Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 16;15:1494772. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1494772

Table 1.

Effect of 32 and 64 mg/L RV in presence or absence of CHX and BZK sub-MICs concentrations, alone or in combination, on biofilm formation in A. baumannii ATCC 19606, 4190 and 3909.

Strains
Treatment ATCC 19606 4190 3909
TSB 1.02 ± 0.05 0.98 ± 0.02 1 ± 0.02
32 RV 0.74 ± 0.06 0.89 ± 0.04 0.86 ± 0.02
64 RV 0.73 ± 0.09 0.84 ± 0.06 0.84 ± 0.1
0 RV 1/8 CHX MIC 0.99 ± 0.01 0.87 ± 0.06 0.9 ± 0.1
1/4 CHX MIC 0.98 ± 0.03 0.49 ± 0.03** 0.79 ± 0.03
1/2 CHX MIC 0.87 ± 0.08 0.4 ± 0.1*** 0.81 ± 0.03
1/8 BZK MIC 0.74 ± 0.01 0.69 ± 0.06* 0.8 ± 0.1
1/4 BZK MIC 0.64 ± 0.1* 0.7 ± 0.04* 0.64 ± 0.03*
1/2 BZK MIC 0.67 ± 0.04* 0.54 ± 0.03** 0.57 ± 0.03**
1/8 CHX MIC+1/8 BZK MIC 0.73 ± 0.01 0.57 ± 0.06* 0.46 ± 0.02***
1/4 CHX MIC+1/4 BZK MIC 0.5 ± 0.03** 0.57 ± 0.03* 0.2 ± 0.01***
½ CHX MIC+ ½ BZK MIC 0.41 ± 0.03*** 0.26 ± 0.02*** 0.1 ± 0.03***
32 RV 1/8 CHX MIC 0.75 ± 0.01 0.49 ± 0.06*** 0.85 ± 0.06
1/4 CHX MIC 0.70 ± 0.04 0.44 ± 0.01*** 0.77 ± 0.04
1/2 CHX MIC 0.73 ± 0.04 0.4 ± 0.05*** 0.64 ± 0.03
1/8 BZK MIC 0.71 ± 0.02 0.59 ± 0.06* 0.6 ± 0.03*
1/4 BZK MIC 0.64 ± 0.03* 0.57 ± 0.03* 0.64 ± 0.02*
1/2 BZK MIC 0.67 ± 0.02* 0.54 ± 0.01** 0.57 ± 0.03**
1/8 CHX MIC+1/8 BZK MIC 0.44 ± 0.02*** 0.35 ± 0.06*** 0.46 ± 0.03***
1/4 CHX MIC+1/4 BZK MIC 0 ± 0.02*** 0 ± 0.02*** 0 ± 0.01***
½ CHX MIC+ ½ BZK MIC 0 ± 0.02*** 0 ± 0.01*** 0 ± 0.02***
64 RV 1/8 CHX MIC 0.69 ± 0.02* 0.47 ± 0.03*** 0.74 ± 0.03
1/4 CHX MIC 0.56 ± 0.07* 0.4 ± 0.08*** 0.65 ± 0.06*
1/2 CHX MIC 0.46 ± 0.02*** 0.39 ± 0.02*** 0.52 ± 0.03**
1/8 BZK MIC 0.59 ± 0.02* 0.56 ± 0.03** 0.6 ± 0.03**
1/4 BZK MIC 0.58 ± 0.01* 0.54 ± 0.07** 0.57 ± 0.02**
1/2 BZK MIC 0.57 ± 0.03* 0.44 ± 0.04** 0.55 ± 0.02**
1/8 CHX MIC+1/8 BZK MIC 0 ± 0.02*** 0 ± 0.02*** 0 ± 0.02***
1/4 CHX MIC+1/4 BZK MIC 0 ± 0.01*** 0 ± 0.04*** 0 ± 0.1***
½ CHX MIC+ ½ BZK MIC 0 ± 0.02*** 0 ± 0.03*** 0 ± 0.02***

The results are shown as OD595/OD600; Synergistic inhibitory effects of RV and/or CHX and BZK on biofilm formation are shown in bold; p-values were calculated using two-way ANOVA (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). Assays were performed in triplicate.