Table 2.
Comparison of correlation of STE, 3D RVEF, and RV FAC with a new onset LBBB or CAVB
| Pre TAVR | Post TAVR |
|---|---|
| Basal RV LS | Basal RV LS |
| 1.122 [1.041–1.21], p = 0.00276 | 1.015 [0.945–1.09], p = 0.680 |
| Mid RV LS | Mid RV LS |
| 1.083 [1.009–1.162], p = 0.0268 | 1.049 [0.984–1.118], p = 0.14 |
| Apical RV LS | Apical RV LS |
| 1.054 [0.983–1.131], p = 0.139 | 0.972 [0.905–1.044] p = 0.437 |
| 3D RVEF | 3D RVEF |
| 0.8753 [ 0.770–0.995], p = 0.0415 | 0.909 [0.8112–1.018], p = 0.0974 |
| RV FAC | RV FAC |
| 0.8419 [0.731–0.970], p = 0.0175 | 0.838 [0.736–0.954], p = 0.00753 |
TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; RV LS, right ventricle longitudinal strain; 3D RVEF, three-dimensional right ventricular ejection fraction; RV FAC, right ventricular fraction area change