Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 28;108(1):546. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13383-0

Table 3.

A comparative analysis of the NanoLuc method under different experimental conditions

Plate counting (CFU/mL) (Klančnik et al. 2017a) NanoLuc bioluminescence assay (this manuscript) Crystal violet assay (Kurinčič et al. 2016; Klančnik et al. 2017a) Resazurin (Kovač et al. 2015)
Biofilm state (early/mature biofilm) Less suitable for mature biofilm. Increase in damaged, VBNC and dead cells that cannot be cultured results in underestimation of cell number Enables the detection of culturable, VBNC and damaged cells, and is therefore suitable for various biofilm conditions Increase in biofilm biomass over time due to the accumulation of extracellular polymers and not due to an increase in the number of cells in mature biofilms; inaccurate for mature biofilms Detects metabolically active cells. Suitable for various biofilm conditions
Mixed biofilms Selection method, such as antibiotic resistance, is required for the identification of individual organisms Suitable for mixed biofilms. Only organisms with the expressed NanoLuc protein can be detected The distinction between organisms is not possible. Only the total biomass can be determined The distinction between organisms is not possible. Only the general metabolic activity can be determined
Biofilm thickness Problem with detachment and degradation of the biofilm, cells could be present in clusters Limited substrate penetration into the thick biofilm and signal attenuation due to the multilayer biofilm Limited dye penetration into the thick biofilm Limited substrate penetration into the thick biofilm and signal attenuation due to the multilayer biofilm
Type of surface used for biofilm growth Difficult removal of biofilms from rough surfaces Risk of light diffusion on certain surfaces The rinsing protocol must be adapted to the surface used Risk of light diffusion on certain surfaces
Dynamic biofilm Detachment of cells in the flow-through system results in the destruction of the dynamic biofilm Retention of the substrate prevents continuous monitoring. Intervals between measurements should be considered Rinsing results in the destruction of the dynamic biofilm Retention of the substrate prevents continuous monitoring. Intervals between measurements should be considered