Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 26;117(6):2557–2566. doi: 10.1093/jee/toae204

Table 3.

Statistical outputs and performance parameters for segmented regression analysis modelling relationships between the precision of estimated means and sampling intensity (number of random samples/sampling grid). Response variables include Asiatic Garden beetle, Maladera formosae Brenske, larvae/0.25 m2 (larval density), plant height (cm), root rating (1-5 nominal scale), above-ground biomass (g), and below-ground biomass (g). Breakpoint estimates represent the sampling intensity where diminishing returns in precision accrue with additional sampling effort. Precision was calculated as the average variance among the means estimated by 50 random draws at each level of sampling intensity (n = 1–63 or 1–47). True means represent estimates provided by sampling all cells in the 64- or 48-cell grid. Total area = 0.2 or 0.15 ha.

Field Sampling
Method
Response Variable True Mean
(± SE)
Precision
Breakpoint
(± SE)
df t P R 2
1 Cup-cutter Larval Density 13.0 ± 2.7 5.2 ± 0.2 59 −12.4 <0.001 0.91
2 Cup-cutter Larval Density 5.5 ± 1.8 4.1 ± 0.2 59 −11.7 <0.001 0.89
1 Cup-cutter Plant Height 14.0 ± 0.5 5.3 ±0.2 59 −14.3 <0.001 0.94
2 Cup-cutter Plant Height 16.3 ± 0.4 5.7 ± 0.3 59 −11.4 <0.001 0.93
1 Cup-cutter Root Rating 1.3 ± 0.1 6.4 ± 0.2 59 −14.9 <0.001 0.94
2 Cup-cutter Root Rating 1.0 ± 0.0 4.1 ± 0.3 59 −7.4 <0.001 0.76
2 Quadrat Larval Density 0.8 ± 0.2 11.5 ± 1.6 59 −4.7 <0.001 0.63
3 Quadrat Larval Density 3.6 ± 0.3 3.6 ± 0.1 43 −15.2 <0.001 0.97
2 Quadrat Above-ground Biomass 29.0 ± 2.7 4.3 ± 0.2 59 −13.3 <0.001 0.93
3 Quadrat Above-ground Biomass 51.7 ± 3.4 4.9 ± 0.1 43 −16.6 <0.001 0.97
2 Quadrat Below-ground Biomass 26.3 ± 3.0 4.1 ± 0.2 59 −13.9 <0.001 0.92
3 Quadrat Below-ground Biomass 84.1 ± 7.6 5.2 ± 0.2 43 −12.6 <0.001 0.94