Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 30;17:396. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-07049-3

Table 3.

Comparison of characteristics of Ocypode stimpsoni microsatellite loci among three populations

Locus Yeonggwang (n = 40) Taean (n = 20) Seocheon (n = 40)
No indiv PCR success N A Ho He PIC P HWE
(P)
Null present No indiv PCR success N A Ho He PIC P HWE
(P)
Null present No indiv PCR success N A Ho He PIC P HWE
(P)
Null present
OS10 36 15 0.944 0.899 0.876

0.000*

(0.973)

no 20 12 0.900 0.909 0.876

0.398

(0.687)

no 22 13 0.818 0.919 0.889

0.000*

(0.420)

no
OS11 37 13 0.946 0.902 0.880

0.076

(0.091)

no 20 10 0.950 0.881 0.844

0.172

(0.629)

Yes

(0.150)

40 25 0.650 0.961 0.947

0.000*

(1.000)

no
OS12 36 17 1.000 0.907 0.885

0.014

(0.035)

no 20 11 0.850 0.890 0.854

0.876

(0.159)

Yes

(0.080)

40 20 0.825 0.903 0.885

0.000*

(0.933)

no
OS13 40 9 0.975 0.786 0.750

0.263

(0.923)

no 20 8 0.950 0.774 0.729

0.682

(0.005)

no 40 15 0.825 0.892 0.87

0.001*

(0.078)

no
OS34 40 10 0.950 0.772 0.739

0.138

(0.023)

no 20 9 1.000 0.832 0.789

0.096

(0.015)

no 40 9 0.950 0.822 0.788

0.624

(0.008)

no
OS36 40 10 0.975 0.797 0.760

0.144

(0.009)

no 20 6 1.000 0.745 0.679

0.049

(0.011)

no 40 7 0.900 0.770 0.723

0.003*

(0.000*)

no
OS41 40 8 0.900 0.789 0.751

0.023

(0.216)

no 20 8 0.800 0.785 0.743

0.137

(0.003*)

no 40 4 1.000 0.738 0.677

0.024

(0.192)

no
OS42 40 6 1.000 0.818 0.780

0.035

(0.000*)

no 19 7 0.947 0.817 0.766

0.870

(0.016)

Yes

(0.197)

40 6 0.500 0.666 0.604

0.000*

(0.956)

no
OS43 40 14 0.875 0.869 0.844

0.000*

(0.632)

no 20 9 0.750 0.872 0.833

0.000*

(0.000*)

no 40 14 0.875 0.869 0.844

0.000*

(0.845)

no
OS46 36 11 0.944 0.838 0.811

0.682

(0.565)

no 20 9 0.800 0.841 0.798

0.225

(0.024)

Yes

(0.241)

38 13 0.500 0.869 0.842

0.000*

(1.000)

no
OS47 40 6 0.875 0.727 0.636

0.000*

(0.886)

no 20 6 0.850 0.776 0.716

0.426

(0.024)

no 40 8 0.950 0.783 0.740

0.045

(0.058)

no
OS54 40 8 1.000 0.798 0.758

0.001*

(0.000*)

no 20 8 1.000 0.810 0.767

0.139

(0.008)

no 39 7 0.795 0.752 0.710

0.742

(0.571)

no
OS55 36 4 0.833 0.615 0.526

0.150

(0.028)

no 20 4 0.900 0.638 0.545

0.318

(0.065)

no 20 4 0.900 0.624 0.529

0.000*

(0.000*)

no
OS56 40 11 1.000 0.863 0.834

0.444

(0.000*)

no 20 9 1.000 0.865 0.824

0.090

(0.029)

no 40 11 0.975 0.864 0.835

0.832

(0.006)

no
OS57 40 12 0.975 0.853 0.824

0.062

(0.929)

no 20 9 1.000 0.859 0.819

0.388

(0.148)

no 40 12 0.750 0.874 0.848

0.064

(0.750)

no
OS59 36 7 1.000 0.815 0.776

0.000*

(0.000*)

no 20 6 1.000 0.735 0.671

0.266

(0.019)

no 40 15 0.950 0.900 0.879

0.000*

(0.842)

no
OS63 34 16 0.824 0.937 0.918

0.000*

(1.000)

Yes

(0.054)

19 8 0.947 0.878 0.837

0.126

(0.601)

no 35 17 0.629 0.915 0.895

0.033

(0.764)

Yes

(0.279)

Avg 38.29 10.41 0.942 0.822 0.785

0.184

(0.371)

19.88 8.17 0.920 0.818 0.770

0.328

(0.143)

37.29 11.76 0.811 0.830 0.794

0.337

(0.495)

No indiv PCR success, Number of individuals of PCR success; NA, number of alleles per locus; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; PIC, polymorphism information content; PHWE, P values of Hardy Weinberg equilibrium test; P, the probability for rejecting Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium when H1 = Heterozygote excess using Genepop (Global Hardy-Weinberg tests; Avg, average. * Indicates significant difference after the application of Holm’s Sequential Bonferroni’s correction (p < 0.05/(17–rank + 1)). The presence of null alleles was investigated using MICROCHECKER v2.2.3 with 1000 randomizations with 95% confidence intervals and 1000 randomizations