Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 26;117(6):2557–2566. doi: 10.1093/jee/toae204

Table 2.

Statistical outputs and performance parameters for segmented regression analysis modelling relationships between the accuracy of estimated means and sampling intensity (number of random samples/sampling grid). Response variables include Asiatic garden beetle, Maladera formosae Brenske, larvae/0.25 m2 (larval density), plant height (cm), root rating (1–5 nominal scale), above-ground biomass (g), and below-ground biomass (g). Breakpoints estimates represent the sampling intensity where diminishing returns in accuracy accrue with additional sampling effort. Accuracy was calculated as the mean absolute difference (%) between estimates provided by 50 random draws at each level of sampling intensity (n = 1–63 or 1–47) and the mean estimated by sampling all cells in a 64- or 48-cell sampling grid (i.e., True Mean). Total area = 0.2 or 0.15 ha. N ≤ 20% = the number of samples required to fall within 20% of the true mean.

Field Sampling Method Response Variable True Mean
(± SE)
Accuracy Breakpoint
(± SE)
df t P R 2 N ≤ 20%
True Mean
1 Cup-cutter Larval Density 13.0 ± 2.7 6.7 ± 0.3 59 −11.8 <0.001 0.95 26.6
2 Cup-cutter Larval Density 5.5 ± 1.8 7.2 ± 0.4 59 −12.4 <0.001 0.95 42.8
1 Cup-cutter Plant Height 14.0 ± 0.5 7.2 ±0.3 59 −14.2 <0.001 0.96 1.0
2 Cup-cutter Plant Height 16.3 ± 0.4 9.8 ± 0.5 59 −14.0 <0.001 0.96 1.0
1 Cup-cutter Root Rating 1.3 ± 0.1 7.0 ± 0.4 59 −11.7 <0.001 0.96 1.0
2 Cup-cutter Root Rating 1.0 ± 0.0 27.9 ± 1.9 59 −16.6 <0.001 0.96 1.0
2 Quadrat Larval Density 0.8 ± 0.2 16.6 ± 1.3 59 −10.7 <0.001 0.95 44.7
3 Quadrat Larval Density 3.6 ± 0.3 5.5 ± 0.3 43 −10.2 <0.001 0.95 4.9
2 Quadrat Above-ground Biomass 29.0 ± 2.7 6.7 ± 0.3 59 −13.7 <0.001 0.97 6.1
3 Quadrat Above-ground Biomass 51.7 ± 3.4 4.5 ± 0.3 43 −8.4 <0.001 0.96 3.3
2 Quadrat Below-ground Biomass 26.3 ± 3.0 5.3 ± 0.2 59 −12.2 <0.001 0.95 5.3
3 Quadrat Below-ground Biomass 84.1 ± 7.6 5.4 ± 0.6 43 −9.3 <0.001 0.96 5.0