185 10.4% 176 9.9% 310 17.4% 418 23.5% 407 22.9% 153 8.6% 133 7.5% 63 3.5% 276 15.5%
Oily/very oily 1,308 25.5% 127 9.7% 77 5.9% 192 14.7% 297 22.7% 382 29.2% 112 8.6% 70 5.4% 30 2.3% 204 15.6%
< 40 years
Sensitive skin
Yes 1,370 46.6% 110 8.0% 126 9.2% 113 8.2% 294 21.5% 430 31.4% 155 11.3% 54 3.9% 41 3.0% 201 14.7%
No 1,570 53.4% 112 7.1% 101 6.4% 128 8.2% 294 18.7% 361 23.0% 81 5.2% 57 3.6% 19 1.2% 204 13.0%
Type of skin
Very dry/dry 589 20.0% 49 8.3% 49 8.3% 52 8.8% 107 18.2% 96 16.3% 32 5.4% 17 2.9% 13 2.2% 71 12.1%
Mixed 1,063 36.2% 77 7.2% 94 8.8% 98 9.2% 229 21.5% 308 29.0% 93 8.7% 49 4.6% 24 2.3% 160 15.1%
Oily/very oily 778 26.5% 48 6.2% 45 5.8% 56 7.2% 161 20.7% 287 36.9% 76 9.8% 32 4.1% 14 1.8% 125 16.1%
40 years and above
Sensitive skin
Yes 845 38.4% 120 14.2% 91 10.8% 215 25.4% 203 24.0% 114 13.5% 99 11.7% 80 9.5% 39 4.6% 122 14.4%
No 1,353 61.6% 201 14.9% 114 8.4% 444 32.8% 353 26.1% 137 10.1% 69 5.1% 120 8.9% 60 4.4% 197 14.6%
Type of skin
Very dry/dry 466 21.2% 64 13.7% 55 11.8% 165 35.4% 131 28.1% 26 5.6% 45 9.7% 34 7.3% 19 4.1% 72 15.5%
Mixed 716 32.6% 108 15.1% 82 11.5% 212 29.6% 189 26.4% 99 13.8% 60 8.4% 84 11.7% 39 5.4% 116 16.2%
Oily/very oily 530 24.1% 79 14.9% 32 6.0% 136 25.7% 136 25.7% 95 17.9% 36 6.8% 38 7.2% 16 3.0% 79 14.9%

In total, 5,138 men were involved (mean age 39.67 ± 12.76 years). Table I indicates the proportion of individuals with the 9 studied dermatological concerns and those with lack of self-confidence with respect to the skin type, presence/absence of skin sensitivity, and age. Table II presents the logistic regression with univariate and multivariate analysis to determine risk factors for lack of self-confidence.

Table II.

Logistic regression with univariate and multivariate analysis to determine risk factors for lack of self-confidence

Factor Univariate Multivariate
Skin sensitivity 1.34(1.20;1.50), p-value 0.000000472 1.275(1.133;1.435), p-value 0.000096
Dry skin 1.60(1.39;1.83), p-value 0.0000000000197 1.820(1.514;2.188), p-value 0.000096
Skin lack of firmness 1.01(0.84;1.22), p-value 0.895 1.018(0.838;1.236), p-value 0.86
Skin feeling tight 0.92(0.75;1.14), p-value 0.456 0.903(0.732;1.114), p-value 0.34
Skin wrinkles 0.87(0.74;1.01), p-value 0.06 0.887(0.752;1.047), p-value 0.155
Skin looking tired 1.21(1.06;1.38), p-value 0.00538 1.261(1.093;1.455), p-value 0.0015
Pimple breakouts/blemishes 1.08(0.94;1.24), p-value 0.307 1.018(0.878;1.181), p-value 0.809
Skin redness 1.03(0.83;1.27), p-value 0.808 1.016(0.816;1.265), p-value 0.886
Skin loss of elasticity 1.31(1.04;1.65), p-value 0.022 1.435(1.120;1.838), p-value 0.0042
Skin getting thinner/weakened 1.17(0.85;1.61), p-value 0.345 1.182(0.845;1.653), p-value 0.328
Dark spots 1.20(1.02;1.41), p-value 0.026 1.232(1.044;1.455), p-value 0.013

Understanding dermatological issues prevalent across diverse skin types is essential for devising successful skincare approaches and tackling skin-related problems effectively.

In general, men with skin sensitivity express more dermatological concerns than those without. Furthermore, they are significantly more likely to express lack of self-confidence. Surprisingly, those ≥ 40 years with skin sensitivity tend to express lack of confidence more than those < 40 years. Moreover, almost half of men with very dry/dry skin and more than a third of those with oily/very oily skin also express a lack of self-confidence. Multivariate analysis shows that the risk factors for lack of self-confidence are: dry skin, loss of elasticity, skin sensitivity, skin looking tired, and dark spots. Conversely, dry skin, lack of firmness, skin tightness, wrinkles, pimple breakouts/blemishes, redness, and weakened skin do not seem to be significantly associated with lack of self-confidence.

Men commonly experience cosmetic issues such as acne resulting in post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, pigmentary disorders like freckles, melasma, and solar lentigo, as well as wrinkles and skin laxity (5, 6). However, wrinkles do not seem to be associated with lack of self-confidence.

Presently, men are subjected to heightened beauty standards and expectations for youthful looks, which can significantly impact their self-confidence, interpersonal relationships, and professional achievements (5, 6). This trend is evident in the growing interest in men’s skincare items and minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Recognizing the pivotal role of skin in aesthetics, men are increasingly conscious of the advantages offered in the facilitation of healthy, youthful skin, targeting issues such as hyperpigmentation, rough texture, and dryness – by both preventing and reversing them.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge the technical support of Aurelie Abric, Cecilia Trehin, and Thierry Lageat.

Funding Statement

Funding This project was funded by L’Oréal Research and Innovation.

Conflict of interest

FF, Aurelie Maudet, MB-V, AIL, CD, DA ,and LL are employees of L’Oréal. CT is sub-contracted for data analysis and writing. CS has no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rahrovan S, Fanian F, Mehryan P, Humbert P, Firooz A. Male versus female skin: what dermatologists and cosmeticians should know. Int J Womens Dermatol 2018; 4: 122–130. 10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang X, Su Y, Zheng B, Wen S, Liu D, Ye L, et al. Gender-related characterization of sensitive skin in normal young Chinese. J Cosmet Dermatol 2020; 19: 1137–1142. 10.1111/jocd.13123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gillen MM. Associations between positive body image and indicators of men’s and women’s mental and physical health. Body Image 2015; 13: 67–74. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weber SM, Ford K. Male skin care needs. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2008; 16: 337–344. 10.1016/j.fsc.2008.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Makino ET, Jiang LI, Tan P, Cheng T, Mehta RC. Addressing male facial skin concerns: clinical efficacy of a topical skincare treatment product for men. J Drugs Dermatol 2018; 17: 301–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Girdwichai N, Chanprapaph K, Vachiramon V. Behaviors and attitudes toward cosmetic treatments among men. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2018; 11: 42–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Dermato-Venereologica are provided here courtesy of MJS Publishing

RESOURCES