Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 30;19:686. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03198-5

Table 2.

Comparison of correlation of STE, 3D RVEF, and RV FAC with a new onset LBBB or CAVB

Pre TAVR Post TAVR
Basal RV LS Basal RV LS
1.122 [1.041–1.21], p = 0.00276 1.015 [0.945–1.09], p = 0.680
Mid RV LS Mid RV LS
1.083 [1.009–1.162], p = 0.0268 1.049 [0.984–1.118], p = 0.14
Apical RV LS Apical RV LS
1.054 [0.983–1.131], p = 0.139 0.972 [0.905–1.044] p = 0.437
3D RVEF 3D RVEF
0.8753 [ 0.770–0.995], p = 0.0415 0.909 [0.8112–1.018], p = 0.0974
RV FAC RV FAC
0.8419 [0.731–0.970], p = 0.0175 0.838 [0.736–0.954], p = 0.00753

TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; RV LS, right ventricle longitudinal strain; 3D RVEF, three-dimensional right ventricular ejection fraction; RV FAC, right ventricular fraction area change